Metrics

Ole MissRebels

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2019

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019Ole Miss481 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 130 teams · 445.0 yds/g · 5,340 yards)#82 (of 130 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 319 points)#86 (of 130 teams · 416.8 yds/g allowed · 5,001 yards)#59 (of 130 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#68 (of 130 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#50 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 16 taken, 14 given · +0.17 /g)#105 (of 130 teams · 28:14 /g · 5h 39m on the season)#108 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#123 (of 130 teams · 27% of last season's receiving production returning)#50 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 717.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 130 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 130 teams · 0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#83 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 130 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 130 teams · 1.229 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 SEC teams in 20191 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#70 (Total offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#124. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#74 (Scoring offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#125. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Total defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #3–#110. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Scoring defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#124. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Point margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #3–#122. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Turnover margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #3–#100. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#67 (Possession: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #11–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#57 (Returning passing: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#123. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Returning receiving: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #5–#123. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#61 (Returning rushing: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #20–#111. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#16 (Team talent: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#52. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#119. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #2–#124. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #1–#125. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #3–#119. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #10–#121. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#58 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range #13–#124. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)
2019Alabama1125 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Michigan)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 510.8 yds/g · 6,640 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 47.2 pts/g · 614 points)#21 (of 130 teams · 324.4 yds/g allowed · 4,217 yards)#13 (of 130 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +28.6 /g · +372 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18 on the season · 28 taken, 10 given · +1.38 /g)#67 (of 130 teams · 29:59 /g · 6h 30m on the season)#59 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#102 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 985.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.400 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 53% of plays successful)#33 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.335 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 130 teams · 1.109 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Arkansas2100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#111 (of 130 teams · 340.1 yds/g · 4,081 yards)#110 (of 130 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 257 points)#110 (of 130 teams · 450.7 yds/g allowed · 5,408 yards)#124 (of 130 teams · 36.8 pts/g allowed · 442 points)#122 (of 130 teams · -15.4 /g · -185 on the season)#97 (of 130 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.42 /g)#111 (of 130 teams · 27:49 /g · 5h 34m on the season)#115 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#57 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#26 (of 130 teams · 707.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#116 (of 130 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#124 (of 130 teams · 0.289 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#119 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 130 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 130 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Auburn944 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon, #13 Alabama)#64 (of 130 teams · 405.8 yds/g · 5,275 yards)#28 (of 130 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#28 (of 130 teams · 337.0 yds/g allowed · 4,381 yards)#17 (of 130 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 254 points)#21 (of 130 teams · +13.7 /g · +178 on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#87 (of 130 teams · 29:05 /g · 6h 18m on the season)#122 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#96 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#33 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning)#13 (of 130 teams · 843.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 130 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 130 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#14 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 130 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 130 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Florida1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #12 Auburn · postseason: #24 Virginia)#44 (of 130 teams · 430.5 yds/g · 5,597 yards)#28 (of 130 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 304.9 yds/g allowed · 3,963 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 201 points)#12 (of 130 teams · +17.8 /g · +231 on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 23 taken, 18 given · +0.38 /g)#62 (of 130 teams · 30:10 /g · 6h 32m on the season)#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#52 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#15 (of 130 teams · 835.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 130 teams · 0.256 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 130 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#22 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 130 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 130 teams · 1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Georgia1225 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida · postseason: #7 Baylor)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #15 Notre Dame · postseason: #7 Baylor)#61 (of 130 teams · 408.1 yds/g · 5,713 yards)#50 (of 130 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 431 points)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 275.8 yds/g allowed · 3,861 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 176 points)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.2 /g · +255 on the season)#49 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.21 /g)#18 (of 130 teams · 32:16 /g · 7h 32m on the season)#57 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#118 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's receiving production returning)#73 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 960.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 130 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#13 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 130 teams · 1.105 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 130 teams · 1.096 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Kentucky850 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#76 (of 130 teams · 392.5 yds/g · 5,102 yards)#76 (of 130 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 353 points)#20 (of 130 teams · 321.9 yds/g allowed · 4,185 yards)#14 (of 130 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 251 points)#34 (of 130 teams · +7.8 /g · +102 on the season)#75 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 18 taken, 20 given · -0.15 /g)#20 (of 130 teams · 32:09 /g · 6h 58m on the season)#44 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's passing production returning)#89 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#106 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 672.