Metrics

Northern IllinoisHuskies

Season
Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2008

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2008Northern Illinois670 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#81 (of 120 teams · 335.1 yds/g · 4,356 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 314 points)#18 (of 120 teams · 297.7 yds/g allowed · 3,870 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 234 points)#37 (of 120 teams · +6.2 /g · +80 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 23 taken, 18 given · +0.38 /g)#19 (of 120 teams · 19:12 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#69 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#72 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.912 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.896 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20080 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#53 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #15–#107. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#56 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #18–#107. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#88 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #18–#107. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#78 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #14–#110. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#70 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #15–#110. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#47 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #11–#114. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#69 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #11–#114. 0 of 13 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#48 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #8–#110. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#87 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #42–#106. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #6–#112. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#80 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #66–#119. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#63 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #2–#116. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range #1–#117. 3 of 13 in the top 10.)
2008Akron570 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 120 teams · 396.7 yds/g · 4,760 yards)#36 (of 120 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 360 points)#93 (of 120 teams · 397.6 yds/g allowed · 4,771 yards)#96 (of 120 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#74 (of 120 teams · -1.3 /g · -15 on the season)#41 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 26 taken, 22 given · +0.33 /g)#91 (of 120 teams · 17:17 /g · 3h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#103 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 120 teams · 0.774 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.851 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Ball State1220 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 120 teams · 442.5 yds/g · 6,195 yards)#18 (of 120 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 489 points)#71 (of 120 teams · 368.2 yds/g allowed · 5,155 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#15 (of 120 teams · +14.4 /g · +202 on the season)#44 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 24 taken, 20 given · +0.29 /g)#57 (of 120 teams · 18:22 /g · 4h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#81 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.947 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 120 teams · 1.042 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Bowling Green660 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 120 teams · 359.8 yds/g · 4,317 yards)#44 (of 120 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 332 points)#54 (of 120 teams · 343.4 yds/g allowed · 4,121 yards)#49 (of 120 teams · 23.2 pts/g allowed · 278 points)#46 (of 120 teams · +4.5 /g · +54 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 23 taken, 21 given · +0.17 /g)#71 (of 120 teams · 17:59 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#93 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.895 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.819 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Buffalo860 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 120 teams · 370.3 yds/g · 5,184 yards)#34 (of 120 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 424 points)#97 (of 120 teams · 408.2 yds/g allowed · 5,715 yards)#78 (of 120 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 395 points)#57 (of 120 teams · +2.1 /g · +29 on the season)#11 (of 120 teams · +17 on the season · 34 taken, 17 given · +1.21 /g)#37 (of 120 teams · 18:48 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#119 (of 120 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.811 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Central Michigan850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 120 teams · 423.5 yds/g · 5,505 yards)#38 (of 120 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#107 (of 120 teams · 423.8 yds/g allowed · 5,509 yards)#90 (of 120 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 393 points)#70 (of 120 teams · -0.7 /g · -9 on the season)#30 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.46 /g)#65 (of 120 teams · 18:14 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.087 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#66 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.042 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.960 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Eastern Michigan390 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 120 teams · 417.5 yds/g · 5,010 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 309 points)#98 (of 120 teams · 408.6 yds/g allowed · 4,903 yards)#110 (of 120 teams · 35.6 pts/g allowed · 427 points)#104 (of 120 teams · -9.8 /g · -118 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.17 /g)#11 (of 120 teams · 19:41 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#75 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.987 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Kent State480 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#36 (of 120 teams · 400.3 yds/g · 4,803 yards)#57 (of 120 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 308 points)#88 (of 120 teams · 395.2 yds/g allowed · 4,742 yards)#99 (of 120 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#91 (of 120 teams · -6.0 /g · -72 on the season)#85 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 22 taken, 27 given · -0.42 /g)#89 (of 120 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 120 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#68 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.964 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Miami (OH)2100 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#89 (of 120 teams · 325.2 yds/g · 3,902 yards)#107 (of 120 teams · 18.4 pts/g · 221 points)#91 (of 120 teams · 395.5 yds/g allowed · 4,746 yards)#102 (of 120 teams · 32.7 pts/g allowed · 392 points)#110 (of 120 teams · -14.3 /g · -171 on the season)#112 (of 120 teams · -13 on the season · 15 taken, 28 given · -1.08 /g)#18 (of 120 teams · 19:13 /g · 3h 51m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 120 teams · -0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 120 teams · 0.102 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#50 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#80 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 120 teams · 0.827 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 120 teams · 0.987 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Ohio480 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 120 teams · 361.4 yds/g · 4,337 yards)#77 (of 120 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 289 points)#57 (of 120 teams · 348.6 yds/g allowed · 4,183 yards)#71 (of 120 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 327 points)#82 (of 120 teams · -3.2 /g · -38 on the season)#114 (of 120 teams · -14 on the season · 19 taken, 33 given · -1.17 /g)#69 (of 120 teams · 18:08 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.023 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#69 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.860 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.841 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Temple570 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#107 (of 120 teams · 298.1 yds/g · 3,577 yards)#82 (of 120 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 281 points)#83 (of 120 teams · 388.0 yds/g allowed · 4,656 yards)#48 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#62 (of 120 teams · +0.3 /g · +4 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 27 taken, 25 given · +0.17 /g)#114 (of 120 teams · 16:32 /g · 3h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 120 teams · -0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#96 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.014 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.762 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Toledo390 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#83 (of 120 teams · 334.1 yds/g · 4,009 yards)#88 (of 120 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 269 points)#78 (of 120 teams · 381.4 yds/g allowed · 4,577 yards)#98 (of 120 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#99 (of 120 teams · -9.0 /g · -108 on the season)#77 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.25 /g)#99 (of 120 teams · 17:05 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#63 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#117 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.874 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.700 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Western Michigan940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 120 teams · 411.5 yds/g · 5,350 yards)#41 (of 120 teams · 28.6 pts/g · 372 points)#89 (of 120 teams · 395.3 yds/g allowed · 5,139 yards)#63 (of 120 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 324 points)#49 (of 120 teams · +3.7 /g · +48 on the season)#80 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 18 taken, 23 given · -0.38 /g)#92 (of 120 teams · 17:15 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#67 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.913 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 120 teams · 1.074 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20082008 Northern IllinoisMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #53
