Metrics

NebraskaCornhuskers

Season
Current

Big Ten

Big Ten, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Nebraska670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Michigan State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Michigan State)#34 (of 128 teams · 446.9 yds/g · 5,810 yards)#43 (of 128 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points)#64 (of 128 teams · 400.4 yds/g allowed · 5,205 yards)#76 (of 128 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 362 points)#52 (of 128 teams · +5.0 /g · +65 on the season)#117 (of 128 teams · -12 on the season · 15 taken, 27 given · -0.92 /g)#20 (of 128 teams · 32:22 /g · 7h 01m on the season)#32 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#56 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#87 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing production returning)#24 (of 128 teams · 699.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 128 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 128 teams · 0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#35 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 128 teams · 1.252 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 128 teams · 1.360 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#79 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #14–#116. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#78 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #24–#114. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #2–#121. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#26 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #1–#117. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#72 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #2–#107. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #4–#126. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#64 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #5–#111. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#41 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #15–#108. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#84 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #24–#120. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#88 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #15–#125. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#46 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #3–#64. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#72 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #31–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #3–#113. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#57 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #9–#120. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #5–#100. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#87 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #10–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #12–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)
2015Illinois570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#88 (of 128 teams · 372.7 yds/g · 4,472 yards)#103 (of 128 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 272 points)#30 (of 128 teams · 350.8 yds/g allowed · 4,210 yards)#37 (of 128 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 279 points)#78 (of 128 teams · -0.6 /g · -7 on the season)#37 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 21 taken, 17 given · +0.33 /g)#66 (of 128 teams · 29:42 /g · 5h 56m on the season)#78 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's receiving production returning)#104 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#60 (of 128 teams · 531.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 128 teams · 0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 128 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#37 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 128 teams · 1.133 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 128 teams · 1.167 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Indiana670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#14 (of 128 teams · 504.3 yds/g · 6,556 yards)#24 (of 128 teams · 36.5 pts/g · 475 points)#121 (of 128 teams · 509.5 yds/g allowed · 6,623 yards)#117 (of 128 teams · 37.6 pts/g allowed · 489 points)#81 (of 128 teams · -1.1 /g · -14 on the season)#23 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.62 /g)#79 (of 128 teams · 29:09 /g · 6h 19m on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#119 (of 128 teams · 25% of last season's receiving production returning)#122 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing production returning)#54 (of 128 teams · 559.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 128 teams · 0.215 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 128 teams · 0.209 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#82 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 128 teams · 1.199 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 128 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Iowa1220 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Northwestern)#72 (of 128 teams · 386.1 yds/g · 5,406 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 433 points)#22 (of 128 teams · 341.0 yds/g allowed · 4,774 yards)#19 (of 128 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#31 (of 128 teams · +10.6 /g · +148 on the season)#11 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 27 taken, 16 given · +0.79 /g)#31 (of 128 teams · 31:38 /g · 7h 23m on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning)#108 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning)#51 (of 128 teams · 573.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 128 teams · 0.195 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 128 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#50 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 128 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 128 teams · 1.113 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Maryland390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#87 (of 128 teams · 375.0 yds/g · 4,500 yards)#95 (of 128 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 296 points)#91 (of 128 teams · 421.2 yds/g allowed · 5,054 yards)#103 (of 128 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 413 points)#104 (of 128 teams · -9.8 /g · -117 on the season)#126 (of 128 teams · -18 on the season · 18 taken, 36 given · -1.50 /g)#111 (of 128 teams · 27:36 /g · 5h 31m on the season)#104 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing production returning)#111 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving production returning)#80 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's rushing production returning)#46 (of 128 teams · 603.