THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Louisiana TechBulldogs

Season
‹
›Current

Conference USA

Peers are the 64 teams in 2016’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Louisiana Tech played 2 such games.

Power 5, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Louisiana Tech9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 Navy)— (431.5 yds/g · 863 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32.5 pts/g · 65 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (481.5 yds/g allowed · 963 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40.0 pts/g allowed · 80 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-7.5 /g · -15 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 2 taken, 1 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:37 /g · 0h 51m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#108 (of 128 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 128 teams · 27% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 451.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.386 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.373 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (50% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.364 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#33 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#71. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#71. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#67. 12 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#71. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#123. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#60 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#125. 6 of 64 in the top 10.)#57 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#127. 6 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#72. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#32 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#71. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #2–#70. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #2–#71. 7 of 64 in the top 10.)
2016Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 560.0 yds/g · 5,040 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.0 pts/g · 405 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +22.6 /g · +203 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 28:36 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 654.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.374 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.391 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 USC · postseason: #4 Washington)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #9 USC, #14 Auburn, #17 Florida, #20 LSU, #21 Tennessee · postseason: #4 Washington)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 494.0 yds/g · 4,446 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 356 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 263.6 yds/g allowed · 2,372 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.8 pts/g allowed · 124 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +25.8 /g · +232 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 31:59 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 982.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.290 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 1.369 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Clemson14–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #11 Florida State, #13 Louisville, #14 Auburn, #22 Virginia Tech · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 513.5 yds/g · 5,135 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 320.7 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +21.1 /g · +211 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 30:07 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 846.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 71 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)#29 (of 71 teams · 431.3 yds/g · 4,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 378 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 246.9 yds/g allowed · 2,469 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.3 pts/g allowed · 133 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.5 /g · +245 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:18 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 852.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 71 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 1.194 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Washington12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado, #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 493.1 yds/g · 4,931 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 344.3 yds/g allowed · 3,443 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 197 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.0 /g · +240 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13 in these games · 23 taken, 10 given · +1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 31:21 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 699.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.380 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 1.295 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Ohio State11–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)#18 (of 71 teams · 456.1 yds/g · 4,561 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 38.7 pts/g · 387 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 295.6 yds/g allowed · 2,956 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +23.0 /g · +230 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 16 taken, 7 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:29 /g · 5h 35m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#86 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 902.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 71 teams · 0.253 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.091 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wisconsin11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #20 LSU · postseason: #15 Western Michigan)#55 (of 71 teams · 358.7 yds/g · 3,587 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 265 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 297.8 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.7 pts/g allowed · 137 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +12.8 /g · +128 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34:25 /g · 5h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 643.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.130 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.121 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016LSU8–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #13 Louisville)#31 (of 71 teams · 428.1 yds/g · 3,853 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 232 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 327.0 yds/g allowed · 2,943 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · +8.3 /g · +75 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 32:07 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 917.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 71 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 1.241 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oklahoma11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #12 Oklahoma State, #16 West Virginia · postseason: #14 Auburn)#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 565.5 yds/g · 5,655 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.4 pts/g · 454 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 451.7 yds/g allowed · 4,517 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 306 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +14.8 /g · +148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · +0 in these games · 14 taken, 14 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:04 /g · 5h 31m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 777.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.383 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 0.219 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Florida · postseason: #6 Michigan)#16 (of 71 teams · 460.7 yds/g · 4,607 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 316 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 354.2 yds/g allowed · 3,542 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +6.6 /g · +66 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:10 /g · 5h 32m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 906.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.267 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 1.355 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Washington State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Stanford)#12 (of 71 teams · 491.9 yds/g · 4,427 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.8 pts/g · 358 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 412.8 yds/g allowed · 3,715 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 244 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +12.7 /g · +114 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 32:09 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 522.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 1.253 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 1.320 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Colorado)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #16 West Virginia, #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #10 Colorado)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 517.0 yds/g · 5,170 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 376 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 486.3 yds/g allowed · 4,863 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · +7.6 /g · +76 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 28:43 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 631.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.300 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 0.218 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.436 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Colorado10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#23 (of 71 teams · 446.4 yds/g · 4,464 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 317 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 3,564 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · +10.6 /g · +106 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 31:17 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 128 teams · 526.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 71 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 1.294 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Georgia8–54 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Auburn)#45 (of 71 teams · 381.6 yds/g · 3,816 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 227 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 323.5 yds/g allowed · 3,235 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 244 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · -1.7 /g · -17 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34:46 /g · 5h 48m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 872.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 71 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 1.152 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Auburn8–54 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 LSU)#48 (of 71 teams · 377.7 yds/g · 3,399 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 223 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 386.0 yds/g allowed · 3,474 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · +6.3 /g · +57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 27:55 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 865.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 71 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Georgia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#47 (of 71 teams · 378.2 yds/g · 3,782 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 424.2 yds/g allowed · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 30:28 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 582.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 71 teams · 0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.432 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.163 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Iowa8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan)#61 (of 71 teams · 336.4 yds/g · 3,364 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 25.5 pts/g · 255 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 344.7 yds/g allowed · 3,447 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 171 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +8.4 /g · +84 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 12 taken, 8 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 31:02 /g · 5h 10m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 558.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 71 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 1.161 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Kansas State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 71 teams · 387.6 yds/g · 3,876 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 432.1 yds/g allowed · 4,321 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 255 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · +3.3 /g · +33 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 17 taken, 11 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:57 /g · 5h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 505.