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 130 teams · 0.182 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 130 teams · 0.114 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#43 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 130 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 130 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019LSU1504 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #13 Alabama · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 568.4 yds/g · 8,526 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 48.4 pts/g · 726 points)#31 (of 130 teams · 343.5 yds/g allowed · 5,153 yards)#32 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 328 points)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +26.5 /g · +398 on the season)#15 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 22 taken, 12 given · +0.67 /g)#60 (of 130 teams · 30:13 /g · 7h 33m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#28 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#87 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 906.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.413 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 130 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 56% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 130 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 130 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Mississippi State670 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 (of 130 teams · 400.1 yds/g · 5,201 yards)#74 (of 130 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 359 points)#73 (of 130 teams · 399.0 yds/g allowed · 5,187 yards)#74 (of 130 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#79 (of 130 teams · -1.2 /g · -16 on the season)#60 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.08 /g)#28 (of 130 teams · 31:40 /g · 6h 52m on the season)#101 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning)#18 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing production returning)#23 (of 130 teams · 732.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 130 teams · 0.247 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 130 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#91 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 130 teams · 1.231 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 130 teams · 1.278 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Missouri660 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#93 (of 130 teams · 374.3 yds/g · 4,491 yards)#93 (of 130 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 304 points)#14 (of 130 teams · 312.0 yds/g allowed · 3,744 yards)#16 (of 130 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 233 points)#45 (of 130 teams · +5.9 /g · +71 on the season)#55 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.08 /g)#69 (of 130 teams · 29:54 /g · 5h 59m on the season)#112 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#35 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#64 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#40 (of 130 teams · 642.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 130 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 130 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 130 teams · 1.275 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019South Carolina480 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Georgia)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Georgia)#96 (of 130 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 4,463 yards)#104 (of 130 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 269 points)#67 (of 130 teams · 393.3 yds/g allowed · 4,719 yards)#53 (of 130 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 313 points)#93 (of 130 teams · -3.7 /g · -44 on the season)#43 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 17 taken, 14 given · +0.25 /g)#117 (of 130 teams · 27:01 /g · 5h 24m on the season)#51 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#32 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning)#21 (of 130 teams · 762.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 130 teams · 0.071 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 130 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#51 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 130 teams · 1.116 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 130 teams · 1.176 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Tennessee852 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#100 (of 130 teams · 365.5 yds/g · 4,752 yards)#98 (of 130 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 314 points)#23 (of 130 teams · 334.5 yds/g allowed · 4,348 yards)#29 (of 130 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#57 (of 130 teams · +2.5 /g · +32 on the season)#70 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g)#79 (of 130 teams · 29:22 /g · 6h 22m on the season)#56 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#20 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's rushing production returning)#16 (of 130 teams · 830.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 130 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 130 teams · 0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#50 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 130 teams · 1.241 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 130 teams · 1.118 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Texas A&M851 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 Oklahoma State)#72 (of 130 teams · 394.5 yds/g · 5,129 yards)#62 (of 130 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#29 (of 130 teams · 340.2 yds/g allowed · 4,423 yards)#37 (of 130 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 293 points)#40 (of 130 teams · +7.0 /g · +91 on the season)#100 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.46 /g)#11 (of 130 teams · 33:07 /g · 7h 10m on the season)#40 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's receiving production returning)#109 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing production returning)#12 (of 130 teams · 848.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 130 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 130 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#36 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#121 (of 130 teams · 1.095 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 130 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Vanderbilt390 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#124 (of 130 teams · 296.7 yds/g · 3,560 yards)#125 (of 130 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 198 points)#100 (of 130 teams · 436.6 yds/g allowed · 5,239 yards)#95 (of 130 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 381 points)#121 (of 130 teams · -15.3 /g · -183 on the season)#81 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 11 taken, 13 given · -0.17 /g)#83 (of 130 teams · 29:16 /g · 5h 51m on the season)#123 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#13 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's receiving production returning)#61 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#52 (of 130 teams · 605.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 130 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 130 teams · 0.209 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#125 (of 130 teams · 36% of plays successful)#113 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 130 teams · 1.211 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 130 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20192019 Ole MissSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #70
Total offense. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #6 of 130; 2019 Florida #44 of 130; 2019 Georgia #61 of 130; 2019 Auburn #64 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #70 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #72 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #76 of 130; 2019 Missouri #93 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #96 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #100 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #111 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 26 of 130. SEC median rank 70.
Scoring offensemedian #74
Scoring offense. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #2 of 130; 2019 Auburn #28 of 130; 2019 Florida #28 of 130; 2019 Georgia #50 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #62 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #74 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #76 of 130; 2019 Missouri #93 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #98 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #104 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #110 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #125 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 82 of 130. SEC median rank 74.
Total defensemedian #28
Total defense. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Georgia #3 of 130; 2019 Florida #9 of 130; 2019 Missouri #14 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #20 of 130; 2019 Alabama #21 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #23 of 130; 2019 Auburn #28 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #29 of 130; 2019 LSU #31 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #67 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #73 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #100 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #110 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 86 of 130. SEC median rank 28.
