THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

Middle TennesseeBlue Raiders

Season
‹
›Current

Conference USA

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2025, released in week 16.

CFP Top 25, 2025

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Middle Tennessee3–90 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#82 (of 136 teams · 371.0 yds/g · 4,452 yards)#107 (of 136 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 269 points)#98 (of 136 teams · 402.6 yds/g allowed · 4,831 yards)#115 (of 136 teams · 30.9 pts/g allowed · 371 points)#113 (of 136 teams · -8.5 /g · -102 on the season)#54 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.17 /g)#103 (of 136 teams · 28:46 /g · 5h 45m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#70 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving production returning)#61 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning)#110 (of 136 teams · 520.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 136 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 136 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 136 teams · 42% of plays successful)#105 (of 136 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 136 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 136 teams · 1.279 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#26 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#119. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#27 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#79. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#94. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#76. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#120. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#38 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #2–#114. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #9–#118. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#51 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #4–#130. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#58 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#122. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#127. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#101. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#26 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #2–#99. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#27 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#97. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#117. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#134. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#135. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)
2025Indiana16–00 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon, #23 Iowa · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)#13 (of 136 teams · 456.3 yds/g · 7,301 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 41.6 pts/g · 666 points)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 266.0 yds/g allowed · 4,256 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 11.7 pts/g allowed · 187 points)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +29.9 /g · +479 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +22 on the season · 30 taken, 8 given · +1.38 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:29 /g · 8h 56m on the season)#117 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#63 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#72 (of 136 teams · 645.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.342 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 51% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 136 teams · 1.223 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 136 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas, #18 Michigan)#26 (of 136 teams · 423.0 yds/g · 5,922 yards)#21 (of 136 teams · 33.4 pts/g · 468 points)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 219.1 yds/g allowed · 3,067 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 9.3 pts/g allowed · 130 points)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +24.1 /g · +338 on the season)#53 (of 136 teams · +3 on the season · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.21 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:01 /g · 7h 42m on the season)#104 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#115 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.327 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · -0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 53% of plays successful)#12 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 (of 136 teams · 1.145 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.043 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Georgia12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama, #13 Texas, #22 Georgia Tech)#52 (of 136 teams · 402.6 yds/g · 5,636 yards)#28 (of 136 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points)#14 (of 136 teams · 298.1 yds/g allowed · 4,173 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 246 points)#15 (of 136 teams · +14.5 /g · +203 on the season)#72 (of 136 teams · +0 on the season · 13 taken, 13 given · +0.00 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:41 /g · 7h 51m on the season)#83 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's receiving production returning)#41 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's rushing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1003.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 136 teams · 0.245 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 136 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 136 teams · 47% of plays successful)#37 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#123 (of 136 teams · 1.147 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 136 teams · 1.150 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Texas Tech12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 BYU, #12 BYU, #15 Utah, #21 Houston)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 461.6 yds/g · 6,463 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 39.4 pts/g · 552 points)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 258.0 yds/g allowed · 3,612 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 11.8 pts/g allowed · 165 points)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +27.6 /g · +387 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +14 on the season · 32 taken, 18 given · +1.00 /g)#60 (of 136 teams · 30:10 /g · 7h 02m on the season)#21 (of 136 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#33 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#82 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's rushing production returning)#29 (of 136 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 136 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · -0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#50 (of 136 teams · 44% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 136 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 136 teams · 1.167 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Oregon13–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #4 Texas Tech)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 USC, #23 Iowa · postseason: #4 Texas Tech, #24 James Madison)#17 (of 136 teams · 452.2 yds/g · 6,783 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 554 points)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 274.8 yds/g allowed · 4,122 yards)#12 (of 136 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 268 points)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +19.1 /g · +286 on the season)#34 (of 136 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.40 /g)#41 (of 136 teams · 30:49 /g · 7h 42m on the season)#110 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving production returning)#71 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 941.