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 71 teams · 0.182 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 0.161 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.140 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Miami9–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #16 West Virginia)#39 (of 71 teams · 403.6 yds/g · 3,632 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 262 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 399.2 yds/g allowed · 3,593 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · +6.4 /g · +58 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 14 taken, 6 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 28:13 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 745.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 71 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016North Carolina8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State, #23 Pittsburgh)#28 (of 71 teams · 431.8 yds/g · 4,318 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 415.6 yds/g allowed · 4,156 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · +3.6 /g · +36 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 10 taken, 12 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 24:40 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 669.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.415 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Northwestern7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #23 Pittsburgh)#38 (of 71 teams · 411.9 yds/g · 4,119 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 279 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 403.1 yds/g allowed · 4,031 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 234 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +4.5 /g · +45 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 19 taken, 13 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 29:02 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 613.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Penn State11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin, #24 Temple)#26 (of 71 teams · 439.9 yds/g · 4,399 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37.2 pts/g · 372 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 355.8 yds/g allowed · 3,558 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13.9 /g · +139 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 742.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 71 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.455 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 1.311 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)#17 (of 71 teams · 457.7 yds/g · 4,577 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 490.8 yds/g allowed · 4,908 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 39.3 pts/g allowed · 393 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · +4.4 /g · +44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31:26 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 649.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.324 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 0.242 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.492 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016USC10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)#14 (of 71 teams · 473.2 yds/g · 5,205 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 350 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 368.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 259 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · +8.3 /g · +91 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 16 taken, 18 given · -0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 31:43 /g · 5h 49m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#114 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 936.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 71 teams · 0.234 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 1.259 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.348 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016West Virginia10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 497.8 yds/g · 4,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 318 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 424.8 yds/g allowed · 4,248 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 228 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · +9.0 /g · +90 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 29:17 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 654.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 71 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.299 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida9–43 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 LSU)#60 (of 71 teams · 338.4 yds/g · 3,046 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 209 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 330.1 yds/g allowed · 2,971 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · +6.1 /g · +55 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 20 taken, 16 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 30:26 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 798.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 71 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Minnesota9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 335.5 yds/g · 3,355 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 350.6 yds/g allowed · 3,506 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +5.2 /g · +52 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 31:05 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 535.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.115 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 1.291 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016NC State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#43 (of 71 teams · 393.8 yds/g · 3,544 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 183 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 370.9 yds/g allowed · 3,338 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · -3.0 /g · -27 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 32:15 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 616.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 71 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 1.341 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oregon State4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 71 teams · 368.1 yds/g · 3,681 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 253 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 427.5 yds/g allowed · 4,275 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 32.1 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · -6.8 /g · -68 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 31:08 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 128 teams · 524.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 71 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 1.256 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.168 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Texas5–73 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 498.1 yds/g · 5,479 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 342 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 470.1 yds/g allowed · 5,171 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 33.7 pts/g allowed · 371 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -2.6 /g · -29 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 19 taken, 22 given · -0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 28:28 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 839.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 71 teams · 0.176 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 0.216 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.120 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 1.273 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia Tech10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Pittsburgh)#20 (of 71 teams · 452.1 yds/g · 4,521 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 338.3 yds/g allowed · 3,383 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · +10.7 /g · +107 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 646.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 71 teams · 0.184 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Kentucky7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Louisville)#40 (of 71 teams · 403.1 yds/g · 3,628 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 226 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 441.1 yds/g allowed · 3,970 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · -5.4 /g · -49 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 31:37 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#93 (of 128 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 652.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 71 teams · 0.147 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 0.245 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 1.328 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Michigan State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 71 teams · 417.3 yds/g · 4,173 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 375.4 yds/g allowed · 3,754 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -4.2 /g · -42 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 32:26 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 719.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 71 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 0.165 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Nebraska9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#53 (of 71 teams · 367.7 yds/g · 3,677 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 226 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 246 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · -2.0 /g · -20 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 10 taken, 12 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 32:28 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 691.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 71 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 1.266 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Stanford10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#54 (of 71 teams · 359.6 yds/g · 3,955 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 276 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 372.4 yds/g allowed · 4,096 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 225 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · +4.6 /g · +51 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 32:51 /g · 6h 01m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 778.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 71 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 1.310 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016TCU6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 71 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 4,449 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 435.4 yds/g allowed · 4,354 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · -0.1 /g · -1 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 27:54 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#107 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 665.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 71 teams · 0.176 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 1.271 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Utah9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#30 (of 71 teams · 430.4 yds/g · 3,874 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 284 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 427.1 yds/g allowed · 3,844 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · +3.7 /g · +33 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:02 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 580.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 71 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Indiana6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 71 teams · 425.8 yds/g · 4,258 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 376.9 yds/g allowed · 3,769 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -4.8 /g · -48 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -12 in these games · 13 taken, 25 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 27:39 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 565.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 71 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 1.356 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 1.331 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Iowa State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 71 teams · 424.9 yds/g · 4,249 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 268 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 473.6 yds/g allowed · 4,736 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 34.1 pts/g allowed · 341 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · -7.3 /g · -73 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 8 taken, 11 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 30:38 /g · 5h 06m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#81 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 552.