Metrics

Oklahoma StateCowboys

Season
Current

Big 12

Big 12, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Oklahoma State1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 520.2 yds/g · 6,763 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 44.2 pts/g · 575 points)#88 (of 120 teams · 409.5 yds/g allowed · 5,324 yards)#61 (of 120 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +17.9 /g · +232 on the season)#12 (of 120 teams · +12 on the season · 34 taken, 22 given · +0.92 /g)#113 (of 120 teams · 16:56 /g · 3h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#57 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.863 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.872 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big 12 teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#35 (Total offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #3–#113. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #3–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Total defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #6–#114. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #6–#103. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Point margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #10–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #7–#116. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Possession: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #17–#113. 0 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #7–#105. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #4–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #8–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #4–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #14–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range #3–#118. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2010Baylor760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 120 teams · 475.3 yds/g · 6,179 yards)#36 (of 120 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 405 points)#104 (of 120 teams · 435.4 yds/g allowed · 5,660 yards)#89 (of 120 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#65 (of 120 teams · +0.7 /g · +9 on the season)#55 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 20 taken, 20 given · +0.00 /g)#44 (of 120 teams · 18:58 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 120 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#29 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#84 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.988 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.947 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Colorado570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#79 (of 120 teams · 359.7 yds/g · 4,316 yards)#84 (of 120 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 290 points)#83 (of 120 teams · 400.0 yds/g allowed · 4,800 yards)#91 (of 120 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#88 (of 120 teams · -6.6 /g · -79 on the season)#64 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g)#30 (of 120 teams · 19:22 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#97 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.957 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Iowa State570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 120 teams · 317.4 yds/g · 3,809 yards)#97 (of 120 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 260 points)#87 (of 120 teams · 408.3 yds/g allowed · 4,899 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 346 points)#90 (of 120 teams · -7.2 /g · -86 on the season)#30 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 23 taken, 17 given · +0.50 /g)#104 (of 120 teams · 17:26 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.080 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#112 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.918 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.815 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Kansas390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#113 (of 120 teams · 296.4 yds/g · 3,557 yards)#111 (of 120 teams · 17.1 pts/g · 205 points)#98 (of 120 teams · 427.7 yds/g allowed · 5,132 yards)#103 (of 120 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 413 points)#112 (of 120 teams · -17.3 /g · -208 on the season)#103 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 12 taken, 20 given · -0.67 /g)#97 (of 120 teams · 17:32 /g · 3h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 120 teams · -0.025 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#110 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.935 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.875 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Kansas State760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 120 teams · 378.8 yds/g · 4,924 yards)#22 (of 120 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 437 points)#106 (of 120 teams · 445.7 yds/g allowed · 5,794 yards)#78 (of 120 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 378 points)#48 (of 120 teams · +4.5 /g · +59 on the season)#38 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.31 /g)#64 (of 120 teams · 18:40 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 120 teams · 0.104 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#60 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#79 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.946 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 120 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Missouri1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 120 teams · 409.6 yds/g · 5,325 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#47 (of 120 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 4,633 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 209 points)#15 (of 120 teams · +13.8 /g · +179 on the season)#15 (of 120 teams · +11 on the season · 29 taken, 18 given · +0.85 /g)#88 (of 120 teams · 17:48 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#34 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.916 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.851 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Nebraska1041 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 120 teams · 398.1 yds/g · 5,574 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 432 points)#11 (of 120 teams · 306.8 yds/g allowed · 4,295 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +13.5 /g · +189 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 23 taken, 24 given · -0.07 /g)#34 (of 120 teams · 19:17 /g · 4h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 120 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#15 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.960 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.795 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Oklahoma1224 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 481.4 yds/g · 6,739 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 37.2 pts/g · 521 points)#53 (of 120 teams · 361.9 yds/g allowed · 5,066 yards)#33 (of 120 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 305 points)#12 (of 120 teams · +15.4 /g · +216 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +14 on the season · 32 taken, 18 given · +1.00 /g)#40 (of 120 teams · 19:02 /g · 4h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 120 teams · 0.801 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 120 teams · 1.069 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Texas574 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 120 teams · 382.5 yds/g · 4,590 yards)#88 (of 120 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 285 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 300.2 yds/g allowed · 3,602 yards)#49 (of 120 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#66 (of 120 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#116 (of 120 teams · -12 on the season · 18 taken, 30 given · -1.00 /g)#17 (of 120 teams · 19:53 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.885 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.857 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Texas A&M940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 120 teams · 441.9 yds/g · 5,744 yards)#34 (of 120 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 406 points)#55 (of 120 teams · 364.3 yds/g allowed · 4,736 yards)#34 (of 120 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#30 (of 120 teams · +9.3 /g · +121 on the season)#81 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 25 taken, 30 given · -0.38 /g)#28 (of 120 teams · 19:27 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#20 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.853 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.875 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Texas Tech850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2010. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 120 teams · 460.2 yds/g · 5,983 yards)#23 (of 120 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 430 points)#114 (of 120 teams · 456.3 yds/g allowed · 5,932 yards)#93 (of 120 teams · 30.9 pts/g allowed · 402 points)#59 (of 120 teams · +2.1 /g · +28 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 23 taken, 27 given · -0.31 /g)#99 (of 120 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#71 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.932 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20102010 Oklahoma StateBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #35
