Metrics

Mississippi StateBulldogs

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2019

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019Mississippi State670 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 (of 130 teams · 400.1 yds/g · 5,201 yards)#74 (of 130 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 359 points)#73 (of 130 teams · 399.0 yds/g allowed · 5,187 yards)#74 (of 130 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#79 (of 130 teams · -1.2 /g · -16 on the season)#60 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.08 /g)#28 (of 130 teams · 31:40 /g · 6h 52m on the season)#101 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning)#18 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing production returning)#23 (of 130 teams · 732.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 130 teams · 0.247 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 130 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#91 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 130 teams · 1.231 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 130 teams · 1.278 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 SEC teams in 20191 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#70 (Total offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#124. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#74 (Scoring offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#125. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Total defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #3–#110. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Scoring defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#124. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Point margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #3–#122. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Turnover margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #3–#100. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#67 (Possession: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #11–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#57 (Returning passing: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#123. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Returning receiving: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #5–#123. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#61 (Returning rushing: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #20–#111. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#16 (Team talent: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#52. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#119. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #2–#124. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#125. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #3–#119. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #10–#121. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#58 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #13–#124. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)
2019Alabama1125 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Michigan)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 510.8 yds/g · 6,640 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 47.2 pts/g · 614 points)#21 (of 130 teams · 324.4 yds/g allowed · 4,217 yards)#13 (of 130 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +28.6 /g · +372 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18 on the season · 28 taken, 10 given · +1.38 /g)#67 (of 130 teams · 29:59 /g · 6h 30m on the season)#59 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#102 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 985.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.400 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 53% of plays successful)#33 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.335 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 130 teams · 1.109 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Arkansas2100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#111 (of 130 teams · 340.1 yds/g · 4,081 yards)#110 (of 130 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 257 points)#110 (of 130 teams · 450.7 yds/g allowed · 5,408 yards)#124 (of 130 teams · 36.8 pts/g allowed · 442 points)#122 (of 130 teams · -15.4 /g · -185 on the season)#97 (of 130 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.42 /g)#111 (of 130 teams · 27:49 /g · 5h 34m on the season)#115 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#57 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#26 (of 130 teams · 707.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#116 (of 130 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#124 (of 130 teams · 0.289 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#119 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 130 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 130 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Auburn944 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon, #13 Alabama)#64 (of 130 teams · 405.8 yds/g · 5,275 yards)#28 (of 130 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#28 (of 130 teams · 337.0 yds/g allowed · 4,381 yards)#17 (of 130 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 254 points)#21 (of 130 teams · +13.7 /g · +178 on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#87 (of 130 teams · 29:05 /g · 6h 18m on the season)#122 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#96 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#33 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning)#13 (of 130 teams · 843.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 130 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 130 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#14 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 130 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 130 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Florida1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #12 Auburn · postseason: #24 Virginia)#44 (of 130 teams · 430.5 yds/g · 5,597 yards)#28 (of 130 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 304.9 yds/g allowed · 3,963 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 201 points)#12 (of 130 teams · +17.8 /g · +231 on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 23 taken, 18 given · +0.38 /g)#62 (of 130 teams · 30:10 /g · 6h 32m on the season)#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#52 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#15 (of 130 teams · 835.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 130 teams · 0.256 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 130 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#22 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 130 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 130 teams · 1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Georgia1225 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida · postseason: #7 Baylor)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #15 Notre Dame · postseason: #7 Baylor)#61 (of 130 teams · 408.1 yds/g · 5,713 yards)#50 (of 130 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 431 points)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 275.8 yds/g allowed · 3,861 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 176 points)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.2 /g · +255 on the season)#49 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.21 /g)#18 (of 130 teams · 32:16 /g · 7h 32m on the season)#57 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#118 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's receiving production returning)#73 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 960.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 130 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#13 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 130 teams · 1.105 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 130 teams · 1.096 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Kentucky850 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#76 (of 130 teams · 392.5 yds/g · 5,102 yards)#76 (of 130 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 353 points)#20 (of 130 teams · 321.9 yds/g allowed · 4,185 yards)#14 (of 130 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 251 points)#34 (of 130 teams · +7.8 /g · +102 on the season)#75 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 18 taken, 20 given · -0.15 /g)#20 (of 130 teams · 32:09 /g · 6h 58m on the season)#44 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's passing production returning)#89 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#106 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 672.