THIRD AND DATA

Lamar game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29vs Abilene Christian21–14 W662784.234–9517–32–183175–151–207–6731:3938%31%
Sep 5at Louisiana7–38 L602053.429–5618–31–149167–130–245–3026:2241%56%
Sep 12at Idaho23–17 W553035.532–14413–23–159153–110–027–4828:4339%35%
Sep 26at Nicholls49–18 W584397.637–19314–21–246235–90–018–6530:4844%36%
Oct 3vs Northwestern State42–14 W534809.133–25015–20–230243–61–127–4025:4555%24%
Oct 10vs Incarnate Word38–35 W693985.847–27512–22–123185–141–3110–7036:4035%44%
Oct 17at SE Louisiana31–34 L754245.729–12727–46–2972510–181–118–6533:5444%38%
Oct 24vs Houston Christian35–10 W714546.445–19617–26–258218–152–316–4537:0648%37%
Oct 31at UT Rio Grande Valley52–23 W673815.741–21218–26–169199–142–209–9437:0546%24%
Season9 games7–25743,3625.9327–1548151–247–1,81417855–1158–141267–5244:48:0243%36%

Success rate

Lamar on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game43.2% · 36.5%
38
31
41
56
39
35
44
36
55
24
35
44
44
38
48
37
46
24
Abilene Christian
@ Louisiana
@ Idaho
@ Nicholls
Northwestern State
Incarnate Word
@ SE Louisiana
Houston Christian
@ UT Rio Grande Valley
Stephen F. Austin
East Texas A&M
@ McNeese

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Lamar on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Lamar's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Lamar offense 43% (247 of 572)Opponent offense / Lamar defense 36% (206 of 565)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Abilene Christian: opponent offense 31% of 61Abilene Christian: Lamar offense 38% of 66Louisiana: opponent offense 56% of 70Louisiana: Lamar offense 41% of 61Idaho: opponent offense 35% of 77Idaho: Lamar offense 39% of 56Nicholls: opponent offense 36% of 69Nicholls: Lamar offense 44% of 57Northwestern State: opponent offense 24% of 68Northwestern State: Lamar offense 55% of 53Incarnate Word: opponent offense 44% of 66Incarnate Word: Lamar offense 35% of 68SE Louisiana: opponent offense 38% of 50SE Louisiana: Lamar offense 44% of 75Houston Christian: opponent offense 37% of 54Houston Christian: Lamar offense 48% of 71UT Rio Grande Valley: opponent offense 24% of 50UT Rio Grande Valley: Lamar offense 46% of 65
Abilene Christian@ Louisiana@ Idaho@ NichollsNorthwestern StateIncarnate Word@ SE LouisianaHouston Christian@ UT Rio Grande ValleyStephen F. AustinEast Texas A&M@ McNeese
Lamar offenseOpponent offense (Lamar defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Abilene Christian

21–14 W · 66 plays to 61
Lamar offense 38% (25/66)ACU offense 31% (19/61)

at Louisiana

7–38 L · 61 plays to 70
Lamar offense 41% (25/61)Louisiana offense 56% (39/70)

at Idaho

23–17 W · 56 plays to 77
Lamar offense 39% (22/56)Idaho offense 35% (27/77)

at Nicholls

49–18 W · 57 plays to 69
Lamar offense 44% (25/57)Nicholls offense 36% (25/69)

vs Northwestern State

42–14 W · 53 plays to 68
Lamar offense 55% (29/53)Northwestern St. offense 24% (16/68)

vs Incarnate Word

38–35 W · 68 plays to 66
Lamar offense 35% (24/68)Incarnate Word offense 44% (29/66)

at SE Louisiana

31–34 L · 75 plays to 50
Lamar offense 44% (33/75)SE Louisiana offense 38% (19/50)

vs Houston Christian

35–10 W · 71 plays to 54
Lamar offense 48% (34/71)HCU offense 37% (20/54)

at UT Rio Grande Valley

52–23 W · 65 plays to 50
Lamar offense 46% (30/65)UT Rio Grande offense 24% (12/50)