Metrics

MassachusettsMinutemen

Season
Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2013

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013Massachusetts1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#122 (of 125 teams · 281.6 yds/g · 3,379 yards)#123 (of 125 teams · 11.7 pts/g · 140 points)#99 (of 125 teams · 433.3 yds/g allowed · 5,199 yards)#98 (of 125 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#117 (of 125 teams · -21.3 /g · -256 on the season)#106 (of 125 teams · -7 on the season · 19 taken, 26 given · -0.58 /g)#71 (of 125 teams · 29:45 /g · 5h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#122 (of 125 teams · -0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 125 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 125 teams · 37% of plays successful)#111 (of 125 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 125 teams · 0.882 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 125 teams · 0.867 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#89 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #5–#124. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#96 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #11–#124. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#78 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #10–#120. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#74 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #5–#123. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#88 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #8–#123. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#74 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #4–#122. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#86 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #3–#107. 1 of 13 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#77 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #7–#122. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#85 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #17–#121. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#91 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #7–#120. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#102 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #26–#124. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#62 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #32–#121. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#57 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range #6–#100. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)
2013Akron570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#108 (of 125 teams · 342.0 yds/g · 4,104 yards)#109 (of 125 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 242 points)#60 (of 125 teams · 397.0 yds/g allowed · 4,764 yards)#74 (of 125 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#100 (of 125 teams · -8.4 /g · -101 on the season)#74 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.17 /g)#86 (of 125 teams · 29:10 /g · 5h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 125 teams · 0.023 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 125 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful)#46 (of 125 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 125 teams · 0.973 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 125 teams · 0.952 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Ball State1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 125 teams · 477.1 yds/g · 6,202 yards)#15 (of 125 teams · 38.5 pts/g · 501 points)#78 (of 125 teams · 413.9 yds/g allowed · 5,380 yards)#47 (of 125 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 321 points)#20 (of 125 teams · +13.8 /g · +180 on the season)#14 (of 125 teams · +11 on the season · 30 taken, 19 given · +0.85 /g)#97 (of 125 teams · 28:42 /g · 6h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 125 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 125 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 125 teams · 47% of plays successful)#76 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 125 teams · 0.883 average PPA on successful plays)#60 (of 125 teams · 0.939 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Bowling Green1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 125 teams · 459.4 yds/g · 6,431 yards)#28 (of 125 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 487 points)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 321.4 yds/g allowed · 4,500 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 222 points)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +18.9 /g · +265 on the season)#20 (of 125 teams · +10 on the season · 21 taken, 11 given · +0.71 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 33:57 /g · 7h 55m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 125 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 49% of plays successful)#62 (of 125 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 125 teams · 0.988 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 125 teams · 0.941 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Buffalo850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 125 teams · 394.7 yds/g · 5,131 yards)#54 (of 125 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 394 points)#50 (of 125 teams · 382.8 yds/g allowed · 4,976 yards)#40 (of 125 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#49 (of 125 teams · +5.9 /g · +77 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +15 on the season · 30 taken, 15 given · +1.15 /g)#39 (of 125 teams · 31:26 /g · 6h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#76 (of 125 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 125 teams · 0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 125 teams · 42% of plays successful)#26 (of 125 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 125 teams · 0.955 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 125 teams · 1.012 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Central Michigan660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#110 (of 125 teams · 341.1 yds/g · 4,093 yards)#96 (of 125 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 279 points)#67 (of 125 teams · 405.2 yds/g allowed · 4,862 yards)#74 (of 125 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#88 (of 125 teams · -5.3 /g · -64 on the season)#94 (of 125 teams · -5 on the season · 22 taken, 27 given · -0.42 /g)#59 (of 125 teams · 30:13 /g · 6h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 125 teams · 0.063 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 125 teams · 0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 125 teams · 42% of plays successful)#110 (of 125 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 125 teams · 0.989 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 125 teams · 0.891 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Eastern Michigan2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#111 (of 125 teams · 336.1 yds/g · 4,033 yards)#113 (of 125 teams · 18.8 pts/g · 226 points)#120 (of 125 teams · 510.8 