Metrics

Old DominionMonarchs

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Old Dominion570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#91 (of 128 teams · 371.3 yds/g · 4,455 yards)#98 (of 128 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 291 points)#97 (of 128 teams · 436.9 yds/g allowed · 5,243 yards)#106 (of 128 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 429 points)#108 (of 128 teams · -11.5 /g · -138 on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.08 /g)#108 (of 128 teams · 27:50 /g · 5h 34m on the season)#125 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#49 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's receiving production returning)#102 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#117 (of 128 teams · 319.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 128 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 128 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#111 (of 128 teams · 38% of plays successful)#94 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 128 teams · 1.280 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 128 teams · 1.154 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Conference USA teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#84 (Total offense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #9–#118. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#90 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #3–#124. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#76 (Total defense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #35–#120. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#85 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #10–#122. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#98 (Point margin: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #7–#127. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#79 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #4–#120. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#63 (Possession: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #6–#119. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning passing: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #15–#125. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning receiving: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #37–#110. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#51 (Returning rushing: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #4–#112. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#97 (Team talent: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #72–#125. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#92 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #6–#126. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#77 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #8–#126. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#86 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #2–#115. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#73 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #27–#123. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#85 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #2–#125. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#48 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range #8–#126. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)
2015Charlotte2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#110 (of 128 teams · 337.2 yds/g · 4,046 yards)#119 (of 128 teams · 17.5 pts/g · 210 points)#88 (of 128 teams · 418.0 yds/g allowed · 5,016 yards)#110 (of 128 teams · 36.3 pts/g allowed · 435 points)#125 (of 128 teams · -18.8 /g · -225 on the season)#120 (of 128 teams · -13 on the season · 22 taken, 35 given · -1.08 /g)#96 (of 128 teams · 28:21 /g · 5h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning)#122 (of 128 teams · 304.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#124 (of 128 teams · -0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 128 teams · 0.148 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#57 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#123 (of 128 teams · 1.063 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 128 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Florida Atlantic390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#84 (of 128 teams · 376.5 yds/g · 4,518 yards)#105 (of 128 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 270 points)#70 (of 128 teams · 405.1 yds/g allowed · 4,861 yards)#83 (of 128 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#98 (of 128 teams · -6.3 /g · -75 on the season)#85 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.17 /g)#82 (of 128 teams · 29:03 /g · 5h 49m on the season)#63 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#107 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving production returning)#69 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning)#90 (of 128 teams · 401.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#114 (of 128 teams · 0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 128 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#74 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#121 (of 128 teams · 1.078 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 128 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Florida International570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#106 (of 128 teams · 347.8 yds/g · 4,173 yards)#90 (of 128 teams · 25.5 pts/g · 306 points)#76 (of 128 teams · 405.7 yds/g allowed · 4,868 yards)#85 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#92 (of 128 teams · -4.3 /g · -52 on the season)#46 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 18 taken, 15 given · +0.25 /g)#65 (of 128 teams · 29:47 /g · 5h 57m on the season)#60 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's passing production returning)#59 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's receiving production returning)#17 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#104 (of 128 teams · 360.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 128 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 128 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#118 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 128 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.068 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Louisiana Tech940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#21 (of 128 teams · 482.8 yds/g · 6,276 yards)#19 (of 128 teams · 37.5 pts/g · 488 points)#48 (of 128 teams · 375.9 yds/g allowed · 4,886 yards)#62 (of 128 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 349 points)#29 (of 128 teams · +10.7 /g · +139 on the season)#61 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#49 (of 128 teams · 30:36 /g · 6h 38m on the season)#121 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#39 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#29 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's rushing production returning)#77 (of 128 teams · 438.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 128 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 128 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#62 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 128 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 128 teams · 1.164 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Marshall1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 (of 128 teams · 400.4 yds/g · 5,205 yards)#51 (of 128 teams · 31.3 pts/g · 407 points)#35 (of 128 teams · 360.5 yds/g allowed · 4,686 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 17.8 pts/g allowed · 231 points)#21 (of 128 teams · +13.5 /g · +176 on the season)#39 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 28 taken, 24 given · +0.31 /g)#59 (of 128 teams · 30:06 /g · 6h 31m on the season)#113 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#108 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving production returning)#79 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning)#72 (of 128 teams · 489.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 128 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#30 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 128 teams · 1.098 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.065 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Middle Tennessee760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 128 teams · 457.4 yds/g · 5,946 yards)#35 (of 128 teams · 34.0 pts/g · 442 points)#74 (of 128 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 5,273 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 346 points)#45 (of 128 teams · +7.4 /g · +96 on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 25 taken, 29 given · -0.31 /g)#63 (of 128 teams · 29:54 /g · 6h 29m on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#51 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)#82 (of 128 teams · 409.