| 2019 | Middle Tennessee4–8 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #59 (of 130 teams · 408.3 yds/g · 4,900 yards) | #85 (of 130 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 316 points) | #114 (of 130 teams · 459.3 yds/g allowed · 5,512 yards) | #81 (of 130 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points) | #92 (of 130 teams · -3.6 /g · -43 on the season) | #43 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 17 taken, 14 given · +0.25 /g) | #118 (of 130 teams · 26:46 /g · 5h 21m on the season) | #110 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning) | #87 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning) | #71 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning) | #92 (of 130 teams · 450.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #41 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #87 (of 130 teams · 0.193 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #65 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #112 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #38 (of 130 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays) | #28 (of 130 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | 1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #42 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#99. 6 of 25 in the top 10.) | #21 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#88. 7 of 25 in the top 10.) | #22 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#82. 7 of 25 in the top 10.) | #19 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#78. 9 of 25 in the top 10.) | #15 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#54. 9 of 25 in the top 10.) | #31 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #3–#120. 5 of 25 in the top 10.) | #47 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#108. 4 of 25 in the top 10.) | #52 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#125. 2 of 25 in the top 10.) | #44 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#118. 5 of 25 in the top 10.) | #65 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#130. 3 of 25 in the top 10.) | #17 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#119. 8 of 25 in the top 10.) | #21 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#83. 7 of 25 in the top 10.) | #21 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#90. 7 of 25 in the top 10.) | #26 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 6 of 25 in the top 10.) | #27 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#114. 6 of 25 in the top 10.) | #49 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #5–#123. 4 of 25 in the top 10.) | #55 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#128. 4 of 25 in the top 10.) |
| 2019 | LSU15–0 | 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma) | 4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #13 Alabama · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 568.4 yds/g · 8,526 yards) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 48.4 pts/g · 726 points) | #31 (of 130 teams · 343.5 yds/g allowed · 5,153 yards) | #32 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 328 points) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +26.5 /g · +398 on the season) | #15 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 22 taken, 12 given · +0.67 /g) | #60 (of 130 teams · 30:13 /g · 7h 33m on the season) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #28 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning) | #87 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing production returning) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 906.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.413 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #31 (of 130 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 56% of plays successful) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #49 (of 130 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays) | #124 (of 130 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Ohio State13–1 | 5 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Penn State) | 5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Penn State, #14 Michigan, #21 Cincinnati) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 529.9 yds/g · 7,419 yards) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 46.9 pts/g · 656 points) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 259.7 yds/g allowed · 3,636 yards) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 13.7 pts/g allowed · 192 points) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +33.1 /g · +464 on the season) | #17 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 25 taken, 16 given · +0.64 /g) | #25 (of 130 teams · 31:58 /g · 7h 28m on the season) | #124 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning) | #80 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning) | #93 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 973.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.368 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 51% of plays successful) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #17 (of 130 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays) | #70 (of 130 teams · 1.221 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Clemson14–1 | 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #24 Virginia · postseason: #2 Ohio State) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 528.7 yds/g · 7,931 yards) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 43.9 pts/g · 659 points) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 288.3 yds/g allowed · 4,325 yards) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 203 points) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +30.4 /g · +456 on the season) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +15 on the season · 30 taken, 15 given · +1.00 /g) | #58 (of 130 teams · 30:16 /g · 7h 34m on the season) | #50 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's passing production returning) | #23 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning) | #65 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 863.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.365 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 51% of plays successful) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #22 (of 130 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays) | #29 (of 130 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Oklahoma12–2 | 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Baylor, #7 Baylor) | 3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Baylor, #7 Baylor, #25 Oklahoma State) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 537.5 yds/g · 7,525 yards) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 42.1 pts/g · 590 points) | #38 (of 130 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 4,990 yards) | #64 (of 130 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 382 points) | #15 (of 130 teams · +14.9 /g · +208 on the season) | #109 (of 130 teams · -8 on the season · 11 taken, 19 given · -0.57 /g) | #37 (of 130 teams · 30:57 /g · 7h 13m on the season) | #120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning) | #72 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving production returning) | #62 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 869.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.401 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #64 (of 130 teams · 0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 54% of plays successful) | #49 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #36 (of 130 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays) | #97 (of 130 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Georgia12–2 | 5 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida · postseason: #7 Baylor) | 3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #15 Notre Dame · postseason: #7 Baylor) | #61 (of 130 teams · 408.1 yds/g · 5,713 yards) | #50 (of 130 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 431 points) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 275.8 yds/g allowed · 3,861 yards) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 176 points) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.2 /g · +255 on the season) | #49 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.21 /g) | #18 (of 130 teams · 32:16 /g · 7h 32m on the season) | #57 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning) | #118 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's receiving production returning) | #73 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 960.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #59 (of 130 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #22 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful) | #13 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #116 (of 130 teams · 1.105 average PPA on successful plays) | #13 (of 130 teams · 1.096 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Oregon12–2 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Wisconsin) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 Utah, #22 USC · postseason: #8 Wisconsin) | #39 (of 130 teams · 433.1 yds/g · 6,063 yards) | #16 (of 130 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 495 points) | #22 (of 130 teams · 329.1 yds/g allowed · 4,607 yards) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 231 points) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.9 /g · +264 on the season) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +16 on the season · 27 taken, 11 given · +1.14 /g) | #104 (of 130 teams · 28:14 /g · 6h 35m on the season) | #35 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning) | #57 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning) | #25 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's rushing production returning) | #17 (of 130 teams · 817.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #18 (of 130 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #26 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful) | #24 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #57 (of 130 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.066 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Baylor11–3 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Oklahoma State) | #52 (of 130 teams · 421.4 yds/g · 5,900 yards) | #27 (of 130 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 471 points) | #39 (of 130 teams · 358.9 yds/g allowed · 5,024 yards) | #19 (of 130 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 277 points) | #19 (of 130 teams · +13.9 /g · +194 on the season) | #13 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 29 taken, 19 given · +0.71 /g) | #103 (of 130 teams · 28:15 /g · 6h 36m on the season) | #62 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's passing production returning) | #22 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning) | #30 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing production returning) | #35 (of 130 teams · 668.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #39 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #25 (of 130 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #48 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #53 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #60 (of 130 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Wisconsin10–4 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Michigan, #16 Iowa, #18 Minnesota) | #38 (of 130 teams · 433.1 yds/g · 6,064 yards) | #23 (of 130 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 477 points) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 287.1 yds/g allowed · 4,020 yards) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 237 points) | #14 (of 130 teams · +17.1 /g · +240 on the season) | #63 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 35:40 /g · 8h 19m on the season) | #91 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's passing production returning) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's receiving production returning) | #47 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning) | #33 (of 130 teams · 675.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #19 (of 130 teams · 0.260 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #11 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #119 (of 130 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays) | #123 (of 130 teams · 1.337 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Florida11–2 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #12 Auburn · postseason: #24 Virginia) | #44 (of 130 teams · 430.5 yds/g · 5,597 yards) | #28 (of 130 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 304.9 yds/g allowed · 3,963 yards) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 201 points) | #12 (of 130 teams · +17.8 /g · +231 on the season) | #31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 23 taken, 18 given · +0.38 /g) | #62 (of 130 teams · 30:10 /g · 6h 32m on the season) | #16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning) | #52 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning) | #15 (of 130 teams · 835.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #21 (of 130 teams · 0.256 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #19 (of 130 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #41 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #22 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #16 (of 130 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays) | #51 (of 130 teams · 1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Penn State11–2 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan, #16 Iowa · postseason: #17 Memphis) | #56 (of 130 teams · 412.0 yds/g · 5,356 yards) | #15 (of 130 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 465 points) | #33 (of 130 teams · 346.5 yds/g allowed · 4,504 yards) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.0 pts/g allowed · 208 points) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +19.8 /g · +257 on the season) | #19 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.62 /g) | #108 (of 130 teams · 27:54 /g · 6h 03m on the season) | #113 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning) | #83 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning) | #130 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's rushing production returning) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 857.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #30 (of 130 teams · 0.237 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #20 (of 130 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #46 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #34 (of 130 teams · 1.269 average PPA on successful plays) | #91 (of 130 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Utah11–3 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #48 (of 130 teams · 429.0 yds/g · 6,006 yards) | #38 (of 130 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 452 points) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 269.2 yds/g allowed · 3,769 yards) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 15.0 pts/g allowed · 210 points) | #13 (of 130 teams · +17.3 /g · +242 on the season) | #17 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 22 taken, 13 given · +0.64 /g) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:19 /g · 8h 00m on the season) | #12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning) | #43 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning) | #47 (of 130 teams · 620.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #12 (of 130 teams · 0.284 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #14 (of 130 teams · 49% of plays successful) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #68 (of 130 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays) | #85 (of 130 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Auburn9–4 | 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon, #13 Alabama) | #64 (of 130 teams · 405.8 yds/g · 5,275 yards) | #28 (of 130 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points) | #28 (of 130 teams · 337.0 yds/g allowed · 4,381 yards) | #17 (of 130 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 254 points) | #21 (of 130 teams · +13.7 /g · +178 on the season) | #31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g) | #87 (of 130 teams · 29:05 /g · 6h 18m on the season) | #122 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning) | #96 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning) | #33 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning) | #13 (of 130 teams · 843.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #58 (of 130 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #12 (of 130 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #40 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #14 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #110 (of 130 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays) | #55 (of 130 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Alabama11–2 | 5 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Michigan) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 510.8 yds/g · 6,640 yards) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 47.2 pts/g · 614 points) | #21 (of 130 teams · 324.4 yds/g allowed · 4,217 yards) | #13 (of 130 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 242 points) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +28.6 /g · +372 on the season) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18 on the season · 28 taken, 10 given · +1.38 /g) | #67 (of 130 teams · 29:59 /g · 6h 30m on the season) | #59 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's passing production returning) | #34 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning) | #102 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 985.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.400 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 53% of plays successful) | #33 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.335 average PPA on successful plays) | #19 (of 130 teams · 1.109 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Michigan9–4 | 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Notre Dame, #16 Iowa) | #68 (of 130 teams · 401.5 yds/g · 5,220 yards) | #44 (of 130 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 412 points) | #11 (of 130 teams · 307.3 yds/g allowed · 3,995 yards) | #25 (of 130 teams · 20.7 pts/g allowed · 269 points) | #26 (of 130 teams · +11.0 /g · +143 on the season) | #63 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 20 taken, 20 given · +0.00 /g) | #76 (of 130 teams · 29:32 /g · 6h 24m on the season) | #30 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #67 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning) | #112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning) | #11 (of 130 teams · 853.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #63 (of 130 teams · 0.182 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #21 (of 130 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #51 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #19 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #80 (of 130 teams · 1.181 average PPA on successful plays) | #53 (of 130 teams · 1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Notre Dame11–2 | 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 USC, #23 Navy, #24 Virginia) | #46 (of 130 teams · 429.9 yds/g · 5,589 yards) | #13 (of 130 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points) | #18 (of 130 teams · 320.2 yds/g allowed · 4,163 yards) | #12 (of 130 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 233 points) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.9 /g · +245 on the season) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +17 on the season · 28 taken, 11 given · +1.31 /g) | #99 (of 130 teams · 28:29 /g · 6h 10m on the season) | #68 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing production returning) | #75 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning) | #82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning) | #14 (of 130 teams · 843.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #28 (of 130 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #17 (of 130 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #37 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #28 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #31 (of 130 teams · 1.274 average PPA on successful plays) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Iowa10–3 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #18 Minnesota · postseason: #22 USC) | #99 (of 130 teams · 366.5 yds/g · 4,765 yards) | #88 (of 130 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 335 points) | #12 (of 130 teams · 308.1 yds/g allowed · 4,006 yards) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 14.0 pts/g allowed · 182 points) | #24 (of 130 teams · +11.8 /g · +153 on the season) | #19 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.62 /g) | #22 (of 130 teams · 32:02 /g · 6h 56m on the season) | #29 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning) | #103 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving production returning) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's rushing production returning) | #43 (of 130 teams · 637.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #83 (of 130 teams · 0.140 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #18 (of 130 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #45 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #37 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #123 (of 130 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.009 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Memphis12–2 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Cincinnati, #21 Cincinnati, #23 Navy) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 485.1 yds/g · 6,791 yards) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 40.4 pts/g · 566 points) | #61 (of 130 teams · 383.5 yds/g allowed · 5,369 yards) | #58 (of 130 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 370 points) | #18 (of 130 teams · +14.0 /g · +196 on the season) | #68 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.07 /g) | #47 (of 130 teams · 30:37 /g · 7h 09m on the season) | #37 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning) | #44 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning) | #95 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's rushing production returning) | #71 (of 130 teams · 552.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.306 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #57 (of 130 teams · 0.140 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #19 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful) | #35 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.373 average PPA on successful plays) | #74 (of 130 teams · 1.228 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Minnesota11–2 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Penn State) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #10 Penn State · postseason: #12 Auburn) | #42 (of 130 teams · 432.0 yds/g · 5,616 yards) | #21 (of 130 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 443 points) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 306.5 yds/g allowed · 3,985 yards) | #37 (of 130 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 293 points) | #25 (of 130 teams · +11.5 /g · +150 on the season) | #40 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.31 /g) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:08 /g · 7h 24m on the season) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's receiving production returning) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning) | #46 (of 130 teams · 621.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #11 (of 130 teams · 0.287 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #27 (of 130 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #15 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful) | #44 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #47 (of 130 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays) | #34 (of 130 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Boise State12–2 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #50 (of 130 teams · 426.6 yds/g · 5,973 yards) | #19 (of 130 teams · 34.7 pts/g · 486 points) | #34 (of 130 teams · 346.5 yds/g allowed · 4,851 yards) | #31 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 306 points) | #22 (of 130 teams · +12.9 /g · +180 on the season) | #68 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.07 /g) | #38 (of 130 teams · 30:56 /g · 7h 13m on the season) | #117 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning) | #102 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning) | #125 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's rushing production returning) | #67 (of 130 teams · 561.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #35 (of 130 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #45 (of 130 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #50 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #41 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #43 (of 130 teams · 1.247 average PPA on successful plays) | #86 (of 130 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | App State13–1 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #41 (of 130 teams · 432.5 yds/g · 6,055 yards) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 38.8 pts/g · 543 points) | #26 (of 130 teams · 336.1 yds/g allowed · 4,705 yards) | #21 (of 130 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 280 points) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.8 /g · +263 on the season) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +15 on the season · 24 taken, 9 given · +1.07 /g) | #46 (of 130 teams · 30:38 /g · 7h 09m on the season) | #43 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning) | #14 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning) | #34 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing production returning) | #101 (of 130 teams · 412.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #16 (of 130 teams · 0.269 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #23 (of 130 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #61 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #12 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.347 average PPA on successful plays) | #128 (of 130 teams · 1.356 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Cincinnati11–3 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #77 (of 130 teams · 392.1 yds/g · 5,489 yards) | #60 (of 130 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 415 points) | #40 (of 130 teams · 361.4 yds/g allowed · 5,060 yards) | #24 (of 130 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 288 points) | #30 (of 130 teams · +9.1 /g · +127 on the season) | #29 (of 130 teams · +6 on the season · 26 taken, 20 given · +0.43 /g) | #27 (of 130 teams · 31:45 /g · 7h 25m on the season) | #52 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's passing production returning) | #29 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning) | #61 (of 130 teams · 576.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #69 (of 130 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #30 (of 130 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #59 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #32 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #104 (of 130 teams · 1.142 average PPA on successful plays) | #38 (of 130 teams · 1.168 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | USC8–5 | 5 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Utah) | #21 (of 130 teams · 454.2 yds/g · 5,905 yards) | #35 (of 130 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 422 points) | #77 (of 130 teams · 408.5 yds/g allowed · 5,310 yards) | #78 (of 130 teams · 29.4 pts/g allowed · 382 points) | #54 (of 130 teams · +3.1 /g · +40 on the season) | #120 (of 130 teams · -10 on the season · 16 taken, 26 given · -0.77 /g) | #94 (of 130 teams · 28:48 /g · 6h 14m on the season) | #41 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing production returning) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning) | #60 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 915.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #22 (of 130 teams · 0.251 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #90 (of 130 teams · 0.195 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful) | #114 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #90 (of 130 teams · 1.162 average PPA on successful plays) | #30 (of 130 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Navy11–2 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #20 (of 130 teams · 455.8 yds/g · 5,925 yards) | #12 (of 130 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 483 points) | #16 (of 130 teams · 313.5 yds/g allowed · 4,076 yards) | #34 (of 130 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 290 points) | #16 (of 130 teams · +14.8 /g · +193 on the season) | #31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 21 taken, 16 given · +0.38 /g) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:28 /g · 7h 15m on the season) | #93 (of 130 teams · 21% of last season's passing production returning) | #46 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning) | #96 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing production returning) | #119 (of 130 teams · 335.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.349 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #32 (of 130 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #17 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful) | #27 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.353 average PPA on successful plays) | #62 (of 130 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Virginia9–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #81 (of 130 teams · 388.9 yds/g · 5,445 yards) | #40 (of 130 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points) | #47 (of 130 teams · 371.9 yds/g allowed · 5,206 yards) | #62 (of 130 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 380 points) | #50 (of 130 teams · +4.9 /g · +69 on the season) | #85 (of 130 teams · -3 on the season · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.21 /g) | #12 (of 130 teams · 33:03 /g · 7h 43m on the season) | #16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning) | #91 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning) | #59 (of 130 teams · 580.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #73 (of 130 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #78 (of 130 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #32 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #40 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #112 (of 130 teams · 1.126 average PPA on successful plays) | #125 (of 130 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2019 | Oklahoma State8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #18 (of 130 teams · 456.5 yds/g · 5,935 yards) | #35 (of 130 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 422 points) | #82 (of 130 teams · 412.3 yds/g allowed · 5,360 yards) | #61 (of 130 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 348 points) | #46 (of 130 teams · +5.7 /g · +74 on the season) | #70 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g) | #93 (of 130 teams · 28:51 /g · 6h 15m on the season) | #125 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning) | #43 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning) | #119 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing production returning) | #39 (of 130 teams · 644.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #43 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #52 (of 130 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #52 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #62 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #55 (of 130 teams · 1.228 average PPA on successful plays) | #61 (of 130 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |