THIRD AND DATA

Nicholls game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 27vs Mississippi Valley State44–10 W825156.341–16825–41–347267–163–427–6833:4546%29%
Sep 5at Kansas State3–71 L581222.139–927–19–3094–161–112–2626:1722%65%
Sep 12vs UT Rio Grande Valley31–28 W753224.339–8721–36–235218–172–221–530:1635%39%
Sep 19at Sam Houston0–59 L591632.836–1247–23–39101–150–037–6624:2922%57%
Sep 26vs Lamar18–49 L703294.736–13818–34–191193–152–4012–11129:1236%44%
Oct 3at Houston Christian2–16 L753354.538–14921–37–186184–151–625–3529:3033%35%
Oct 17vs Stephen F. Austin0–56 L622273.736–12113–26–106154–150–3111–10230:0131%57%
Oct 24at Northwestern State31–27 W673605.441–20213–26–158187–172–204–2826:0732%46%
Oct 31at McNeese3–16 L732944.056–2613–17–33143–160–437–6330:1424%23%
Season9 games3–66212,6674.3362–1342128–259–1,32515041–14211–261456–5044:19:5132%45%

Success rate

Nicholls on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game31.9% · 44.8%
46
29
22
65
35
39
22
57
36
44
33
35
31
57
32
46
24
23
Mississippi Valley State
@ Kansas State
UT Rio Grande Valley
@ Sam Houston
Lamar
@ Houston Christian
Stephen F. Austin
@ Northwestern State
@ McNeese
East Texas A&M
@ Incarnate Word
SE Louisiana

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 22.4%, defense allows 64.8%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Nicholls on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Nicholls's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Nicholls offense 32% (197 of 618)Opponent offense / Nicholls defense 45% (274 of 611)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Mississippi Valley State: opponent offense 29% of 52Mississippi Valley State: Nicholls offense 46% of 81Kansas State: opponent offense 65% of 71Kansas State: Nicholls offense 22% of 58UT Rio Grande Valley: opponent offense 39% of 80UT Rio Grande Valley: Nicholls offense 35% of 74Sam Houston: opponent offense 57% of 72Sam Houston: Nicholls offense 22% of 59Lamar: opponent offense 44% of 57Lamar: Nicholls offense 36% of 69Houston Christian: opponent offense 35% of 63Houston Christian: Nicholls offense 33% of 75Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 57% of 72Stephen F. Austin: Nicholls offense 31% of 62Northwestern State: opponent offense 46% of 84Northwestern State: Nicholls offense 32% of 66McNeese: opponent offense 23% of 60McNeese: Nicholls offense 24% of 74
Nicholls offenseOpponent offense (Nicholls defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Mississippi Valley State

44–10 W · 81 plays to 52
Nicholls offense 46% (37/81)Miss. Valley St. offense 29% (15/52)

at Kansas State

3–71 L · 58 plays to 71
Nicholls offense 22% (13/58)Kansas State offense 65% (46/71)

vs UT Rio Grande Valley

31–28 W · 74 plays to 80
Nicholls offense 35% (26/74)UT Rio Grande offense 39% (31/80)

at Sam Houston

0–59 L · 59 plays to 72
Nicholls offense 22% (13/59)Sam Houston offense 57% (41/72)

vs Lamar

18–49 L · 69 plays to 57
Nicholls offense 36% (25/69)Lamar offense 44% (25/57)

at Houston Christian

2–16 L · 75 plays to 63
Nicholls offense 33% (25/75)HCU offense 35% (22/63)

vs Stephen F. Austin

0–56 L · 62 plays to 72
Nicholls offense 31% (19/62)SFA offense 57% (41/72)

at Northwestern State

31–27 W · 66 plays to 84
Nicholls offense 32% (21/66)Northwestern St. offense 46% (39/84)

at McNeese

3–16 L · 74 plays to 60
Nicholls offense 24% (18/74)McNeese offense 23% (14/60)