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 128 teams · 0.060 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 128 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#114 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#77 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 128 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Michigan1032 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #13 Northwestern · postseason: #19 Florida)#69 (of 128 teams · 395.9 yds/g · 5,147 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 408 points)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 280.7 yds/g allowed · 3,649 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#15 (of 128 teams · +15.0 /g · +195 on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 12 taken, 16 given · -0.31 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:28 /g · 7h 15m on the season)#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#89 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#67 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 851.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 128 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 128 teams · 1.138 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 128 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Michigan State1220 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State, #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#73 (of 128 teams · 385.5 yds/g · 5,397 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 417 points)#26 (of 128 teams · 349.9 yds/g allowed · 4,898 yards)#25 (of 128 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#43 (of 128 teams · +8.1 /g · +113 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +14 on the season · 28 taken, 14 given · +1.00 /g)#14 (of 128 teams · 32:52 /g · 7h 40m on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#118 (of 128 teams · 31% of last season's rushing production returning)#23 (of 128 teams · 715.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 128 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 128 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#56 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 128 teams · 1.255 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 128 teams · 1.219 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Minnesota670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#103 (of 128 teams · 358.9 yds/g · 4,666 yards)#106 (of 128 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 292 points)#24 (of 128 teams · 345.9 yds/g allowed · 4,497 yards)#45 (of 128 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 327 points)#86 (of 128 teams · -2.7 /g · -35 on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.31 /g)#84 (of 128 teams · 29:00 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#41 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#120 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's receiving production returning)#114 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing production returning)#64 (of 128 teams · 516.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 128 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 128 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#70 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 128 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 128 teams · 1.072 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Northwestern1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)#116 (of 128 teams · 327.1 yds/g · 4,252 yards)#114 (of 128 teams · 19.5 pts/g · 254 points)#13 (of 128 teams · 318.9 yds/g allowed · 4,146 yards)#12 (of 128 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#74 (of 128 teams · +0.9 /g · +12 on the season)#61 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#64 (of 128 teams · 29:48 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#102 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#84 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning)#48 (of 128 teams · 595.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 128 teams · 0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful)#13 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 128 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 128 teams · 1.140 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Ohio State1214 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Notre Dame)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan · postseason: #8 Notre Dame)#41 (of 128 teams · 434.1 yds/g · 5,643 yards)#28 (of 128 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 464 points)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 311.3 yds/g allowed · 4,047 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 196 points)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +20.6 /g · +268 on the season)#48 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 21 taken, 18 given · +0.23 /g)#77 (of 128 teams · 29:16 /g · 6h 20m on the season)#38 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 907.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.227 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 128 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 128 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 128 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Penn State760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#105 (of 128 teams · 348.6 yds/g · 4,532 yards)#101 (of 128 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 301 points)#14 (of 128 teams · 324.5 yds/g allowed · 4,218 yards)#26 (of 128 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#72 (of 128 teams · +1.3 /g · +17 on the season)#39 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.31 /g)#71 (of 128 teams · 29:30 /g · 6h 23m on the season)#41 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#24 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving production returning)#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing production returning)#21 (of 128 teams · 732.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 128 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 128 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 128 teams · 38% of plays successful)#20 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 128 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 128 teams · 1.186 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Purdue2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#95 (of 128 teams · 368.6 yds/g · 4,423 yards)#92 (of 128 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 301 points)#111 (of 128 teams · 459.0 yds/g allowed · 5,508 yards)#112 (of 128 teams · 36.5 pts/g allowed · 438 points)#107 (of 128 teams · -11.4 /g · -137 on the season)#100 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.42 /g)#110 (of 128 teams · 27:41 /g · 5h 32m on the season)#73 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's passing production returning)#95 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning)#125 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing production returning)#59 (of 128 teams · 534.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 128 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 128 teams · 0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#98 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#95 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 128 teams · 1.133 average PPA on successful plays)#78 (of 128 teams · 1.218 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Rutgers480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#83 (of 128 teams · 377.0 yds/g · 4,524 yards)#78 (of 128 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 325 points)#112 (of 128 teams · 462.0 yds/g allowed · 5,544 yards)#104 (of 128 teams · 34.9 pts/g allowed · 419 points)#102 (of 128 teams · -7.8 /g · -94 on the season)#85 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 16 taken, 18 given · -0.17 /g)#39 (of 128 teams · 31:16 /g · 6h 15m on the season)#108 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing production returning)#31 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#21 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's rushing production returning)#47 (of 128 teams · 602.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 128 teams · 0.164 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 128 teams · 0.238 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#100 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 128 teams · 1.126 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 128 teams · 1.359 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Wisconsin1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 USC)#79 (of 128 teams · 378.6 yds/g · 4,922 yards)#81 (of 128 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 348 points)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 268.5 yds/g allowed · 3,491 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 13.7 pts/g allowed · 178 points)#23 (of 128 teams · +13.1 /g · +170 on the season)#48 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 21 taken, 18 given · +0.23 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:52 /g · 7h 20m on the season)#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#58 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#107 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#37 (of 128 teams · 635.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 128 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 128 teams · 0.021 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 128 teams · 1.091 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 128 teams · 1.166 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20152015 NebraskaBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #79
Total offense. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Indiana #14 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #41 of 128; 2015 Michigan #69 of 128; 2015 Iowa #72 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #73 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #79 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #83 of 128; 2015 Maryland #87 of 128; 2015 Illinois #88 of 128; 2015 Purdue #95 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #103 of 128; 2015 Penn State #105 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #116 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 34 of 128. Big Ten median rank 79.
Scoring offensemedian #78
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Indiana #24 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #28 of 128; 2015 Michigan #50 of 128; 2015 Iowa #54 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #60 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #78 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #81 of 128; 2015 Purdue #92 of 128; 2015 Maryland #95 of 128; 2015 Penn State #101 of 128; 2015 Illinois #103 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #106 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #114 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 43 of 128. Big Ten median rank 78.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Wisconsin #2 of 128; 2015 Michigan #4 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #9 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #13 of 128; 2015 Penn State #14 of 128; 2015 Iowa #22 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #24 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #26 of 128; 2015 Illinois #30 of 128; 2015 Maryland #91 of 128; 2015 Purdue #111 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #112 of 128; 2015 Indiana #121 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 64 of 128. Big Ten median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #26
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Wisconsin #1 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #2 of 128; 2015 Michigan #6 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #12 of 128; 2015 Iowa #19 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #25 of 128; 2015 Penn State #26 of 128; 2015 Illinois #37 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #45 of 128; 2015 Maryland #103 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #104 of 128; 2015 Purdue #112 of 128; 2015 Indiana #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 76 of 128. Big Ten median rank 26.
Point marginmedian #72
Point margin. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #2 of 128; 2015 Michigan #15 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #23 of 128; 2015 Iowa #31 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #43 of 128; 2015 Penn State #72 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #74 of 128; 2015 Illinois #78 of 128; 2015 Indiana #81 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #86 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #102 of 128; 2015 Maryland #104 of 128; 2015 Purdue #107 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 52 of 128. Big Ten median rank 72.
Turnover marginmedian #48
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Michigan State #4 of 128; 2015 Iowa #11 of 128; 2015 Indiana #23 of 128; 2015 Illinois #37 of 128; 2015 Penn State #39 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #48 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #48 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #61 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #85 of 128; 2015 Michigan #92 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #92 of 128; 2015 Purdue #100 of 128; 2015 Maryland #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 117 of 128. Big Ten median rank 48.
Possessionmedian #64
Possession. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Wisconsin #5 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #14 of 128; 2015 Iowa #31 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #39 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #64 of 128; 2015 Illinois #66 of 128; 2015 Penn State #71 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #77 of 128; 2015 Indiana #79 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #84 of 128; 2015 Purdue #110 of 128; 2015 Maryland #111 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 20 of 128. Big Ten median rank 64.
