Metrics

Louisiana TechBulldogs

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2004

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2004Louisiana Tech660 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 119 teams · 380.0 yds/g · 4,560 yards)#55 (of 119 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 308 points)#93 (of 119 teams · 407.8 yds/g allowed · 4,894 yards)#93 (of 119 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#87 (of 119 teams · -6.2 /g · -74 on the season)#71 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 28 taken, 30 given · -0.17 /g)#60 (of 119 teams · 18:06 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#82 (of 119 teams · -0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 119 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 119 teams · 30% of plays successful)#88 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 119 teams · 1.071 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 119 teams · 1.027 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Western Athletic teams in 20040 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#40 (Total offense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #4–#86. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #2–#109. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#89 (Total defense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #40–#118. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#102 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #29–#119. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#79 (Point margin: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #4–#119. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#61 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #20–#116. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#55 (Possession: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #3–#109. 2 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#73 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #13–#108. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#91 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #9–#105. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#67 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #11–#104. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#81 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #16–#111. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #20–#113. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#65 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range #23–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2004Boise State1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 492.7 yds/g · 5,912 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48.9 pts/g · 587 points)#50 (of 119 teams · 357.8 yds/g allowed · 4,294 yards)#65 (of 119 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +23.3 /g · +279 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 31 taken, 23 given · +0.67 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:45 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 119 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#28 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 119 teams · 1.045 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.993 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Fresno State930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 119 teams · 404.5 yds/g · 4,854 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 40.2 pts/g · 482 points)#40 (of 119 teams · 339.3 yds/g allowed · 4,071 yards)#29 (of 119 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 246 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +19.7 /g · +236 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 30 taken, 22 given · +0.67 /g)#55 (of 119 teams · 18:12 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 119 teams · -0.020 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 119 teams · -0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#16 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 119 teams · 0.994 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 119 teams · 1.054 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Hawai'i850 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 119 teams · 434.5 yds/g · 5,649 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 467 points)#118 (of 119 teams · 487.8 yds/g allowed · 6,341 yards)#114 (of 119 teams · 38.4 pts/g allowed · 499 points)#72 (of 119 teams · -2.5 /g · -32 on the season)#61 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 25 taken, 26 given · -0.08 /g)#109 (of 119 teams · 16:31 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 119 teams · -0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 119 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#111 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#33 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 119 teams · 0.976 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Nevada570 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 119 teams · 418.8 yds/g · 5,025 yards)#35 (of 119 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 356 points)#89 (of 119 teams · 399.4 yds/g allowed · 4,793 yards)#107 (of 119 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 413 points)#81 (of 119 teams · -4.8 /g · -57 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 29 taken, 27 given · +0.17 /g)#26 (of 119 teams · 18:52 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 119 teams · -0.179 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 119 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#81 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 119 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 119 teams · 1.315 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Rice380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#48 (of 119 teams · 381.8 yds/g · 4,200 yards)#61 (of 119 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 272 points)#53 (of 119 teams · 364.6 yds/g allowed · 4,010 yards)#105 (of 119 teams · 34.3 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#96 (of 119 teams · -9.6 /g · -105 on the season)#82 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 20 taken, 24 given · -0.36 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:27 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 119 teams · -0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#67 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#94 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 119 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.957 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004SMU380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 119 teams · 333.9 yds/g · 3,673 yards)#109 (of 119 teams · 18.4 pts/g · 202 points)#116 (of 119 teams · 467.3 yds/g allowed · 5,140 yards)#113 (of 119 teams · 38.2 pts/g allowed · 420 points)#119 (of 119 teams · -19.8 /g · -218 on the season)#116 (of 119 teams · -19 on the season · 11 taken, 30 given · -1.73 /g)#91 (of 119 teams · 17:16 /g · 3h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 119 teams · -0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 119 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#95 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 119 teams · 1.058 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 119 teams · 1.024 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004San José State290 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#84 (of 119 teams · 337.7 yds/g · 3,715 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 312 points)#112 (of 119 teams · 441.0 yds/g allowed · 4,851 yards)#119 (of 119 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 469 points)#109 (of 119 teams · -14.3 /g · -157 on the season)#77 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 22 taken, 25 given · -0.27 /g)#93 (of 119 teams · 17:14 /g · 3h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 119 teams · -0.139 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 119 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#108 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 119 teams · 0.829 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.899 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Tulsa480 