yds/g allowed · 6,130 yards)#123 (of 125 teams · 45.2 pts/g allowed · 542 points)#123 (of 125 teams · -26.3 /g · -316 on the season)#122 (of 125 teams · -12 on the season · 11 taken, 23 given · -1.00 /g)#67 (of 125 teams · 29:57 /g · 5h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 125 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 125 teams · 0.176 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful)#122 (of 125 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 125 teams · 0.964 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 125 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Kent State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#89 (of 125 teams · 368.9 yds/g · 4,427 yards)#105 (of 125 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 249 points)#71 (of 125 teams · 409.9 yds/g allowed · 4,919 yards)#68 (of 125 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points)#92 (of 125 teams · -6.2 /g · -74 on the season)#87 (of 125 teams · -4 on the season · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.33 /g)#51 (of 125 teams · 30:30 /g · 6h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 (of 125 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 125 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#107 (of 125 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 125 teams · 0.986 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 125 teams · 0.930 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Miami (OH)0120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#124 (of 125 teams · 225.8 yds/g · 2,710 yards)#124 (of 125 teams · 9.8 pts/g · 117 points)#115 (of 125 teams · 484.3 yds/g allowed · 5,811 yards)#107 (of 125 teams · 35.7 pts/g allowed · 428 points)#122 (of 125 teams · -25.9 /g · -311 on the season)#74 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.17 /g)#103 (of 125 teams · 28:36 /g · 5h 43m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#121 (of 125 teams · -0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 125 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 125 teams · 36% of plays successful)#124 (of 125 teams · 52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 125 teams · 0.912 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.827 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Northern Illinois1220 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 519.8 yds/g · 7,277 yards)#11 (of 125 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 555 points)#79 (of 125 teams · 414.9 yds/g allowed · 5,808 yards)#52 (of 125 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 351 points)#18 (of 125 teams · +14.6 /g · +204 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +13 on the season · 30 taken, 17 given · +0.93 /g)#106 (of 125 teams · 28:23 /g · 6h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 125 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 125 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 49% of plays successful)#78 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 125 teams · 0.885 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 125 teams · 0.860 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Ohio760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#84 (of 125 teams · 379.4 yds/g · 4,932 yards)#73 (of 125 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 356 points)#68 (of 125 teams · 405.9 yds/g allowed · 5,276 yards)#72 (of 125 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#69 (of 125 teams · -0.1 /g · -1 on the season)#73 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 22 taken, 24 given · -0.15 /g)#107 (of 125 teams · 28:19 /g · 6h 08m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 125 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 125 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#96 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful)#54 (of 125 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 125 teams · 0.949 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 125 teams · 1.006 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Toledo750 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#39 (of 125 teams · 447.3 yds/g · 5,368 yards)#39 (of 125 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 396 points)#88 (of 125 teams · 421.8 yds/g allowed · 5,061 yards)#74 (of 125 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#56 (of 125 teams · +4.4 /g · +53 on the season)#38 (of 125 teams · +4 on the season · 20 taken, 16 given · +0.33 /g)#88 (of 125 teams · 29:08 /g · 5h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 125 teams · 0.091 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#121 (of 125 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 125 teams · 48% of plays successful)#114 (of 125 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#121 (of 125 teams · 0.814 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 125 teams · 0.988 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Western Michigan1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 125 teams · 327.2 yds/g · 3,926 yards)#118 (of 125 teams · 17.2 pts/g · 206 points)#86 (of 125 teams · 419.2 yds/g allowed · 5,030 yards)#105 (of 125 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 425 points)#116 (of 125 teams · -18.3 /g · -219 on the season)#106 (of 125 teams · -7 on the season · 19 taken, 26 given · -0.58 /g)#100 (of 125 teams · 28:39 /g · 5h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 125 teams · -0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 125 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 125 teams · 38% of plays successful)#102 (of 125 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 125 teams · 0.865 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 125 teams · 0.909 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20132013 MassachusettsMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #89
Total offense. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Northern Illinois #5 of 125; 2013 Ball State #19 of 125; 2013 Bowling Green #29 of 125; 2013 Toledo #39 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #78 of 125; 2013 Ohio #84 of 125; 2013 Kent State #89 of 125; 2013 Akron #108 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #110 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #111 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #112 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 122 of 125. Mid-American median rank 89.
Scoring offensemedian #96
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Northern Illinois #11 of 125; 2013 Ball State #15 of 125; 2013 Bowling Green #28 of 125; 2013 Toledo #39 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #54 of 125; 2013 Ohio #73 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #96 of 125; 2013 Kent State #105 of 125; 2013 Akron #109 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #113 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #118 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 123 of 125. Mid-American median rank 96.
