Metrics

Middle TennesseeBlue Raiders

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2018

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Middle Tennessee860 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#80 (of 130 teams · 388.7 yds/g · 5,442 yards)#77 (of 130 teams · 28.0 pts/g · 392 points)#51 (of 130 teams · 378.3 yds/g allowed · 5,296 yards)#62 (of 130 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 374 points)#67 (of 130 teams · +1.3 /g · +18 on the season)#44 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 24 taken, 20 given · +0.29 /g)#41 (of 130 teams · 30:26 /g · 7h 06m on the season)#77 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's passing production returning)#28 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#23 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's rushing production returning)#91 (of 130 teams · 414.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 130 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 130 teams · 0.120 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#46 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 130 teams · 1.210 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 130 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 Conference USA teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#80 (Total offense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #14–#130. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#77 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #27–#129. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#51 (Total defense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #4–#119. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#60 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #7–#112. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#67 (Point margin: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #23–#126. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#57 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #17–#129. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Possession: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #2–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#69 (Returning passing: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #1–#127. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#53 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #14–#126. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#63 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #13–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#100 (Team talent: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #67–#123. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#97 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #16–#130. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#52 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #5–#124. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#84 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #42–#125. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #2–#101. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#70 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #5–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#71 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range #19–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)
2018Charlotte570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#117 (of 130 teams · 339.2 yds/g · 4,070 yards)#114 (of 130 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 260 points)#24 (of 130 teams · 337.1 yds/g allowed · 4,045 yards)#60 (of 130 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 319 points)#95 (of 130 teams · -4.9 /g · -59 on the season)#57 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 16 taken, 15 given · +0.08 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 35:01 /g · 7h 00m on the season)#47 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing production returning)#86 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#29 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's rushing production returning)#123 (of 130 teams · 311.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 130 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 130 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#101 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#48 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 130 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 130 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Florida Atlantic570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#14 (of 130 teams · 478.8 yds/g · 5,746 yards)#45 (of 130 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 373 points)#80 (of 130 teams · 415.7 yds/g allowed · 4,988 yards)#91 (of 130 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#75 (of 130 teams · -0.6 /g · -7 on the season)#113 (of 130 teams · -7 on the season · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.58 /g)#72 (of 130 teams · 29:24 /g · 5h 53m on the season)#122 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#56 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#73 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning)#67 (of 130 teams · 537.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 130 teams · 0.213 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 130 teams · 0.170 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#70 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 130 teams · 1.292 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 130 teams · 1.282 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Florida International940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#47 (of 130 teams · 420.9 yds/g · 5,471 yards)#27 (of 130 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 450 points)#57 (of 130 teams · 386.8 yds/g allowed · 5,028 yards)#46 (of 130 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 328 points)#34 (of 130 teams · +9.4 /g · +122 on the season)#17 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 22 taken, 13 given · +0.69 /g)#97 (of 130 teams · 28:10 /g · 6h 06m on the season)#101 (of 130 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#107 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#90 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#78 (of 130 teams · 476.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 130 teams · 0.262 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 130 teams · 0.174 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#78 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#97 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.389 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 130 teams · 1.109 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Louisiana Tech850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#87 (of 130 teams · 379.1 yds/g · 4,928 yards)#97 (of 130 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 321 points)#28 (of 130 teams · 341.3 yds/g allowed · 4,437 yards)#39 (of 130 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 299 points)#65 (of 130 teams · +1.7 /g · +22 on the season)#47 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 22 taken, 19 given · +0.23 /g)#48 (of 130 teams · 30:15 /g · 6h 33m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#39 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#115 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's rushing production returning)#77 (of 130 teams · 477.