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 71 teams · 0.183 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 0.286 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 1.238 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Maryland6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 71 teams · 353.9 yds/g · 3,185 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 182 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 456.4 yds/g allowed · 4,108 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 297 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · -12.8 /g · -115 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -10 in these games · 5 taken, 15 given · -1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 27:32 /g · 4h 08m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 652.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 71 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.397 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Mississippi State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#34 (of 71 teams · 419.1 yds/g · 3,353 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 234 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 475.9 yds/g allowed · 3,807 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 272 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · -4.8 /g · -38 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.38 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 29:31 /g · 3h 56m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#113 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 679.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 71 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 1.314 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.402 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Tennessee9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Florida, #22 Virginia Tech)#21 (of 71 teams · 450.3 yds/g · 4,053 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 520.9 yds/g allowed · 4,688 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · +1.4 /g · +13 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 27:46 /g · 4h 10m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 813.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 71 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 0.233 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 1.374 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Texas A&M8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Auburn, #21 Tennessee)#25 (of 71 teams · 444.3 yds/g · 3,999 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 283 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 506.3 yds/g allowed · 4,557 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 29.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1.9 /g · +17 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +7 in these games · 22 taken, 15 given · +0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:35 /g · 3h 50m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#93 (of 128 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 814.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 71 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 0.158 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.474 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 1.221 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Texas Tech5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 537.5 yds/g · 5,375 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 396 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 571.0 yds/g allowed · 5,710 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 46.0 pts/g allowed · 460 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · -6.4 /g · -64 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 10 taken, 16 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 30:54 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 128 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 604.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.272 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.333 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 1.381 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016UCLA4–81 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 71 teams · 370.2 yds/g · 3,702 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 240 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 398.3 yds/g allowed · 3,983 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · -5.5 /g · -55 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:31 /g · 4h 15m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 819.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 71 teams · 0.118 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 1.393 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.084 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Vanderbilt6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Tennessee)#59 (of 71 teams · 341.8 yds/g · 3,076 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 18.8 pts/g · 169 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 392.1 yds/g allowed · 3,529 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 200 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · -3.4 /g · -31 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 31:52 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#89 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 128 teams · 619.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 71 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 1.252 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Arkansas7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Florida)#27 (of 71 teams · 436.9 yds/g · 3,932 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 255 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 492.8 yds/g allowed · 4,435 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 336 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · -9.0 /g · -81 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35:40 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 27% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 689.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 71 teams · 0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.312 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 1.385 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.462 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Baylor7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Oklahoma State)#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 512.0 yds/g · 4,608 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 286 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 496.1 yds/g allowed · 4,465 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 37.2 pts/g allowed · 335 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · -5.4 /g · -49 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:54 /g · 3h 53m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#78 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 128 teams · 619.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 71 teams · 0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 1.289 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 1.293 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Duke4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 71 teams · 399.6 yds/g · 3,996 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 218 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 465.0 yds/g allowed · 4,650 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 326 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · -10.8 /g · -108 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 14 taken, 17 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 30:53 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 599.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 71 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 0.241 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.129 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Missouri4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#22 (of 71 teams · 448.0 yds/g · 4,032 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 21.3 pts/g · 192 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 510.3 yds/g allowed · 4,593 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 306 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -12.7 /g · -114 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · -5 in these games · 14 taken, 19 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 23:03 /g · 3h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 633.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 71 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 1.340 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 1.235 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 331.4 yds/g · 2,983 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 451.4 yds/g allowed · 4,063 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 35.6 pts/g allowed · 320 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -14.3 /g · -129 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 30:29 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 618.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 0.251 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 1.325 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wake Forest7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #24 Temple)#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 298.0 yds/g · 2,682 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 19.2 pts/g · 173 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 409.3 yds/g allowed · 3,684 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · -4.9 /g · -44 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +10 in these games · 22 taken, 12 given · +1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 31:24 /g · 4h 43m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 517.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 32% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.296 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Ole Miss5–71 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 71 teams · 454.6 yds/g · 4,091 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 268 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 483.9 yds/g allowed · 4,355 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 37.8 pts/g allowed · 340 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · -8.0 /g · -72 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 10 taken, 16 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:37 /g · 3h 50m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 808.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 71 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.288 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 1.378 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.421 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oregon4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Utah)#13 (of 71 teams · 488.9 yds/g · 5,378 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 372 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 529.9 yds/g allowed · 5,829 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 469 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · -8.8 /g · -97 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 11 taken, 13 given · -0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 26:00 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 738.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 71 teams · 0.255 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.331 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.410 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 1.200 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016South Carolina6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Tennessee)#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 304.7 yds/g · 2,742 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 14.8 pts/g · 133 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 401.2 yds/g allowed · 3,611 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · -10.1 /g · -91 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 29:44 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 706.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 71 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 0.144 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 1.242 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 1.185 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Arizona3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#41 (of 71 teams · 400.2 yds/g · 3,602 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 203 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 480.7 yds/g allowed · 4,326 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g allowed · 393 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -21.1 /g · -190 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -13 in these games · 6 taken, 19 given · -1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:48 /g · 3h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 616.