Total defensemedian #78
Total defense. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Bowling Green #10 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #50 of 125; 2013 Akron #60 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #67 of 125; 2013 Ohio #68 of 125; 2013 Kent State #71 of 125; 2013 Ball State #78 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #79 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #86 of 125; 2013 Toledo #88 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #115 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #120 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 99 of 125. Mid-American median rank 78.
Scoring defensemedian #74
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Bowling Green #5 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #40 of 125; 2013 Ball State #47 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #52 of 125; 2013 Kent State #68 of 125; 2013 Ohio #72 of 125; 2013 Akron #74 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #74 of 125; 2013 Toledo #74 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #105 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #107 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 98 of 125. Mid-American median rank 74.
Point marginmedian #88
Point margin. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Bowling Green #8 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #18 of 125; 2013 Ball State #20 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #49 of 125; 2013 Toledo #56 of 125; 2013 Ohio #69 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #88 of 125; 2013 Kent State #92 of 125; 2013 Akron #100 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #116 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #122 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 117 of 125. Mid-American median rank 88.
Turnover marginmedian #74
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Buffalo #4 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #10 of 125; 2013 Ball State #14 of 125; 2013 Bowling Green #20 of 125; 2013 Toledo #38 of 125; 2013 Ohio #73 of 125; 2013 Akron #74 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #74 of 125; 2013 Kent State #87 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #94 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #106 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #122 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 106 of 125. Mid-American median rank 74.
Possessionmedian #86
Possession. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Bowling Green #3 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #39 of 125; 2013 Kent State #51 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #59 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #67 of 125; 2013 Akron #86 of 125; 2013 Toledo #88 of 125; 2013 Ball State #97 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #100 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #103 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #106 of 125; 2013 Ohio #107 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 71 of 125. Mid-American median rank 86.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #77
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Bowling Green #7 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #17 of 125; 2013 Ball State #43 of 125; 2013 Toledo #62 of 125; 2013 Kent State #75 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #76 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #77 of 125; 2013 Ohio #93 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #103 of 125; 2013 Akron #105 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #120 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 122 of 125. Mid-American median rank 77.
Defensive EPAmedian #85
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Buffalo #17 of 125; 2013 Bowling Green #43 of 125; 2013 Akron #54 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #59 of 125; 2013 Ball State #71 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #85 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #92 of 125; 2013 Ohio #96 of 125; 2013 Kent State #101 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #113 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #119 of 125; 2013 Toledo #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 78 of 125. Mid-American median rank 85.
Offensive success ratemedian #91
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Bowling Green #7 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #10 of 125; 2013 Toledo #14 of 125; 2013 Ball State #16 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #73 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #76 of 125; 2013 Kent State #91 of 125; 2013 Ohio #96 of 125; 2013 Akron #105 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #108 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #113 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #120 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 117 of 125. Mid-American median rank 91.
Defensive success ratemedian #102
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Buffalo #26 of 125; 2013 Akron #46 of 125; 2013 Ohio #54 of 125; 2013 Bowling Green #62 of 125; 2013 Ball State #76 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #78 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #102 of 125; 2013 Kent State #107 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #110 of 125; 2013 Toledo #114 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #122 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 111 of 125. Mid-American median rank 102.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #62
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Central Michigan #32 of 125; 2013 Bowling Green #34 of 125; 2013 Kent State #36 of 125; 2013 Akron #45 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #52 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #59 of 125; 2013 Ohio #62 of 125; 2013 Miami (OH) #82 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #98 of 125; 2013 Ball State #100 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #112 of 125; 2013 Toledo #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 102 of 125. Mid-American median rank 62.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #57
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Miami (OH) #6 of 125; 2013 Northern Illinois #13 of 125; 2013 Eastern Michigan #22 of 125; 2013 Central Michigan #26 of 125; 2013 Western Michigan #36 of 125; 2013 Kent State #57 of 125; 2013 Ball State #60 of 125; 2013 Bowling Green #62 of 125; 2013 Akron #69 of 125; 2013 Toledo #91 of 125; 2013 Ohio #99 of 125; 2013 Buffalo #100 of 125. Marked: 2013 Massachusetts, ranked 17 of 125. Mid-American median rank 57.