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 130 teams · 0.182 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 130 teams · 0.114 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#43 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 130 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 130 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019LSU1504 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #13 Alabama · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 568.4 yds/g · 8,526 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 48.4 pts/g · 726 points)#31 (of 130 teams · 343.5 yds/g allowed · 5,153 yards)#32 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 328 points)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +26.5 /g · +398 on the season)#15 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 22 taken, 12 given · +0.67 /g)#60 (of 130 teams · 30:13 /g · 7h 33m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#28 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#87 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 906.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.413 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 130 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 56% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 130 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 130 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Missouri660 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#93 (of 130 teams · 374.3 yds/g · 4,491 yards)#93 (of 130 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 304 points)#14 (of 130 teams · 312.0 yds/g allowed · 3,744 yards)#16 (of 130 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 233 points)#45 (of 130 teams · +5.9 /g · +71 on the season)#55 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.08 /g)#69 (of 130 teams · 29:54 /g · 5h 59m on the season)#112 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#35 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#64 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#40 (of 130 teams · 642.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 130 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 130 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 130 teams · 1.275 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Ole Miss481 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 130 teams · 445.0 yds/g · 5,340 yards)#82 (of 130 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 319 points)#86 (of 130 teams · 416.8 yds/g allowed · 5,001 yards)#59 (of 130 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#68 (of 130 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#50 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 16 taken, 14 given · +0.17 /g)#105 (of 130 teams · 28:14 /g · 5h 39m on the season)#108 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#123 (of 130 teams · 27% of last season's receiving production returning)#50 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 717.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 130 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 130 teams · 0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#83 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 130 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 130 teams · 1.229 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019South Carolina480 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Georgia)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Georgia)#96 (of 130 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 4,463 yards)#104 (of 130 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 269 points)#67 (of 130 teams · 393.3 yds/g allowed · 4,719 yards)#53 (of 130 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 313 points)#93 (of 130 teams · -3.7 /g · -44 on the season)#43 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 17 taken, 14 given · +0.25 /g)#117 (of 130 teams · 27:01 /g · 5h 24m on the season)#51 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#32 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning)#21 (of 130 teams · 762.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 130 teams · 0.071 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 130 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#51 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 130 teams · 1.116 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 130 teams · 1.176 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Tennessee852 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#100 (of 130 teams · 365.5 yds/g · 4,752 yards)#98 (of 130 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 314 points)#23 (of 130 teams · 334.5 yds/g allowed · 4,348 yards)#29 (of 130 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#57 (of 130 teams · +2.5 /g · +32 on the season)#70 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g)#79 (of 130 teams · 29:22 /g · 6h 22m on the season)#56 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#20 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's rushing production returning)#16 (of 130 teams · 830.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 130 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 130 teams · 0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#50 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 130 teams · 1.241 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 130 teams · 1.118 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Texas A&M851 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 Oklahoma State)#72 (of 130 teams · 394.5 yds/g · 5,129 yards)#62 (of 130 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#29 (of 130 teams · 340.2 yds/g allowed · 4,423 yards)#37 (of 130 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 293 points)#40 (of 130 teams · +7.0 /g · +91 on the season)#100 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.46 /g)#11 (of 130 teams · 33:07 /g · 7h 10m on the season)#40 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's receiving production returning)#109 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing production returning)#12 (of 130 teams · 848.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 130 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 130 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#36 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#121 (of 130 teams · 1.095 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 130 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Vanderbilt390 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#124 (of 130 teams · 296.7 yds/g · 3,560 yards)#125 (of 130 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 198 points)#100 (of 130 teams · 436.6 yds/g allowed · 5,239 yards)#95 (of 130 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 381 points)#121 (of 130 teams · -15.3 /g · -183 on the season)#81 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 11 taken, 13 given · -0.17 /g)#83 (of 130 teams · 29:16 /g · 5h 51m on the season)#123 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#13 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's receiving production returning)#61 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#52 (of 130 teams · 605.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 130 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 130 teams · 0.209 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#125 (of 130 teams · 36% of plays successful)#113 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 130 teams · 1.211 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 130 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20192019 Mississippi StateSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #70
Total offense. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #6 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #26 of 130; 2019 Florida #44 of 130; 2019 Georgia #61 of 130; 2019 Auburn #64 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #72 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #76 of 130; 2019 Missouri #93 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #96 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #100 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #111 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 70 of 130. SEC median rank 70.
Scoring offensemedian #74
Scoring offense. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #2 of 130; 2019 Auburn #28 of 130; 2019 Florida #28 of 130; 2019 Georgia #50 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #62 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #76 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #82 of 130; 2019 Missouri #93 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #98 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #104 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #110 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #125 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 74 of 130. SEC median rank 74.
Total defensemedian #28
Total defense. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Georgia #3 of 130; 2019 Florida #9 of 130; 2019 Missouri #14 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #20 of 130; 2019 Alabama #21 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #23 of 130; 2019 Auburn #28 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #29 of 130; 2019 LSU #31 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #67 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #86 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #100 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #110 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 73 of 130. SEC median rank 28.
