THIRD AND DATA

Marshall game log

2009: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 5vs Southern Illinois31–28 W———————————39%54%
Sep 12at #10 Virginia Tech10–52 L———————————26%49%
Sep 19vs Bowling Green17–10 W———————————42%43%
Sep 26at Memphis27–16 W———————————37%40%
Oct 3vs East Carolina17–21 L———————————42%46%
Oct 10at Tulane31–10 W———————————48%43%
Oct 17at #25 West Virginia7–24 L———————————36%35%
Oct 24vs UAB27–7 W———————————50%43%
Nov 1at UCF20–21 L———————————40%36%
Nov 14vs Southern Miss20–27 L———————————39%36%
Nov 21vs SMU34–31 W———————————45%44%
Nov 28at UTEP21–52 L———————————53%51%
Dec 26vs Ohio21–17 W———————————29%22%
Season13 games7–6—————–—–———————41%42%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Marshall on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Marshall's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Marshall offense 41% (351 of 860)Opponent offense / Marshall defense 42% (352 of 837)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Southern Illinois: opponent offense 54% of 65Southern Illinois: Marshall offense 39% of 71#10 Virginia Tech: opponent offense 49% of 71#10 Virginia Tech: Marshall offense 26% of 61Bowling Green: opponent offense 43% of 82Bowling Green: Marshall offense 42% of 57Memphis: opponent offense 40% of 60Memphis: Marshall offense 37% of 59East Carolina: opponent offense 46% of 57East Carolina: Marshall offense 42% of 69Tulane: opponent offense 43% of 77Tulane: Marshall offense 48% of 50#25 West Virginia: opponent offense 35% of 54#25 West Virginia: Marshall offense 36% of 67UAB: opponent offense 43% of 61UAB: Marshall offense 50% of 76UCF: opponent offense 36% of 78UCF: Marshall offense 40% of 63Southern Miss: opponent offense 36% of 58Southern Miss: Marshall offense 39% of 76SMU: opponent offense 44% of 61SMU: Marshall offense 45% of 73UTEP: opponent offense 51% of 63UTEP: Marshall offense 53% of 76Ohio: opponent offense 22% of 50Ohio: Marshall offense 29% of 62
Southern Illinois@ #10 Virginia TechBowling Green@ MemphisEast Carolina@ Tulane@ #25 West VirginiaUAB@ UCFSouthern MissSMU@ UTEPOhio *
Marshall offenseOpponent offense (Marshall defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Southern Illinois

31–28 W · 71 plays to 65
Marshall offense 39% (28/71)Southern Ill. offense 54% (35/65)

at #10 Virginia Tech

10–52 L · 61 plays to 71
Marshall offense 26% (16/61)Virginia Tech offense 49% (35/71)

vs Bowling Green

17–10 W · 57 plays to 82
Marshall offense 42% (24/57)Bowling Green offense 43% (35/82)

at Memphis

27–16 W · 59 plays to 60
Marshall offense 37% (22/59)Memphis offense 40% (24/60)

vs East Carolina

17–21 L · 69 plays to 57
Marshall offense 42% (29/69)East Carolina offense 46% (26/57)

at Tulane

31–10 W · 50 plays to 77
Marshall offense 48% (24/50)Tulane offense 43% (33/77)

at #25 West Virginia

7–24 L · 67 plays to 54
Marshall offense 36% (24/67)West Virginia offense 35% (19/54)

vs UAB

27–7 W · 76 plays to 61
Marshall offense 50% (38/76)UAB offense 43% (26/61)

at UCF

20–21 L · 63 plays to 78
Marshall offense 40% (25/63)UCF offense 36% (28/78)

vs Southern Miss

20–27 L · 76 plays to 58
Marshall offense 39% (30/76)Southern Miss offense 36% (21/58)

vs SMU

34–31 W · 73 plays to 61
Marshall offense 45% (33/73)SMU offense 44% (27/61)

at UTEP

21–52 L · 76 plays to 63
Marshall offense 53% (40/76)UTEP offense 51% (32/63)

vs Ohio

21–17 W · 62 plays to 50
Marshall offense 29% (18/62)Ohio offense 22% (11/50)