Total offense. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma #10 of 120; 2010 Baylor #13 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #15 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #23 of 120; 2010 Missouri #35 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #44 of 120; 2010 Texas #58 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #62 of 120; 2010 Colorado #79 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #99 of 120; 2010 Kansas #113 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 3 of 120. Big 12 median rank 35.
Scoring offensemedian #36
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma #14 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #22 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #23 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #34 of 120; 2010 Baylor #36 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #39 of 120; 2010 Missouri #43 of 120; 2010 Colorado #84 of 120; 2010 Texas #88 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #97 of 120; 2010 Kansas #111 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 3 of 120. Big 12 median rank 36.
Total defensemedian #83
Total defense. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Texas #6 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #11 of 120; 2010 Missouri #47 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #53 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #55 of 120; 2010 Colorado #83 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #87 of 120; 2010 Kansas #98 of 120; 2010 Baylor #104 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #106 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #114 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 88 of 120. Big 12 median rank 83.
Scoring defensemedian #61
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Missouri #6 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #9 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #33 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #34 of 120; 2010 Texas #49 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #76 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #78 of 120; 2010 Baylor #89 of 120; 2010 Colorado #91 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #93 of 120; 2010 Kansas #103 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 61 of 120. Big 12 median rank 61.
Point marginmedian #48
Point margin. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma #12 of 120; 2010 Missouri #15 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #16 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #30 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #48 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #59 of 120; 2010 Baylor #65 of 120; 2010 Texas #66 of 120; 2010 Colorado #88 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #90 of 120; 2010 Kansas #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 10 of 120. Big 12 median rank 48.
Turnover marginmedian #55
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma #7 of 120; 2010 Missouri #15 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #30 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #38 of 120; 2010 Baylor #55 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #61 of 120; 2010 Colorado #64 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #74 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #81 of 120; 2010 Kansas #103 of 120; 2010 Texas #116 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 12 of 120. Big 12 median rank 55.
Possessionmedian #44
Possession. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Texas #17 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #28 of 120; 2010 Colorado #30 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #34 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #40 of 120; 2010 Baylor #44 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #64 of 120; 2010 Missouri #88 of 120; 2010 Kansas #97 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #99 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #104 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 113 of 120. Big 12 median rank 44.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Baylor #15 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #29 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #41 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #43 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #45 of 120; 2010 Colorado #51 of 120; 2010 Missouri #58 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #59 of 120; 2010 Texas #68 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #87 of 120; 2010 Kansas #105 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 7 of 120. Big 12 median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #57
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Texas A&M #4 of 120; 2010 Texas #10 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #11 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #30 of 120; 2010 Missouri #33 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #84 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #86 of 120; 2010 Colorado #96 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #105 of 120; 2010 Baylor #108 of 120; 2010 Kansas #109 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 57 of 120. Big 12 median rank 57.
Offensive success ratemedian #37
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma #25 of 120; 2010 Baylor #29 of 120; 2010 Missouri #34 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #36 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #37 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #60 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #64 of 120; 2010 Texas #73 of 120; 2010 Colorado #76 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #94 of 120; 2010 Kansas #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 8 of 120. Big 12 median rank 37.
Defensive success ratemedian #57
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Oklahoma #4 of 120; 2010 Texas #9 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #15 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #20 of 120; 2010 Missouri #34 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #71 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #79 of 120; 2010 Baylor #84 of 120; 2010 Colorado #97 of 120; 2010 Kansas #110 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 57 of 120. Big 12 median rank 57.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #67
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Baylor #14 of 120; 2010 Nebraska #27 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #37 of 120; 2010 Kansas #49 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #65 of 120; 2010 Missouri #67 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #71 of 120; 2010 Colorado #72 of 120; 2010 Texas #87 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #102 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 98 of 120. Big 12 median rank 67.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #29
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Nebraska #3 of 120; 2010 Iowa State #9 of 120; 2010 Missouri #17 of 120; 2010 Texas #20 of 120; 2010 Kansas #29 of 120; 2010 Texas A&M #30 of 120; 2010 Texas Tech #64 of 120; 2010 Baylor #77 of 120; 2010 Colorado #84 of 120; 2010 Kansas State #109 of 120; 2010 Oklahoma #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 Oklahoma State, ranked 28 of 120. Big 12 median rank 29.