THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

LSUTigers

Season
‹
›Current

SEC

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2018, released in week 15.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. LSU played 9 such games.

CFP Top 25, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018LSU10–35 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #8 UCF)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #8 UCF)#40 (of 74 teams · 375.1 yds/g · 3,376 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 270 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 364.9 yds/g allowed · 3,284 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 220 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +5.6 /g · +50 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31:52 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 10% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 74 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)2 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#19 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#59. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#15 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#58. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#65. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#14 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#12 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#36. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#22 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #2–#65. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#27 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#65. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#52 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#123. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#77 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #19–#116. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)#60 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#127. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#18 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#81. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#67. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#60. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#39 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #4–#74. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#72. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)
2018Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State, #19 Texas A&M, #23 Missouri · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 520.7 yds/g · 4,686 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 47.2 pts/g · 425 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 270.1 yds/g allowed · 2,431 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +33.1 /g · +298 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 17 taken, 9 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 31:03 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 978.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.375 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.327 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.342 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Clemson15–01 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #19 Texas A&M, #20 Syracuse · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 534.2 yds/g · 5,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 46.2 pts/g · 462 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 310.1 yds/g allowed · 3,101 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +30.8 /g · +308 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:04 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 893.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.362 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.354 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.282 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Georgia11–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida, #14 Kentucky, #23 Missouri)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 453.0 yds/g · 4,077 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 312.4 yds/g allowed · 2,812 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 172 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.6 /g · +149 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 32:17 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 964.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.300 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.080 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Michigan10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern)#21 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 348 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,621 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.0 /g · +160 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:43 /g · 5h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 862.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 74 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.454 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Notre Dame12–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Michigan)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Michigan, #20 Syracuse, #22 Northwestern)#11 (of 74 teams · 447.5 yds/g · 4,475 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 337 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 328.5 yds/g allowed · 3,285 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 169 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.8 /g · +168 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 29:16 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 847.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.339 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.171 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018West Virginia8–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 509.5 yds/g · 5,095 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 41.3 pts/g · 413 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 414.0 yds/g allowed · 4,140 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +13.8 /g · +138 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 28:42 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 646.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.316 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 0.192 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Ohio State13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan · postseason: #9 Washington)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan, #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern · postseason: #9 Washington)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 539.9 yds/g · 5,939 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 42.8 pts/g · 471 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 411.9 yds/g allowed · 4,531 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 304 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.2 /g · +167 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 30:45 /g · 5h 38m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Mississippi State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Texas A&M)#56 (of 74 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,071 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 185 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 268.9 yds/g allowed · 2,420 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 13.9 pts/g allowed · 125 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 30:55 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 730.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 74 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.131 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.099 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oklahoma12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas, #16 West Virginia, #24 Iowa State)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 600.7 yds/g · 6,007 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 51.3 pts/g · 513 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 468.9 yds/g allowed · 4,689 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.4 /g · +154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 7 taken, 10 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 30:24 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 843.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.516 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.322 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 54% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.458 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.330 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Washington10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Washington State, #17 Utah, #17 Utah)#35 (of 74 teams · 396.3 yds/g · 3,963 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 256 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 327.9 yds/g allowed · 3,279 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +6.8 /g · +68 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31:41 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 772.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 74 teams · 0.205 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.135 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Washington State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Utah · postseason: #24 Iowa State)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 448.8 yds/g · 4,039 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36.6 pts/g · 329 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 381.0 yds/g allowed · 3,429 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 234 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +10.6 /g · +95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 14 taken, 9 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 32:03 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 554.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.286 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.340 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Kentucky10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #10 Florida, #18 Mississippi State, #23 Missouri · postseason: #12 Penn State)#55 (of 74 teams · 344.9 yds/g · 3,104 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 330.9 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 142 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 30:41 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 670.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 74 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 0.125 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Syracuse10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #16 West Virginia)#15 (of 74 teams · 440.2 yds/g · 3,962 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g allowed · 3,818 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 260 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6.8 /g · +61 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 22 taken, 13 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 30:56 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 570.