THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

OhioBobcats

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2019

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019Ohio7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 130 teams · 442.2 yds/g · 5,749 yards)#20 (of 130 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 446 points)#76 (of 130 teams · 403.7 yds/g allowed · 5,248 yards)#60 (of 130 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#35 (of 130 teams · +7.8 /g · +101 on the season)#91 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.31 /g)#26 (of 130 teams · 31:46 /g · 6h 53m on the season)#49 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's passing production returning)#121 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#124 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's rushing production returning)#118 (of 130 teams · 337.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 130 teams · 0.276 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 130 teams · 0.215 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 130 teams · 49% of plays successful)#79 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 130 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 130 teams · 1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Mid-American teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#66 (Total offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #16–#130. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #18–#130. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Total defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #7–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#72 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #26–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#82 (Point margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #28–#129. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #15–#128. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Possession: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #5–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#26 (Returning passing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #1–#130. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#86 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #16–#130. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #3–#124. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#118 (Team talent: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #90–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #14–#130. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#92 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #15–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #13–#130. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#90 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #23–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#71 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #19–#122. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range #2–#113. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2019Akron0–120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#130 (of 130 teams · 242.2 yds/g · 2,906 yards)#130 (of 130 teams · 10.5 pts/g · 126 points)#83 (of 130 teams · 413.9 yds/g allowed · 4,967 yards)#122 (of 130 teams · 36.3 pts/g allowed · 435 points)#129 (of 130 teams · -25.8 /g · -309 on the season)#128 (of 130 teams · -15 on the season · 11 taken, 26 given · -1.25 /g)#122 (of 130 teams · 26:29 /g · 5h 18m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#65 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#104 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#124 (of 130 teams · 312.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#130 (of 130 teams · -0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 130 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#130 (of 130 teams · 31% of plays successful)#123 (of 130 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 130 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.041 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Ball State5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 130 teams · 463.0 yds/g · 5,556 yards)#18 (of 130 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 418 points)#91 (of 130 teams · 425.2 yds/g allowed · 5,102 yards)#94 (of 130 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#53 (of 130 teams · +3.4 /g · +41 on the season)#15 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 24 taken, 16 given · +0.67 /g)#57 (of 130 teams · 30:16 /g · 6h 03m on the season)#89 (of 130 teams · 30% of last season's passing production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#96 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing production returning)#120 (of 130 teams · 327.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 130 teams · 0.232 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 130 teams · 0.209 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#90 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 130 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 130 teams · 1.213 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Bowling Green3–90 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#120 (of 130 teams · 319.1 yds/g · 3,829 yards)#128 (of 130 teams · 16.0 pts/g · 192 points)#117 (of 130 teams · 467.2 yds/g allowed · 5,606 yards)#126 (of 130 teams · 38.6 pts/g allowed · 463 points)#127 (of 130 teams · -22.6 /g · -271 on the season)#103 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 15 taken, 21 given · -0.50 /g)#81 (of 130 teams · 29:20 /g · 5h 52m on the season)#115 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#88 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#66 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#122 (of 130 teams · 315.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#126 (of 130 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#126 (of 130 teams · 0.307 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#118 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#116 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 130 teams · 1.102 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 130 teams · 1.298 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Buffalo8–50 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#82 (of 130 teams · 388.5 yds/g · 5,051 yards)#46 (of 130 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 291.9 yds/g allowed · 3,795 yards)#26 (of 130 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#28 (of 130 teams · +10.2 /g · +132 on the season)#19 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.62 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:02 /g · 7h 22m on the season)#119 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#130 (of 130 teams · 18% of last season's receiving production returning)#53 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#126 (of 130 teams · 284.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 130 teams · 0.194 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 130 teams · 0.046 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#23 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 130 teams · 1.129 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 130 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Central Michigan8–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 130 teams · 434.0 yds/g · 6,076 yards)#54 (of 130 teams · 30.4 pts/g · 426 points)#41 (of 130 teams · 362.4 yds/g allowed · 5,074 yards)#72 (of 130 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#59 (of 130 teams · +2.1 /g · +30 on the season)#121 (of 130 teams · -11 on the season · 19 taken, 30 given · -0.79 /g)#56 (of 130 teams · 30:17 /g · 7h 04m on the season)#26 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#86 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's rushing production returning)#99 (of 130 teams · 416.