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 136 teams · 0.303 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 136 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 136 teams · 47% of plays successful)#15 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 136 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 136 teams · 1.226 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Ole Miss13–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma · postseason: #3 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma, #20 Tulane · postseason: #3 Georgia, #20 Tulane)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 490.1 yds/g · 7,351 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 554 points)#48 (of 136 teams · 348.1 yds/g allowed · 5,222 yards)#37 (of 136 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#12 (of 136 teams · +15.9 /g · +238 on the season)#71 (of 136 teams · +1 on the season · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.07 /g)#104 (of 136 teams · 28:46 /g · 7h 11m on the season)#96 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning)#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's receiving production returning)#122 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing production returning)#21 (of 136 teams · 813.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 136 teams · 0.307 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 136 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 136 teams · 48% of plays successful)#39 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 136 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 136 teams · 1.290 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Texas A&M11–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Notre Dame)#23 (of 136 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 5,783 yards)#19 (of 136 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 439 points)#18 (of 136 teams · 307.4 yds/g allowed · 3,996 yards)#36 (of 136 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 273 points)#18 (of 136 teams · +12.8 /g · +166 on the season)#120 (of 136 teams · -9 on the season · 10 taken, 19 given · -0.69 /g)#14 (of 136 teams · 32:30 /g · 7h 03m on the season)#49 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing production returning)#86 (of 136 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 917.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 136 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 136 teams · 0.118 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 136 teams · 1.230 average PPA on successful plays)#135 (of 136 teams · 1.440 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Oklahoma10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama, #18 Michigan)#93 (of 136 teams · 354.5 yds/g · 4,609 yards)#79 (of 136 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 341 points)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 272.8 yds/g allowed · 3,546 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 201 points)#29 (of 136 teams · +10.8 /g · +140 on the season)#87 (of 136 teams · -3 on the season · 13 taken, 16 given · -0.23 /g)#76 (of 136 teams · 29:44 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#63 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's passing production returning)#27 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#30 (of 136 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning)#14 (of 136 teams · 882.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 136 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · -0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 136 teams · 40% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 136 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 136 teams · 1.335 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Alabama11–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)#84 (of 136 teams · 367.7 yds/g · 5,516 yards)#50 (of 136 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 443 points)#13 (of 136 teams · 297.2 yds/g allowed · 4,458 yards)#20 (of 136 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#31 (of 136 teams · +10.3 /g · +155 on the season)#27 (of 136 teams · +7 on the season · 20 taken, 13 given · +0.47 /g)#28 (of 136 teams · 31:35 /g · 7h 54m on the season)#88 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's passing production returning)#12 (of 136 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 993.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 136 teams · 0.208 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 136 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 136 teams · 43% of plays successful)#22 (of 136 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 136 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 136 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Miami13–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #11 Notre Dame · postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)#48 (of 136 teams · 404.9 yds/g · 6,479 yards)#35 (of 136 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 495 points)#11 (of 136 teams · 294.2 yds/g allowed · 4,707 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 14.8 pts/g allowed · 237 points)#11 (of 136 teams · +16.1 /g · +258 on the season)#17 (of 136 teams · +10 on the season · 25 taken, 15 given · +0.63 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:04 /g · 8h 49m on the season)#98 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#124 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#15 (of 136 teams · 874.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 136 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 136 teams · 0.034 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 136 teams · 47% of plays successful)#13 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 (of 136 teams · 1.156 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 136 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Notre Dame10–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 USC)#12 (of 136 teams · 459.5 yds/g · 5,514 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 42.0 pts/g · 504 points)#22 (of 136 teams · 313.1 yds/g allowed · 3,757 yards)#11 (of 136 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +24.4 /g · +293 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +13 on the season · 23 taken, 10 given · +1.08 /g)#87 (of 136 teams · 29:18 /g · 5h 52m on the season)#116 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#24 (of 136 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 912.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.333 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#14 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.497 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 136 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025BYU12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #15 Utah, #17 Arizona · postseason: #22 Georgia Tech)#55 (of 136 teams · 400.3 yds/g · 5,604 yards)#32 (of 136 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 440 points)#35 (of 136 teams · 332.6 yds/g allowed · 4,657 yards)#19 (of 136 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 268 points)#21 (of 136 teams · +12.3 /g · +172 on the season)#20 (of 136 teams · +8 on the season · 24 taken, 16 given · +0.57 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 32:43 /g · 7h 38m on the season)#112 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#56 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#53 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's rushing production returning)#70 (of 136 teams · 649.