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 74 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Penn State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 74 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 4,012 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.5 /g · +115 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:17 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 834.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Texas10–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #4 Oklahoma · postseason: #5 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Oklahoma, #24 Iowa State · postseason: #5 Georgia)#30 (of 74 teams · 407.4 yds/g · 4,481 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 352 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 396.6 yds/g allowed · 4,362 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +6.5 /g · +71 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 14 taken, 8 given · +0.55 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31:58 /g · 5h 52m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 861.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 74 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 0.160 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Fresno State12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Boise State)— (359.5 yds/g · 719 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26.0 pts/g · 52 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (288.5 yds/g allowed · 577 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.5 pts/g allowed · 35 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+8.5 /g · +17 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 5 taken, 4 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:38 /g · 1h 03m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#54 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 459.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.238 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018UCF12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (568.0 yds/g · 568 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45.0 pts/g · 45 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (272.0 yds/g allowed · 272 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g allowed · 14 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+31.0 /g · +31 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 1 taken, 0 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:31 /g · 0h 29m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#45 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 568.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.403 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.760 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.156 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Florida10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #7 Michigan)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #7 Michigan)#26 (of 74 teams · 414.8 yds/g · 3,733 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 250 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 367.2 yds/g allowed · 3,305 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · +3.4 /g · +31 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 31:08 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 831.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 74 teams · 0.212 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 0.167 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Utah9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#27 (of 74 teams · 413.2 yds/g · 3,719 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 277 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 350.7 yds/g allowed · 3,156 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 20.9 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +9.9 /g · +89 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 30:41 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 594.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 74 teams · 0.206 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.396 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Northwestern9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #17 Utah)#59 (of 74 teams · 339.1 yds/g · 3,730 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 250 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g allowed · 4,105 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2.6 /g · +29 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 17 taken, 12 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 34m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 608.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 74 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.170 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Iowa State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 West Virginia)#47 (of 74 teams · 363.8 yds/g · 3,638 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 367.5 yds/g allowed · 3,675 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · +3.6 /g · +36 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 28:00 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 575.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Boise State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Fresno State)— (414.0 yds/g · 414 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (424.0 yds/g allowed · 424 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44.0 pts/g allowed · 44 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-23.0 /g · -23 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 0 taken, 1 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:39 /g · 0h 35m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#56 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 543.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.171 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.347 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Texas A&M9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 LSU, #14 Kentucky)#16 (of 74 teams · 428.4 yds/g · 3,856 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 268 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 362.2 yds/g allowed · 3,260 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · -1.2 /g · -11 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 5 taken, 14 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:20 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 805.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 74 teams · 0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 0.208 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.458 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Missouri8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)#19 (of 74 teams · 424.6 yds/g · 3,821 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 401.4 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · +6.0 /g · +54 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 10 taken, 13 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 30:29 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 595.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 74 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.088 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.388 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20182018 LSUCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #19
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Alabama #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #5 of 74; 2018 Georgia #9 of 74; 2018 Washington State #10 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #15 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 74; 2018 Missouri #19 of 74; 2018 Michigan #21 of 74; 2018 Florida #26 of 74; 2018 Utah #27 of 74; 2018 Texas #30 of 74; 2018 Penn State #32 of 74; 2018 Washington #35 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #47 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #55 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #56 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #59 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 40 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 19.
Scoring offensemedian #15
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #5 of 74; 2018 Washington State #6 of 74; 2018 Georgia #7 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #7 of 74; 2018 Michigan #9 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2018 Texas #15 of 74; 2018 Missouri #16 of 74; 2018 Utah #19 of 74; 2018 Penn State #20 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #25 of 74; 2018 Florida #33 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #35 of 74; 2018 Washington #38 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #53 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #54 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #58 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 23 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 15.
Total defensemedian #16
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #2 of 74; 2018 Alabama #3 of 74; 2018 Clemson #6 of 74; 2018 Georgia #7 of 74; 2018 Washington #10 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #12 of 74; 2018 Utah #14 of 74; 2018 Penn State #15 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 74; 2018 Florida #18 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #19 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #21 of 74; 2018 Washington State #24 of 74; 2018 Texas #31 of 74; 2018 Missouri #33 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #35 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #37 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 17 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Scoring defensemedian #14
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #4 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #6 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Washington #7 of 74; 2018 Georgia #10 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #13 of 74; 2018 Utah #14 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #17 of 74; 2018 Florida #19 of 74; 2018 Texas #21 of 74; 2018 Missouri #22 of 74; 2018 Washington State #23 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #30 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #32 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #38 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #45 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #61 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 20 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 14.
Point marginmedian #12
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #1 of 74; 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #3 of 74; 2018 Georgia #4 of 74; 2018 Michigan #5 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #6 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #8 of 74; 2018 Penn State #10 of 74; 2018 Washington State #11 of 74; 2018 Utah #12 of 74; 2018 Washington #13 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #14 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #15 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #15 of 74; 2018 Texas #17 of 74; 2018 Missouri #18 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #23 of 74; 2018 Florida #24 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #28 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #36 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 19 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 12.
Turnover marginmedian #22
