THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Ole MissRebels

Season
‹
›Current

SEC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Ole Miss played 8 such games.

SEC, 2025

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Ole Miss13–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma · postseason: #3 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma, #20 Tulane · postseason: #3 Georgia, #20 Tulane)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 462.3 yds/g · 3,698 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 266 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 375.8 yds/g allowed · 3,006 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 203 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · +7.9 /g · +63 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 8 taken, 7 given · +0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 30:38 /g · 4h 05m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 136 teams · 813.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 74 teams · 0.276 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.397 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 16 SEC teams in 20251 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#38 (Total offense: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #2–#63. 3 of 16 in the top 10.)#36 (Scoring offense: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #6–#66. 3 of 16 in the top 10.)#35 (Total defense: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #7–#71. 2 of 16 in the top 10.)#27 (Scoring defense: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #7–#73. 2 of 16 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #8–#59. 2 of 16 in the top 10.)#41 (Turnover margin: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #7–#72. 1 of 16 in the top 10.)#35 (Possession: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #5–#72. 2 of 16 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning passing: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #9–#127. 1 of 16 in the top 10.)#54 (Returning receiving: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #4–#127. 1 of 16 in the top 10.)#38 (Returning rushing: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #1–#122. 2 of 16 in the top 10.)#14 (Team talent: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #1–#55. 5 of 16 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive EPA: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #1–#67. 3 of 16 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive EPA: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #5–#72. 2 of 16 in the top 10.)#40 (Offensive success rate: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #4–#65. 2 of 16 in the top 10.)#29 (Defensive success rate: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #2–#71. 3 of 16 in the top 10.)#25 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #5–#72. 4 of 16 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range #17–#74. 0 of 16 in the top 10.)
2025Vanderbilt10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#12 (of 74 teams · 440.1 yds/g · 3,961 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 303 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 383.4 yds/g allowed · 3,451 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.0 /g · +99 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31:34 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 685.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.392 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 0.212 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.427 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.250 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas A&M11–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Notre Dame)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 447.7 yds/g · 4,029 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 302 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +9.4 /g · +85 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -5 in these games · 8 taken, 13 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:48 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 136 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 917.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 74 teams · 0.277 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 0.169 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.443 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Alabama11–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)#38 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g · 3,732 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 321.0 yds/g allowed · 3,210 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 198 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +7.2 /g · +72 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 32:34 /g · 5h 26m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 136 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 993.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 74 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Georgia12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama, #13 Texas, #22 Georgia Tech)#22 (of 74 teams · 404.2 yds/g · 3,638 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 324.3 yds/g allowed · 2,919 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10.6 /g · +95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 8 taken, 9 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33:04 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1003.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 74 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Missouri8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#30 (of 74 teams · 385.8 yds/g · 3,472 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 231 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 310.9 yds/g allowed · 2,798 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +2.2 /g · +20 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 8 taken, 14 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 31:12 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 136 teams · 804.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 74 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 1.287 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.297 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Oklahoma10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama, #18 Michigan)#61 (of 74 teams · 320.2 yds/g · 2,882 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 196 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 321.7 yds/g allowed · 2,895 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 161 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · +3.9 /g · +35 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 11 taken, 12 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 28:35 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 136 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 136 teams · 882.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 74 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025LSU7–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 (of 74 teams · 308.6 yds/g · 2,777 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 18.9 pts/g · 170 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 370.0 yds/g allowed · 3,330 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 193 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · -2.6 /g · -23 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 29:23 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 920.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Tennessee8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 462.0 yds/g · 4,158 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 319 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 421.6 yds/g allowed · 3,794 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +2.7 /g · +24 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:20 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 136 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 136 teams · 866.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.315 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 0.234 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Texas10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #18 Michigan)#46 (of 74 teams · 353.0 yds/g · 3,177 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 235 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 376.3 yds/g allowed · 3,387 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 220 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · +1.7 /g · +15 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 13 taken, 5 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 26:58 /g · 4h 03m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.390 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Florida4–81 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas)#56 (of 74 teams · 329.0 yds/g · 3,290 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 4,056 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · -8.2 /g · -82 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 28:52 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 136 teams · 73% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 136 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 136 teams · 898.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 74 teams · 0.130 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 0.220 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.110 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.235 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Auburn5–72 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 74 teams · 345.4 yds/g · 3,109 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 186 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 359.7 yds/g allowed · 3,237 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 213 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · -3.0 /g · -27 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 11 taken, 7 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 30:15 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 136 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 136 teams · 891.