Metrics

LSUTigers

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010LSU1123 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 120 teams · 343.1 yds/g · 4,461 yards)#45 (of 120 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 386 points)#12 (of 120 teams · 307.1 yds/g allowed · 3,993 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 18.2 pts/g allowed · 237 points)#24 (of 120 teams · +11.5 /g · +149 on the season)#20 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 32 taken, 23 given · +0.69 /g)#41 (of 120 teams · 19:02 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 120 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#52 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 120 teams · 0.829 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.808 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 SEC teams in 20101 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#43 (Total offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #7–#110. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #7–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #5–#93. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Scoring defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #3–#107. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#31 (Point margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #6–#109. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Turnover margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #12–#90. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Possession: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #25–#105. 0 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#39 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #3–#120. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #14–#89. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #4–#120. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #7–#78. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #3–#111. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#93 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #6–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2010Alabama1032 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 120 teams · 444.1 yds/g · 5,773 yards)#18 (of 120 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 464 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 286.4 yds/g allowed · 3,723 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 176 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22.1 /g · +288 on the season)#12 (of 120 teams · +12 on the season · 26 taken, 14 given · +0.92 /g)#33 (of 120 teams · 19:19 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.167 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 120 teams · -0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.873 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 120 teams · 1.005 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Arkansas1030 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 482.5 yds/g · 6,273 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 36.5 pts/g · 474 points)#36 (of 120 teams · 347.9 yds/g allowed · 4,523 yards)#47 (of 120 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#18 (of 120 teams · +13.1 /g · +170 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 25 taken, 24 given · +0.08 /g)#72 (of 120 teams · 18:22 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#43 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.037 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.980 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Auburn1401 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 499.2 yds/g · 6,989 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.2 pts/g · 577 points)#60 (of 120 teams · 368.4 yds/g allowed · 5,157 yards)#53 (of 120 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#11 (of 120 teams · +17.1 /g · +240 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.36 /g)#50 (of 120 teams · 18:54 /g · 4h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#78 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.890 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.929 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Florida854 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 120 teams · 350.9 yds/g · 4,561 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 306.5 yds/g allowed · 3,985 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#33 (of 120 teams · +8.5 /g · +111 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 29 taken, 27 given · +0.15 /g)#52 (of 120 teams · 18:52 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 120 teams · -0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#40 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.979 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.812 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Georgia675 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 120 teams · 385.0 yds/g · 5,005 yards)#30 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#23 (of 120 teams · 328.5 yds/g allowed · 4,271 yards)#36 (of 120 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#28 (of 120 teams · +10.0 /g · +130 on the season)#19 (of 120 teams · +10 on the season · 26 taken, 16 given · +0.77 /g)#46 (of 120 teams · 18:57 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#31 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.921 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.984 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Kentucky670 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 120 teams · 427.9 yds/g · 5,562 yards)#34 (of 120 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 406 points)#45 (of 120 teams · 354.1 yds/g allowed · 4,604 yards)#72 (of 120 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#56 (of 120 teams · +2.9 /g · +37 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.31 /g)#76 (of 120 teams · 18:16 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#65 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.946 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.983 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Mississippi State940 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#42 (of 120 teams · 401.3 yds/g · 5,217 yards)#48 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 377 points)#49 (of 120 teams · 356.9 yds/g allowed · 4,639 yards)#21 (of 120 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 258 points)#31 (of 120 teams · +9.2 /g · +119 on the season)#27 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 28 taken, 21 given · +0.54 /g)#25 (of 120 teams · 19:29 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 120 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#33 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.924 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.974 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Ole Miss480 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 120 teams · 399.8 yds/g · 4,798 yards)#41 (of 120 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 367 points)#81 (of 120 teams · 399.2 yds/g allowed · 4,790 yards)#107 (of 120 teams · 35.2 pts/g allowed · 422 points)#84 (of 120 teams · -4.6 /g · -55 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 18 taken, 24 given · -0.50 /g)#62 (of 120 teams · 18:41 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#90 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#59 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.958 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 120 teams · 1.020 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010South Carolina951 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#47 (of 120 teams · 392.8 yds/g · 5,499 yards)#38 (of 120 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 433 points)#46 (of 120 teams · 354.4 yds/g allowed · 4,961 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 324 points)#35 (of 120 teams · +7.8 /g · +109 on the season)#55 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 26 taken, 26 given · +0.00 /g)#36 (of 120 teams · 19:14 /g · 4h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#45 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.982 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.966 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Tennessee673 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 120 teams · 363.8 yds/g · 4,729 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 351 points)#69 (of 120 teams · 382.1 yds/g allowed · 4,968 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#61 (of 120 teams · +1.9 /g · +25 on the season)#38 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 28 taken, 24 given · +0.31 /g)#58 (of 120 teams · 18:45 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#64 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.038 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.937 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Vanderbilt2100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#110 (of 120 teams · 298.3 yds/g · 3,579 yards)#112 (of 120 teams · 16.9 pts/g · 203 points)#93 (of 120 teams · 419.3 yds/g allowed · 5,031 yards)#94 (of 120 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 374 points)#109 (of 120 teams · -14.3 /g · -171 on the season)#84 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.42 /g)#105 (of 120 teams · 17:24 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 120 teams · -0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 120 teams · 33% of plays successful)#48 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.922 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.975 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20102010 LSUSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #43
Total offense. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Auburn #7 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #9 of 120; 2010 Alabama #22 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #27 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #42 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #43 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #47 of 120; 2010 Georgia #56 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #75 of 120; 2010 Florida #82 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #110 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 86 of 120. SEC median rank 43.