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 136 teams · 0.220 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 136 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#33 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 136 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 136 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Texas10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #18 Michigan)#69 (of 136 teams · 388.7 yds/g · 5,053 yards)#41 (of 136 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 396 points)#40 (of 136 teams · 338.9 yds/g allowed · 4,405 yards)#28 (of 136 teams · 20.3 pts/g allowed · 264 points)#32 (of 136 teams · +10.2 /g · +132 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +14 on the season · 23 taken, 9 given · +1.08 /g)#111 (of 136 teams · 28:30 /g · 6h 10m on the season)#76 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's passing production returning)#65 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving production returning)#21 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's rushing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 136 teams · 0.179 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 136 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 136 teams · 40% of plays successful)#43 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 136 teams · 1.366 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 136 teams · 1.178 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Vanderbilt10–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 463.2 yds/g · 6,022 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 38.5 pts/g · 500 points)#56 (of 136 teams · 357.5 yds/g allowed · 4,648 yards)#47 (of 136 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#13 (of 136 teams · +15.6 /g · +203 on the season)#48 (of 136 teams · +3 on the season · 15 taken, 12 given · +0.23 /g)#35 (of 136 teams · 31:18 /g · 6h 47m on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 75% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#55 (of 136 teams · 685.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.413 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 136 teams · 0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 50% of plays successful)#73 (of 136 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.415 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 136 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Utah11–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 483.1 yds/g · 6,281 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 41.3 pts/g · 537 points)#59 (of 136 teams · 357.9 yds/g allowed · 4,653 yards)#17 (of 136 teams · 18.9 pts/g allowed · 246 points)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +22.4 /g · +291 on the season)#28 (of 136 teams · +6 on the season · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.46 /g)#42 (of 136 teams · 30:48 /g · 6h 40m on the season)#53 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's passing production returning)#130 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's receiving production returning)#119 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing production returning)#44 (of 136 teams · 707.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.347 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 136 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 50% of plays successful)#32 (of 136 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 136 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 136 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025USC9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Michigan, #23 Iowa)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 465.1 yds/g · 6,047 yards)#13 (of 136 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 465 points)#49 (of 136 teams · 350.5 yds/g allowed · 4,557 yards)#51 (of 136 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 299 points)#18 (of 136 teams · +12.8 /g · +166 on the season)#59 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.15 /g)#71 (of 136 teams · 29:50 /g · 6h 28m on the season)#66 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's passing production returning)#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#110 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#17 (of 136 teams · 847.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.344 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 136 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 49% of plays successful)#117 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 136 teams · 1.342 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 136 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Arizona9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 136 teams · 407.9 yds/g · 5,303 yards)#30 (of 136 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 410 points)#19 (of 136 teams · 308.9 yds/g allowed · 4,015 yards)#21 (of 136 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 251 points)#22 (of 136 teams · +12.2 /g · +159 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +18 on the season · 31 taken, 13 given · +1.38 /g)#38 (of 136 teams · 30:57 /g · 6h 42m on the season)#13 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#44 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's receiving production returning)#58 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's rushing production returning)#67 (of 136 teams · 651.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 136 teams · 0.167 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 136 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 136 teams · 43% of plays successful)#27 (of 136 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 136 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 136 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 136 teams · 397.9 yds/g · 5,173 yards)#69 (of 136 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 358 points)#24 (of 136 teams · 323.6 yds/g allowed · 4,207 yards)#29 (of 136 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#40 (of 136 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#59 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.15 /g)#74 (of 136 teams · 29:47 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#48 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing production returning)#47 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing production returning)#11 (of 136 teams · 907.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 136 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 136 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#70 (of 136 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#129 (of 136 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.130 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Virginia11–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 136 teams · 419.1 yds/g · 5,867 yards)#38 (of 136 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 431 points)#20 (of 136 teams · 311.1 yds/g allowed · 4,356 yards)#22 (of 136 teams · 19.6 pts/g allowed · 274 points)#25 (of 136 teams · +11.2 /g · +157 on the season)#33 (of 136 teams · +6 on the season · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.43 /g)#19 (of 136 teams · 32:16 /g · 7h 32m on the season)#118 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#71 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving production returning)#76 (of 136 teams · 34% of last season's rushing production returning)#62 (of 136 teams · 666.