Metrics

Notre DameFighting Irish

Season
Current

FBS Independents

FBS Independents, 2019

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019Notre Dame1122 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 USC, #23 Navy, #24 Virginia)#46 (of 130 teams · 429.9 yds/g · 5,589 yards)#13 (of 130 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points)#18 (of 130 teams · 320.2 yds/g allowed · 4,163 yards)#12 (of 130 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 233 points)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.9 /g · +245 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +17 on the season · 28 taken, 11 given · +1.31 /g)#99 (of 130 teams · 28:29 /g · 6h 10m on the season)#68 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing production returning)#75 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)#14 (of 130 teams · 843.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 130 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 130 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#28 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 130 teams · 1.274 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 6 FBS Independents teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#46 (Total offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #28–#126. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#67 (Scoring offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #13–#118. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#69 (Total defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #18–#130. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #12–#130. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#51 (Point margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #8–#130. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#55 (Turnover margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #4–#128. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#99 (Possession: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #15–#127. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#38 (Returning passing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #31–#104. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#42 (Returning receiving: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #20–#98. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#82 (Returning rushing: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #12–#128. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#114 (Team talent: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #14–#129. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #26–#127. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#68 (Defensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #17–#130. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #12–#128. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#76 (Defensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #28–#130. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#59 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #31–#129. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range #8–#96. 2 of 6 in the top 10.)
2019Army580 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#89 (of 130 teams · 379.1 yds/g · 4,929 yards)#67 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 370 points)#30 (of 130 teams · 342.3 yds/g allowed · 4,450 yards)#41 (of 130 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 299 points)#47 (of 130 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season)#70 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.08 /g)#15 (of 130 teams · 32:39 /g · 7h 05m on the season)#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#49 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#128 (of 130 teams · 265.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 130 teams · 0.237 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 130 teams · 0.184 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful)#77 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#129 (of 130 teams · 1.046 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 130 teams · 1.187 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019BYU760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Boise State, #22 USC)#28 (of 130 teams · 443.7 yds/g · 5,768 yards)#67 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 370 points)#69 (of 130 teams · 393.7 yds/g allowed · 5,118 yards)#48 (of 130 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 331 points)#55 (of 130 teams · +3.0 /g · +39 on the season)#60 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#71 (of 130 teams · 29:47 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#79 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's passing production returning)#31 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#100 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning)#68 (of 130 teams · 560.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 130 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 130 teams · 0.136 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#76 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 130 teams · 1.182 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Liberty850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 130 teams · 439.4 yds/g · 5,712 yards)#34 (of 130 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points)#81 (of 130 teams · 412.2 yds/g allowed · 5,359 yards)#68 (of 130 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#51 (of 130 teams · +4.8 /g · +62 on the season)#51 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.15 /g)#109 (of 130 teams · 27:53 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#20 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#22 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning)#129 (of 130 teams · 153.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 130 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 130 teams · 0.160 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#58 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 130 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 130 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Massachusetts1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#126 (of 130 teams · 293.1 yds/g · 3,517 yards)#118 (of 130 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 237 points)#130 (of 130 teams · 559.5 yds/g allowed · 6,714 yards)#130 (of 130 teams · 52.7 pts/g allowed · 632 points)#130 (of 130 teams · -32.9 /g · -395 on the season)#55 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#127 (of 130 teams · 26:04 /g · 5h 13m on the season)#104 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#98 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#128 (of 130 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#114 (of 130 teams · 358.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#127 (of 130 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#130 (of 130 teams · 0.403 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#128 (of 130 teams · 34% of plays successful)#130 (of 130 teams · 54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 130 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 130 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019New Mexico State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2019. Range 0–2.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#102 (of 130 teams · 361.1 yds/g · 4,333 yards)#108 (of 130 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 260 points)#126 (of 130 teams · 479.9 yds/g allowed · 5,759 yards)#129 (of 130 teams · 41.0 pts/g allowed · 492 points)#125 (of 130 teams · -19.3 /g · -232 on the season)#128 (of 130 teams · -15 on the season · 12 taken, 27 given · -1.25 /g)#116 (of 130 teams · 27:11 /g · 5h 26m on the season)#34 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#42 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#12 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning)#127 (of 130 teams · 269.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 130 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 130 teams · 0.265 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#124 (of 130 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 130 teams · 1.132 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 130 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20192019 Notre DameFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #46
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 BYU #28 of 130; 2019 Liberty #33 of 130; 2019 Army #89 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #102 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #126 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 46 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 46.
Scoring offensemedian #67
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #34 of 130; 2019 Army #67 of 130; 2019 BYU #67 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #108 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #118 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 13 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 67.
Total defensemedian #69
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Army #30 of 130; 2019 BYU #69 of 130; 2019 Liberty #81 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #126 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 18 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 69.
Scoring defensemedian #48
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Army #41 of 130; 2019 BYU #48 of 130; 2019 Liberty #68 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #129 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 12 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 48.
Point marginmedian #51
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Army #47 of 130; 2019 Liberty #51 of 130; 2019 BYU #55 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #125 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 8 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 51.
Turnover marginmedian #55
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #51 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #55 of 130; 2019 BYU #60 of 130; 2019 Army #70 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 4 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 55.
Possessionmedian #99
Possession. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Army #15 of 130; 2019 BYU #71 of 130; 2019 Liberty #109 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #116 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 99 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 99.
Returning passingmedian #38
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #31 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #34 of 130; 2019 Army #38 of 130; 2019 BYU #79 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #104 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 68 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Returning receivingmedian #42
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #20 of 130; 2019 BYU #31 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #42 of 130; 2019 Army #49 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #98 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 75 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 42.
Returning rushingmedian #82
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 New Mexico State #12 of 130; 2019 Liberty #22 of 130; 2019 Army #94 of 130; 2019 BYU #100 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 82 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 82.
Team talentmedian #114
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 BYU #68 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #114 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #127 of 130; 2019 Army #128 of 130; 2019 Liberty #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 14 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 114.
Offensive EPAmedian #29
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #26 of 130; 2019 Army #29 of 130; 2019 BYU #65 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #109 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 28 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 29.
Defensive EPAmedian #68
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 BYU #53 of 130; 2019 Liberty #68 of 130; 2019 Army #81 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #117 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 17 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 68.
Offensive success ratemedian #36
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Army #12 of 130; 2019 BYU #33 of 130; 2019 Liberty #36 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #104 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 37 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 36.
Defensive success ratemedian #76
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #58 of 130; 2019 BYU #76 of 130; 2019 Army #77 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #124 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 28 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 76.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #59
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Liberty #53 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #59 of 130; 2019 BYU #79 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #108 of 130; 2019 Army #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 31 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 59.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #45
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2019, best rank first: 2019 BYU #8 of 130; 2019 Army #45 of 130; 2019 New Mexico State #46 of 130; 2019 Liberty #82 of 130; 2019 Massachusetts #96 of 130. Marked: 2019 Notre Dame, ranked 9 of 130. FBS Independents median rank 45.