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 130 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 130 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#42 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 130 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 130 teams · 1.194 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Marshall940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 (of 130 teams · 393.6 yds/g · 5,117 yards)#74 (of 130 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 367 points)#25 (of 130 teams · 337.5 yds/g allowed · 4,387 yards)#27 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#45 (of 130 teams · +6.4 /g · +83 on the season)#69 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 24 taken, 24 given · +0.00 /g)#118 (of 130 teams · 26:56 /g · 5h 50m on the season)#127 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#33 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving production returning)#28 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's rushing production returning)#82 (of 130 teams · 451.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 130 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 130 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 130 teams · 1.185 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 130 teams · 1.194 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018North Texas940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#20 (of 130 teams · 460.4 yds/g · 5,985 yards)#27 (of 130 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 450 points)#48 (of 130 teams · 374.6 yds/g allowed · 4,870 yards)#43 (of 130 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#29 (of 130 teams · +10.5 /g · +136 on the season)#34 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#31 (of 130 teams · 31:13 /g · 6h 46m on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#24 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning)#79 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's rushing production returning)#107 (of 130 teams · 368.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 130 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 130 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#28 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 130 teams · 1.205 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 130 teams · 1.279 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Old Dominion480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#40 (of 130 teams · 427.2 yds/g · 5,126 yards)#49 (of 130 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 370 points)#119 (of 130 teams · 471.4 yds/g allowed · 5,657 yards)#111 (of 130 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 431 points)#96 (of 130 teams · -5.1 /g · -61 on the season)#109 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.50 /g)#76 (of 130 teams · 29:11 /g · 5h 50m on the season)#41 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#53 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving production returning)#63 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's rushing production returning)#121 (of 130 teams · 333.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 130 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 130 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#88 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 130 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 130 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Rice2110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#125 (of 130 teams · 318.4 yds/g · 4,139 yards)#124 (of 130 teams · 18.9 pts/g · 246 points)#104 (of 130 teams · 445.4 yds/g allowed · 5,790 yards)#112 (of 130 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 468 points)#126 (of 130 teams · -17.1 /g · -222 on the season)#83 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.15 /g)#18 (of 130 teams · 32:39 /g · 7h 04m on the season)#63 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's passing production returning)#62 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's rushing production returning)#105 (of 130 teams · 375.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#122 (of 130 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#124 (of 130 teams · 0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#125 (of 130 teams · 35% of plays successful)#101 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 130 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays)#127 (of 130 teams · 1.396 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Southern Miss650 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#98 (of 130 teams · 367.6 yds/g · 4,044 yards)#90 (of 130 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 288 points)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 280.2 yds/g allowed · 3,082 yards)#19 (of 130 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 218 points)#46 (of 130 teams · +6.4 /g · +70 on the season)#80 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.09 /g)#58 (of 130 teams · 29:59 /g · 5h 30m on the season)#69 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's passing production returning)#126 (of 130 teams · 24% of last season's receiving production returning)#117 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's rushing production returning)#101 (of 130 teams · 387.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 130 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#99 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 130 teams · 1.216 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 130 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018UAB1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 (of 130 teams · 405.5 yds/g · 5,677 yards)#60 (of 130 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 418 points)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 299.2 yds/g allowed · 4,189 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 238 points)#23 (of 130 teams · +12.9 /g · +180 on the season)#69 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 20 taken, 20 given · +0.00 /g)#16 (of 130 teams · 32:46 /g · 7h 39m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#14 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's receiving production returning)#13 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning)#100 (of 130 teams · 387.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 130 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 130 teams · 1.221 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 130 teams · 1.223 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018UTEP1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#126 (of 130 teams · 307.7 yds/g · 3,692 yards)#127 (of 130 teams · 17.7 pts/g · 212 points)#68 (of 130 teams · 394.4 yds/g allowed · 4,733 yards)#99 (of 130 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 393 points)#121 (of 130 teams · -15.1 /g · -181 on the season)#129 (of 130 teams · -17 on the season · 11 taken, 28 given · -1.42 /g)#32 (of 130 teams · 30:55 /g · 6h 11m on the season)#74 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's passing production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's receiving production returning)#65 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#118 (of 130 teams · 345.