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 71 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.299 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 1.351 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 1.323 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016California5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Utah)#11 (of 71 teams · 492.4 yds/g · 4,924 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 354 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 527.5 yds/g allowed · 5,275 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.5 pts/g allowed · 435 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · -8.1 /g · -81 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · +2 in these games · 13 taken, 11 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 28:22 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 601.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 71 teams · 0.231 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.316 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 1.247 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 1.221 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Illinois3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 295.1 yds/g · 2,951 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 17.4 pts/g · 174 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 425.9 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 34.6 pts/g allowed · 346 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -17.2 /g · -172 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:21 /g · 4h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 523.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 0.176 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 1.269 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.156 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Purdue3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#56 (of 71 teams · 356.8 yds/g · 3,211 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 22.9 pts/g · 206 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 465.2 yds/g allowed · 4,187 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 383 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -19.7 /g · -177 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -11 in these games · 12 taken, 23 given · -1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 28:40 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#77 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 512.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.295 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#37 (of 71 teams · 413.1 yds/g · 3,718 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 554.6 yds/g allowed · 4,991 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.0 pts/g allowed · 387 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -18.1 /g · -163 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 28:16 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 520.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 71 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Arizona State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#49 (of 71 teams · 376.4 yds/g · 3,764 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 32.4 pts/g · 324 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 549.9 yds/g allowed · 5,499 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g allowed · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · -11.3 /g · -113 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 30:43 /g · 5h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 694.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 71 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.339 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.452 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 236.0 yds/g · 1,888 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 12.0 pts/g · 96 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 413.8 yds/g allowed · 3,310 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -22.4 /g · -179 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · +0 in these games · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 30:55 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 533.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 29% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 1.222 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.422 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Kansas2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 71 teams · 355.3 yds/g · 3,198 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 17.8 pts/g · 160 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 485.0 yds/g allowed · 4,365 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 40.2 pts/g allowed · 362 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -22.4 /g · -202 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -7 in these games · 18 taken, 25 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 28:44 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 491.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 0.234 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 1.278 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Rutgers2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 253.6 yds/g · 2,536 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 9.9 pts/g · 99 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 469.3 yds/g allowed · 4,693 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 40.8 pts/g allowed · 408 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -30.9 /g · -309 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 11 taken, 17 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 27:47 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 585.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.043 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 1.225 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20162016 Louisiana TechPower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #33
Total offense. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #3 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Baylor #6 of 71; 2016 Texas #7 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #8 of 71; 2016 Alabama #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 California #11 of 71; 2016 Washington State #12 of 71; 2016 Oregon #13 of 71; 2016 USC #14 of 71; 2016 Florida State #16 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #17 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #18 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #19 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #21 of 71; 2016 Missouri #22 of 71; 2016 Colorado #23 of 71; 2016 TCU #24 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #25 of 71; 2016 Penn State #26 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #27 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #28 of 71; 2016 Michigan #29 of 71; 2016 Utah #30 of 71; 2016 LSU #31 of 71; 2016 Indiana #32 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #33 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #34 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #35 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #37 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #38 of 71; 2016 Miami #39 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #40 of 71; 2016 Arizona #41 of 71; 2016 Duke #42 of 71; 2016 NC State #43 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #44 of 71; 2016 Georgia #45 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #47 of 71; 2016 Auburn #48 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #49 of 71; 2016 UCLA #51 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #52 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #53 of 71; 2016 Stanford #54 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #55 of 71; 2016 Purdue #56 of 71; 2016 Kansas #57 of 71; 2016 Maryland #58 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #59 of 71; 2016 Florida #60 of 71; 2016 Iowa #61 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #62 of 71; 2016 Virginia #63 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #65 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #66 of 71; 2016 Illinois #67 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71; 2016 Boston College #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Scoring offensemedian #33
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #3 of 71; 2016 Washington #3 of 71; 2016 Washington State #5 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #6 of 71; 2016 Alabama #7 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #9 of 71; 2016 Michigan #10 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #11 of 71; 2016 Penn State #12 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #13 of 71; 2016 California #14 of 71; 2016 Oregon #15 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #17 of 71; 2016 USC #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Baylor #20 of 71; 2016 Colorado #21 of 71; 2016 Florida State #22 of 71; 2016 Utah #23 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #24 of 71; 2016 Texas #25 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #26 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #27 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #28 of 71; 2016 Miami #29 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #31 of 71; 2016 TCU #31 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #33 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #34 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #35 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #36 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #38 of 71; 2016 LSU #39 of 71; 2016 Iowa #40 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #41 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #42 of 71; 2016 Stanford #43 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #44 of 71; 2016 Auburn #45 of 71; 2016 Indiana #46 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #46 of 71; 2016 UCLA #48 of 71; 2016 Florida #50 of 71; 2016 Purdue #51 of 71; 2016 Georgia #52 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #53 of 71; 2016 Arizona #54 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Missouri #57 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 NC State #60 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #63 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #64 of 71; 2016 Kansas #65 of 71; 2016 Illinois #66 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #67 of 71; 2016 Boston College #69 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Total defensemedian #36
Total defense. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Alabama #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Georgia #6 of 71; 2016 LSU #7 of 71; 2016 Florida #8 of 71; 2016 Louisville #9 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #10 of 71; 2016 Washington #11 of 71; 2016 Iowa #12 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #13 of 71; 2016 Florida State #15 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 Colorado #17 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #18 of 71; 2016 USC #19 of 71; 2016 NC State #20 of 71; 2016 Stanford #21 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #22 of 71; 2016 Indiana #23 of 71; 2016 Auburn #24 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #25 of 71; 2016 UCLA #27 of 71; 2016 Miami #28 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #29 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #30 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #32 of 71; 2016 Washington State #34 of 71; 2016 Boston College #35 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #36 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #37 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #38 of 71; 2016 Illinois #41 of 71; 2016 Utah #42 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #43 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #44 of 71; 2016 TCU #45 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #46 of 71; 2016 Virginia #47 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #48 of 71; 2016 Maryland #49 of 71; 2016 Duke #50 of 71; 2016 Purdue #51 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #52 of 71; 2016 Texas #53 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #54 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #55 of 71; 2016 Arizona #56 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #57 of 71; 2016 Kansas #58 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #59 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #60 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #61 of 71; 2016 Baylor #62 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #63 of 71; 2016 Missouri #64 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #65 of 71; 2016 California #66 of 71; 2016 Oregon #67 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #68 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #69 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 36.