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 136 teams · 0.173 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 136 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 136 teams · 41% of plays successful)#18 (of 136 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 136 teams · 1.277 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 136 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Tulane11–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 North Texas)#37 (of 136 teams · 411.5 yds/g · 5,761 yards)#68 (of 136 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 388 points)#79 (of 136 teams · 384.3 yds/g allowed · 5,380 yards)#58 (of 136 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 335 points)#61 (of 136 teams · +3.8 /g · +53 on the season)#20 (of 136 teams · +8 on the season · 25 taken, 17 given · +0.57 /g)#40 (of 136 teams · 30:52 /g · 7h 12m on the season)#85 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#122 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's receiving production returning)#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's rushing production returning)#68 (of 136 teams · 650.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 136 teams · 0.205 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 136 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 136 teams · 45% of plays successful)#110 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 136 teams · 1.205 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 136 teams · 1.183 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Houston10–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Arizona)#62 (of 136 teams · 395.0 yds/g · 5,135 yards)#55 (of 136 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 378 points)#47 (of 136 teams · 347.9 yds/g allowed · 4,522 yards)#47 (of 136 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#48 (of 136 teams · +6.2 /g · +81 on the season)#45 (of 136 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.31 /g)#17 (of 136 teams · 32:19 /g · 7h 00m on the season)#59 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's passing production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning)#66 (of 136 teams · 656.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#101 (of 136 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 136 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 136 teams · 41% of plays successful)#63 (of 136 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 136 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.119 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Georgia Tech9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 136 teams · 460.1 yds/g · 5,982 yards)#27 (of 136 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 418 points)#94 (of 136 teams · 399.5 yds/g allowed · 5,193 yards)#69 (of 136 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#40 (of 136 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#108 (of 136 teams · -6 on the season · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.46 /g)#95 (of 136 teams · 29:03 /g · 6h 18m on the season)#37 (of 136 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning)#39 (of 136 teams · 715.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 136 teams · 0.272 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 136 teams · 0.194 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 49% of plays successful)#102 (of 136 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 136 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 136 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Iowa9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Vanderbilt)#119 (of 136 teams · 320.1 yds/g · 4,161 yards)#54 (of 136 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 381 points)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 284.1 yds/g allowed · 3,694 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 209 points)#17 (of 136 teams · +13.2 /g · +172 on the season)#66 (of 136 teams · +1 on the season · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.08 /g)#31 (of 136 teams · 31:28 /g · 6h 49m on the season)#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving production returning)#69 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#42 (of 136 teams · 710.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 136 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 136 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 136 teams · 44% of plays successful)#35 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#134 (of 136 teams · 1.099 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.076 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025James Madison12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 136 teams · 454.9 yds/g · 6,368 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 519 points)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 267.0 yds/g allowed · 3,738 yards)#13 (of 136 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +18.7 /g · +262 on the season)#70 (of 136 teams · +1 on the season · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.07 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 34:13 /g · 7h 59m on the season)#25 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's passing production returning)#92 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's receiving production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 89% of last season's rushing production returning)#127 (of 136 teams · 459.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 136 teams · 0.225 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 136 teams · 45% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 136 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays)#132 (of 136 teams · 1.418 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025North Texas12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 511.4 yds/g · 7,160 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 45.1 pts/g · 631 points)#77 (of 136 teams · 382.1 yds/g allowed · 5,349 yards)#76 (of 136 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 371 points)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +18.6 /g · +260 on the season)#15 (of 136 teams · +9 on the season · 28 taken, 19 given · +0.64 /g)#114 (of 136 teams · 28:23 /g · 6h 37m on the season)#89 (of 136 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#51 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#72 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#96 (of 136 teams · 569.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.351 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 136 teams · 0.162 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 52% of plays successful)#77 (of 136 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 136 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 136 teams · 1.221 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20252025 Middle TennesseeCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #26
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 North Texas #1 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #2 of 136; 2025 Utah #4 of 136; 2025 USC #8 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #10 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #11 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #12 of 136; 2025 Indiana #13 of 136; 2025 James Madison #16 of 136; 2025 Oregon #17 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #23 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #26 of 136; 2025 Virginia #29 of 136; 2025 Tulane #37 of 136; 2025 Arizona #42 of 136; 2025 Miami #48 of 136; 2025 Georgia #52 of 136; 2025 BYU #55 of 136; 2025 Michigan #58 of 136; 2025 Houston #62 of 136; 2025 Texas #69 of 136; 2025 Alabama #84 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #93 of 136; 2025 Iowa #119 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 82 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 26.
Scoring offensemedian #27
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 North Texas #1 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #2 of 136; 2025 Indiana #3 of 136; 2025 Utah #4 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #7 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #8 of 136; 2025 James Madison #9 of 136; 2025 Oregon #10 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #10 of 136; 2025 USC #13 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #19 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #21 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #27 of 136; 2025 Georgia #28 of 136; 2025 Arizona #30 of 136; 2025 BYU #32 of 136; 2025 Miami #35 of 136; 2025 Virginia #38 of 136; 2025 Texas #41 of 136; 2025 Alabama #50 of 136; 2025 Iowa #54 of 136; 2025 Houston #55 of 136; 2025 Tulane #68 of 136; 2025 Michigan #69 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #79 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 107 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 27.
Total defensemedian #20
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #3 of 136; 2025 Indiana #4 of 136; 2025 James Madison #5 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #6 of 136; 2025 Oregon #7 of 136; 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Miami #11 of 136; 2025 Alabama #13 of 136; 2025 Georgia #14 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #18 of 136; 2025 Arizona #19 of 136; 2025 Virginia #20 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #22 of 136; 2025 Michigan #24 of 136; 2025 BYU #35 of 136; 2025 Texas #40 of 136; 2025 Houston #47 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #48 of 136; 2025 USC #49 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #56 of 136; 2025 Utah #59 of 136; 2025 North Texas #77 of 136; 2025 Tulane #79 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #94 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 98 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Scoring defensemedian #20
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Indiana #2 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #3 of 136; 2025 Miami #5 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #7 of 136; 2025 Iowa #8 of 136; 2025 Georgia #10 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #11 of 136; 2025 Oregon #12 of 136; 2025 James Madison #13 of 136; 2025 Utah #17 of 136; 2025 BYU #19 of 136; 2025 Alabama #20 of 136; 2025 Arizona #21 of 136; 2025 Virginia #22 of 136; 2025 Texas #28 of 136; 2025 Michigan #29 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #36 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #37 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #47 of 136; 2025 Houston #47 of 136; 2025 USC #51 of 136; 2025 Tulane #58 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #69 of 136; 2025 North Texas #76 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 115 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Point marginmedian #17
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #3 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #4 of 136; 2025 Utah #5 of 136; 2025 Oregon #6 of 136; 2025 James Madison #7 of 136; 2025 North Texas #8 of 136; 2025 Miami #11 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #12 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #13 of 136; 2025 Georgia #15 of 136; 2025 Iowa #17 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #18 of 136; 2025 USC #18 of 136; 2025 BYU #21 of 136; 2025 Arizona #22 of 136; 2025 Virginia #25 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #29 of 136; 2025 Alabama #31 of 136; 2025 Texas #32 of 136; 2025 Michigan #40 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #40 of 136; 2025 Houston #48 of 136; 2025 Tulane #61 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 113 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Arizona #1 of 136; 2025 Indiana #2 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #4 of 136; 2025 Texas #5 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #7 of 136; 2025 North Texas #15 of 136; 2025 Miami #17 of 136; 2025 BYU #20 of 136; 2025 Tulane #20 of 136; 2025 Alabama #27 of 136; 2025 Utah #28 of 136; 2025 Virginia #33 of 136; 2025 Oregon #34 of 136; 2025 Houston #45 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #48 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #53 of 136; 2025 USC #59 of 136; 2025 Michigan #59 of 136; 2025 Iowa #66 of 136; 2025 James Madison #70 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #71 of 136; 2025 Georgia #72 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #87 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #108 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #120 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 54 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #38
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 James Madison #2 of 136; 2025 Georgia #4 of 136; 2025 Indiana #5 of 136; 2025 Miami #6 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 136; 2025 BYU #10 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #14 of 136; 2025 Houston #17 of 136; 2025 Virginia #19 of 136; 2025 Alabama #28 of 136; 2025 Iowa #31 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #35 of 136; 2025 Arizona #38 of 136; 2025 Tulane #40 of 136; 2025 Oregon #41 of 136; 2025 Utah #42 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #60 of 136; 2025 USC #71 of 136; 2025 Michigan #74 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #76 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #87 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #95 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #104 of 136; 2025 Texas #111 of 136; 2025 North Texas #114 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 103 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 38.
Returning passingmedian #80
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 136; 2025 Arizona #13 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #21 of 136; 2025 James Madison #25 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #37 of 136; 2025 Michigan #48 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #49 of 136; 2025 Utah #53 of 136; 2025 Houston #59 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #63 of 136; 2025 USC #66 of 136; 2025 Texas #76 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Georgia #83 of 136; 2025 Tulane #85 of 136; 2025 Alabama #88 of 136; 2025 North Texas #89 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #96 of 136; 2025 Miami #98 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #104 of 136; 2025 Oregon #110 of 136; 2025 BYU #112 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #116 of 136; 2025 Indiana #117 of 136; 2025 Virginia #118 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 1 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 80.
Returning receivingmedian #51
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #4 of 136; 2025 Houston #6 of 136; 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Alabama #12 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #27 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #32 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #33 of 136; 2025 Georgia #34 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #37 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Arizona #44 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 North Texas #51 of 136; 2025 USC #54 of 136; 2025 BYU #56 of 136; 2025 Oregon #61 of 136; 2025 Indiana #63 of 136; 2025 Texas #65 of 136; 2025 Virginia #71 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #83 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #86 of 136; 2025 James Madison #92 of 136; 2025 Tulane #122 of 136; 2025 Miami #124 of 136; 2025 Utah #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 70 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 51.
Returning rushingmedian #58
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #2 of 136; 2025 James Madison #4 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #8 of 136; 2025 Houston #9 of 136; 2025 Texas #21 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #24 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #30 of 136; 2025 Georgia #41 of 136; 2025 Alabama #46 of 136; 2025 BYU #53 of 136; 2025 Miami #55 of 136; 2025 Arizona #58 of 136; 2025 Iowa #69 of 136; 2025 Oregon #71 of 136; 2025 North Texas #72 of 136; 2025 Virginia #76 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #82 of 136; 2025 Tulane #83 of 136; 2025 USC #110 of 136; 2025 Indiana #111 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #115 of 136; 2025 Utah #119 of 136; 2025 Michigan #120 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #122 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 61 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 58.
Team talentmedian #29
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia #1 of 136; 2025 Alabama #2 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 136; 2025 Texas #4 of 136; 2025 Oregon #5 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #9 of 136; 2025 Michigan #11 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #14 of 136; 2025 Miami #15 of 136; 2025 USC #17 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #21 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #29 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Iowa #42 of 136; 2025 Utah #44 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #55 of 136; 2025 Virginia #62 of 136; 2025 Houston #66 of 136; 2025 Arizona #67 of 136; 2025 Tulane #68 of 136; 2025 BYU #70 of 136; 2025 Indiana #72 of 136; 2025 North Texas #96 of 136; 2025 James Madison #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 110 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 29.