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 128 teams · 0.187 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 128 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#73 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#85 (of 128 teams · 1.163 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 128 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015North Texas1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#118 (of 128 teams · 320.1 yds/g · 3,841 yards)#124 (of 128 teams · 15.2 pts/g · 182 points)#120 (of 128 teams · 502.6 yds/g allowed · 6,031 yards)#122 (of 128 teams · 41.3 pts/g allowed · 495 points)#127 (of 128 teams · -26.1 /g · -313 on the season)#105 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 18 taken, 25 given · -0.58 /g)#119 (of 128 teams · 26:36 /g · 5h 19m on the season)#70 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's passing production returning)#44 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving production returning)#93 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning)#97 (of 128 teams · 380.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#126 (of 128 teams · -0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 128 teams · 0.284 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#123 (of 128 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#125 (of 128 teams · 1.057 average PPA on successful plays)#48 (of 128 teams · 1.167 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Rice570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 (of 128 teams · 401.8 yds/g · 4,822 yards)#87 (of 128 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 313 points)#103 (of 128 teams · 447.4 yds/g allowed · 5,369 yards)#108 (of 128 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 430 points)#104 (of 128 teams · -9.8 /g · -117 on the season)#119 (of 128 teams · -12 on the season · 10 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:31 /g · 6h 42m on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#72 (of 128 teams · 58% of last season's receiving production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#91 (of 128 teams · 399.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 128 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#126 (of 128 teams · 0.336 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#71 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#97 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 128 teams · 1.181 average PPA on successful plays)#126 (of 128 teams · 1.433 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Southern Miss950 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#12 (of 128 teams · 509.5 yds/g · 7,133 yards)#13 (of 128 teams · 39.9 pts/g · 559 points)#50 (of 128 teams · 379.5 yds/g allowed · 5,313 yards)#49 (of 128 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#18 (of 128 teams · +14.4 /g · +201 on the season)#74 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 24 taken, 25 given · -0.07 /g)#53 (of 128 teams · 30:20 /g · 7h 05m on the season)#68 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing production returning)#74 (of 128 teams · 470.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 128 teams · 0.285 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 128 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#27 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.454 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 128 teams · 1.223 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015UTEP570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#107 (of 128 teams · 341.3 yds/g · 4,095 yards)#112 (of 128 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 248 points)#94 (of 128 teams · 427.8 yds/g allowed · 5,133 yards)#98 (of 128 teams · 32.9 pts/g allowed · 395 points)#110 (of 128 teams · -12.3 /g · -147 on the season)#113 (of 128 teams · -11 on the season · 12 taken, 23 given · -0.92 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:39 /g · 6h 44m on the season)#124 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#99 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving production returning)#71 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning)#125 (of 128 teams · 256.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 128 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 128 teams · 0.190 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#47 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 128 teams · 1.131 average PPA on successful plays)#125 (of 128 teams · 1.431 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015UTSA390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#98 (of 128 teams · 362.3 yds/g · 4,347 yards)#104 (of 128 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 271 points)#101 (of 128 teams · 444.1 yds/g allowed · 5,329 yards)#101 (of 128 teams · 33.8 pts/g allowed · 405 points)#106 (of 128 teams · -11.2 /g · -134 on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#91 (of 128 teams · 28:33 /g · 5h 43m on the season)#76 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's passing production returning)#110 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's receiving production returning)#112 (of 128 teams · 35% of last season's rushing production returning)#105 (of 128 teams · 356.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 128 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 128 teams · 0.168 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#98 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 128 teams · 1.106 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 128 teams · 1.137 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Western Kentucky1220 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 526.4 yds/g · 7,369 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 44.3 pts/g · 620 points)#72 (of 128 teams · 405.2 yds/g allowed · 5,673 yards)#53 (of 128 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 363 points)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +18.4 /g · +257 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +14 on the season · 31 taken, 17 given · +1.00 /g)#57 (of 128 teams · 30:12 /g · 7h 03m on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#48 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's receiving production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning)#106 (of 128 teams · 353.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.323 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 128 teams · 0.161 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#54 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 128 teams · 1.237 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 128 teams · 1.349 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20152015 Old DominionConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #84
Total offense. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Western Kentucky #9 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #12 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #21 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #32 of 128; 2015 Rice #62 of 128; 2015 Marshall #64 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #84 of 128; 2015 UTSA #98 of 128; 2015 Florida International #106 of 128; 2015 UTEP #107 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #110 of 128; 2015 North Texas #118 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 91 of 128. Conference USA median rank 84.
Scoring offensemedian #90
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Western Kentucky #3 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #13 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #19 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #35 of 128; 2015 Marshall #51 of 128; 2015 Rice #87 of 128; 2015 Florida International #90 of 128; 2015 UTSA #104 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #105 of 128; 2015 UTEP #112 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #119 of 128; 2015 North Texas #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 98 of 128. Conference USA median rank 90.
Total defensemedian #76
Total defense. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Marshall #35 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #48 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #50 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #70 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #72 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #74 of 128; 2015 Florida International #76 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #88 of 128; 2015 UTEP #94 of 128; 2015 UTSA #101 of 128; 2015 Rice #103 of 128; 2015 North Texas #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 97 of 128. Conference USA median rank 76.