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#125 (of 130 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 130 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#123 (of 130 teams · 37% of plays successful)#76 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 130 teams · 1.255 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 130 teams · 1.179 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018UTSA390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#130 (of 130 teams · 247.1 yds/g · 2,965 yards)#129 (of 130 teams · 14.2 pts/g · 170 points)#97 (of 130 teams · 435.5 yds/g allowed · 5,226 yards)#87 (of 130 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 374 points)#125 (of 130 teams · -17.0 /g · -204 on the season)#57 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g)#110 (of 130 teams · 27:39 /g · 5h 32m on the season)#113 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#119 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's receiving production returning)#102 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 405.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#130 (of 130 teams · -0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 130 teams · 0.226 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#124 (of 130 teams · 36% of plays successful)#84 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 (of 130 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 130 teams · 1.298 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Western Kentucky390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#104 (of 130 teams · 359.7 yds/g · 4,316 yards)#118 (of 130 teams · 21.1 pts/g · 253 points)#83 (of 130 teams · 421.6 yds/g allowed · 5,059 yards)#76 (of 130 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 334 points)#102 (of 130 teams · -6.8 /g · -81 on the season)#51 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.17 /g)#117 (of 130 teams · 27:05 /g · 5h 25m on the season)#117 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#90 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#48 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning)#112 (of 130 teams · 353.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 130 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 130 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#96 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 (of 130 teams · 1.072 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 130 teams · 1.111 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20182018 Middle TennesseeConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #80
Total offense. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Florida Atlantic #14 of 130; 2018 North Texas #20 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #40 of 130; 2018 Florida International #47 of 130; 2018 UAB #67 of 130; 2018 Marshall #73 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #87 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #98 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #104 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #117 of 130; 2018 Rice #125 of 130; 2018 UTEP #126 of 130; 2018 UTSA #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 80 of 130. Conference USA median rank 80.
Scoring offensemedian #77
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Florida International #27 of 130; 2018 North Texas #27 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #45 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #49 of 130; 2018 UAB #60 of 130; 2018 Marshall #74 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #90 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #97 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #114 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #118 of 130; 2018 Rice #124 of 130; 2018 UTEP #127 of 130; 2018 UTSA #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 77 of 130. Conference USA median rank 77.
Total defensemedian #51
Total defense. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Southern Miss #4 of 130; 2018 UAB #9 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #24 of 130; 2018 Marshall #25 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #28 of 130; 2018 North Texas #48 of 130; 2018 Florida International #57 of 130; 2018 UTEP #68 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #80 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #83 of 130; 2018 UTSA #97 of 130; 2018 Rice #104 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #119 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 51 of 130. Conference USA median rank 51.
Scoring defensemedian #60
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UAB #7 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #19 of 130; 2018 Marshall #27 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #39 of 130; 2018 North Texas #43 of 130; 2018 Florida International #46 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #60 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #76 of 130; 2018 UTSA #87 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #91 of 130; 2018 UTEP #99 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #111 of 130; 2018 Rice #112 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 62 of 130. Conference USA median rank 60.
Point marginmedian #67
Point margin. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UAB #23 of 130; 2018 North Texas #29 of 130; 2018 Florida International #34 of 130; 2018 Marshall #45 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #46 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #65 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #75 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #95 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #96 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #102 of 130; 2018 UTEP #121 of 130; 2018 UTSA #125 of 130; 2018 Rice #126 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 67 of 130. Conference USA median rank 67.
Turnover marginmedian #57
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Florida International #17 of 130; 2018 North Texas #34 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #47 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #51 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #57 of 130; 2018 UTSA #57 of 130; 2018 Marshall #69 of 130; 2018 UAB #69 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #80 of 130; 2018 Rice #83 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #109 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #113 of 130; 2018 UTEP #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 44 of 130. Conference USA median rank 57.
Possessionmedian #48
Possession. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Charlotte #2 of 130; 2018 UAB #16 of 130; 2018 Rice #18 of 130; 2018 North Texas #31 of 130; 2018 UTEP #32 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #48 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #58 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #72 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #76 of 130; 2018 Florida International #97 of 130; 2018 UTSA #110 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #117 of 130; 2018 Marshall #118 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 41 of 130. Conference USA median rank 48.
