Metrics

Oklahoma StateCowboys

Season
Current

Big 12

Big 12, 2016

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Oklahoma State1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Colorado)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #16 West Virginia, #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #10 Colorado)#14 (of 128 teams · 494.8 yds/g · 6,432 yards)#17 (of 128 teams · 38.6 pts/g · 502 points)#92 (of 128 teams · 446.3 yds/g allowed · 5,802 yards)#53 (of 128 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#22 (of 128 teams · +12.1 /g · +157 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 25 taken, 14 given · +0.85 /g)#84 (of 128 teams · 28:51 /g · 6h 15m on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's passing production returning)#51 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#70 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's rushing production returning)#39 (of 128 teams · 631.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 128 teams · 0.260 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 128 teams · 0.171 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#72 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 128 teams · 1.256 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 128 teams · 1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Big 12 teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#16 (Total offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #1–#106. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#45 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #3–#120. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#83 (Total defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #51–#128. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#68 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #25–#128. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#49 (Point margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #10–#126. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#85 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #4–#123. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#77 (Possession: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #19–#111. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#51 (Returning passing: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #1–#107. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#70 (Returning receiving: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #32–#105. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#67 (Returning rushing: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #23–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#39 (Team talent: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #11–#72. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #1–#126. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#76 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #41–#124. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#22 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #5–#125. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#58 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #32–#125. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#81 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #11–#126. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#62 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range #23–#104. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2016Baylor760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Oklahoma State)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 522.7 yds/g · 6,795 yards)#35 (of 128 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 450 points)#82 (of 128 teams · 430.9 yds/g allowed · 5,601 yards)#71 (of 128 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#49 (of 128 teams · +5.6 /g · +73 on the season)#96 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 22 taken, 27 given · -0.38 /g)#111 (of 128 teams · 27:01 /g · 5h 51m on the season)#78 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's passing production returning)#105 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#67 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#40 (of 128 teams · 619.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 128 teams · 0.222 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 128 teams · 0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#46 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#85 (of 128 teams · 1.169 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 128 teams · 1.152 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Iowa State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#60 (of 128 teams · 421.6 yds/g · 5,059 yards)#71 (of 128 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 332 points)#102 (of 128 teams · 452.9 yds/g allowed · 5,435 yards)#88 (of 128 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 376 points)#86 (of 128 teams · -3.7 /g · -44 on the season)#85 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 13 taken, 16 given · -0.25 /g)#69 (of 128 teams · 29:39 /g · 5h 56m on the season)#81 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#64 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing production returning)#56 (of 128 teams · 552.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 128 teams · 0.194 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 128 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#116 (of 128 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 128 teams · 1.173 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 128 teams · 1.161 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Kansas2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#106 (of 128 teams · 359.5 yds/g · 4,314 yards)#120 (of 128 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 243 points)#109 (of 128 teams · 456.2 yds/g allowed · 5,474 yards)#114 (of 128 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 448 points)#126 (of 128 teams · -17.1 /g · -205 on the season)#123 (of 128 teams · -14 on the season · 22 taken, 36 given · -1.17 /g)#102 (of 128 teams · 27:48 /g · 5h 34m on the season)#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#68 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning)#72 (of 128 teams · 491.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#126 (of 128 teams · 0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 128 teams · 0.176 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#125 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful)#98 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 128 teams · 1.163 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 128 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Kansas State940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#81 (of 128 teams · 388.8 yds/g · 5,054 yards)#45 (of 128 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 419 points)#51 (of 128 teams · 387.7 yds/g allowed · 5,040 yards)#25 (of 128 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#34 (of 128 teams · +9.9 /g · +129 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +13 on the season · 25 taken, 12 given · +1.00 /g)#19 (of 128 teams · 32:36 /g · 7h 04m on the season)#65 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's passing production returning)#70 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#33 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning)#70 (of 128 teams · 505.