Offensive EPAmedian #29
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 136; 2025 North Texas #2 of 136; 2025 Utah #3 of 136; 2025 USC #4 of 136; 2025 Indiana #5 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #6 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #11 of 136; 2025 Oregon #12 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #21 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #23 of 136; 2025 Georgia #26 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #29 of 136; 2025 James Madison #31 of 136; 2025 Miami #32 of 136; 2025 BYU #33 of 136; 2025 Alabama #38 of 136; 2025 Tulane #41 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 Texas #57 of 136; 2025 Virginia #61 of 136; 2025 Arizona #69 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #100 of 136; 2025 Houston #101 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 85 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 29.
Defensive EPAmedian #26
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #4 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #5 of 136; 2025 James Madison #6 of 136; 2025 Indiana #7 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #9 of 136; 2025 Miami #12 of 136; 2025 Oregon #13 of 136; 2025 Iowa #18 of 136; 2025 BYU #22 of 136; 2025 Virginia #23 of 136; 2025 Utah #24 of 136; 2025 Arizona #26 of 136; 2025 Alabama #28 of 136; 2025 Georgia #37 of 136; 2025 Texas #40 of 136; 2025 Houston #47 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #49 of 136; 2025 Michigan #52 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #55 of 136; 2025 USC #65 of 136; 2025 Tulane #67 of 136; 2025 North Texas #74 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #96 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #99 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 111 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 26.
Offensive success ratemedian #27
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 North Texas #2 of 136; 2025 Indiana #3 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 136; 2025 Utah #6 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #7 of 136; 2025 USC #8 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #12 of 136; 2025 Oregon #16 of 136; 2025 Georgia #18 of 136; 2025 Miami #20 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #24 of 136; 2025 BYU #27 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #32 of 136; 2025 Michigan #33 of 136; 2025 James Madison #36 of 136; 2025 Tulane #42 of 136; 2025 Iowa #46 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #50 of 136; 2025 Alabama #56 of 136; 2025 Arizona #66 of 136; 2025 Houston #79 of 136; 2025 Virginia #80 of 136; 2025 Texas #94 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #97 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 70 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 27.
Defensive success ratemedian #32
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 James Madison #1 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #2 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #3 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #5 of 136; 2025 Indiana #6 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #12 of 136; 2025 Miami #13 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #14 of 136; 2025 Oregon #15 of 136; 2025 Virginia #18 of 136; 2025 Alabama #22 of 136; 2025 Arizona #27 of 136; 2025 Utah #32 of 136; 2025 BYU #33 of 136; 2025 Iowa #35 of 136; 2025 Georgia #37 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #39 of 136; 2025 Texas #43 of 136; 2025 Houston #63 of 136; 2025 Michigan #70 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #73 of 136; 2025 North Texas #77 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #102 of 136; 2025 Tulane #110 of 136; 2025 USC #117 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 105 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 32.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #60
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Notre Dame #1 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 136; 2025 Texas #13 of 136; 2025 Oregon #20 of 136; 2025 USC #21 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #31 of 136; 2025 North Texas #34 of 136; 2025 James Madison #37 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #45 of 136; 2025 Virginia #46 of 136; 2025 Alabama #48 of 136; 2025 Arizona #51 of 136; 2025 Utah #60 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #65 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #70 of 136; 2025 Indiana #74 of 136; 2025 Houston #78 of 136; 2025 Tulane #94 of 136; 2025 BYU #106 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #115 of 136; 2025 Miami #120 of 136; 2025 Georgia #123 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #124 of 136; 2025 Michigan #129 of 136; 2025 Iowa #134 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 79 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 60.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #55
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Iowa #3 of 136; 2025 Houston #7 of 136; 2025 Michigan #8 of 136; 2025 Georgia #15 of 136; 2025 USC #20 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #21 of 136; 2025 Texas #26 of 136; 2025 Tulane #29 of 136; 2025 Arizona #40 of 136; 2025 Virginia #42 of 136; 2025 BYU #43 of 136; 2025 North Texas #55 of 136; 2025 Oregon #57 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #64 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #65 of 136; 2025 Alabama #67 of 136; 2025 Miami #77 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #95 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #105 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #113 of 136; 2025 Indiana #116 of 136; 2025 Utah #118 of 136; 2025 James Madison #132 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #135 of 136. Marked: 2025 Middle Tennessee, ranked 88 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 55.