Scoring offensemedian #38
Scoring offense. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Auburn #7 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #17 of 120; 2010 Alabama #18 of 120; 2010 Georgia #30 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #34 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #38 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #41 of 120; 2010 Florida #43 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #48 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #58 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 45 of 120. SEC median rank 38.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #5 of 120; 2010 Florida #9 of 120; 2010 Georgia #23 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #36 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #45 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #46 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #49 of 120; 2010 Auburn #60 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #69 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #81 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #93 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 12 of 120. SEC median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #43
Scoring defense. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #3 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #21 of 120; 2010 Florida #29 of 120; 2010 Georgia #36 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #43 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #47 of 120; 2010 Auburn #53 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #56 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #72 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #94 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #107 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 11 of 120. SEC median rank 43.
Point marginmedian #31
Point margin. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #6 of 120; 2010 Auburn #11 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #18 of 120; 2010 Georgia #28 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #31 of 120; 2010 Florida #33 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #35 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #56 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #61 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #84 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #109 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 24 of 120. SEC median rank 31.
Turnover marginmedian #38
Turnover margin. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #12 of 120; 2010 Georgia #19 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #27 of 120; 2010 Auburn #34 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #38 of 120; 2010 Florida #47 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #52 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #55 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #74 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #84 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #90 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 20 of 120. SEC median rank 38.
Possessionmedian #50
Possession. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Mississippi State #25 of 120; 2010 Alabama #33 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #36 of 120; 2010 Georgia #46 of 120; 2010 Auburn #50 of 120; 2010 Florida #52 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #58 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #62 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #72 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #76 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #105 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 41 of 120. SEC median rank 50.
Returning passing
Returning passing. SEC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 LSU, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. SEC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 LSU, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. SEC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 LSU, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. SEC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 LSU, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #39
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Auburn #3 of 120; 2010 Alabama #4 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #12 of 120; 2010 Georgia #20 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #22 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #39 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #40 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #77 of 120; 2010 Florida #93 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #95 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 90 of 120. SEC median rank 39.
Defensive EPAmedian #56
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Florida #14 of 120; 2010 Alabama #16 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #27 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #51 of 120; 2010 Auburn #56 of 120; 2010 Georgia #58 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #69 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #72 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #77 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #82 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #89 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 26 of 120. SEC median rank 56.
Offensive success ratemedian #35
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Auburn #4 of 120; 2010 Alabama #6 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #23 of 120; 2010 Georgia #24 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #30 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #35 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #39 of 120; 2010 Florida #80 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #90 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #104 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 51 of 120. SEC median rank 35.
Defensive success ratemedian #45
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #7 of 120; 2010 Georgia #31 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #33 of 120; 2010 Florida #40 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #43 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #45 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #48 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #59 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #64 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #65 of 120; 2010 Auburn #78 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 52 of 120. SEC median rank 45.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Tennessee #3 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #4 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #16 of 120; 2010 Florida #18 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #29 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #36 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #59 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #62 of 120; 2010 Georgia #64 of 120; 2010 Auburn #85 of 120; 2010 Alabama #93 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 111 of 120. SEC median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #93
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Florida #8 of 120; 2010 Auburn #61 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #69 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #89 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #93 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #94 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #99 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #101 of 120; 2010 Georgia #102 of 120; 2010 Alabama #111 of 120; 2010 Ole Miss #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 LSU, ranked 6 of 120. SEC median rank 93.