THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Oklahoma StateCowboys

Season
‹
›Current

Big 12

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Big 12, 2013

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 125 teams · 448.8 yds/g · 5,834 yds)#14 (of 125 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 508 points)#53 (of 125 teams · 384.9 yds/g allowed · 5,004 yds)#19 (of 125 teams · 21.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#11 (of 125 teams · +17.5 /g · +227 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +15 on the season · 33 taken, 18 given · +1.15 /g)#119 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 26:42 /g · 5h 47m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 125 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#79 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#14 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#33 (of 125 teams · 0.988 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 125 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Big 12 teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#63 (Total offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #1–#119. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #1–#120. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#53 (Total defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #20–#106. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #19–#109. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#52 (Point margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #2–#112. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #4–#123. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#58 (Possession: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #17–#119. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#73 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #11–#123. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #2–#65. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#79 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #17–#123. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#44 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #3–#91. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #20–#122. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#44 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #1–#111. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)
2013Baylor11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 618.8 yds/g · 8,044 yds)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 52.4 pts/g · 681 points)#28 (of 125 teams · 360.3 yds/g allowed · 4,684 yds)#36 (of 125 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 306 points)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +28.9 /g · +375 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +13 on the season · 29 taken, 16 given · +1.00 /g)#114 (of 125 teams · 27:26 /g · 5h 57m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 125 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#27 (of 125 teams · 46% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 125 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 125 teams · 0.988 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Kansas State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#72 (of 125 teams · 402.7 yds/g · 5,235 yds)#37 (of 125 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#26 (of 125 teams · 358.9 yds/g allowed · 4,665 yds)#31 (of 125 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#34 (of 125 teams · +10.3 /g · +134 on the season)#61 (of 125 teams · +0 on the season · 25 taken, 25 given · +0.00 /g)#17 (of 125 teams · 32:32 /g · 7h 03m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 125 teams · 0.141 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 125 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#17 (of 125 teams · 47% of plays successful)#91 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 125 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.803 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Iowa State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#97 (of 125 teams · 363.0 yds/g · 4,356 yds)#90 (of 125 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 298 points)#106 (of 125 teams · 463.1 yds/g allowed · 5,557 yds)#109 (of 125 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 432 points)#105 (of 125 teams · -11.2 /g · -134 on the season)#71 (of 125 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.08 /g)#34 (of 125 teams · 31:38 /g · 6h 20m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#104 (of 125 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 125 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#94 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful)#73 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 125 teams · 0.888 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 125 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Oklahoma11–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#52 (of 125 teams · 423.0 yds/g · 5,499 yds)#40 (of 125 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points)#20 (of 125 teams · 350.1 yds/g allowed · 4,552 yds)#22 (of 125 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#33 (of 125 teams · +10.8 /g · +140 on the season)#21 (of 125 teams · +9 on the season · 25 taken, 16 given · +0.69 /g)#20 (of 125 teams · 32:17 /g · 7h 00m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 125 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 125 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#61 (of 125 teams · 43% of plays successful)#35 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 125 teams · 0.872 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 125 teams · 0.912 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013TCU4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#106 (of 125 teams · 344.8 yds/g · 4,138 yds)#88 (of 125 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 301 points)#24 (of 125 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 4,277 yds)#54 (of 125 teams · 25.3 pts/g allowed · 303 points)#70 (of 125 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 on the season)#74 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 28 taken, 30 given · -0.17 /g)#41 (of 125 teams · 31:14 /g · 6h 15m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.008 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#88 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.810 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 125 teams · 1.041 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Texas8–55 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 125 teams · 408.7 yds/g · 5,313 yds)#65 (of 125 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 381 points)#69 (of 125 teams · 407.2 yds/g allowed · 5,294 yds)#57 (of 125 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#59 (of 125 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season)#39 (of 125 teams · +4 on the season · 26 taken, 22 given · +0.31 /g)#58 (of 125 teams · 30:14 /g · 6h 33m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 125 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 125 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#104 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful)#56 (of 125 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 125 teams · 0.883 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 125 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Texas Tech8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 511.0 yds/g · 6,643 yds)#23 (of 125 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 465 points)#85 (of 125 teams · 418.5 yds/g allowed · 5,441 yds)#88 (of 125 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 397 points)#52 (of 125 teams · +5.2 /g · +68 on the season)#123 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -14 on the season · 19 taken, 33 given · -1.08 /g)#96 (of 125 teams · 28:42 /g · 6h 13m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 125 teams · 0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 125 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#40 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#44 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 125 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 125 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013West Virginia4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 (of 125 teams · 410.8 yds/g · 