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 128 teams · 0.214 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 128 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#69 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 128 teams · 1.077 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 128 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Oklahoma1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #12 Oklahoma State, #16 West Virginia · postseason: #14 Auburn)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 554.8 yds/g · 7,212 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.9 pts/g · 571 points)#83 (of 128 teams · 432.0 yds/g allowed · 5,616 yards)#68 (of 128 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +15.1 /g · +196 on the season)#67 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g)#25 (of 128 teams · 32:16 /g · 7h 00m on the season)#51 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing production returning)#83 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#23 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning)#18 (of 128 teams · 777.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.376 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 128 teams · 0.190 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#45 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 128 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 128 teams · 1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016TCU670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 128 teams · 463.1 yds/g · 6,021 yards)#52 (of 128 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#76 (of 128 teams · 426.7 yds/g allowed · 5,547 yards)#64 (of 128 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 364 points)#60 (of 128 teams · +3.0 /g · +39 on the season)#90 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.31 /g)#98 (of 128 teams · 28:07 /g · 6h 06m on the season)#107 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing production returning)#79 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's receiving production returning)#117 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's rushing production returning)#30 (of 128 teams · 665.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 128 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 128 teams · 0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#32 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 128 teams · 1.160 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 128 teams · 1.222 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Texas573 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 128 teams · 491.3 yds/g · 5,895 yards)#46 (of 128 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 383 points)#94 (of 128 teams · 448.3 yds/g allowed · 5,379 yards)#90 (of 128 teams · 31.5 pts/g allowed · 378 points)#65 (of 128 teams · +0.4 /g · +5 on the season)#85 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.25 /g)#95 (of 128 teams · 28:16 /g · 5h 39m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#78 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#57 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 839.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 128 teams · 0.168 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 128 teams · 0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#58 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#126 (of 128 teams · 1.009 average PPA on successful plays)#60 (of 128 teams · 1.188 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Texas Tech570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 566.6 yds/g · 6,799 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 524 points)#128 (of 128 teams · 554.3 yds/g allowed · 6,652 yards)#128 (of 128 teams · 43.5 pts/g allowed · 522 points)#66 (of 128 teams · +0.2 /g · +2 on the season)#93 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.33 /g)#46 (of 128 teams · 30:56 /g · 6h 11m on the season)#47 (of 128 teams · 93% of last season's passing production returning)#64 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's receiving production returning)#108 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#46 (of 128 teams · 604.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 128 teams · 0.302 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#124 (of 128 teams · 0.300 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#125 (of 128 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 128 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 128 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016West Virginia1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2016. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 128 teams · 485.5 yds/g · 6,312 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 405 points)#73 (of 128 teams · 425.9 yds/g allowed · 5,537 yards)#35 (of 128 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 312 points)#41 (of 128 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#38 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.31 /g)#77 (of 128 teams · 29:07 /g · 6h 18m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning)#94 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)#31 (of 128 teams · 654.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 128 teams · 0.208 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 128 teams · 0.114 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#50 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#54 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 128 teams · 1.233 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 128 teams · 1.122 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20162016 Oklahoma StateBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #16
Total offense. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Texas Tech #1 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #2 of 128; 2016 Baylor #6 of 128; 2016 Texas #16 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #17 of 128; 2016 TCU #29 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #60 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #81 of 128; 2016 Kansas #106 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 14 of 128. Big 12 median rank 16.
Scoring offensemedian #45
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #3 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #5 of 128; 2016 Baylor #35 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #45 of 128; 2016 Texas #46 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #50 of 128; 2016 TCU #52 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #71 of 128; 2016 Kansas #120 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 17 of 128. Big 12 median rank 45.
Total defensemedian #83
Total defense. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Kansas State #51 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #73 of 128; 2016 TCU #76 of 128; 2016 Baylor #82 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #83 of 128; 2016 Texas #94 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #102 of 128; 2016 Kansas #109 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #128 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 92 of 128. Big 12 median rank 83.
