| 2023 | Massachusetts3–9 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range 0–3.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #88 (of 133 teams · 356.3 yds/g · 4,275 yards) | #97 (of 133 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 278 points) | #117 (of 133 teams · 428.0 yds/g allowed · 5,136 yards) | #133 (of 133 teams · 37.8 pts/g allowed · 454 points) | #129 (of 133 teams · -14.7 /g · -176 on the season) | #77 (of 133 teams · -1 on the season · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.08 /g) | #68 (of 133 teams · 29:45 /g · 5h 57m on the season) | #52 (of 133 teams · 86% of last season's passing production returning) | #64 (of 133 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning) | #58 (of 133 teams · 63% of last season's rushing production returning) | #76 (of 133 teams · 565.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #81 (of 133 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #130 (of 133 teams · 0.298 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #87 (of 133 teams · 41% of plays successful) | #132 (of 133 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #28 (of 133 teams · 1.323 average PPA on successful plays) | #66 (of 133 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range 0–3.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #88 (Total offense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #29–#119. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) | #97 (Scoring offense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #7–#121. 1 of 4 in the top 10.) | #53 (Total defense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #5–#117. 1 of 4 in the top 10.) | #32 (Scoring defense: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #7–#133. 1 of 4 in the top 10.) | #78 (Point margin: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #4–#129. 1 of 4 in the top 10.) | #77 (Turnover margin: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #20–#98. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) | #36 (Possession: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #11–#68. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) | #52 (Returning passing: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #19–#120. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) | #60 (Returning receiving: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #16–#104. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) | #58 (Returning rushing: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #50–#79. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) | #76 (Team talent: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #11–#131. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) | #81 (Offensive EPA: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #6–#119. 1 of 4 in the top 10.) | #101 (Defensive EPA: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #3–#130. 1 of 4 in the top 10.) | #80 (Offensive success rate: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #7–#106. 1 of 4 in the top 10.) | #121 (Defensive success rate: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #5–#132. 1 of 4 in the top 10.) | #34 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #28–#130. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) | #51 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range #28–#66. 0 of 4 in the top 10.) |
| 2023 | Army6–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range 0–3.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #119 (of 133 teams · 311.6 yds/g · 3,739 yards) | #113 (of 133 teams · 20.5 pts/g · 246 points) | #53 (of 133 teams · 364.2 yds/g allowed · 4,370 yards) | #32 (of 133 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 253 points) | #78 (of 133 teams · -0.6 /g · -7 on the season) | #92 (of 133 teams · -3 on the season · 19 taken, 22 given · -0.25 /g) | #11 (of 133 teams · 32:32 /g · 6h 30m on the season) | #114 (of 133 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning) | #16 (of 133 teams · 71% of last season's receiving production returning) | #75 (of 133 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning) | #131 (of 133 teams · 0.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #93 (of 133 teams · 0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #101 (of 133 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #80 (of 133 teams · 41% of plays successful) | #121 (of 133 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #130 (of 133 teams · 1.074 average PPA on successful plays) | #28 (of 133 teams · 1.188 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2023 | Notre Dame10–3 | 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range 0–3.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #18 NC State · postseason: #19 Oregon State) | #29 (of 133 teams · 432.2 yds/g · 5,619 yards) | #7 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 509 points) | #5 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 276.0 yds/g allowed · 3,588 yards) | #7 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 207 points) | #4 — top 10 (of 133 teams · +23.2 /g · +302 on the season) | #20 (of 133 teams · +7 on the season · 24 taken, 17 given · +0.54 /g) | #49 (of 133 teams · 30:48 /g · 6h 40m on the season) | #120 (of 133 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning) | #104 (of 133 teams · 34% of last season's receiving production returning) | #79 (of 133 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning) | #11 (of 133 teams · 870.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #6 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 0.342 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #3 — top 10 (of 133 teams · -0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #7 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 50% of plays successful) | #5 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #34 (of 133 teams · 1.310 average PPA on successful plays) | #56 (of 133 teams · 1.239 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2023 | UConn3–9 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 4 FBS Independents teams in 2023. Range 0–3.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #105 (of 133 teams · 326.9 yds/g · 3,923 yards) | #121 (of 133 teams · 19.1 pts/g · 229 points) | #101 (of 133 teams · 408.0 yds/g allowed · 4,896 yards) | #99 (of 133 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points) | #119 (of 133 teams · -10.8 /g · -129 on the season) | #98 (of 133 teams · -4 on the season · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.33 /g) | #36 (of 133 teams · 31:16 /g · 6h 15m on the season) | #19 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #60 (of 133 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning) | #50 (of 133 teams · 69% of last season's rushing production returning) | #93 (of 133 teams · 484.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #119 (of 133 teams · 0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #102 (of 133 teams · 0.225 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #106 (of 133 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #123 (of 133 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #102 (of 133 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays) | #51 (of 133 teams · 1.228 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |