THIRD AND DATA

New Haven game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 28vs Marist22–21 W754185.637–10722–38–311198–181–116–6935:4835%20%
Sep 5vs Stonehill3–21 L572955.222–12217–35–173140–110–224–3621:2938%43%
Sep 12at South Dakota State14–57 L592364.034–1509–25–86104–150–124–2626:1720%45%
Sep 19vs Brown10–17 L742783.827–6327–47–215179–190–018–9132:0635%41%
Sep 26at Merrimack10–17 L501703.422–4211–28–128102–110–121–522:0422%42%
Oct 3at Austin Peay17–42 L723264.533–9925–39–227184–151–108–7538:1236%32%
Oct 17at Robert Morris26–15 W642393.742–15512–22–84154–151–209–7135:0633%23%
Oct 24at Central Connecticut20–42 L673064.621–225–46–304195–130–237–6528:2741%49%
Oct 31vs Duquesne14–41 L582554.421–5920–37–196135–130–035–4925:1236%43%
Season9 games2–75762,5234.4259–799168–317–1,72413541–1303–101452–4874:24:4133%38%

Success rate

New Haven on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game33.4% · 38.4%
35
20
38
43
20
45
35
41
22
42
36
32
33
23
41
49
36
43
Marist
Stonehill
@ South Dakota State
Brown
@ Merrimack
@ Austin Peay
@ Robert Morris
@ Central Connecticut
Duquesne
Long Island University
@ Wagner
@ Mercyhurst

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: New Haven on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is New Haven's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:New Haven offense 33% (189 of 566)Opponent offense / New Haven defense 38% (208 of 542)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Marist: opponent offense 20% of 46Marist: New Haven offense 35% of 72Stonehill: opponent offense 43% of 60Stonehill: New Haven offense 38% of 58South Dakota State: opponent offense 45% of 67South Dakota State: New Haven offense 20% of 56Brown: opponent offense 41% of 69Brown: New Haven offense 35% of 74Merrimack: opponent offense 42% of 64Merrimack: New Haven offense 22% of 49Austin Peay: opponent offense 32% of 44Austin Peay: New Haven offense 36% of 70Robert Morris: opponent offense 23% of 62Robert Morris: New Haven offense 33% of 63Central Connecticut: opponent offense 49% of 61Central Connecticut: New Haven offense 41% of 66Duquesne: opponent offense 43% of 69Duquesne: New Haven offense 36% of 58
New Haven offenseOpponent offense (New Haven defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Marist

22–21 W · 72 plays to 46
New Haven offense 35% (25/72)Marist offense 20% (9/46)

vs Stonehill

3–21 L · 58 plays to 60
New Haven offense 38% (22/58)Stonehill offense 43% (26/60)

at South Dakota State

14–57 L · 56 plays to 67
New Haven offense 20% (11/56)South Dakota St. offense 45% (30/67)

vs Brown

10–17 L · 74 plays to 69
New Haven offense 35% (26/74)Brown offense 41% (28/69)

at Merrimack

10–17 L · 49 plays to 64
New Haven offense 22% (11/49)Merrimack offense 42% (27/64)

at Austin Peay

17–42 L · 70 plays to 44
New Haven offense 36% (25/70)Austin Peay offense 32% (14/44)

at Robert Morris

26–15 W · 63 plays to 62
New Haven offense 33% (21/63)Robert Morris offense 23% (14/62)

at Central Connecticut

20–42 L · 66 plays to 61
New Haven offense 41% (27/66)Central Conn. offense 49% (30/61)

vs Duquesne

14–41 L · 58 plays to 69
New Haven offense 36% (21/58)Duquesne offense 43% (30/69)