THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

LouisianaRagin' Cajuns

Season
‹
›Current

Sun Belt

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Sun Belt, 2012

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012Louisiana9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 124 teams · 454.9 yds/g · 5,914 yds)#24 (of 124 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 461 points)#87 (of 124 teams · 427.3 yds/g allowed · 5,555 yds)#63 (of 124 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#38 (of 124 teams · +7.4 /g · +96 on the season)#65 (of 124 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.08 /g)#87 (of 124 teams · 29:26 /g · 6h 23m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 124 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 124 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#44 (of 124 teams · 43% of plays successful)#88 (of 124 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 124 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 124 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Sun Belt teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#66 (Total offense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #11–#106. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#70 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #24–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#71 (Total defense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #27–#98. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#63 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #43–#91. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#71 (Point margin: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #30–#109. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#65 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #19–#109. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #17–#94. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#44 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #10–#117. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#75 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #18–#122. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #7–#115. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#65 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #19–#120. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#31 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #5–#121. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#67 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #39–#118. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2012Arkansas State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 124 teams · 466.7 yds/g · 6,067 yds)#26 (of 124 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 454 points)#50 (of 124 teams · 380.3 yds/g allowed · 4,944 yds)#43 (of 124 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#30 (of 124 teams · +10.5 /g · +136 on the season)#24 (of 124 teams · +9 on the season · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.69 /g)#40 (of 124 teams · 31:32 /g · 6h 50m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 124 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 48% of plays successful)#65 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#121 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 0.832 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 124 teams · 0.969 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012UL Monroe8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#42 (of 124 teams · 432.8 yds/g · 5,626 yds)#32 (of 124 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 440 points)#80 (of 124 teams · 418.8 yds/g allowed · 5,444 yds)#73 (of 124 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 379 points)#54 (of 124 teams · +4.7 /g · +61 on the season)#34 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.54 /g)#66 (of 124 teams · 30:28 /g · 6h 36m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 124 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 124 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#73 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#100 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.007 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 124 teams · 0.942 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Florida Atlantic3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#100 (of 124 teams · 349.8 yds/g · 4,198 yds)#107 (of 124 teams · 20.5 pts/g · 246 points)#71 (of 124 teams · 405.3 yds/g allowed · 4,863 yds)#86 (of 124 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 370 points)#107 (of 124 teams · -10.3 /g · -124 on the season)#75 (of 124 teams · -2 on the season · 17 taken, 19 given · -0.17 /g)#22 (of 124 teams · 32:36 /g · 6h 31m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 124 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 124 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#96 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#92 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 124 teams · 0.998 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 124 teams · 0.911 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Florida International3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#76 (of 124 teams · 384.0 yds/g · 4,608 yds)#84 (of 124 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 300 points)#68 (of 124 teams · 402.9 yds/g allowed · 4,835 yds)#91 (of 124 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#94 (of 124 teams · -6.7 /g · -80 on the season)#85 (of 124 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.33 /g)#38 (of 124 teams · 31:35 /g · 6h 19m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 124 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 124 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#86 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#24 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.031 average PPA on successful plays)#118 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 1.038 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012North Texas4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 (of 124 teams · 392.2 yds/g · 4,706 yds)#105 (of 124 teams · 20.9 pts/g · 251 points)#77 (of 124 teams · 414.8 yds/g allowed · 4,977 yds)#61 (of 124 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 334 points)#96 (of 124 teams · -6.9 /g · -83 on the season)#56 (of 124 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g)#17 (of 124 teams · 32:53 /g · 6h 35m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 124 teams · -0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 124 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#93 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#81 (of 124 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 124 teams · 0.926 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 124 teams · 0.906 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Troy5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 124 teams · 498.8 yds/g · 5,985 yds)#53 (of 124 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 367 points)#98 (of 124 teams · 442.9 yds/g allowed · 5,315 yds)#84 (of 124 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#71 (of 124 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#97 (of 124 teams · -7 on the season · 20 taken, 27 given · -0.58 /g)#63 (of 124 teams · 30:32 /g · 6h 06m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 124 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 124 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#23 (of 124 teams · 45% of plays successful)#44 (of 124 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 124 teams · 0.951 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 124 teams · 1.007 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Western Kentucky7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 124 teams · 383.5 yds/g · 4,985 yds)#70 (of 124 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 366 points)#27 (of 124 teams · 348.4 yds/g allowed · 4,529 yds)#50 (of 124 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 331 points)#60 (of 124 teams · +2.7 /g · +35 on the season)#65 (of 124 teams · -1 on the season · 23 taken, 24 given · -0.08 /g)#24 (of 124 teams · 32:21 /g · 7h 01m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 124 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 124 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#54 (of 124 teams · 42% of plays successful)#40 (of 124 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 124 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 124 teams · 0.938 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Middle Tennessee8–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 (of 124 teams · 392.8 yds/g · 4,713 yds)#77 (of 124 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 319 points)#94 (of 124 teams · 440.8 yds/g allowed · 5,290 yds)#62 (of 124 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#76 (of 124 teams · -1.4 /g · -17 on the season)#19 (of 124 teams · +10 on the season · 28 taken, 18 given · +0.83 /g)#94 (of 124 teams · 29:12 /g · 5h 50m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 (of 124 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#122 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#47 (of 124 teams · 43% of plays successful)#120 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 124 teams · 0.869 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 124 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012South Alabama2–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#106 (of 124 teams · 333.4 yds/g · 4,334 yds)#117 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 240 points)#52 (of 124 teams · 382.9 yds/g allowed · 4,978 yds)#75 (of 124 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 383 points)#109 (of 124 teams · -11.0 /g · -143 on the season)#109 (of 124 teams · -12 on the season · 21 taken, 33 given · -0.92 /g)#59 (of 124 teams · 30:37 /g · 6h 38m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · -0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 124 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#115 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 37% of plays successful)#19 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 124 teams · 0.880 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 124 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20122012 LouisianaSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #66