Returning passingmedian #69
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Louisiana Tech #1 of 130; 2018 UAB #1 of 130; 2018 North Texas #10 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #41 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #47 of 130; 2018 Rice #63 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #69 of 130; 2018 UTEP #74 of 130; 2018 Florida International #101 of 130; 2018 UTSA #113 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #117 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #122 of 130; 2018 Marshall #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 77 of 130. Conference USA median rank 69.
Returning receivingmedian #53
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UAB #14 of 130; 2018 North Texas #24 of 130; 2018 UTEP #25 of 130; 2018 Marshall #33 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #39 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #53 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #56 of 130; 2018 Rice #62 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #86 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #90 of 130; 2018 Florida International #107 of 130; 2018 UTSA #119 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #126 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 28 of 130. Conference USA median rank 53.
Returning rushingmedian #63
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UAB #13 of 130; 2018 Marshall #28 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #29 of 130; 2018 Rice #46 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #48 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #63 of 130; 2018 UTEP #65 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #73 of 130; 2018 North Texas #79 of 130; 2018 Florida International #90 of 130; 2018 UTSA #102 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #115 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #117 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 23 of 130. Conference USA median rank 63.
Team talentmedian #100
Team talent. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Florida Atlantic #67 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #77 of 130; 2018 Florida International #78 of 130; 2018 Marshall #82 of 130; 2018 UTSA #94 of 130; 2018 UAB #100 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #101 of 130; 2018 Rice #105 of 130; 2018 North Texas #107 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #112 of 130; 2018 UTEP #118 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #121 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #123 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 91 of 130. Conference USA median rank 100.
Offensive EPAmedian #97
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Florida International #16 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #36 of 130; 2018 UAB #43 of 130; 2018 North Texas #64 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #85 of 130; 2018 Marshall #96 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #97 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #99 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #111 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #113 of 130; 2018 Rice #122 of 130; 2018 UTEP #125 of 130; 2018 UTSA #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 102 of 130. Conference USA median rank 97.
Defensive EPAmedian #52
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UAB #5 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #6 of 130; 2018 Marshall #25 of 130; 2018 North Texas #30 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #40 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #43 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #55 of 130; 2018 UTEP #70 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #74 of 130; 2018 Florida International #80 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #98 of 130; 2018 UTSA #108 of 130; 2018 Rice #124 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 52 of 130. Conference USA median rank 52.
Offensive success ratemedian #84
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 North Texas #42 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #44 of 130; 2018 UAB #52 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #57 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #76 of 130; 2018 Florida International #78 of 130; 2018 Marshall #84 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #93 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #99 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #101 of 130; 2018 UTEP #123 of 130; 2018 UTSA #124 of 130; 2018 Rice #125 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 92 of 130. Conference USA median rank 84.
Defensive success ratemedian #48
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Southern Miss #2 of 130; 2018 UAB #6 of 130; 2018 Marshall #10 of 130; 2018 North Texas #28 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #42 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #48 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #70 of 130; 2018 UTEP #76 of 130; 2018 UTSA #84 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #88 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #96 of 130; 2018 Florida International #97 of 130; 2018 Rice #101 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 46 of 130. Conference USA median rank 48.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #70
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Florida International #5 of 130; 2018 Rice #22 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #27 of 130; 2018 UTEP #40 of 130; 2018 UAB #60 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #65 of 130; 2018 North Texas #73 of 130; 2018 Marshall #86 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #91 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #94 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #100 of 130; 2018 UTSA #120 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #124 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 70 of 130. Conference USA median rank 70.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #71
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Florida International #19 of 130; 2018 Western Kentucky #20 of 130; 2018 UTEP #41 of 130; 2018 Marshall #50 of 130; 2018 Louisiana Tech #52 of 130; 2018 Southern Miss #62 of 130; 2018 UAB #71 of 130; 2018 Charlotte #77 of 130; 2018 North Texas #99 of 130; 2018 Florida Atlantic #100 of 130; 2018 UTSA #102 of 130; 2018 Old Dominion #115 of 130; 2018 Rice #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Middle Tennessee, ranked 88 of 130. Conference USA median rank 71.