Metrics

Louisiana TechBulldogs

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2008

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2008Louisiana Tech850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#72 (of 120 teams · 343.1 yds/g · 4,460 yards)#72 (of 120 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 320 points)#74 (of 120 teams · 376.5 yds/g allowed · 4,895 yards)#52 (of 120 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points)#59 (of 120 teams · +0.9 /g · +12 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 29 taken, 22 given · +0.54 /g)#115 (of 120 teams · 16:22 /g · 3h 33m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 120 teams · -0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#48 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.877 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20080 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#68 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #5–#112. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#72 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #12–#106. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#76 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #21–#117. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#93 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #3–#118. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#81 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #4–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#64 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #19–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#73 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #12–#115. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#77 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #16–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#61 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #6–#108. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#68 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #26–#115. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#51 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #3–#118. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#58 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #14–#85. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#49 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #8–#120. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)
2008Boise State1210 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 120 teams · 440.9 yds/g · 5,731 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 489 points)#21 (of 120 teams · 308.1 yds/g allowed · 4,006 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.0 /g · +325 on the season)#21 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 35 taken, 26 given · +0.69 /g)#88 (of 120 teams · 17:30 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 120 teams · 1.001 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Fresno State760 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 120 teams · 387.2 yds/g · 5,034 yards)#37 (of 120 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 385 points)#100 (of 120 teams · 410.9 yds/g allowed · 5,341 yards)#93 (of 120 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 404 points)#76 (of 120 teams · -1.5 /g · -19 on the season)#105 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.85 /g)#70 (of 120 teams · 18:05 /g · 3h 55m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#82 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.921 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Hawai'i770 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 120 teams · 345.8 yds/g · 4,841 yards)#71 (of 120 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 345 points)#55 (of 120 teams · 345.6 yds/g allowed · 4,839 yards)#84 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 404 points)#87 (of 120 teams · -4.2 /g · -59 on the season)#103 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 30 taken, 41 given · -0.79 /g)#73 (of 120 teams · 17:53 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#51 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.917 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.815 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Idaho2100 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 120 teams · 320.9 yds/g · 3,851 yards)#103 (of 120 teams · 19.6 pts/g · 235 points)#117 (of 120 teams · 472.0 yds/g allowed · 5,664 yards)#118 (of 120 teams · 42.8 pts/g allowed · 513 points)#117 (of 120 teams · -23.2 /g · -278 on the season)#116 (of 120 teams · -16 on the season · 18 taken, 34 given · -1.33 /g)#62 (of 120 teams · 18:18 /g · 3h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 120 teams · -0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 120 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#118 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.900 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Nevada760 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 508.5 yds/g · 6,611 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 489 points)#94 (of 120 teams · 400.2 yds/g allowed · 5,203 yards)#100 (of 120 teams · 32.3 pts/g allowed · 420 points)#41 (of 120 teams · +5.3 /g · +69 on the season)#54 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 27 taken, 26 given · +0.08 /g)#12 (of 120 teams · 19:40 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.071 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 120 teams · 0.955 average PPA on successful plays)#120 (of 120 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008New Mexico State390 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 120 teams · 355.6 yds/g · 4,267 yards)#89 (of 120 teams · 22.2 pts/g · 266 points)#76 (of 120 teams · 379.6 yds/g allowed · 4,555 yards)#106 (of 120 teams · 34.1 pts/g allowed · 409 points)#108 (of 120 teams · -11.9 /g · -143 on the season)#85 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 24 taken, 29 given · -0.42 /g)#63 (of 120 teams · 18:17 /g · 3h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#108 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.990 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.837 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008San José State660 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 120 teams · 282.8 yds/g · 3,394 yards)#106 (of 120 teams · 18.7 pts/g · 224 points)#22 (of 120 teams · 311.7 yds/g allowed · 3,740 yards)#37 (of 120 teams · 21.6 pts/g allowed · 259 points)#81 (of 120 teams · -2.9 /g · -35 on the season)#19 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 29 taken, 20 given · +0.75 /g)#78 (of 120 teams · 17:44 /g · 3h 33m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 120 teams · -0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 120 teams · -0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#37 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.915 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.868 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Utah State390 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 120 teams · 334.3 yds/g · 4,011 yards)#78 (of 120 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 288 points)#102 (of 120 teams · 412.7 yds/g allowed · 4,952 yards)#108 (of 120 teams · 34.7 pts/g allowed · 416 points)#106 (of 120 teams · -10.7 /g · -128 on the season)#64 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 26 taken, 27 given · -0.08 /g)#94 (of 120 teams · 17:08 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#101 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.917 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.860 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20082008 Louisiana TechWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #68
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Nevada #5 of 120; 2008 Boise State #16 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #43 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #62 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #68 of 120; 2008 Utah State #82 of 120; 2008 Idaho #92 of 120; 2008 San José State #112 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 72 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 68.
Scoring offensemedian #72
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #12 of 120; 2008 Nevada #12 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #37 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #71 of 120; 2008 Utah State #78 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #89 of 120; 2008 Idaho #103 of 120; 2008 San José State #106 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 72 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 72.
Total defensemedian #76
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #21 of 120; 2008 San José State #22 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #55 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #76 of 120; 2008 Nevada #94 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #100 of 120; 2008 Utah State #102 of 120; 2008 Idaho #117 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 74 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 76.
Scoring defensemedian #93
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #3 of 120; 2008 San José State #37 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #84 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #93 of 120; 2008 Nevada #100 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #106 of 120; 2008 Utah State #108 of 120; 2008 Idaho #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 52 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 93.
Point marginmedian #81
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #4 of 120; 2008 Nevada #41 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #76 of 120; 2008 San José State #81 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #87 of 120; 2008 Utah State #106 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #108 of 120; 2008 Idaho #117 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 59 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 81.
Turnover marginmedian #64
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 San José State #19 of 120; 2008 Boise State #21 of 120; 2008 Nevada #54 of 120; 2008 Utah State #64 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #85 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #103 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #105 of 120; 2008 Idaho #116 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 24 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 64.
Possessionmedian #73
Possession. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Nevada #12 of 120; 2008 Idaho #62 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #63 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #70 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #73 of 120; 2008 San José State #78 of 120; 2008 Boise State #88 of 120; 2008 Utah State #94 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 115 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 73.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #77
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #16 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #19 of 120; 2008 Nevada #32 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #64 of 120; 2008 Utah State #77 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #78 of 120; 2008 Idaho #85 of 120; 2008 San José State #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 99 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 77.
Defensive EPAmedian #61
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #6 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #34 of 120; 2008 San José State #37 of 120; 2008 Nevada #61 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #85 of 120; 2008 Utah State #97 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #101 of 120; 2008 Idaho #108 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 58 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 61.
Offensive success ratemedian #68
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #26 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #30 of 120; 2008 Nevada #41 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #59 of 120; 2008 Idaho #94 of 120; 2008 Utah State #105 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #109 of 120; 2008 San José State #115 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 68 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 68.
Defensive success ratemedian #51
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #3 of 120; 2008 Nevada #7 of 120; 2008 San José State #37 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #51 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #82 of 120; 2008 Utah State #101 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #108 of 120; 2008 Idaho #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 48 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 51.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #58
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 New Mexico State #14 of 120; 2008 Nevada #34 of 120; 2008 Boise State #47 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #54 of 120; 2008 Utah State #58 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #59 of 120; 2008 San José State #60 of 120; 2008 Idaho #71 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 85 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 58.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #49
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Hawai'i #8 of 120; 2008 New Mexico State #16 of 120; 2008 Utah State #30 of 120; 2008 San José State #32 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #49 of 120; 2008 Idaho #51 of 120; 2008 Boise State #108 of 120; 2008 Nevada #120 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisiana Tech, ranked 80 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 49.