THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

North CarolinaTar Heels

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. North Carolina played 10 such games.

ACC, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016North Carolina8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State, #23 Pittsburgh)#28 (of 71 teams · 431.8 yds/g · 4,318 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 415.6 yds/g allowed · 4,156 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · +3.6 /g · +36 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 10 taken, 12 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 24:40 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 669.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.415 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 ACC teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #2–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #2–#69. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #5–#69. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#30 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #8–#66. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#27 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #5–#68. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #2–#59. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #8–#70. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#25 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #1–#112. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #1–#108. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #1–#80. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #4–#67. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#23 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #3–#70. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#27 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #6–#65. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#24 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #2–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #4–#64. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #5–#66. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#51 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #3–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2016Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 560.0 yds/g · 5,040 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.0 pts/g · 405 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +22.6 /g · +203 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 28:36 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 654.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.374 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.391 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Clemson14–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #11 Florida State, #13 Louisville, #14 Auburn, #22 Virginia Tech · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 513.5 yds/g · 5,135 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 320.7 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +21.1 /g · +211 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 30:07 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 846.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 71 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Florida · postseason: #6 Michigan)#16 (of 71 teams · 460.7 yds/g · 4,607 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 316 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 354.2 yds/g allowed · 3,542 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +6.6 /g · +66 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:10 /g · 5h 32m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 906.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.267 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 1.355 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Georgia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#47 (of 71 teams · 378.2 yds/g · 3,782 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 424.2 yds/g allowed · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 30:28 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 582.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 71 teams · 0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.432 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.163 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Miami9–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #16 West Virginia)#39 (of 71 teams · 403.6 yds/g · 3,632 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 262 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 399.2 yds/g allowed · 3,593 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · +6.4 /g · +58 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 14 taken, 6 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 28:13 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 745.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 71 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)#17 (of 71 teams · 457.7 yds/g · 4,577 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 490.8 yds/g allowed · 4,908 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 39.3 pts/g allowed · 393 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · +4.4 /g · +44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31:26 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 649.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.324 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 0.242 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.492 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016NC State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#43 (of 71 teams · 393.8 yds/g · 3,544 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 183 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 370.9 yds/g allowed · 3,338 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · -3.0 /g · -27 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 32:15 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 616.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 71 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 1.341 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia Tech10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Pittsburgh)#20 (of 71 teams · 452.1 yds/g · 4,521 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 338.3 yds/g allowed · 3,383 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · +10.7 /g · +107 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 646.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 71 teams · 0.184 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Duke4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 71 teams · 399.6 yds/g · 3,996 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 218 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 465.0 yds/g allowed · 4,650 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 326 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · -10.8 /g · -108 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 14 taken, 17 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 30:53 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 599.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 71 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 0.241 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.129 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 331.4 yds/g · 2,983 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 451.4 yds/g allowed · 4,063 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 35.6 pts/g allowed · 320 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -14.3 /g · -129 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 30:29 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 618.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 0.251 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 1.325 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wake Forest7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #24 Temple)#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 298.0 yds/g · 2,682 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 19.2 pts/g · 173 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 409.3 yds/g allowed · 3,684 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · -4.9 /g · -44 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +10 in these games · 22 taken, 12 given · +1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 31:24 /g · 4h 43m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 517.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 32% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.296 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#37 (of 71 teams · 413.1 yds/g · 3,718 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 554.6 yds/g allowed · 4,991 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.0 pts/g allowed · 387 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -18.1 /g · -163 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 28:16 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 520.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 71 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 236.0 yds/g · 1,888 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 12.0 pts/g · 96 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 413.8 yds/g allowed · 3,310 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -22.4 /g · -179 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · +0 in these games · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 30:55 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 533.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 29% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 1.222 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.422 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20162016 North CarolinaACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Florida State #16 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #17 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #37 of 71; 2016 Miami #39 of 71; 2016 Duke #42 of 71; 2016 NC State #43 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #47 of 71; 2016 Virginia #63 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #66 of 71; 2016 Boston College #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 28 of 71. ACC median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #29
