THIRD AND DATA

Miami (OH) game log

2015: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 5vs Presbyterian26–7 W634667.440–20517–23–261185–130–0213–12625:5852%31%
Sep 12at #21 Wisconsin0–58 L581572.724–-313–34–16093–150–147–7223:1121%50%
Sep 19vs Cincinnati33–37 L754486.041–22014–34–228175–182–316–5023:2833%46%
Sep 26at #24 Western Kentucky14–56 L682914.340–12315–28–168157–170–046–3630:0928%58%
Oct 3at Kent State14–20 L873864.436–9121–51–295235–203–4410–6732:4633%24%
Oct 10at Ohio3–34 L492535.224–879–25–166121–100–046–4723:3524%44%
Oct 17vs Northern Illinois12–45 L743094.241–15316–33–156174–171–129–7539:4532%51%
Oct 24at Western Michigan13–35 L542765.127–5814–27–218124–140–228–6423:0930%44%
Oct 29vs Buffalo24–29 L673485.231–12413–36–224195–161–216–5324:4631%35%
Nov 7vs Eastern Michigan28–13 W654416.847–29113–18–150216–131–224–3035:1946%24%
Nov 14vs Akron28–37 L733845.331–6820–42–316186–160–3410–7028:5034%36%
Nov 21at Massachusetts20–13 W692994.346–13912–23–160187–170–014–3033:3935%34%
Season12 games3–98024,0585.1428–1556177–374–2,50219958–1868–183189–7205:44:3534%40%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Miami (OH) on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Miami (OH)'s defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Miami (OH) offense 34% (270 of 802)Opponent offense / Miami (OH) defense 40% (349 of 862)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Presbyterian: opponent offense 31% of 68Presbyterian: Miami (OH) offense 52% of 63#21 Wisconsin: opponent offense 50% of 80#21 Wisconsin: Miami (OH) offense 21% of 58Cincinnati: opponent offense 46% of 94Cincinnati: Miami (OH) offense 33% of 75#24 Western Kentucky: opponent offense 58% of 74#24 Western Kentucky: Miami (OH) offense 28% of 68Kent State: opponent offense 24% of 62Kent State: Miami (OH) offense 33% of 87Ohio: opponent offense 44% of 77Ohio: Miami (OH) offense 24% of 49Northern Illinois: opponent offense 51% of 63Northern Illinois: Miami (OH) offense 32% of 74Western Michigan: opponent offense 44% of 79Western Michigan: Miami (OH) offense 30% of 54Buffalo: opponent offense 35% of 69Buffalo: Miami (OH) offense 31% of 67Eastern Michigan: opponent offense 24% of 59Eastern Michigan: Miami (OH) offense 46% of 65Akron: opponent offense 36% of 73Akron: Miami (OH) offense 34% of 73Massachusetts: opponent offense 34% of 64Massachusetts: Miami (OH) offense 35% of 69
Presbyterian@ #21 WisconsinCincinnati@ #24 Western Kentucky@ Kent State@ OhioNorthern Illinois@ Western MichiganBuffaloEastern MichiganAkron@ Massachusetts
Miami (OH) offenseOpponent offense (Miami (OH) defense)
Successful snaps by player
PlayerSuccessful · rate of snaps

vs Presbyterian

26–7 W · 63 plays to 68
Miami (OH) offense 52% (33/63)Presbyterian offense 31% (21/68)

at #21 Wisconsin

0–58 L · 58 plays to 80
Miami (OH) offense 21% (12/58)Wisconsin offense 50% (40/80)

vs Cincinnati

33–37 L · 75 plays to 94
Miami (OH) offense 33% (25/75)Cincinnati offense 46% (43/94)

at #24 Western Kentucky

14–56 L · 68 plays to 74
Miami (OH) offense 28% (19/68)Western Kentucky offense 58% (43/74)

at Kent State

14–20 L · 87 plays to 62
Miami (OH) offense 33% (29/87)Kent State offense 24% (15/62)

at Ohio

3–34 L · 49 plays to 77
Miami (OH) offense 24% (12/49)Ohio offense 44% (34/77)

vs Northern Illinois

12–45 L · 74 plays to 63
Miami (OH) offense 32% (24/74)Northern Ill. offense 51% (32/63)

at Western Michigan

13–35 L · 54 plays to 79
Miami (OH) offense 30% (16/54)Western Michigan offense 44% (35/79)

vs Buffalo

24–29 L · 67 plays to 69
Miami (OH) offense 31% (21/67)Buffalo offense 35% (24/69)

vs Eastern Michigan

28–13 W · 65 plays to 59
Miami (OH) offense 46% (30/65)Eastern Michigan offense 24% (14/59)

vs Akron

28–37 L · 73 plays to 73
Miami (OH) offense 34% (25/73)Akron offense 36% (26/73)

at Massachusetts

20–13 W · 69 plays to 64
Miami (OH) offense 35% (24/69)Massachusetts offense 34% (22/64)