Metrics

Northern IllinoisHuskies

Season
Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2011

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2011Northern Illinois1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 120 teams · 455.6 yds/g · 6,378 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 38.3 pts/g · 536 points)#74 (of 120 teams · 395.0 yds/g allowed · 5,530 yards)#85 (of 120 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 424 points)#34 (of 120 teams · +8.0 /g · +112 on the season)#19 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 27 taken, 18 given · +0.64 /g)#109 (of 120 teams · 16:53 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#56 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.942 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.967 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#70 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #19–#120. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#72 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #8–#118. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#65 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #7–#114. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#77 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #3–#116. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#78 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #11–#119. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#61 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #12–#117. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#80 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #41–#114. 0 of 13 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#72 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #9–#120. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#65 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #7–#118. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#70 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #18–#120. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#56 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #25–#116. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#54 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #5–#115. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#59 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range #1–#109. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)
2011Akron1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#115 (of 120 teams · 277.8 yds/g · 3,333 yards)#118 (of 120 teams · 14.2 pts/g · 170 points)#97 (of 120 teams · 427.2 yds/g allowed · 5,126 yards)#116 (of 120 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 462 points)#119 (of 120 teams · -24.3 /g · -292 on the season)#111 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.92 /g)#99 (of 120 teams · 17:20 /g · 3h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 120 teams · -0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#113 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.889 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.797 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Ball State660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#90 (of 120 teams · 346.5 yds/g · 4,158 yards)#72 (of 120 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 304 points)#114 (of 120 teams · 468.1 yds/g allowed · 5,617 yards)#103 (of 120 teams · 34.7 pts/g allowed · 416 points)#100 (of 120 teams · -9.3 /g · -112 on the season)#40 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 17 taken, 15 given · +0.17 /g)#114 (of 120 teams · 16:27 /g · 3h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#118 (of 120 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#116 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 120 teams · 0.844 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.917 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Bowling Green570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 120 teams · 384.5 yds/g · 4,614 yards)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 318 points)#80 (of 120 teams · 406.0 yds/g allowed · 4,872 yards)#77 (of 120 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 346 points)#78 (of 120 teams · -2.3 /g · -28 on the season)#117 (of 120 teams · -14 on the season · 14 taken, 28 given · -1.17 /g)#43 (of 120 teams · 18:51 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.005 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#82 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.952 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.884 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Buffalo390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#76 (of 120 teams · 365.2 yds/g · 4,382 yards)#97 (of 120 teams · 22.2 pts/g · 266 points)#65 (of 120 teams · 384.9 yds/g allowed · 4,619 yards)#83 (of 120 teams · 29.4 pts/g allowed · 353 points)#95 (of 120 teams · -7.3 /g · -87 on the season)#83 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 11 taken, 15 given · -0.33 /g)#49 (of 120 teams · 18:38 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#101 (of 120 teams · -0.005 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#95 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#53 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.916 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.915 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Central Michigan390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 120 teams · 389.9 yds/g · 4,679 yards)#92 (of 120 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 271 points)#100 (of 120 teams · 430.5 yds/g allowed · 5,166 yards)#99 (of 120 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 400 points)#103 (of 120 teams · -10.8 /g · -129 on the season)#114 (of 120 teams · -12 on the season · 11 taken, 23 given · -1.00 /g)#88 (of 120 teams · 17:40 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#80 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.949 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.869 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Eastern Michigan660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#106 (of 120 teams · 321.7 yds/g · 3,860 yards)#104 (of 120 teams · 21.3 pts/g · 255 points)#25 (of 120 teams · 326.5 yds/g allowed · 3,918 yards)#50 (of 120 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#80 (of 120 teams · -3.1 /g · -37 on the season)#98 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.58 /g)#78 (of 120 teams · 17:56 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#33 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.950 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Kent State570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#120 (of 120 teams · 223.3 yds/g · 2,679 yards)#114 (of 120 teams · 17.1 pts/g · 205 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 298.3 yds/g allowed · 3,580 yards)#49 (of 120 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 291 points)#94 (of 120 teams · -7.2 /g · -86 on the season)#14 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 28 taken, 19 given · +0.75 /g)#108 (of 120 teams · 16:56 /g · 3h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 120 teams · -0.098 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 120 teams · 32% of plays successful)#25 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 120 teams · 0.826 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.868 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Miami (OH)480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 120 teams · 372.9 yds/g · 4,475 yards)#103 (of 120 teams · 21.3 pts/g · 256 points)#49 (of 120 teams · 363.7 yds/g allowed · 4,364 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 275 points)#73 (of 120 teams · -1.6 /g · -19 on the season)#79 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.25 /g)#54 (of 120 teams · 18:35 /g · 3h 43m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#75 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#36 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.032 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 120 teams · 1.030 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Ohio1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 120 teams · 445.4 yds/g · 6,236 yards)#41 (of 120 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 427 points)#47 (of 120 teams · 361.0 yds/g allowed · 5,054 yards)#32 (of 120 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 310 points)#30 (of 120 teams · +8.4 /g · +117 on the season)#53 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 27 taken, 27 given · +0.00 /g)#41 (of 120 teams · 18:58 /g · 4h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#27 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.897 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 120 teams · 1.022 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Temple940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#79 (of 120 teams · 359.1 yds/g · 4,668 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 398 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 283.9 yds/g allowed · 3,690 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 13.9 pts/g allowed · 181 points)#11 (of 120 teams · +16.7 /g · +217 on the season)#12 (of 120 teams · +10 on the season · 20 taken, 10 given · +0.77 /g)#46 (of 120 teams · 18:48 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 120 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#30 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.936 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Toledo940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 120 teams · 442.3 yds/g · 5,750 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 42.2 pts/g · 549 points)#54 (of 120 teams · 371.1 yds/g allowed · 4,825 yards)#94 (of 120 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 412 points)#24 (of 120 teams · +10.5 /g · +137 on the season)#12 (of 120 teams · +10 on the season · 24 taken, 14 given · +0.77 /g)#80 (of 120 teams · 17:55 /g · 3h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.095 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#75 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.877 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Western Michigan760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2011. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#28 (of 120 teams · 437.0 yds/g · 5,681 yards)#18 (of 120 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 459 points)#86 (of 120 teams · 412.5 yds/g allowed · 5,363 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 373 points)#36 (of 120 teams · +6.6 /g · +86 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 30 taken, 31 given · -0.08 /g)#110 (of 120 teams · 16:37 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#68 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.944 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.960 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20112011 Northern IllinoisMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #70