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 130 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 130 teams · 0.118 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#38 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 130 teams · 1.197 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 130 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Eastern Michigan6–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 (of 130 teams · 405.5 yds/g · 5,271 yards)#65 (of 130 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 379 points)#94 (of 130 teams · 430.5 yds/g allowed · 5,596 yards)#87 (of 130 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 398 points)#82 (of 130 teams · -1.5 /g · -19 on the season)#40 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 21 taken, 17 given · +0.31 /g)#97 (of 130 teams · 28:32 /g · 6h 11m on the season)#90 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's passing production returning)#36 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#121 (of 130 teams · 317.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 130 teams · 0.222 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 130 teams · 0.248 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#120 (of 130 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 130 teams · 1.173 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 130 teams · 1.153 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Kent State7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 (of 130 teams · 405.6 yds/g · 5,273 yards)#63 (of 130 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 380 points)#121 (of 130 teams · 472.8 yds/g allowed · 6,146 yards)#97 (of 130 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 414 points)#88 (of 130 teams · -2.6 /g · -34 on the season)#27 (of 130 teams · +6 on the season · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.46 /g)#125 (of 130 teams · 26:16 /g · 5h 41m on the season)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#16 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's receiving production returning)#54 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's rushing production returning)#123 (of 130 teams · 313.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 130 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 130 teams · 0.254 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#126 (of 130 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 130 teams · 1.094 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 130 teams · 1.137 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Miami (OH)8–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#122 (of 130 teams · 309.1 yds/g · 4,328 yards)#99 (of 130 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 338 points)#60 (of 130 teams · 381.9 yds/g allowed · 5,347 yards)#69 (of 130 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 394 points)#95 (of 130 teams · -4.0 /g · -56 on the season)#54 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.14 /g)#102 (of 130 teams · 28:15 /g · 6h 36m on the season)#130 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#39 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving production returning)#115 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#113 (of 130 teams · 359.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 130 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 130 teams · 0.131 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#66 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 130 teams · 1.137 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 130 teams · 1.175 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Northern Illinois5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#103 (of 130 teams · 358.7 yds/g · 4,304 yards)#103 (of 130 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 274 points)#63 (of 130 teams · 386.5 yds/g allowed · 4,638 yards)#71 (of 130 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 338 points)#100 (of 130 teams · -5.3 /g · -64 on the season)#103 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.50 /g)#14 (of 130 teams · 32:45 /g · 6h 33m on the season)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#105 (of 130 teams · 398.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 130 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 130 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#107 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful)#67 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 130 teams · 1.205 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 130 teams · 1.229 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Toledo6–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 130 teams · 433.7 yds/g · 5,204 yards)#75 (of 130 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 327 points)#122 (of 130 teams · 475.7 yds/g allowed · 5,708 yards)#102 (of 130 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 386 points)#97 (of 130 teams · -4.9 /g · -59 on the season)#113 (of 130 teams · -8 on the season · 11 taken, 19 given · -0.67 /g)#72 (of 130 teams · 29:46 /g · 5h 57m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#122 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)#91 (of 130 teams · 451.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 130 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 130 teams · 0.269 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#103 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 130 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 130 teams · 1.303 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Western Michigan7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#25 (of 130 teams · 445.7 yds/g · 5,794 yards)#30 (of 130 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 430 points)#87 (of 130 teams · 419.7 yds/g allowed · 5,456 yards)#50 (of 130 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#39 (of 130 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#19 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.62 /g)#54 (of 130 teams · 30:20 /g · 6h 34m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#93 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving production returning)#86 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's rushing production returning)#90 (of 130 teams · 452.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 130 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 130 teams · 0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#92 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 130 teams · 1.294 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 130 teams · 1.126 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20192019 OhioMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #66
Total offense. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ball State #16 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #25 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #36 of 130; 2019 Toledo #37 of 130; 2019 Kent State #66 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #67 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #82 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #103 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #120 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #122 of 130; 2019 Akron #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 29 of 130. Mid-American median rank 66.
Scoring offensemedian #63
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ball State #18 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #30 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #46 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #54 of 130; 2019 Kent State #63 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #65 of 130; 2019 Toledo #75 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #99 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #103 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #128 of 130; 2019 Akron #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 20 of 130. Mid-American median rank 63.
Total defensemedian #83
Total defense. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Buffalo #7 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #41 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #60 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #63 of 130; 2019 Akron #83 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #87 of 130; 2019 Ball State #91 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #94 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #117 of 130; 2019 Kent State #121 of 130; 2019 Toledo #122 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 76 of 130. Mid-American median rank 83.
Scoring defensemedian #72
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Buffalo #26 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #50 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #69 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #71 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #72 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #87 of 130; 2019 Ball State #94 of 130; 2019 Kent State #97 of 130; 2019 Toledo #102 of 130; 2019 Akron #122 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #126 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 60 of 130. Mid-American median rank 72.
Point marginmedian #82
Point margin. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Buffalo #28 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #39 of 130; 2019 Ball State #53 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #59 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #82 of 130; 2019 Kent State #88 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #95 of 130; 2019 Toledo #97 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #100 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #127 of 130; 2019 Akron #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 35 of 130. Mid-American median rank 82.
Turnover marginmedian #54
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ball State #15 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #19 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #19 of 130; 2019 Kent State #27 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #40 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #54 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #103 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #103 of 130; 2019 Toledo #113 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #121 of 130; 2019 Akron #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 91 of 130. Mid-American median rank 54.
Possessionmedian #57
Possession. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Buffalo #5 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #14 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #54 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #56 of 130; 2019 Ball State #57 of 130; 2019 Toledo #72 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #81 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #97 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #102 of 130; 2019 Akron #122 of 130; 2019 Kent State #125 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 26 of 130. Mid-American median rank 57.
Returning passingmedian #26
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Akron #1 of 130; 2019 Toledo #1 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #1 of 130; 2019 Kent State #12 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #12 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #26 of 130; 2019 Ball State #89 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #90 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #115 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #119 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 49 of 130. Mid-American median rank 26.
Returning receivingmedian #86
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Kent State #16 of 130; 2019 Ball State #25 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #36 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #39 of 130; 2019 Akron #65 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #86 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #88 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #93 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #94 of 130; 2019 Toledo #122 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 121 of 130. Mid-American median rank 86.
Returning rushingmedian #55
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Central Michigan #3 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #4 of 130; 2019 Toledo #43 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #53 of 130; 2019 Kent State #54 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #55 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #66 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #86 of 130; 2019 Ball State #96 of 130; 2019 Akron #104 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #115 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 124 of 130. Mid-American median rank 55.
Team talentmedian #118
Team talent. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Western Michigan #90 of 130; 2019 Toledo #91 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #99 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #105 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #113 of 130; 2019 Ball State #120 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #121 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #122 of 130; 2019 Kent State #123 of 130; 2019 Akron #124 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #126 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 118 of 130. Mid-American median rank 118.
Offensive EPAmedian #55
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Western Michigan #24 of 130; 2019 Ball State #31 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #37 of 130; 2019 Toledo #54 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #55 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #56 of 130; 2019 Kent State #57 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #99 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #117 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #126 of 130; 2019 Akron #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 14 of 130. Mid-American median rank 55.
Defensive EPAmedian #92
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Buffalo #15 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #47 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #49 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #56 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #65 of 130; 2019 Akron #92 of 130; 2019 Ball State #96 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #113 of 130; 2019 Kent State #114 of 130; 2019 Toledo #119 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #126 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 102 of 130. Mid-American median rank 92.
Offensive success ratemedian #53
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Kent State #24 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #25 of 130; 2019 Ball State #31 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #49 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #53 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #54 of 130; 2019 Toledo #73 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #107 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #115 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #118 of 130; 2019 Akron #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 13 of 130. Mid-American median rank 53.
Defensive success ratemedian #90
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Buffalo #23 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #38 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #66 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #67 of 130; 2019 Ball State #90 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #92 of 130; 2019 Toledo #103 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #116 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #120 of 130; 2019 Akron #123 of 130; 2019 Kent State #126 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 79 of 130. Mid-American median rank 90.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #71
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Western Michigan #19 of 130; 2019 Akron #28 of 130; 2019 Toledo #45 of 130; 2019 Ball State #62 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #67 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #73 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #83 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #106 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #109 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #117 of 130; 2019 Kent State #122 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 71 of 130. Mid-American median rank 71.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #39
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Akron #2 of 130; 2019 Western Michigan #24 of 130; 2019 Kent State #27 of 130; 2019 Eastern Michigan #31 of 130; 2019 Buffalo #33 of 130; 2019 Miami (OH) #39 of 130; 2019 Ball State #65 of 130; 2019 Northern Illinois #79 of 130; 2019 Central Michigan #100 of 130; 2019 Bowling Green #112 of 130; 2019 Toledo #113 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ohio, ranked 52 of 130. Mid-American median rank 39.