Total offense. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Ball State #15 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #20 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #22 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #27 of 120; 2008 Kent State #36 of 120; 2008 Akron #40 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #53 of 120; 2008 Ohio #56 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #58 of 120; 2008 Toledo #83 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #89 of 120; 2008 Temple #107 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 81 of 120. Mid-American median rank 53.
Scoring offensemedian #56
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Ball State #18 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #34 of 120; 2008 Akron #36 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #38 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #41 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #44 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #56 of 120; 2008 Kent State #57 of 120; 2008 Ohio #77 of 120; 2008 Temple #82 of 120; 2008 Toledo #88 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #107 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 76 of 120. Mid-American median rank 56.
Total defensemedian #88
Total defense. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Bowling Green #54 of 120; 2008 Ohio #57 of 120; 2008 Ball State #71 of 120; 2008 Toledo #78 of 120; 2008 Temple #83 of 120; 2008 Kent State #88 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #89 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #91 of 120; 2008 Akron #93 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #97 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #98 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #107 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 18 of 120. Mid-American median rank 88.
Scoring defensemedian #78
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Ball State #29 of 120; 2008 Temple #48 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #49 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #63 of 120; 2008 Ohio #71 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #78 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #90 of 120; 2008 Akron #96 of 120; 2008 Toledo #98 of 120; 2008 Kent State #99 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #102 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #110 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 14 of 120. Mid-American median rank 78.
Point marginmedian #70
Point margin. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Ball State #15 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #46 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #49 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #57 of 120; 2008 Temple #62 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #70 of 120; 2008 Akron #74 of 120; 2008 Ohio #82 of 120; 2008 Kent State #91 of 120; 2008 Toledo #99 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #104 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #110 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 37 of 120. Mid-American median rank 70.
Turnover marginmedian #47
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Buffalo #11 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #30 of 120; 2008 Akron #41 of 120; 2008 Ball State #44 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #47 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #47 of 120; 2008 Temple #47 of 120; 2008 Toledo #77 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #80 of 120; 2008 Kent State #85 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #112 of 120; 2008 Ohio #114 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 37 of 120. Mid-American median rank 47.
Possessionmedian #69
Possession. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Eastern Michigan #11 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #18 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #37 of 120; 2008 Ball State #57 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #65 of 120; 2008 Ohio #69 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #71 of 120; 2008 Kent State #89 of 120; 2008 Akron #91 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #92 of 120; 2008 Toledo #99 of 120; 2008 Temple #114 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 19 of 120. Mid-American median rank 69.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #48
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Ball State #8 of 120; 2008 Kent State #23 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #24 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #29 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #33 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #43 of 120; 2008 Akron #48 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #49 of 120; 2008 Ohio #66 of 120; 2008 Toledo #68 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #90 of 120; 2008 Temple #110 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 55 of 120. Mid-American median rank 48.
Defensive EPAmedian #87
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Ohio #42 of 120; 2008 Temple #67 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #70 of 120; 2008 Toledo #76 of 120; 2008 Kent State #81 of 120; 2008 Ball State #87 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #90 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #91 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #93 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #98 of 120; 2008 Akron #100 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #106 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 62 of 120. Mid-American median rank 87.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Ball State #6 of 120; 2008 Akron #15 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #27 of 120; 2008 Kent State #38 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #42 of 120; 2008 Ohio #43 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #44 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #50 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #51 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #54 of 120; 2008 Toledo #63 of 120; 2008 Temple #112 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 69 of 120. Mid-American median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #80
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Central Michigan #66 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #67 of 120; 2008 Kent State #68 of 120; 2008 Ohio #69 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #75 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #80 of 120; 2008 Ball State #81 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #93 of 120; 2008 Temple #96 of 120; 2008 Akron #103 of 120; 2008 Toledo #117 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 72 of 120. Mid-American median rank 80.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #63
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Central Michigan #2 of 120; 2008 Temple #8 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #22 of 120; 2008 Kent State #29 of 120; 2008 Ball State #36 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #62 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #69 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #75 of 120; 2008 Toledo #89 of 120; 2008 Ohio #95 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #105 of 120; 2008 Akron #116 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 63 of 120. Mid-American median rank 63.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #55
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Toledo #1 of 120; 2008 Temple #2 of 120; 2008 Buffalo #7 of 120; 2008 Bowling Green #12 of 120; 2008 Ohio #19 of 120; 2008 Akron #26 of 120; 2008 Kent State #89 of 120; 2008 Central Michigan #95 of 120; 2008 Eastern Michigan #102 of 120; 2008 Miami (OH) #103 of 120; 2008 Ball State #113 of 120; 2008 Western Michigan #117 of 120. Marked: 2008 Northern Illinois, ranked 55 of 120. Mid-American median rank 55.