Scoring defensemedian #85
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Marshall #10 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #49 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #53 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #60 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #62 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #83 of 128; 2015 Florida International #85 of 128; 2015 UTEP #98 of 128; 2015 UTSA #101 of 128; 2015 Rice #108 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #110 of 128; 2015 North Texas #122 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 106 of 128. Conference USA median rank 85.
Point marginmedian #98
Point margin. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Western Kentucky #7 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #18 of 128; 2015 Marshall #21 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #29 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #45 of 128; 2015 Florida International #92 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #98 of 128; 2015 Rice #104 of 128; 2015 UTSA #106 of 128; 2015 UTEP #110 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #125 of 128; 2015 North Texas #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 108 of 128. Conference USA median rank 98.
Turnover marginmedian #79
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Western Kentucky #4 of 128; 2015 Marshall #39 of 128; 2015 Florida International #46 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #61 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #74 of 128; 2015 UTSA #79 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #85 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #92 of 128; 2015 North Texas #105 of 128; 2015 UTEP #113 of 128; 2015 Rice #119 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 79 of 128. Conference USA median rank 79.
Possessionmedian #63
Possession. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 UTEP #6 of 128; 2015 Rice #8 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #49 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #53 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #57 of 128; 2015 Marshall #59 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #63 of 128; 2015 Florida International #65 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #82 of 128; 2015 UTSA #91 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #96 of 128; 2015 North Texas #119 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 108 of 128. Conference USA median rank 63.
Returning passingmedian #68
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Middle Tennessee #15 of 128; 2015 Rice #21 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #26 of 128; 2015 Florida International #60 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #63 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #68 of 128; 2015 North Texas #70 of 128; 2015 UTSA #76 of 128; 2015 Marshall #113 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #121 of 128; 2015 UTEP #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 125 of 128. Conference USA median rank 68.
Returning receivingmedian #59
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Southern Miss #37 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #39 of 128; 2015 North Texas #44 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #48 of 128; 2015 Florida International #59 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #61 of 128; 2015 Rice #72 of 128; 2015 UTEP #99 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #107 of 128; 2015 Marshall #108 of 128; 2015 UTSA #110 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 49 of 128. Conference USA median rank 59.
Returning rushingmedian #51
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Rice #4 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #8 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #13 of 128; 2015 Florida International #17 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #29 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #51 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #69 of 128; 2015 UTEP #71 of 128; 2015 Marshall #79 of 128; 2015 North Texas #93 of 128; 2015 UTSA #112 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 102 of 128. Conference USA median rank 51.
Team talentmedian #97
Team talent. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Marshall #72 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #74 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #77 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #82 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #90 of 128; 2015 Rice #91 of 128; 2015 North Texas #97 of 128; 2015 Florida International #104 of 128; 2015 UTSA #105 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #106 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #122 of 128; 2015 UTEP #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 117 of 128. Conference USA median rank 97.
Offensive EPAmedian #92
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Western Kentucky #6 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #11 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #28 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #44 of 128; 2015 Rice #65 of 128; 2015 Marshall #83 of 128; 2015 Florida International #97 of 128; 2015 UTSA #108 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #114 of 128; 2015 UTEP #119 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #124 of 128; 2015 North Texas #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 92 of 128. Conference USA median rank 92.
Defensive EPAmedian #77
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Marshall #8 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #20 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #30 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #35 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #58 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #71 of 128; 2015 Florida International #77 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #79 of 128; 2015 UTSA #85 of 128; 2015 UTEP #96 of 128; 2015 North Texas #119 of 128; 2015 Rice #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 88 of 128. Conference USA median rank 77.
Offensive success ratemedian #86
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Western Kentucky #2 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #19 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #30 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #49 of 128; 2015 Marshall #64 of 128; 2015 Rice #71 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #86 of 128; 2015 Florida International #89 of 128; 2015 UTSA #92 of 128; 2015 North Texas #108 of 128; 2015 UTEP #110 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #115 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 111 of 128. Conference USA median rank 86.
Defensive success ratemedian #73
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Southern Miss #27 of 128; 2015 Marshall #30 of 128; 2015 UTEP #47 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #54 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #57 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #62 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #73 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #74 of 128; 2015 Rice #97 of 128; 2015 UTSA #98 of 128; 2015 Florida International #118 of 128; 2015 North Texas #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 94 of 128. Conference USA median rank 73.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #85
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Southern Miss #2 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #43 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #50 of 128; 2015 Florida International #70 of 128; 2015 Rice #77 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #85 of 128; 2015 UTEP #100 of 128; 2015 UTSA #112 of 128; 2015 Marshall #116 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #121 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #123 of 128; 2015 North Texas #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 19 of 128. Conference USA median rank 85.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #48
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Marshall #8 of 128; 2015 Florida International #9 of 128; 2015 Middle Tennessee #27 of 128; 2015 UTSA #33 of 128; 2015 Louisiana Tech #44 of 128; 2015 North Texas #48 of 128; 2015 Florida Atlantic #69 of 128; 2015 Southern Miss #82 of 128; 2015 Charlotte #96 of 128; 2015 Western Kentucky #115 of 128; 2015 UTEP #125 of 128; 2015 Rice #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 Old Dominion, ranked 43 of 128. Conference USA median rank 48.