Scoring defensemedian #29
Scoring defense. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Georgia #1 of 130; 2019 Florida #7 of 130; 2019 Alabama #13 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #14 of 130; 2019 Missouri #16 of 130; 2019 Auburn #17 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #29 of 130; 2019 LSU #32 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #37 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #53 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #59 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #95 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 74 of 130. SEC median rank 29.
Point marginmedian #40
Point margin. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #3 of 130; 2019 LSU #4 of 130; 2019 Georgia #10 of 130; 2019 Florida #12 of 130; 2019 Auburn #21 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #40 of 130; 2019 Missouri #45 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #57 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #68 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #93 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #121 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #122 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 79 of 130. SEC median rank 40.
Turnover marginmedian #50
Turnover margin. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #3 of 130; 2019 LSU #15 of 130; 2019 Auburn #31 of 130; 2019 Florida #31 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #43 of 130; 2019 Georgia #49 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #50 of 130; 2019 Missouri #55 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #70 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #75 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #81 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #97 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #100 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 60 of 130. SEC median rank 50.
Possessionmedian #67
Possession. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Texas A&M #11 of 130; 2019 Georgia #18 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #20 of 130; 2019 LSU #60 of 130; 2019 Florida #62 of 130; 2019 Alabama #67 of 130; 2019 Missouri #69 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #79 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #83 of 130; 2019 Auburn #87 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #105 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #111 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #117 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 28 of 130. SEC median rank 67.
Returning passingmedian #57
Returning passing. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Florida #16 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #40 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #44 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #51 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #56 of 130; 2019 Georgia #57 of 130; 2019 Alabama #59 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #108 of 130; 2019 Missouri #112 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #115 of 130; 2019 Auburn #122 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #123 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 101 of 130. SEC median rank 57.
Returning receivingmedian #34
Returning receiving. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Tennessee #5 of 130; 2019 Florida #7 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #13 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #25 of 130; 2019 LSU #28 of 130; 2019 Alabama #34 of 130; 2019 Missouri #35 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #37 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #55 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #89 of 130; 2019 Auburn #96 of 130; 2019 Georgia #118 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #123 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 18 of 130. SEC median rank 34.
Returning rushingmedian #61
Returning rushing. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Tennessee #20 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #32 of 130; 2019 Auburn #33 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #50 of 130; 2019 Florida #52 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #57 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #61 of 130; 2019 Missouri #64 of 130; 2019 Georgia #73 of 130; 2019 LSU #87 of 130; 2019 Alabama #102 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #106 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #109 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 111 of 130. SEC median rank 61.
Team talentmedian #16
Team talent. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #1 of 130; 2019 Georgia #3 of 130; 2019 LSU #5 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #12 of 130; 2019 Auburn #13 of 130; 2019 Florida #15 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #16 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #21 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #25 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #26 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2019 Missouri #40 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #52 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 23 of 130. SEC median rank 16.
Offensive EPAmedian #62
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #3 of 130; 2019 Florida #21 of 130; 2019 Auburn #58 of 130; 2019 Georgia #59 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #62 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #66 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #72 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #91 of 130; 2019 Missouri #98 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #110 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #116 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 23 of 130. SEC median rank 62.
Defensive EPAmedian #37
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #2 of 130; 2019 Georgia #6 of 130; 2019 Missouri #7 of 130; 2019 Auburn #12 of 130; 2019 Florida #19 of 130; 2019 LSU #31 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #37 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #41 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #44 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #54 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #83 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #95 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 76 of 130. SEC median rank 37.
Offensive success ratemedian #41
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #4 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #18 of 130; 2019 Georgia #22 of 130; 2019 Auburn #40 of 130; 2019 Florida #41 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #76 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #86 of 130; 2019 Missouri #88 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #91 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #93 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #113 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #125 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 34 of 130. SEC median rank 41.
Defensive success ratemedian #36
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Missouri #3 of 130; 2019 LSU #10 of 130; 2019 Georgia #13 of 130; 2019 Auburn #14 of 130; 2019 Florida #22 of 130; 2019 Alabama #33 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #36 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #43 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #50 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #51 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #83 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #113 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 91 of 130. SEC median rank 36.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #50
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #10 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #15 of 130; 2019 Florida #16 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #27 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2019 LSU #49 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #50 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #64 of 130; 2019 Auburn #110 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #115 of 130; 2019 Georgia #116 of 130; 2019 Missouri #118 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #121 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 54 of 130. SEC median rank 50.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #58
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Georgia #13 of 130; 2019 Alabama #19 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #21 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #41 of 130; 2019 Florida #51 of 130; 2019 Auburn #55 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #58 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #59 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #75 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #84 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #87 of 130; 2019 Missouri #102 of 130; 2019 LSU #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Mississippi State, ranked 103 of 130. SEC median rank 58.