4,929 yds)#79 (of 125 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 316 points)#102 (of 125 teams · 455.0 yds/g allowed · 5,460 yds)#100 (of 125 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 400 points)#94 (of 125 teams · -7.0 /g · -84 on the season)#87 (of 125 teams · -4 on the season · 28 taken, 32 given · -0.33 /g)#61 (of 125 teams · 30:08 /g · 6h 02m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 125 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 125 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#112 (of 125 teams · 38% of plays successful)#52 (of 125 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 125 teams · 0.993 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 125 teams · 0.927 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Kansas3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 294.5 yds/g · 3,534 yds)#120 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 15.3 pts/g · 184 points)#97 (of 125 teams · 432.3 yds/g allowed · 5,188 yds)#94 (of 125 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#112 (of 125 teams · -16.5 /g · -198 on the season)#54 (of 125 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.08 /g)#77 (of 125 teams · 29:31 /g · 5h 54m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#123 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 125 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#123 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 34% of plays successful)#48 (of 125 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 125 teams · 0.951 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 125 teams · 0.950 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20132013 Oklahoma StateBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #63
Total offense. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #1 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #8 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #52 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #63 of 125; 2013 Texas #65 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #72 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #97 of 125; 2013 TCU #106 of 125; 2013 Kansas #119 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 37 of 125. Big 12 median rank 63.
Scoring offensemedian #40
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #1 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #23 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #37 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #40 of 125; 2013 Texas #65 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #79 of 125; 2013 TCU #88 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #90 of 125; 2013 Kansas #120 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 14 of 125. Big 12 median rank 40.
Total defensemedian #53
Total defense. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oklahoma #20 of 125; 2013 TCU #24 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #26 of 125; 2013 Baylor #28 of 125; 2013 Texas #69 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #85 of 125; 2013 Kansas #97 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #102 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #106 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 53 of 125. Big 12 median rank 53.
Scoring defensemedian #54
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oklahoma #22 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #31 of 125; 2013 Baylor #36 of 125; 2013 TCU #54 of 125; 2013 Texas #57 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #88 of 125; 2013 Kansas #94 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #100 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #109 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 19 of 125. Big 12 median rank 54.
Point marginmedian #52
Point margin. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #2 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #33 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #34 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #52 of 125; 2013 Texas #59 of 125; 2013 TCU #70 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #94 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #105 of 125; 2013 Kansas #112 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 11 of 125. Big 12 median rank 52.
Turnover marginmedian #54
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #8 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #21 of 125; 2013 Texas #39 of 125; 2013 Kansas #54 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #61 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #71 of 125; 2013 TCU #74 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #87 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 4 of 125. Big 12 median rank 54.
Possessionmedian #58
Possession. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Kansas State #17 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #20 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #34 of 125; 2013 TCU #41 of 125; 2013 Texas #58 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #61 of 125; 2013 Kansas #77 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #96 of 125; 2013 Baylor #114 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 119 of 125. Big 12 median rank 58.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #73
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #11 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #22 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #33 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #72 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #99 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #104 of 125; 2013 Texas #115 of 125; 2013 TCU #119 of 125; 2013 Kansas #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 73 of 125. Big 12 median rank 73.
Defensive EPAmedian #32
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #2 of 125; 2013 TCU #7 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #28 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #32 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #44 of 125; 2013 Texas #53 of 125; 2013 Kansas #55 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #58 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #65 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 5 of 125. Big 12 median rank 32.
Offensive success ratemedian #79
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Kansas State #17 of 125; 2013 Baylor #27 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #40 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #61 of 125; 2013 TCU #88 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #94 of 125; 2013 Texas #104 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #112 of 125; 2013 Kansas #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 79 of 125. Big 12 median rank 79.
Defensive success ratemedian #44
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 TCU #3 of 125; 2013 Baylor #5 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #35 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #44 of 125; 2013 Kansas #48 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #52 of 125; 2013 Texas #56 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #73 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #91 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 14 of 125. Big 12 median rank 44.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #60
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #20 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #31 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #47 of 125; 2013 Kansas #60 of 125; 2013 Kansas State #94 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #97 of 125; 2013 Texas #101 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #108 of 125; 2013 TCU #122 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 33 of 125. Big 12 median rank 60.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #44
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Kansas State #1 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #33 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #40 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #44 of 125; 2013 Texas #45 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #50 of 125; 2013 Kansas #67 of 125; 2013 Baylor #92 of 125; 2013 TCU #111 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oklahoma State, ranked 43 of 125. Big 12 median rank 44.