Scoring defensemedian #68
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Kansas State #25 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #35 of 128; 2016 TCU #64 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #68 of 128; 2016 Baylor #71 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #88 of 128; 2016 Texas #90 of 128; 2016 Kansas #114 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #128 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 53 of 128. Big 12 median rank 68.
Point marginmedian #49
Point margin. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #10 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #34 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #41 of 128; 2016 Baylor #49 of 128; 2016 TCU #60 of 128; 2016 Texas #65 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #66 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #86 of 128; 2016 Kansas #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 22 of 128. Big 12 median rank 49.
Turnover marginmedian #85
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Kansas State #4 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #38 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #67 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #85 of 128; 2016 Texas #85 of 128; 2016 TCU #90 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #93 of 128; 2016 Baylor #96 of 128; 2016 Kansas #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 10 of 128. Big 12 median rank 85.
Possessionmedian #77
Possession. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Kansas State #19 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #25 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #46 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #69 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #77 of 128; 2016 Texas #95 of 128; 2016 TCU #98 of 128; 2016 Kansas #102 of 128; 2016 Baylor #111 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 84 of 128. Big 12 median rank 77.
Returning passingmedian #51
Returning passing. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Texas #1 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #1 of 128; 2016 Kansas #12 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #47 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #51 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #65 of 128; 2016 Baylor #78 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #81 of 128; 2016 TCU #107 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 58 of 128. Big 12 median rank 51.
Returning receivingmedian #70
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 West Virginia #32 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #64 of 128; 2016 Kansas #68 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #70 of 128; 2016 Texas #78 of 128; 2016 TCU #79 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #83 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #94 of 128; 2016 Baylor #105 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 51 of 128. Big 12 median rank 70.
Returning rushingmedian #67
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #23 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #33 of 128; 2016 Texas #57 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #64 of 128; 2016 Baylor #67 of 128; 2016 Kansas #86 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #94 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #108 of 128; 2016 TCU #117 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 70 of 128. Big 12 median rank 67.
Team talentmedian #39
Team talent. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Texas #11 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #18 of 128; 2016 TCU #30 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #31 of 128; 2016 Baylor #40 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #46 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #56 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #70 of 128; 2016 Kansas #72 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 39 of 128. Big 12 median rank 39.
Offensive EPAmedian #36
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #12 of 128; 2016 Baylor #30 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #36 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #38 of 128; 2016 TCU #47 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #48 of 128; 2016 Texas #59 of 128; 2016 Kansas #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 18 of 128. Big 12 median rank 36.
Defensive EPAmedian #76
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 West Virginia #41 of 128; 2016 Baylor #46 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #48 of 128; 2016 TCU #68 of 128; 2016 Kansas #80 of 128; 2016 Texas #82 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #84 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #108 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #124 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 76 of 128. Big 12 median rank 76.
Offensive success ratemedian #22
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #5 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #10 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #18 of 128; 2016 Texas #22 of 128; 2016 Baylor #32 of 128; 2016 TCU #35 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #45 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #50 of 128; 2016 Kansas #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 21 of 128. Big 12 median rank 22.
Defensive success ratemedian #58
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 TCU #32 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #45 of 128; 2016 Baylor #46 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #54 of 128; 2016 Texas #58 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #69 of 128; 2016 Kansas #98 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #116 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 72 of 128. Big 12 median rank 58.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #81
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Texas Tech #11 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #12 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #53 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #81 of 128; 2016 Baylor #85 of 128; 2016 Kansas #89 of 128; 2016 TCU #90 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #118 of 128; 2016 Texas #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 41 of 128. Big 12 median rank 81.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #62
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 West Virginia #23 of 128; 2016 Baylor #35 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #46 of 128; 2016 Texas #60 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #62 of 128; 2016 Kansas #72 of 128; 2016 TCU #84 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #89 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #104 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oklahoma State, ranked 71 of 128. Big 12 median rank 62.