Scoring defensemedian #35
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #2 of 71; 2016 Alabama #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #5 of 71; 2016 Florida #6 of 71; 2016 LSU #7 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Auburn #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 Stanford #11 of 71; 2016 Colorado #13 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #14 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #15 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #15 of 71; 2016 Louisville #17 of 71; 2016 Miami #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Penn State #20 of 71; 2016 NC State #21 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #23 of 71; 2016 USC #24 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Georgia #27 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #28 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #29 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #31 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #32 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #33 of 71; 2016 Washington State #34 of 71; 2016 Utah #35 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #36 of 71; 2016 TCU #36 of 71; 2016 Indiana #38 of 71; 2016 UCLA #38 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #40 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #41 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #42 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #43 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #44 of 71; 2016 Duke #46 of 71; 2016 Maryland #48 of 71; 2016 Texas #49 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #50 of 71; 2016 Missouri #50 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #52 of 71; 2016 Boston College #53 of 71; 2016 Illinois #54 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #56 of 71; 2016 Virginia #57 of 71; 2016 Baylor #58 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #59 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #60 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #61 of 71; 2016 Kansas #62 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #63 of 71; 2016 Purdue #64 of 71; 2016 Oregon #65 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #66 of 71; 2016 California #67 of 71; 2016 Arizona #68 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #69 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 35.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 71; 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Washington #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Louisville #5 of 71; 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #7 of 71; 2016 Penn State #8 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #9 of 71; 2016 Washington State #10 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #11 of 71; 2016 Colorado #12 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #13 of 71; 2016 Iowa #14 of 71; 2016 LSU #15 of 71; 2016 USC #16 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #17 of 71; 2016 Florida State #18 of 71; 2016 Miami #19 of 71; 2016 Auburn #20 of 71; 2016 Florida #21 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #22 of 71; 2016 Stanford #23 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #24 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #25 of 71; 2016 Utah #26 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #27 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #28 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #30 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #31 of 71; 2016 TCU #32 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #33 of 71; 2016 Georgia #34 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #35 of 71; 2016 Texas #36 of 71; 2016 NC State #37 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #39 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #40 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #41 of 71; 2016 Indiana #42 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #43 of 71; 2016 Baylor #44 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #44 of 71; 2016 UCLA #46 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #47 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #48 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #49 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #50 of 71; 2016 California #51 of 71; 2016 Oregon #52 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #53 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #54 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #56 of 71; 2016 Missouri #59 of 71; 2016 Maryland #60 of 71; 2016 Virginia #63 of 71; 2016 Illinois #64 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #65 of 71; 2016 Purdue #66 of 71; 2016 Arizona #67 of 71; 2016 Boston College #68 of 71; 2016 Kansas #69 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #1 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Miami #5 of 71; 2016 Utah #5 of 71; 2016 Colorado #7 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #8 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #10 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #10 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #10 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #10 of 71; 2016 Georgia #14 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #14 of 71; 2016 Penn State #14 of 71; 2016 Florida #18 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #18 of 71; 2016 Iowa #20 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #21 of 71; 2016 Auburn #22 of 71; 2016 Washington State #22 of 71; 2016 Michigan #24 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #24 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #26 of 71; 2016 California #27 of 71; 2016 LSU #28 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #28 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #30 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #30 of 71; 2016 Boston College #33 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #33 of 71; 2016 Stanford #35 of 71; 2016 Alabama #36 of 71; 2016 Louisville #36 of 71; 2016 NC State #36 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #36 of 71; 2016 Oregon #40 of 71; 2016 USC #40 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #42 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #42 of 71; 2016 Texas #44 of 71; 2016 Clemson #45 of 71; 2016 Duke #45 of 71; 2016 Illinois #45 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #45 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #45 of 71; 2016 TCU #45 of 71; 2016 UCLA #45 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #45 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #53 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #54 of 71; 2016 Missouri #56 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #57 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #57 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #59 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #59 of 71; 2016 Virginia #59 of 71; 2016 Baylor #62 of 71; 2016 Kansas #62 of 71; 2016 Maryland #64 of 71; 2016 Indiana #65 of 71; 2016 Purdue #66 of 71; 2016 Arizona #67 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #36
Possession. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Arkansas #1 of 71; 2016 Georgia #2 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #4 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 71; 2016 Michigan #7 of 71; 2016 Florida State #8 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #9 of 71; 2016 Utah #10 of 71; 2016 Stanford #11 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #12 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #13 of 71; 2016 NC State #14 of 71; 2016 Washington State #15 of 71; 2016 LSU #16 of 71; 2016 Alabama #17 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #18 of 71; 2016 USC #19 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #21 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #23 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #24 of 71; 2016 Washington #25 of 71; 2016 Colorado #26 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #27 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #28 of 71; 2016 Iowa #29 of 71; 2016 Boston College #31 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #32 of 71; 2016 Duke #33 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #35 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #36 of 71; 2016 Virginia #37 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #38 of 71; 2016 Florida #39 of 71; 2016 Clemson #40 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #42 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #43 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #44 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #45 of 71; 2016 Kansas #46 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #47 of 71; 2016 Purdue #48 of 71; 2016 Louisville #49 of 71; 2016 Texas #50 of 71; 2016 Penn State #51 of 71; 2016 California #52 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #53 of 71; 2016 Miami #54 of 71; 2016 Auburn #56 of 71; 2016 TCU #57 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #58 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #59 of 71; 2016 Indiana #60 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Oregon #63 of 71; 2016 Baylor #64 of 71; 2016 Arizona #65 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #66 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #67 of 71; 2016 UCLA #68 of 71; 2016 Illinois #69 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #70 of 71; 2016 Missouri #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 36.