Total offense. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Ohio #22 of 120; 2011 Toledo #23 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #28 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #54 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #59 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #70 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #76 of 120; 2011 Temple #79 of 120; 2011 Ball State #90 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #106 of 120; 2011 Akron #115 of 120; 2011 Kent State #120 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 19 of 120. Mid-American median rank 70.
Scoring offensemedian #72
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Toledo #8 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #18 of 120; 2011 Temple #39 of 120; 2011 Ohio #41 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #63 of 120; 2011 Ball State #72 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #92 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #97 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #103 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #104 of 120; 2011 Kent State #114 of 120; 2011 Akron #118 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 12 of 120. Mid-American median rank 72.
Total defensemedian #65
Total defense. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Temple #7 of 120; 2011 Kent State #9 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #25 of 120; 2011 Ohio #47 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #49 of 120; 2011 Toledo #54 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #65 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #80 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #86 of 120; 2011 Akron #97 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #100 of 120; 2011 Ball State #114 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 74 of 120. Mid-American median rank 65.
Scoring defensemedian #77
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Temple #3 of 120; 2011 Ohio #32 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #39 of 120; 2011 Kent State #49 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #50 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #76 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #77 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #83 of 120; 2011 Toledo #94 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #99 of 120; 2011 Ball State #103 of 120; 2011 Akron #116 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 85 of 120. Mid-American median rank 77.
Point marginmedian #78
Point margin. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Temple #11 of 120; 2011 Toledo #24 of 120; 2011 Ohio #30 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #36 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #73 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #78 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #80 of 120; 2011 Kent State #94 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #95 of 120; 2011 Ball State #100 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #103 of 120; 2011 Akron #119 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 34 of 120. Mid-American median rank 78.
Turnover marginmedian #61
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Temple #12 of 120; 2011 Toledo #12 of 120; 2011 Kent State #14 of 120; 2011 Ball State #40 of 120; 2011 Ohio #53 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #61 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #79 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #83 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #98 of 120; 2011 Akron #111 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #114 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #117 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 19 of 120. Mid-American median rank 61.
Possessionmedian #80
Possession. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Ohio #41 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #43 of 120; 2011 Temple #46 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #49 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #54 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #78 of 120; 2011 Toledo #80 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #88 of 120; 2011 Akron #99 of 120; 2011 Kent State #108 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #110 of 120; 2011 Ball State #114 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 109 of 120. Mid-American median rank 80.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #72
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Western Michigan #15 of 120; 2011 Toledo #28 of 120; 2011 Ohio #37 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #45 of 120; 2011 Temple #52 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #72 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #79 of 120; 2011 Ball State #85 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #96 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #101 of 120; 2011 Akron #115 of 120; 2011 Kent State #120 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 9 of 120. Mid-American median rank 72.
Defensive EPAmedian #65
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Kent State #7 of 120; 2011 Temple #28 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #50 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #51 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #55 of 120; 2011 Ohio #61 of 120; 2011 Toledo #65 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #72 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #77 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #90 of 120; 2011 Akron #92 of 120; 2011 Ball State #118 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 74 of 120. Mid-American median rank 65.
Offensive success ratemedian #70
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Western Michigan #18 of 120; 2011 Toledo #22 of 120; 2011 Ohio #27 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #58 of 120; 2011 Ball State #59 of 120; 2011 Temple #70 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #73 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #75 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #84 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #95 of 120; 2011 Akron #116 of 120; 2011 Kent State #120 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 28 of 120. Mid-American median rank 70.
Defensive success ratemedian #56
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Kent State #25 of 120; 2011 Ohio #27 of 120; 2011 Temple #30 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #33 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #36 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #53 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #68 of 120; 2011 Toledo #75 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #80 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #82 of 120; 2011 Akron #113 of 120; 2011 Ball State #116 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 56 of 120. Mid-American median rank 56.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #54
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Miami (OH) #5 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #42 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #43 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #44 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #49 of 120; 2011 Temple #54 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #65 of 120; 2011 Ohio #80 of 120; 2011 Akron #84 of 120; 2011 Toledo #93 of 120; 2011 Ball State #110 of 120; 2011 Kent State #115 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 50 of 120. Mid-American median rank 54.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #59
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Akron #1 of 120; 2011 Kent State #21 of 120; 2011 Central Michigan #22 of 120; 2011 Bowling Green #32 of 120; 2011 Toledo #38 of 120; 2011 Buffalo #53 of 120; 2011 Ball State #59 of 120; 2011 Eastern Michigan #72 of 120; 2011 Temple #75 of 120; 2011 Western Michigan #86 of 120; 2011 Ohio #108 of 120; 2011 Miami (OH) #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Northern Illinois, ranked 88 of 120. Mid-American median rank 59.