Scoring offense. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #3 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Florida State #22 of 71; 2016 Miami #29 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #38 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #44 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 NC State #60 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #63 of 71; 2016 Boston College #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 26 of 71. ACC median rank 29.
Total defensemedian #32
Total defense. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Louisville #9 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #10 of 71; 2016 Florida State #15 of 71; 2016 NC State #20 of 71; 2016 Miami #28 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #32 of 71; 2016 Boston College #35 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #37 of 71; 2016 Virginia #47 of 71; 2016 Duke #50 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #60 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 36 of 71. ACC median rank 32.
Scoring defensemedian #30
Scoring defense. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #15 of 71; 2016 Louisville #17 of 71; 2016 Miami #18 of 71; 2016 NC State #21 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #33 of 71; 2016 Duke #46 of 71; 2016 Boston College #53 of 71; 2016 Virginia #57 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #61 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #66 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 32 of 71. ACC median rank 30.
Point marginmedian #27
Point margin. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #5 of 71; 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #11 of 71; 2016 Florida State #18 of 71; 2016 Miami #19 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #25 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #33 of 71; 2016 NC State #37 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #43 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Virginia #63 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #65 of 71; 2016 Boston College #68 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 27 of 71. ACC median rank 27.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wake Forest #2 of 71; 2016 Miami #5 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #14 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #26 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #30 of 71; 2016 Boston College #33 of 71; 2016 Louisville #36 of 71; 2016 NC State #36 of 71; 2016 Clemson #45 of 71; 2016 Duke #45 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #45 of 71; 2016 Virginia #59 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 42 of 71. ACC median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #33
Possession. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Florida State #8 of 71; 2016 NC State #14 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #23 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #24 of 71; 2016 Boston College #31 of 71; 2016 Duke #33 of 71; 2016 Virginia #37 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #38 of 71; 2016 Clemson #40 of 71; 2016 Louisville #49 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #53 of 71; 2016 Miami #54 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 70 of 71. ACC median rank 33.
Returning passingmedian #25
Returning passing. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Virginia #12 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #12 of 128; 2016 Boston College #19 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #22 of 128; 2016 Clemson #25 of 128; 2016 Miami #25 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #34 of 128; 2016 Duke #36 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 Florida State #82 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #85 of 128; 2016 NC State #112 of 128. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 97 of 128. ACC median rank 25.
Returning receivingmedian #34
Returning receiving. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Florida State #3 of 128; 2016 NC State #5 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #6 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #18 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #34 of 128; 2016 Clemson #35 of 128; 2016 Boston College #49 of 128; 2016 Virginia #65 of 128; 2016 Miami #71 of 128; 2016 Duke #103 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #108 of 128. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 60 of 128. ACC median rank 34.
Returning rushingmedian #39
Returning rushing. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wake Forest #1 of 128; 2016 Miami #9 of 128; 2016 Virginia #10 of 128; 2016 Louisville #12 of 128; 2016 Clemson #26 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #34 of 128; 2016 Boston College #39 of 128; 2016 Florida State #39 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #47 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 Duke #52 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #54 of 128; 2016 NC State #58 of 128. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 80 of 128. ACC median rank 39.
Team talentmedian #36
Team talent. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Florida State #4 of 128; 2016 Clemson #9 of 128; 2016 Miami #19 of 128; 2016 Louisville #32 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #35 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #36 of 128; 2016 Virginia #42 of 128; 2016 NC State #44 of 128; 2016 Duke #48 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #50 of 128; 2016 Boston College #60 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #66 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #67 of 128. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 29 of 128. ACC median rank 36.
Offensive EPAmedian #23
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #3 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #4 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 Clemson #13 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Miami #23 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #25 of 71; 2016 Duke #45 of 71; 2016 NC State #53 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #58 of 71; 2016 Virginia #65 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #68 of 71; 2016 Boston College #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 10 of 71. ACC median rank 23.
Defensive EPAmedian #27
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Louisville #7 of 71; 2016 NC State #15 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Florida State #23 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Miami #27 of 71; 2016 Boston College #42 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #54 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #56 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #65 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 39 of 71. ACC median rank 27.
Offensive success ratemedian #24
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #2 of 71; 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #13 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #15 of 71; 2016 Duke #24 of 71; 2016 Miami #43 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #46 of 71; 2016 NC State #57 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #60 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #68 of 71; 2016 Boston College #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 23 of 71. ACC median rank 24.
Defensive success ratemedian #32
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Florida State #14 of 71; 2016 NC State #15 of 71; 2016 Miami #30 of 71; 2016 Boston College #32 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #36 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #37 of 71; 2016 Duke #41 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #60 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #64 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 53 of 71. ACC median rank 32.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #31
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia Tech #5 of 71; 2016 Louisville #6 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #7 of 71; 2016 Miami #20 of 71; 2016 Florida State #28 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #31 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #33 of 71; 2016 NC State #35 of 71; 2016 Boston College #50 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 Clemson #56 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #62 of 71; 2016 Duke #66 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 8 of 71. ACC median rank 31.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #51
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Clemson #32 of 71; 2016 Miami #39 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #42 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 NC State #55 of 71; 2016 Florida State #57 of 71; 2016 Louisville #62 of 71; 2016 Duke #65 of 71; 2016 Boston College #67 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #68 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 North Carolina, ranked 3 of 71. ACC median rank 51.