Metrics

North TexasMean Green

Season
Current

Sun Belt

Sun Belt, 2011

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2011North Texas570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#94 (of 120 teams · 341.8 yds/g · 4,101 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 298 points)#99 (of 120 teams · 429.3 yds/g allowed · 5,152 yards)#88 (of 120 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#88 (of 120 teams · -5.8 /g · -70 on the season)#11 (of 120 teams · +10 on the season · 27 taken, 17 given · +0.83 /g)#21 (of 120 teams · 19:41 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 120 teams · -0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#65 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.944 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.972 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Sun Belt teams in 20110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#86 (Total offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #37–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#78 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #31–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#55 (Total defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #12–#99. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#84 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #14–#110. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#75 (Point margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #19–#117. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#72 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #11–#106. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#72 (Possession: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #2–#120. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#88 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #29–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#26 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #3–#96. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#84 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #32–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#48 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #9–#92. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#51 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #3–#114. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#67 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range #15–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)
2011Arkansas State1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 120 teams · 410.2 yds/g · 5,333 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 422 points)#12 (of 120 teams · 302.8 yds/g allowed · 3,936 yards)#25 (of 120 teams · 20.8 pts/g allowed · 270 points)#19 (of 120 teams · +11.7 /g · +152 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 25 taken, 26 given · -0.08 /g)#72 (of 120 teams · 18:02 /g · 3h 55m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.095 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.885 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.931 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Florida Atlantic1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 (of 120 teams · 236.4 yds/g · 2,837 yards)#119 (of 120 teams · 12.9 pts/g · 155 points)#42 (of 120 teams · 356.9 yds/g allowed · 4,283 yards)#103 (of 120 teams · 34.7 pts/g allowed · 416 points)#117 (of 120 teams · -21.8 /g · -261 on the season)#101 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 17 taken, 25 given · -0.67 /g)#116 (of 120 teams · 16:01 /g · 3h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#116 (of 120 teams · -0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#118 (of 120 teams · 33% of plays successful)#78 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.942 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.935 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Florida International850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#100 (of 120 teams · 335.6 yds/g · 4,363 yards)#74 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 325 points)#19 (of 120 teams · 314.5 yds/g allowed · 4,088 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 253 points)#46 (of 120 teams · +5.5 /g · +72 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 18 taken, 15 given · +0.23 /g)#111 (of 120 teams · 16:34 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#42 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.830 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.949 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Louisiana940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 120 teams · 394.6 yds/g · 5,130 yards)#32 (of 120 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 420 points)#77 (of 120 teams · 399.9 yds/g allowed · 5,199 yards)#84 (of 120 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 388 points)#62 (of 120 teams · +2.5 /g · +32 on the season)#72 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 21 taken, 23 given · -0.15 /g)#56 (of 120 teams · 18:26 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#48 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.994 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.851 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Middle Tennessee2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#73 (of 120 teams · 368.3 yds/g · 4,420 yards)#96 (of 120 teams · 22.3 pts/g · 267 points)#88 (of 120 teams · 414.1 yds/g allowed · 4,969 yards)#110 (of 120 teams · 36.8 pts/g allowed · 441 points)#109 (of 120 teams · -14.5 /g · -174 on the season)#93 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 20 taken, 26 given · -0.50 /g)#120 (of 120 teams · 15:05 /g · 3h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#114 (of 120 teams · -0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#92 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.848 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.889 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Troy390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 120 teams · 348.9 yds/g · 4,187 yards)#94 (of 120 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 269 points)#94 (of 120 teams · 424.3 yds/g allowed · 5,091 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 33.7 pts/g allowed · 404 points)#105 (of 120 teams · -11.3 /g · -135 on the season)#106 (of 120 teams · -9 on the season · 18 taken, 27 given · -0.75 /g)#119 (of 120 teams · 15:14 /g · 3h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#66 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.953 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011UL Monroe480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 120 teams · 355.3 yds/g · 4,263 yards)#78 (of 120 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 295 points)#18 (of 120 teams · 313.8 yds/g allowed · 3,766 yards)#59 (of 120 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 305 points)#71 (of 120 teams · -0.8 /g · -10 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g)#53 (of 120 teams · 18:35 /g · 3h 43m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#24 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.070 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Western Kentucky750 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 120 teams · 348.9 yds/g · 4,187 yards)#89 (of 120 teams · 22.9 pts/g · 275 points)#55 (of 120 teams · 373.8 yds/g allowed · 4,486 yards)#55 (of 120 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#75 (of 120 teams · -1.9 /g · -23 on the season)#79 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.25 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 21:52 /g · 4h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.023 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#20 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.901 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 120 teams · 1.093 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20112011 North TexasSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #86
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Arkansas State #37 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #49 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #73 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #82 of 120; 2011 Troy #86 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #86 of 120; 2011 Florida International #100 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #119 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 94 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 86.
Scoring offensemedian #78
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Arkansas State #31 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #32 of 120; 2011 Florida International #74 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #78 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #89 of 120; 2011 Troy #94 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #96 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #119 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 76 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 78.
Total defensemedian #55
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Arkansas State #12 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #18 of 120; 2011 Florida International #19 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #42 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #55 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #77 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #88 of 120; 2011 Troy #94 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 99 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 55.
Scoring defensemedian #84
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida International #14 of 120; 2011 Arkansas State #25 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #55 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #59 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #84 of 120; 2011 Troy #101 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #103 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 88 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 84.
Point marginmedian #75
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Arkansas State #19 of 120; 2011 Florida International #46 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #62 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #71 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #75 of 120; 2011 Troy #105 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #109 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #117 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 88 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 75.
Turnover marginmedian #72
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida International #37 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #45 of 120; 2011 Arkansas State #61 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #72 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #79 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #93 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #101 of 120; 2011 Troy #106 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 11 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 72.
Possessionmedian #72
Possession. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Western Kentucky #2 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #53 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #56 of 120; 2011 Arkansas State #72 of 120; 2011 Florida International #111 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #116 of 120; 2011 Troy #119 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #120 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 21 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 72.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 North Texas, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 North Texas, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 North Texas, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 North Texas, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #88
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Arkansas State #29 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #62 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #82 of 120; 2011 Florida International #83 of 120; 2011 Troy #88 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #89 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #114 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #116 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 113 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 88.
Defensive EPAmedian #26
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Arkansas State #3 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #8 of 120; 2011 Florida International #22 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #23 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #26 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #84 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #89 of 120; 2011 Troy #96 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 82 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 26.
Offensive success ratemedian #84
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Arkansas State #32 of 120; 2011 Florida International #46 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #74 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #79 of 120; 2011 Troy #84 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #93 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #104 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #118 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 105 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 84.
Defensive success ratemedian #48
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Arkansas State #9 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #20 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #24 of 120; 2011 Florida International #42 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #48 of 120; 2011 Troy #66 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #78 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #92 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 65 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 48.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #51
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 UL Monroe #3 of 120; 2011 Louisiana #18 of 120; 2011 Troy #41 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #51 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #79 of 120; 2011 Arkansas State #89 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #109 of 120; 2011 Florida International #114 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 48 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 51.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #67
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Louisiana #15 of 120; 2011 Middle Tennessee #36 of 120; 2011 Arkansas State #64 of 120; 2011 UL Monroe #66 of 120; 2011 Florida Atlantic #67 of 120; 2011 Troy #69 of 120; 2011 Florida International #76 of 120; 2011 Western Kentucky #118 of 120. Marked: 2011 North Texas, ranked 92 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 67.