THIRD AND DATA

McNeese game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29vs Stephen F. Austin27–38 L654076.333–19919–32–208185–120–235–6028:1338%41%
Sep 5vs Texas Wesleyan52–0 W665007.637–22020–29–280237–131–206–5930:3848%—
Sep 12vs Tarleton State24–27 L764956.531–20927–45–286249–171–106–4635:1043%50%
Sep 19at UT Rio Grande Valley10–27 L622794.528–10914–34–170185–150–147–6826:2334%44%
Sep 26vs East Texas A&M27–24 W614126.834–21017–27–202143–131–2110–7328:4736%43%
Oct 3at #15 LSU14–63 L471964.230–1028–17–9461–120–014–3222:4726%57%
Oct 17at Northwestern State24–21 W643976.236–11518–28–282185–120–1211–13828:1634%35%
Oct 24at Incarnate Word6–38 L662834.339–16012–27–123133–170–228–6928:2029%46%
Oct 31vs Nicholls16–3 W622023.346–1625–16–40114–160–216–5529:4623%24%
Season9 games4–55693,1715.6314–1486140–255–1,68514542–1273–131463–6004:18:2035%43%

Success rate

McNeese on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game35.3% · 43.2%
38
41
48
43
50
34
44
36
43
26
57
34
35
29
46
23
24
Stephen F. Austin
Texas Wesleyan
Tarleton State
@ UT Rio Grande Valley
East Texas A&M
@ LSU
@ Northwestern State
@ Incarnate Word
Nicholls
@ Houston Christian
@ SE Louisiana
Lamar

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 25.5%, defense allows 57.4%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: McNeese on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is McNeese's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:McNeese offense 35% (198 of 561)Opponent offense / McNeese defense 43% (254 of 588)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 41% of 66Stephen F. Austin: McNeese offense 38% of 65Texas Wesleyan: McNeese offense 48% of 65Tarleton State: opponent offense 50% of 70Tarleton State: McNeese offense 43% of 76UT Rio Grande Valley: opponent offense 44% of 68UT Rio Grande Valley: McNeese offense 34% of 61East Texas A&M: opponent offense 43% of 68East Texas A&M: McNeese offense 36% of 61#15 LSU: opponent offense 57% of 101#15 LSU: McNeese offense 26% of 47Northwestern State: opponent offense 35% of 71Northwestern State: McNeese offense 34% of 61Incarnate Word: opponent offense 46% of 70Incarnate Word: McNeese offense 29% of 65Nicholls: opponent offense 24% of 74Nicholls: McNeese offense 23% of 60
Stephen F. AustinTexas WesleyanTarleton State@ UT Rio Grande ValleyEast Texas A&M@ #15 LSU@ Northwestern State@ Incarnate WordNicholls@ Houston Christian@ SE LouisianaLamar
McNeese offenseOpponent offense (McNeese defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Stephen F. Austin

27–38 L · 65 plays to 66
McNeese offense 38% (25/65)SFA offense 41% (27/66)

vs Texas Wesleyan

52–0 W · 65 plays to 0
McNeese offense 48% (31/65)Texas Wesleyan offense — (0/0)

vs Tarleton State

24–27 L · 76 plays to 70
McNeese offense 43% (33/76)Tarleton State offense 50% (35/70)

at UT Rio Grande Valley

10–27 L · 61 plays to 68
McNeese offense 34% (21/61)UT Rio Grande offense 44% (30/68)

vs East Texas A&M

27–24 W · 61 plays to 68
McNeese offense 36% (22/61)East Texas A&M offense 43% (29/68)

at #15 LSU

14–63 L · 47 plays to 101
McNeese offense 26% (12/47)LSU offense 57% (58/101)

at Northwestern State

24–21 W · 61 plays to 71
McNeese offense 34% (21/61)Northwestern St. offense 35% (25/71)

at Incarnate Word

6–38 L · 65 plays to 70
McNeese offense 29% (19/65)Incarnate Word offense 46% (32/70)

vs Nicholls

16–3 W · 60 plays to 74
McNeese offense 23% (14/60)Nicholls offense 24% (18/74)