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#71 (of 119 teams · 355.3 yds/g · 4,263 yards)#40 (of 119 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 345 points)#90 (of 119 teams · 402.3 yds/g allowed · 4,827 yards)#102 (of 119 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 398 points)#79 (of 119 teams · -4.4 /g · -53 on the season)#108 (of 119 teams · -11 on the season · 17 taken, 28 given · -0.92 /g)#52 (of 119 teams · 18:14 /g · 3h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 119 teams · -0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 119 teams · -0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#90 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#29 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 119 teams · 0.936 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 119 teams · 1.022 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004UTEP840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 119 teams · 393.9 yds/g · 4,727 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 429 points)#52 (of 119 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 4,335 yards)#57 (of 119 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points)#19 (of 119 teams · +10.7 /g · +128 on the season)#57 (of 119 teams · +0 on the season · 30 taken, 30 given · +0.00 /g)#83 (of 119 teams · 17:33 /g · 3h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 119 teams · -0.098 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 119 teams · -0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#87 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#61 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 119 teams · 1.078 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 119 teams · 0.917 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20042004 Louisiana TechWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #40
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Boise State #4 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #16 of 119; 2004 Nevada #26 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #30 of 119; 2004 UTEP #40 of 119; 2004 Rice #48 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #71 of 119; 2004 San José State #84 of 119; 2004 SMU #86 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 51 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 40.
Scoring offensemedian #35
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Boise State #2 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #5 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #9 of 119; 2004 UTEP #11 of 119; 2004 Nevada #35 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #40 of 119; 2004 San José State #44 of 119; 2004 Rice #61 of 119; 2004 SMU #109 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 55 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 35.
Total defensemedian #89
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Fresno State #40 of 119; 2004 Boise State #50 of 119; 2004 UTEP #52 of 119; 2004 Rice #53 of 119; 2004 Nevada #89 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #90 of 119; 2004 San José State #112 of 119; 2004 SMU #116 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #118 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 93 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 89.
Scoring defensemedian #102
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Fresno State #29 of 119; 2004 UTEP #57 of 119; 2004 Boise State #65 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #102 of 119; 2004 Rice #105 of 119; 2004 Nevada #107 of 119; 2004 SMU #113 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #114 of 119; 2004 San José State #119 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 93 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 102.
Point marginmedian #79
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Boise State #4 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #8 of 119; 2004 UTEP #19 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #72 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #79 of 119; 2004 Nevada #81 of 119; 2004 Rice #96 of 119; 2004 San José State #109 of 119; 2004 SMU #119 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 87 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 79.
Turnover marginmedian #61
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Boise State #20 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #20 of 119; 2004 Nevada #51 of 119; 2004 UTEP #57 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #61 of 119; 2004 San José State #77 of 119; 2004 Rice #82 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #108 of 119; 2004 SMU #116 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 71 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 61.
Possessionmedian #55
Possession. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Rice #3 of 119; 2004 Boise State #6 of 119; 2004 Nevada #26 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #52 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #55 of 119; 2004 UTEP #83 of 119; 2004 SMU #91 of 119; 2004 San José State #93 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #109 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 60 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 55.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #73
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Boise State #13 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #32 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #35 of 119; 2004 SMU #71 of 119; 2004 UTEP #73 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #88 of 119; 2004 San José State #91 of 119; 2004 Rice #106 of 119; 2004 Nevada #108 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 82 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 73.
Defensive EPAmedian #91
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Boise State #9 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #28 of 119; 2004 UTEP #32 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #72 of 119; 2004 Rice #91 of 119; 2004 SMU #92 of 119; 2004 San José State #98 of 119; 2004 Nevada #100 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #105 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 103 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 91.
Offensive success ratemedian #67
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Boise State #11 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #16 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #41 of 119; 2004 Nevada #52 of 119; 2004 Rice #67 of 119; 2004 SMU #70 of 119; 2004 San José State #73 of 119; 2004 UTEP #87 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #90 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 104 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 67.
Defensive success ratemedian #81
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Fresno State #16 of 119; 2004 Boise State #28 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #29 of 119; 2004 UTEP #61 of 119; 2004 Nevada #81 of 119; 2004 Rice #94 of 119; 2004 SMU #95 of 119; 2004 San José State #108 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #111 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 88 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 81.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #33
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 UTEP #20 of 119; 2004 SMU #26 of 119; 2004 Boise State #29 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #33 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #61 of 119; 2004 Nevada #72 of 119; 2004 Rice #93 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #94 of 119; 2004 San José State #113 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 24 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 33.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #65
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2004, best rank first: 2004 San José State #23 of 119; 2004 UTEP #30 of 119; 2004 Rice #45 of 119; 2004 Hawai'i #51 of 119; 2004 Boise State #65 of 119; 2004 Tulsa #77 of 119; 2004 SMU #80 of 119; 2004 Fresno State #98 of 119; 2004 Nevada #117 of 119. Marked: 2004 Louisiana Tech, ranked 82 of 119. Western Athletic median rank 65.