Returning passingmedian #59
Returning passing. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Auburn #1 of 128; 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #1 of 128; 2016 Texas #1 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #1 of 128; 2016 Kansas #12 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #12 of 128; 2016 Virginia #12 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #12 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #17 of 128; 2016 Boston College #19 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #22 of 128; 2016 Iowa #22 of 128; 2016 Clemson #25 of 128; 2016 Illinois #25 of 128; 2016 Miami #25 of 128; 2016 LSU #30 of 128; 2016 Washington #30 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #34 of 128; 2016 Duke #36 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #37 of 128; 2016 Ole Miss #42 of 128; 2016 UCLA #44 of 128; 2016 Maryland #46 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #47 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #51 of 128; 2016 Georgia #52 of 128; 2016 South Carolina #53 of 128; 2016 Washington State #55 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #58 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #59 of 128; 2016 Arizona #64 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #65 of 128; 2016 Colorado #67 of 128; 2016 Missouri #69 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #74 of 128; 2016 Purdue #77 of 128; 2016 Baylor #78 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #81 of 128; 2016 Florida State #82 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #85 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #86 of 128; 2016 Vanderbilt #89 of 128; 2016 Kentucky #93 of 128; 2016 Texas A&M #93 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #97 of 128; 2016 Indiana #99 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #100 of 128; 2016 Alabama #101 of 128; 2016 Penn State #102 of 128; 2016 Michigan #105 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #106 of 128; 2016 TCU #107 of 128; 2016 Stanford #109 of 128; 2016 Oregon #111 of 128; 2016 NC State #112 of 128; 2016 Mississippi State #113 of 128; 2016 USC #114 of 128; 2016 California #115 of 128; 2016 Arkansas #118 of 128; 2016 Florida #121 of 128; 2016 Utah #122 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, ranked 108 of 128. Power 5 median rank 59.
Returning receivingmedian #60
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Kentucky #2 of 128; 2016 Florida State #3 of 128; 2016 NC State #5 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #6 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #8 of 128; 2016 USC #11 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #15 of 128; 2016 Michigan #17 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #18 of 128; 2016 Texas A&M #19 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 128; 2016 Maryland #22 of 128; 2016 LSU #23 of 128; 2016 Penn State #28 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #29 of 128; 2016 Indiana #31 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #32 of 128; 2016 Vanderbilt #33 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #34 of 128; 2016 Clemson #35 of 128; 2016 Washington State #38 of 128; 2016 Purdue #44 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #46 of 128; 2016 Missouri #47 of 128; 2016 Boston College #49 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #50 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #51 of 128; 2016 Alabama #54 of 128; 2016 Arkansas #56 of 128; 2016 Colorado #58 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #60 of 128; 2016 Georgia #63 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #64 of 128; 2016 Virginia #65 of 128; 2016 Stanford #66 of 128; 2016 Kansas #68 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #70 of 128; 2016 Miami #71 of 128; 2016 Oregon #72 of 128; 2016 Iowa #74 of 128; 2016 Mississippi State #74 of 128; 2016 Texas #78 of 128; 2016 TCU #79 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #83 of 128; 2016 Ole Miss #88 of 128; 2016 Utah #88 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #92 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #93 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #94 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #98 of 128; 2016 Florida #101 of 128; 2016 Illinois #102 of 128; 2016 Duke #103 of 128; 2016 Baylor #105 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #108 of 128; 2016 Auburn #110 of 128; 2016 Washington #111 of 128; 2016 Arizona #113 of 128; 2016 UCLA #114 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #115 of 128; 2016 South Carolina #121 of 128; 2016 California #124 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, ranked 59 of 128. Power 5 median rank 60.