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Syracuse #2 of 74; 2018 Alabama #7 of 74; 2018 Utah #11 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #11 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #14 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Washington State #17 of 74; 2018 Texas #19 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #20 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #22 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #22 of 74; 2018 Florida #24 of 74; 2018 Penn State #28 of 74; 2018 Georgia #32 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 74; 2018 Clemson #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #37 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #37 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #47 of 74; 2018 Missouri #48 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 2 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 22.
Possessionmedian #27
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #2 of 74; 2018 Georgia #11 of 74; 2018 Washington State #13 of 74; 2018 Texas #14 of 74; 2018 Washington #17 of 74; 2018 Florida #22 of 74; 2018 Alabama #23 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #26 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #27 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #29 of 74; 2018 Utah #29 of 74; 2018 Missouri #32 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #34 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #35 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #46 of 74; 2018 Clemson #49 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #55 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #60 of 74; 2018 Penn State #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 16 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 27.
Returning passingmedian #52
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Missouri #1 of 130; 2018 Texas #14 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #18 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #25 of 130; 2018 Alabama #26 of 130; 2018 Penn State #27 of 130; 2018 Washington #35 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #36 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #38 of 130; 2018 Georgia #42 of 130; 2018 UCF #45 of 130; 2018 Clemson #49 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #52 of 130; 2018 Fresno State #54 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #55 of 130; 2018 Boise State #56 of 130; 2018 Utah #58 of 130; 2018 Florida #60 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #66 of 130; 2018 Michigan #92 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #96 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #106 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #119 of 130; 2018 Washington State #123 of 130. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 103 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 52.
Returning receivingmedian #77
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #19 of 130; 2018 Fresno State #26 of 130; 2018 Michigan #40 of 130; 2018 Washington State #45 of 130; 2018 Georgia #50 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #59 of 130; 2018 Texas #63 of 130; 2018 UCF #64 of 130; 2018 Florida #65 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #68 of 130; 2018 Clemson #70 of 130; 2018 Missouri #74 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #77 of 130; 2018 Washington #77 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #84 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #94 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #96 of 130; 2018 Boise State #104 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #105 of 130; 2018 Alabama #108 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #109 of 130; 2018 Penn State #112 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #114 of 130; 2018 Utah #116 of 130. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 115 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 77.
Returning rushingmedian #60
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 130; 2018 Fresno State #6 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #14 of 130; 2018 Utah #24 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #24 of 130; 2018 Clemson #27 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2018 Texas #35 of 130; 2018 UCF #36 of 130; 2018 Florida #38 of 130; 2018 Washington #39 of 130; 2018 Alabama #42 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #60 of 130; 2018 Michigan #64 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #74 of 130; 2018 Missouri #77 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #78 of 130; 2018 Boise State #80 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #82 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #97 of 130; 2018 Penn State #98 of 130; 2018 Georgia #108 of 130; 2018 Washington State #109 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #112 of 130. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 127 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 60.
Team talentmedian #18
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2018 Alabama #2 of 130; 2018 Georgia #3 of 130; 2018 Clemson #5 of 130; 2018 Michigan #8 of 130; 2018 Texas #9 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #10 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #11 of 130; 2018 Penn State #12 of 130; 2018 Florida #13 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 130; 2018 Washington #18 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #23 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #36 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #44 of 130; 2018 Missouri #46 of 130; 2018 Utah #47 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #52 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #54 of 130; 2018 UCF #55 of 130; 2018 Washington State #61 of 130; 2018 Boise State #65 of 130; 2018 Fresno State #81 of 130. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 6 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 18.
Offensive EPAmedian #20
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #4 of 74; 2018 Georgia #5 of 74; 2018 Washington State #6 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #10 of 74; 2018 Texas #16 of 74; 2018 Michigan #19 of 74; 2018 Florida #20 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #22 of 74; 2018 Utah #24 of 74; 2018 Washington #25 of 74; 2018 Missouri #29 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #34 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #40 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #42 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #47 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #56 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 52 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Defensive EPAmedian #16
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #5 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #9 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Georgia #12 of 74; 2018 Washington #13 of 74; 2018 Utah #15 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #16 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #19 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #20 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #21 of 74; 2018 Missouri #23 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Texas #31 of 74; 2018 Florida #35 of 74; 2018 Washington State #38 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #40 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #45 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #67 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 14 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Offensive success ratemedian #17
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Georgia #3 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #5 of 74; 2018 Clemson #7 of 74; 2018 Washington State #8 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #9 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Missouri #15 of 74; 2018 Washington #16 of 74; 2018 Florida #17 of 74; 2018 Utah #19 of 74; 2018 Texas #20 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #23 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #24 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #30 of 74; 2018 Penn State #31 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #37 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #41 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #50 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 60 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Defensive success ratemedian #17
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #1 of 74; 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Michigan #3 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #6 of 74; 2018 Utah #7 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #8 of 74; 2018 Penn State #9 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #10 of 74; 2018 Missouri #11 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #13 of 74; 2018 Washington #17 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #19 of 74; 2018 Florida #22 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #26 of 74; 2018 Washington State #31 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #32 of 74; 2018 Georgia #35 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #37 of 74; 2018 Texas #44 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #50 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #56 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 23 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #39
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #9 of 74; 2018 Clemson #15 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #17 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #19 of 74; 2018 Alabama #21 of 74; 2018 Washington State #33 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #38 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #39 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #48 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #50 of 74; 2018 Georgia #51 of 74; 2018 Texas #58 of 74; 2018 Florida #59 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #60 of 74; 2018 Michigan #62 of 74; 2018 Utah #64 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #68 of 74; 2018 Missouri #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 35 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 39.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #36
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Georgia #1 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #2 of 74; 2018 Washington #6 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #11 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #12 of 74; 2018 Penn State #18 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #21 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #25 of 74; 2018 Florida #30 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #36 of 74; 2018 Texas #38 of 74; 2018 Clemson #40 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #45 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #51 of 74; 2018 Washington State #56 of 74; 2018 Alabama #59 of 74; 2018 Missouri #65 of 74; 2018 Utah #66 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #69 of 74; 2018 Michigan #71 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #72 of 74. Marked: 2018 LSU, ranked 17 of 74. CFP Top 25 median rank 36.