THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Northern IllinoisHuskies

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Northern Illinois played 2 such games.

Mid-American, 2014

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2014Northern Illinois11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (352.0 yds/g · 704 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (18.5 pts/g · 37 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (410.5 yds/g allowed · 821 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33.5 pts/g allowed · 67 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-15.0 /g · -30 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:57 /g · 0h 54m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#114 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.191 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.184 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.374 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.417 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20140 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#69 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #69–#70. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#61 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #61–#66. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#29 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #29–#54. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#37 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #37–#68. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#54 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #54–#69. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#49 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #49–#65. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#47 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #47–#76. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#66 (Returning passing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #1–#119. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning receiving: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #7–#125. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#46 (Returning rushing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #5–#118. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)#43 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #43–#58. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #34–#63. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#55 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #55–#59. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#21 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #21–#65. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#3 — top 10 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #3–#60. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#17 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range #17–#64. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)
2014Akron5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (329.5 yds/g · 659 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (12.0 pts/g · 24 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (387.0 yds/g allowed · 774 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (15.5 pts/g allowed · 31 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3.5 /g · -7 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+4 in these games · 5 taken, 1 given · +2.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:48 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.044 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.107 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Toledo9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (417.5 yds/g · 835 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g · 54 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (478.0 yds/g allowed · 956 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43.0 pts/g allowed · 86 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-16.0 /g · -32 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:52 /g · 1h 10m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.158 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.280 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.202 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.213 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Bowling Green8–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (421.0 yds/g · 842 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.0 pts/g · 62 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (669.0 yds/g allowed · 1,338 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (55.0 pts/g allowed · 110 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-24.0 /g · -48 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 4 taken, 4 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:04 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#81 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.354 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (59% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.252 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Buffalo5–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (394.0 yds/g · 394 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (669.0 yds/g allowed · 669 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (63.0 pts/g allowed · 63 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-42.0 /g · -42 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 0 taken, 1 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35:04 /g · 0h 35m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#31 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 34% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.543 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.858 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.813 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Central Michigan7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 276.3 yds/g · 829 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 76 teams · 17.0 pts/g · 51 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 386.3 yds/g allowed · 1,159 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 81 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · -10.0 /g · -30 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · -2 in these games · 4 taken, 6 given · -0.67 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 29:23 /g · 1h 28m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 76 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · 38% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 76 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 76 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Eastern Michigan2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (130.0 yds/g · 260 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (7.0 pts/g · 14 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (575.5 yds/g allowed · 1,151 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (69.0 pts/g allowed · 138 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-62.0 /g · -124 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-10 in these games · 1 taken, 11 given · -5.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35:51 /g · 1h 12m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#80 (of 128 teams · 34% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.235 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.415 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.972 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.376 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Kent State2–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (203.0 yds/g · 406 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (6.5 pts/g · 13 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (574.0 yds/g allowed · 1,148 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (55.5 pts/g allowed · 111 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-49.0 /g · -98 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 6 taken, 8 given · -1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:04 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#47 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.322 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (57% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.238 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.074 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Miami (OH)2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (198.0 yds/g · 198 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.0 pts/g · 10 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (460.0 yds/g allowed · 460 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-24.0 /g · -24 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 3 taken, 1 given · +2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:55 /g · 0h 26m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#78 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.055 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.229 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.207 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Ohio6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (223.0 yds/g · 223 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (3.0 pts/g · 3 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (402.0 yds/g allowed · 402 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20.0 pts/g allowed · 20 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-17.0 /g · -17 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 0 taken, 1 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21:29 /g · 0h 21m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#98 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.104 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Western Michigan8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (343.5 yds/g · 687 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25.5 pts/g · 51 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (446.5 yds/g allowed · 893 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39.0 pts/g allowed · 78 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-13.5 /g · -27 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 2 taken, 3 given · -0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:05 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#66 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.193 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.204 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.435 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Ball State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (219.0 yds/g · 219 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (13.0 pts/g · 13 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (455.0 yds/g allowed · 455 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.0 pts/g allowed · 17 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-4.0 /g · -4 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 2 taken, 1 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:53 /g · 0h 29m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.938 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.121 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Massachusetts3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 296.5 yds/g · 1,186 yds · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 83 points · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 439.8 yds/g allowed · 1,759 yds · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 38.3 pts/g allowed · 153 points · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -17.5 /g · -70 in these games · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 3 taken, 4 given · -0.25 /g · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 23:06 /g · 1h 32m in these games · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 76 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 0.249 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · 37% of plays successful · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.416 average PPA on successful plays · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 1.173 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 4 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20142014 Northern IllinoisMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #69
Total offense. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Massachusetts #69 of 76; 2014 Central Michigan #70 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 69.
Scoring offensemedian #61
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Massachusetts #61 of 76; 2014 Central Michigan #66 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 61.
Total defensemedian #29
Total defense. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Central Michigan #29 of 76; 2014 Massachusetts #54 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 29.
Scoring defensemedian #37
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Central Michigan #37 of 76; 2014 Massachusetts #68 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 37.
Point marginmedian #54
Point margin. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Central Michigan #54 of 76; 2014 Massachusetts #69 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 54.
Turnover marginmedian #49
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Massachusetts #49 of 76; 2014 Central Michigan #65 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 49.
Possessionmedian #47
Possession. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Central Michigan #47 of 76; 2014 Massachusetts #76 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 47.
Returning passingmedian #66
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Akron #1 of 128; 2014 Toledo #1 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #31 of 128; 2014 Central Michigan #41 of 128; 2014 Kent State #47 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #56 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #66 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #78 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #80 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #81 of 128; 2014 Ohio #98 of 128; 2014 Ball State #119 of 128. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, ranked 114 of 128. Mid-American median rank 66.
Returning receivingmedian #48
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Central Michigan #8 of 128; 2014 Akron #15 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #17 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #18 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #44 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #48 of 128; 2014 Kent State #68 of 128; 2014 Toledo #70 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #90 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #114 of 128; 2014 Ohio #116 of 128; 2014 Ball State #125 of 128. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, ranked 7 of 128. Mid-American median rank 48.
Returning rushingmedian #46
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Akron #5 of 128; 2014 Bowling Green #14 of 128; 2014 Ball State #21 of 128; 2014 Eastern Michigan #24 of 128; 2014 Kent State #40 of 128; 2014 Central Michigan #41 of 128; 2014 Miami (OH) #46 of 128; 2014 Massachusetts #56 of 128; 2014 Toledo #75 of 128; 2014 Western Michigan #82 of 128; 2014 Ohio #117 of 128; 2014 Buffalo #118 of 128. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, ranked 82 of 128. Mid-American median rank 46.
Team talent
Team talent. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: . Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #43
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Massachusetts #43 of 76; 2014 Central Michigan #58 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 43.
Defensive EPAmedian #34
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Central Michigan #34 of 76; 2014 Massachusetts #63 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 34.
Offensive success ratemedian #55
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Central Michigan #55 of 76; 2014 Massachusetts #59 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 55.
Defensive success ratemedian #21
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Central Michigan #21 of 76; 2014 Massachusetts #65 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 21.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #3
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Massachusetts #3 of 76; 2014 Central Michigan #60 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 3.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #17
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Massachusetts #17 of 76; 2014 Central Michigan #64 of 76. Marked: 2014 Northern Illinois, which has no value for this metric. Mid-American median rank 17.