Returning rushingmedian #57
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wake Forest #1 of 128; 2016 LSU #2 of 128; 2016 Washington State #5 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #6 of 128; 2016 Miami #9 of 128; 2016 Virginia #10 of 128; 2016 Louisville #12 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #23 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #25 of 128; 2016 Clemson #26 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #27 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #27 of 128; 2016 Vanderbilt #29 of 128; 2016 Kentucky #30 of 128; 2016 Purdue #31 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #33 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #34 of 128; 2016 Boston College #39 of 128; 2016 Florida State #39 of 128; 2016 Georgia #42 of 128; 2016 Washington #43 of 128; 2016 Oregon #44 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #47 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #48 of 128; 2016 Penn State #49 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 USC #51 of 128; 2016 Duke #52 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #54 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #55 of 128; 2016 Texas #57 of 128; 2016 NC State #58 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #64 of 128; 2016 California #65 of 128; 2016 Baylor #67 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #70 of 128; 2016 Colorado #71 of 128; 2016 Michigan #72 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #74 of 128; 2016 Mississippi State #75 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #75 of 128; 2016 Stanford #77 of 128; 2016 Ole Miss #78 of 128; 2016 Iowa #79 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #80 of 128; 2016 Maryland #85 of 128; 2016 Kansas #86 of 128; 2016 Illinois #93 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #94 of 128; 2016 Arizona #95 of 128; 2016 Indiana #96 of 128; 2016 South Carolina #103 of 128; 2016 Missouri #106 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #108 of 128; 2016 UCLA #110 of 128; 2016 TCU #117 of 128; 2016 Arkansas #119 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #121 of 128; 2016 Auburn #122 of 128; 2016 Utah #123 of 128; 2016 Florida #124 of 128; 2016 Texas A&M #125 of 128; 2016 Alabama #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, ranked 118 of 128. Power 5 median rank 57.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 128; 2016 USC #2 of 128; 2016 LSU #3 of 128; 2016 Florida State #4 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 128; 2016 Georgia #6 of 128; 2016 Auburn #7 of 128; 2016 Michigan #8 of 128; 2016 Clemson #9 of 128; 2016 Texas #11 of 128; 2016 UCLA #12 of 128; 2016 Texas A&M #13 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #14 of 128; 2016 Ole Miss #15 of 128; 2016 Florida #16 of 128; 2016 Stanford #17 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #18 of 128; 2016 Miami #19 of 128; 2016 Penn State #20 of 128; 2016 Oregon #21 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #22 of 128; 2016 South Carolina #23 of 128; 2016 Washington #24 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #25 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #26 of 128; 2016 Arkansas #27 of 128; 2016 Mississippi State #28 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #29 of 128; 2016 TCU #30 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #31 of 128; 2016 Louisville #32 of 128; 2016 Kentucky #33 of 128; 2016 Maryland #34 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #35 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #36 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2016 Missouri #38 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #39 of 128; 2016 Baylor #40 of 128; 2016 Vanderbilt #41 of 128; 2016 Virginia #42 of 128; 2016 Arizona #43 of 128; 2016 NC State #44 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #45 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #46 of 128; 2016 California #47 of 128; 2016 Duke #48 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #49 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #50 of 128; 2016 Utah #51 of 128; 2016 Indiana #53 of 128; 2016 Iowa #55 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #56 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #59 of 128; 2016 Boston College #60 of 128; 2016 Colorado #62 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #63 of 128; 2016 Illinois #64 of 128; 2016 Washington State #65 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #66 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #67 of 128; 2016 Purdue #68 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #70 of 128; 2016 Kansas #72 of 128. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, ranked 78 of 128. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #32
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Washington #2 of 71; 2016 Louisville #3 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #4 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #5 of 71; 2016 Alabama #6 of 71; 2016 Washington State #7 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #10 of 71; 2016 Oregon #11 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #12 of 71; 2016 Clemson #13 of 71; 2016 USC #14 of 71; 2016 California #15 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 LSU #17 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #18 of 71; 2016 Baylor #19 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #21 of 71; 2016 Michigan #22 of 71; 2016 Miami #23 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #24 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #25 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #26 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #27 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #28 of 71; 2016 TCU #29 of 71; 2016 Texas #30 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #31 of 71; 2016 Colorado #32 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #33 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #35 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #36 of 71; 2016 Utah #37 of 71; 2016 Stanford #38 of 71; 2016 Auburn #39 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #40 of 71; 2016 Maryland #43 of 71; 2016 Arizona #44 of 71; 2016 Duke #45 of 71; 2016 Iowa #46 of 71; 2016 UCLA #47 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #48 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #49 of 71; 2016 Georgia #50 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #51 of 71; 2016 Missouri #52 of 71; 2016 NC State #53 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #54 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #55 of 71; 2016 Indiana #56 of 71; 2016 Florida #57 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #58 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #60 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #62 of 71; 2016 Purdue #63 of 71; 2016 Illinois #64 of 71; 2016 Virginia #65 of 71; 2016 Kansas #67 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #68 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #69 of 71; 2016 Boston College #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 32.
