THIRD AND DATA

North Carolina Central game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29at Texas Southern30–42 L733214.439–19016–34–131255–140–013–2533:1642%47%
Sep 5vs Elizabeth City State27–6 W613265.343–16612–18–160205–111–229–9030:4345%29%
Sep 12vs North Carolina A&T30–22 W603696.241–22313–19–146184–120–105–5033:1738%35%
Sep 19at Gardner-Webb20–44 L462184.731–6810–15–150103–110–028–7524:5626%43%
Sep 26at East Carolina9–42 L702083.042–3517–28–173164–170–038–6238:2023%51%
Oct 3vs Campbell31–38 L623595.830–16021–32–199187–140–314–5027:5935%45%
Oct 10vs William & Mary14–17 L824395.443–28217–39–157219–190–319–8133:3838%27%
Oct 23at Delaware State31–12 W714276.052–27215–19–155285–122–215–3537:1854%37%
Oct 31vs Howard34–0 W714726.640–19519–31–277194–151–1010–8336:5338%16%
Season9 games4–55963,1395.3361–1591140–235–1,54817546–1254–121161–5514:56:2038%37%

Success rate

N.C. Central on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game38.0% · 37.2%
42
47
45
29
38
35
26
43
23
51
35
45
38
27
54
37
38
16
@ Texas Southern
Elizabeth City State
North Carolina A&T
@ Gardner-Webb
@ East Carolina
Campbell
William & Mary
@ Delaware State
Howard
@ Norfolk State
@ South Carolina State
Morgan State

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: N.C. Central on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is N.C. Central's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:N.C. Central offense 38% (224 of 589)Opponent offense / N.C. Central defense 37% (203 of 546)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Texas Southern: opponent offense 47% of 53Texas Southern: N.C. Central offense 42% of 72Elizabeth City State: opponent offense 29% of 52Elizabeth City State: N.C. Central offense 45% of 60North Carolina A&T: opponent offense 35% of 75North Carolina A&T: N.C. Central offense 38% of 58Gardner-Webb: opponent offense 43% of 75Gardner-Webb: N.C. Central offense 26% of 46East Carolina: opponent offense 51% of 59East Carolina: N.C. Central offense 23% of 70Campbell: opponent offense 45% of 75Campbell: N.C. Central offense 35% of 62William & Mary: opponent offense 27% of 56William & Mary: N.C. Central offense 38% of 82Delaware State: opponent offense 37% of 46Delaware State: N.C. Central offense 54% of 71Howard: opponent offense 16% of 55Howard: N.C. Central offense 38% of 68
N.C. Central offenseOpponent offense (N.C. Central defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Texas Southern

30–42 L · 72 plays to 53
N.C. Central offense 42% (30/72)Texas Southern offense 47% (25/53)

vs Elizabeth City State

27–6 W · 60 plays to 52
N.C. Central offense 45% (27/60)Elizabeth City St. offense 29% (15/52)

vs North Carolina A&T

30–22 W · 58 plays to 75
N.C. Central offense 38% (22/58)N.C. A&T offense 35% (26/75)

at Gardner-Webb

20–44 L · 46 plays to 75
N.C. Central offense 26% (12/46)Gardner-Webb offense 43% (32/75)

at East Carolina

9–42 L · 70 plays to 59
N.C. Central offense 23% (16/70)East Carolina offense 51% (30/59)

vs Campbell

31–38 L · 62 plays to 75
N.C. Central offense 35% (22/62)Campbell offense 45% (34/75)

vs William & Mary

14–17 L · 82 plays to 56
N.C. Central offense 38% (31/82)William & Mary offense 27% (15/56)

at Delaware State

31–12 W · 71 plays to 46
N.C. Central offense 54% (38/71)Delaware State offense 37% (17/46)

vs Howard

34–0 W · 68 plays to 55
N.C. Central offense 38% (26/68)Howard offense 16% (9/55)