Returning passingmedian #41
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Indiana #15 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #21 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #25 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #38 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #41 of 128; 2015 Penn State #41 of 128; 2015 Purdue #73 of 128; 2015 Illinois #78 of 128; 2015 Iowa #92 of 128; 2015 Michigan #99 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #102 of 128; 2015 Maryland #104 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #108 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 32 of 128. Big Ten median rank 41.
Returning receivingmedian #84
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Penn State #24 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #31 of 128; 2015 Illinois #34 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #36 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #58 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #84 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #86 of 128; 2015 Michigan #89 of 128; 2015 Iowa #94 of 128; 2015 Purdue #95 of 128; 2015 Maryland #111 of 128; 2015 Indiana #119 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 56 of 128. Big Ten median rank 84.
Returning rushingmedian #88
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #15 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #21 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #55 of 128; 2015 Michigan #67 of 128; 2015 Maryland #80 of 128; 2015 Penn State #88 of 128; 2015 Illinois #104 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #107 of 128; 2015 Iowa #108 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #114 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #118 of 128; 2015 Indiana #122 of 128; 2015 Purdue #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 87 of 128. Big Ten median rank 88.
Team talentmedian #46
Team talent. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Penn State #21 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #23 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2015 Maryland #46 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #47 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #48 of 128; 2015 Iowa #51 of 128; 2015 Indiana #54 of 128; 2015 Purdue #59 of 128; 2015 Illinois #60 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #64 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 24 of 128. Big Ten median rank 46.
Offensive EPAmedian #72
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #31 of 128; 2015 Indiana #36 of 128; 2015 Iowa #40 of 128; 2015 Michigan #47 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #59 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #72 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #88 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #96 of 128; 2015 Penn State #102 of 128; 2015 Purdue #105 of 128; 2015 Maryland #109 of 128; 2015 Illinois #111 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #117 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 39 of 128. Big Ten median rank 72.
Defensive EPAmedian #28
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Northwestern #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #12 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #14 of 128; 2015 Iowa #21 of 128; 2015 Illinois #22 of 128; 2015 Penn State #28 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #46 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 128; 2015 Maryland #81 of 128; 2015 Purdue #97 of 128; 2015 Indiana #106 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #113 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 62 of 128. Big Ten median rank 28.
Offensive success ratemedian #57
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #9 of 128; 2015 Indiana #36 of 128; 2015 Michigan #38 of 128; 2015 Iowa #52 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #56 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #57 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #74 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #94 of 128; 2015 Purdue #98 of 128; 2015 Illinois #109 of 128; 2015 Penn State #112 of 128; 2015 Maryland #114 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 44 of 128. Big Ten median rank 57.
Defensive success ratemedian #37
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Wisconsin #5 of 128; 2015 Michigan #6 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #8 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #13 of 128; 2015 Penn State #20 of 128; 2015 Illinois #37 of 128; 2015 Iowa #50 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #56 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #70 of 128; 2015 Maryland #77 of 128; 2015 Indiana #82 of 128; 2015 Purdue #95 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #100 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 35 of 128. Big Ten median rank 37.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #87
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Maryland #10 of 128; 2015 Penn State #21 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #31 of 128; 2015 Iowa #54 of 128; 2015 Indiana #72 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #87 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #88 of 128; 2015 Michigan #96 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #97 of 128; 2015 Illinois #98 of 128; 2015 Purdue #99 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #104 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #118 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 35 of 128. Big Ten median rank 87.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #63
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Minnesota #12 of 128; 2015 Iowa #25 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #36 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #46 of 128; 2015 Illinois #47 of 128; 2015 Penn State #59 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #63 of 128; 2015 Maryland #75 of 128; 2015 Purdue #78 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #79 of 128; 2015 Michigan #99 of 128; 2015 Indiana #112 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #116 of 128. Marked: 2015 Nebraska, ranked 117 of 128. Big Ten median rank 63.