Defensive EPAmedian #33
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 71; 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Florida #5 of 71; 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Louisville #7 of 71; 2016 Colorado #8 of 71; 2016 LSU #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 UCLA #12 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #13 of 71; 2016 Iowa #14 of 71; 2016 NC State #15 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #17 of 71; 2016 Auburn #18 of 71; 2016 Indiana #19 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #20 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #21 of 71; 2016 Penn State #22 of 71; 2016 Florida State #23 of 71; 2016 Georgia #24 of 71; 2016 USC #25 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Miami #27 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #28 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #29 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #30 of 71; 2016 TCU #31 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #32 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #33 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #36 of 71; 2016 Washington State #38 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #39 of 71; 2016 Illinois #40 of 71; 2016 Stanford #41 of 71; 2016 Boston College #42 of 71; 2016 Maryland #43 of 71; 2016 Utah #44 of 71; 2016 Texas #45 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #46 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #47 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #48 of 71; 2016 Missouri #49 of 71; 2016 Baylor #51 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #52 of 71; 2016 Kansas #53 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #54 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #56 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #57 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #59 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #61 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #62 of 71; 2016 Purdue #63 of 71; 2016 Arizona #64 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #65 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #66 of 71; 2016 California #67 of 71; 2016 Oregon #68 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #69 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive success ratemedian #33
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #1 of 71; 2016 Clemson #2 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #3 of 71; 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Washington State #5 of 71; 2016 Alabama #6 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #7 of 71; 2016 USC #8 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #10 of 71; 2016 Texas #11 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #12 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #13 of 71; 2016 Michigan #14 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #15 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #16 of 71; 2016 California #17 of 71; 2016 LSU #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Oregon #20 of 71; 2016 Baylor #21 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #22 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #23 of 71; 2016 Duke #24 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #25 of 71; 2016 TCU #27 of 71; 2016 Utah #28 of 71; 2016 Colorado #29 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #30 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #31 of 71; 2016 Georgia #32 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #33 of 71; 2016 Penn State #34 of 71; 2016 Stanford #36 of 71; 2016 Auburn #38 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #39 of 71; 2016 Iowa #40 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #42 of 71; 2016 Miami #43 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #44 of 71; 2016 Missouri #45 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #46 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #47 of 71; 2016 Florida #48 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #49 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #50 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #51 of 71; 2016 Indiana #52 of 71; 2016 Arizona #53 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #55 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #56 of 71; 2016 NC State #57 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 Purdue #59 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #60 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #62 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #63 of 71; 2016 UCLA #64 of 71; 2016 Illinois #65 of 71; 2016 Kansas #66 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #67 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #68 of 71; 2016 Boston College #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Defensive success ratemedian #34
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 71; 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 LSU #6 of 71; 2016 Colorado #7 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #9 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #10 of 71; 2016 Florida #11 of 71; 2016 Washington #12 of 71; 2016 Indiana #13 of 71; 2016 Florida State #14 of 71; 2016 NC State #15 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 USC #17 of 71; 2016 Iowa #18 of 71; 2016 TCU #20 of 71; 2016 Georgia #21 of 71; 2016 UCLA #23 of 71; 2016 Auburn #24 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #25 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #26 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #27 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #28 of 71; 2016 Utah #29 of 71; 2016 Miami #30 of 71; 2016 Stanford #31 of 71; 2016 Boston College #32 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #33 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #34 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #35 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #36 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #37 of 71; 2016 Washington State #38 of 71; 2016 Texas #39 of 71; 2016 Duke #41 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #42 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #45 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #46 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #47 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #48 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #49 of 71; 2016 Baylor #50 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #52 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #53 of 71; 2016 Purdue #54 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #55 of 71; 2016 Illinois #56 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #57 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #58 of 71; 2016 Arizona #59 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #60 of 71; 2016 Missouri #61 of 71; 2016 Kansas #62 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #63 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #64 of 71; 2016 Maryland #65 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #66 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #67 of 71; 2016 California #68 of 71; 2016 Oregon #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 34.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Texas A&M #2 of 71; 2016 Penn State #3 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #4 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #5 of 71; 2016 Louisville #6 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #7 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #8 of 71; 2016 Oregon #9 of 71; 2016 Maryland #10 of 71; 2016 UCLA #11 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #12 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #13 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #14 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #15 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #17 of 71; 2016 Indiana #18 of 71; 2016 Arizona #19 of 71; 2016 Miami #20 of 71; 2016 Missouri #21 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #23 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #25 of 71; 2016 Purdue #26 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #27 of 71; 2016 Florida State #28 of 71; 2016 LSU #29 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #30 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #31 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #32 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #33 of 71; 2016 Washington #34 of 71; 2016 NC State #35 of 71; 2016 Baylor #36 of 71; 2016 Alabama #38 of 71; 2016 Illinois #39 of 71; 2016 TCU #40 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #41 of 71; 2016 Stanford #42 of 71; 2016 USC #43 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #44 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #45 of 71; 2016 Washington State #46 of 71; 2016 California #47 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #48 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #49 of 71; 2016 Boston College #50 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 Colorado #52 of 71; 2016 Florida #53 of 71; 2016 Michigan #54 of 71; 2016 Utah #55 of 71; 2016 Clemson #56 of 71; 2016 Kansas #57 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #58 of 71; 2016 Iowa #59 of 71; 2016 Georgia #60 of 71; 2016 Auburn #61 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #62 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #63 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #65 of 71; 2016 Duke #66 of 71; 2016 Texas #67 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #68 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #69 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #37
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UCLA #2 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #6 of 71; 2016 Illinois #7 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #10 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #12 of 71; 2016 Maryland #13 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #14 of 71; 2016 Oregon #15 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #16 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #17 of 71; 2016 California #18 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #19 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #20 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #21 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #22 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #23 of 71; 2016 Auburn #25 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Missouri #27 of 71; 2016 Michigan #28 of 71; 2016 LSU #29 of 71; 2016 Washington #30 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #31 of 71; 2016 Clemson #32 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #33 of 71; 2016 Georgia #34 of 71; 2016 TCU #35 of 71; 2016 Texas #36 of 71; 2016 Kansas #37 of 71; 2016 Florida #38 of 71; 2016 Miami #39 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #40 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #41 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #42 of 71; 2016 Baylor #43 of 71; 2016 Colorado #44 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #45 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #46 of 71; 2016 Stanford #47 of 71; 2016 Penn State #48 of 71; 2016 Washington State #49 of 71; 2016 Arizona #50 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #52 of 71; 2016 Indiana #53 of 71; 2016 NC State #55 of 71; 2016 USC #56 of 71; 2016 Florida State #57 of 71; 2016 Purdue #58 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #59 of 71; 2016 Alabama #60 of 71; 2016 Utah #61 of 71; 2016 Louisville #62 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #63 of 71; 2016 Duke #65 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #66 of 71; 2016 Boston College #67 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #68 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #69 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #70 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisiana Tech, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 37.