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Troy #11 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #23 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #42 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #66 of 124; 2012 North Texas #67 of 124; 2012 Florida International #76 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #77 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #100 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #106 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 29 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 66.
Scoring offensemedian #70
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arkansas State #26 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #32 of 124; 2012 Troy #53 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #70 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #77 of 124; 2012 Florida International #84 of 124; 2012 North Texas #105 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #107 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #117 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 24 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 70.
Total defensemedian #71
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Western Kentucky #27 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #50 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #52 of 124; 2012 Florida International #68 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #71 of 124; 2012 North Texas #77 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #80 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #94 of 124; 2012 Troy #98 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 87 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 71.
Scoring defensemedian #63
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arkansas State #43 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #50 of 124; 2012 North Texas #61 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #62 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #73 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #75 of 124; 2012 Troy #84 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #86 of 124; 2012 Florida International #91 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 63 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 63.
Point marginmedian #71
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arkansas State #30 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #54 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #60 of 124; 2012 Troy #71 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #76 of 124; 2012 Florida International #94 of 124; 2012 North Texas #96 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #107 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #109 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 38 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 71.
Turnover marginmedian #65
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Middle Tennessee #19 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #24 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #34 of 124; 2012 North Texas #56 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #65 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #75 of 124; 2012 Florida International #85 of 124; 2012 Troy #97 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #109 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 65 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 65.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 North Texas #17 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #22 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #24 of 124; 2012 Florida International #38 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #40 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #59 of 124; 2012 Troy #63 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #66 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #94 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 87 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 40.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Louisiana, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Louisiana, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Louisiana, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Louisiana, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #44
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arkansas State #10 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #26 of 124; 2012 Troy #29 of 124; 2012 Florida International #44 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #67 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #69 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #88 of 124; 2012 North Texas #113 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #117 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 17 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 44.
Defensive EPAmedian #75
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 South Alabama #18 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #40 of 124; 2012 Florida International #51 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #67 of 124; 2012 North Texas #75 of 124; 2012 Troy #88 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #89 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #96 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 85 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 75.
Offensive success ratemedian #54
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arkansas State #7 of 124; 2012 Troy #23 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #47 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #54 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #73 of 124; 2012 Florida International #86 of 124; 2012 North Texas #93 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #96 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #115 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 44 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 54.
Defensive success ratemedian #65
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 South Alabama #19 of 124; 2012 Florida International #24 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #40 of 124; 2012 Troy #44 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #65 of 124; 2012 North Texas #81 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #92 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #100 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #120 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 88 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 65.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #31
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida International #5 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #9 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #11 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #13 of 124; 2012 Troy #44 of 124; 2012 North Texas #64 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #103 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #113 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 31 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 31.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #67
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 North Texas #39 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #43 of 124; 2012 South Alabama #53 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #65 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #67 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #70 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #91 of 124; 2012 Troy #114 of 124; 2012 Florida International #118 of 124. Marked: 2012 Louisiana, ranked 84 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 67.