Scoring defensemedian #29
Scoring defense. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Georgia #1 of 130; 2019 Florida #7 of 130; 2019 Alabama #13 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #14 of 130; 2019 Missouri #16 of 130; 2019 Auburn #17 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #29 of 130; 2019 LSU #32 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #37 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #53 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #74 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #95 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 59 of 130. SEC median rank 29.
Point marginmedian #40
Point margin. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #3 of 130; 2019 LSU #4 of 130; 2019 Georgia #10 of 130; 2019 Florida #12 of 130; 2019 Auburn #21 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #40 of 130; 2019 Missouri #45 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #57 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #79 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #93 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #121 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #122 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 68 of 130. SEC median rank 40.
Turnover marginmedian #50
Turnover margin. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #3 of 130; 2019 LSU #15 of 130; 2019 Auburn #31 of 130; 2019 Florida #31 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #43 of 130; 2019 Georgia #49 of 130; 2019 Missouri #55 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #60 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #70 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #75 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #81 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #97 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #100 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 50 of 130. SEC median rank 50.
Possessionmedian #67
Possession. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Texas A&M #11 of 130; 2019 Georgia #18 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #20 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #28 of 130; 2019 LSU #60 of 130; 2019 Florida #62 of 130; 2019 Alabama #67 of 130; 2019 Missouri #69 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #79 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #83 of 130; 2019 Auburn #87 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #111 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #117 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 105 of 130. SEC median rank 67.
Returning passingmedian #57
Returning passing. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Florida #16 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #40 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #44 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #51 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #56 of 130; 2019 Georgia #57 of 130; 2019 Alabama #59 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #101 of 130; 2019 Missouri #112 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #115 of 130; 2019 Auburn #122 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #123 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 108 of 130. SEC median rank 57.
Returning receivingmedian #34
Returning receiving. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Tennessee #5 of 130; 2019 Florida #7 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #13 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #18 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #25 of 130; 2019 LSU #28 of 130; 2019 Alabama #34 of 130; 2019 Missouri #35 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #37 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #55 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #89 of 130; 2019 Auburn #96 of 130; 2019 Georgia #118 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 123 of 130. SEC median rank 34.
Returning rushingmedian #61
Returning rushing. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Tennessee #20 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #32 of 130; 2019 Auburn #33 of 130; 2019 Florida #52 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #57 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #61 of 130; 2019 Missouri #64 of 130; 2019 Georgia #73 of 130; 2019 LSU #87 of 130; 2019 Alabama #102 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #106 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #109 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #111 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 50 of 130. SEC median rank 61.
Team talentmedian #16
Team talent. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #1 of 130; 2019 Georgia #3 of 130; 2019 LSU #5 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #12 of 130; 2019 Auburn #13 of 130; 2019 Florida #15 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #16 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #21 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #23 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #26 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2019 Missouri #40 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #52 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 25 of 130. SEC median rank 16.
Offensive EPAmedian #62
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #3 of 130; 2019 Florida #21 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #23 of 130; 2019 Auburn #58 of 130; 2019 Georgia #59 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #62 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #66 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #91 of 130; 2019 Missouri #98 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #110 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #116 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 72 of 130. SEC median rank 62.
Defensive EPAmedian #37
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #2 of 130; 2019 Georgia #6 of 130; 2019 Missouri #7 of 130; 2019 Auburn #12 of 130; 2019 Florida #19 of 130; 2019 LSU #31 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #37 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #41 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #44 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #54 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #76 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #95 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 83 of 130. SEC median rank 37.
Offensive success ratemedian #41
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #4 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #18 of 130; 2019 Georgia #22 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #34 of 130; 2019 Auburn #40 of 130; 2019 Florida #41 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #76 of 130; 2019 Missouri #88 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #91 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #93 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #113 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #125 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 86 of 130. SEC median rank 41.
Defensive success ratemedian #36
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Missouri #3 of 130; 2019 LSU #10 of 130; 2019 Georgia #13 of 130; 2019 Auburn #14 of 130; 2019 Florida #22 of 130; 2019 Alabama #33 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #36 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #43 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #50 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #51 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #91 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #113 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 83 of 130. SEC median rank 36.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #50
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #10 of 130; 2019 Florida #16 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #27 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2019 LSU #49 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #50 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #54 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #64 of 130; 2019 Auburn #110 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #115 of 130; 2019 Georgia #116 of 130; 2019 Missouri #118 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #121 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 15 of 130. SEC median rank 50.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #58
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Georgia #13 of 130; 2019 Alabama #19 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #21 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #41 of 130; 2019 Florida #51 of 130; 2019 Auburn #55 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #58 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #59 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #84 of 130; 2019 Texas A&M #87 of 130; 2019 Missouri #102 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #103 of 130; 2019 LSU #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 Ole Miss, ranked 75 of 130. SEC median rank 58.