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 74 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.086 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.315 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Mississippi State5–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#40 (of 74 teams · 372.2 yds/g · 3,350 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 231 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 461.1 yds/g allowed · 4,150 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · -10.2 /g · -92 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 12 taken, 13 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 28:14 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 136 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 136 teams · 770.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 74 teams · 0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Kentucky5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 (of 74 teams · 314.2 yds/g · 2,828 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 18.0 pts/g · 162 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 382.3 yds/g allowed · 3,441 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 268 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · -11.8 /g · -106 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 11 taken, 20 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 30:24 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 136 teams · 763.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 0.206 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.161 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025South Carolina4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#60 (of 74 teams · 321.0 yds/g · 3,210 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 183 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 375.0 yds/g allowed · 3,750 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 248 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · -6.5 /g · -65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:40 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 136 teams · 88% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 136 teams · 833.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 0.145 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Arkansas2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 16 SEC teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#15 (of 74 teams · 419.9 yds/g · 3,779 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 256 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 456.0 yds/g allowed · 4,104 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 39.2 pts/g allowed · 353 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · -10.8 /g · -97 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -12 in these games · 3 taken, 15 given · -1.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 29:18 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 9% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 136 teams · 772.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.284 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.360 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.398 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 1.299 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20252025 Ole MissSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #38
Total offense. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Tennessee #3 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #9 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #12 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #15 of 74; 2025 Georgia #22 of 74; 2025 Missouri #30 of 74; 2025 Alabama #38 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #40 of 74; 2025 Texas #46 of 74; 2025 Auburn #48 of 74; 2025 Florida #56 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #60 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #61 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #62 of 74; 2025 LSU #63 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 2 of 74. SEC median rank 38.
Scoring offensemedian #36
Scoring offense. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Tennessee #6 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #10 of 74; 2025 Georgia #16 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #25 of 74; 2025 Alabama #31 of 74; 2025 Texas #36 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #38 of 74; 2025 Missouri #38 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #50 of 74; 2025 Auburn #54 of 74; 2025 LSU #61 of 74; 2025 Florida #62 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #64 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #66 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 11 of 74. SEC median rank 36.
Total defensemedian #35
Total defense. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Missouri #7 of 74; 2025 Alabama #10 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #12 of 74; 2025 Georgia #14 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #17 of 74; 2025 Auburn #28 of 74; 2025 LSU #32 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #35 of 74; 2025 Texas #37 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #39 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #40 of 74; 2025 Florida #51 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #58 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #68 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #71 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 36 of 74. SEC median rank 35.
Scoring defensemedian #27
Scoring defense. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Oklahoma #7 of 74; 2025 Alabama #10 of 74; 2025 Georgia #13 of 74; 2025 LSU #15 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #21 of 74; 2025 Missouri #23 of 74; 2025 Auburn #25 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #27 of 74; 2025 Texas #29 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #30 of 74; 2025 Florida #43 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #53 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #59 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #67 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 34 of 74. SEC median rank 27.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #8 of 74; 2025 Georgia #9 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #13 of 74; 2025 Alabama #17 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #25 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #31 of 74; 2025 Missouri #33 of 74; 2025 Texas #34 of 74; 2025 LSU #40 of 74; 2025 Auburn #42 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #51 of 74; 2025 Florida #54 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #56 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #57 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #59 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 16 of 74. SEC median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #41
Turnover margin. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 LSU #7 of 74; 2025 Texas #12 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #15 of 74; 2025 Alabama #16 of 74; 2025 Auburn #17 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #26 of 74; 2025 Georgia #41 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #41 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #41 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #41 of 74; 2025 Florida #45 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #56 of 74; 2025 Missouri #59 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #66 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 30 of 74. SEC median rank 41.
Possessionmedian #35
Possession. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia #5 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 74; 2025 Alabama #11 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #17 of 74; 2025 Missouri #22 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #31 of 74; 2025 Auburn #35 of 74; 2025 LSU #50 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #51 of 74; 2025 Florida #57 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #60 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #63 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #67 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #68 of 74; 2025 Texas #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 26 of 74. SEC median rank 35.
Returning passingmedian #68
Returning passing. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 136; 2025 LSU #20 of 136; 2025 Arkansas #26 of 136; 2025 South Carolina #33 of 136; 2025 Florida #47 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #49 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #63 of 136; 2025 Mississippi State #68 of 136; 2025 Kentucky #75 of 136; 2025 Texas #76 of 136; 2025 Georgia #83 of 136; 2025 Alabama #88 of 136; 2025 Tennessee #106 of 136; 2025 Missouri #124 of 136; 2025 Auburn #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 96 of 136. SEC median rank 68.
Returning receivingmedian #54
Returning receiving. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #4 of 136; 2025 Alabama #12 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #27 of 136; 2025 South Carolina #29 of 136; 2025 Georgia #34 of 136; 2025 LSU #42 of 136; 2025 Auburn #46 of 136; 2025 Mississippi State #54 of 136; 2025 Florida #58 of 136; 2025 Tennessee #59 of 136; 2025 Texas #65 of 136; 2025 Kentucky #74 of 136; 2025 Missouri #76 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #86 of 136; 2025 Arkansas #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 83 of 136. SEC median rank 54.
Returning rushingmedian #38
Returning rushing. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #2 of 136; 2025 Mississippi State #14 of 136; 2025 Florida #17 of 136; 2025 Texas #21 of 136; 2025 LSU #29 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #30 of 136; 2025 South Carolina #38 of 136; 2025 Georgia #41 of 136; 2025 Arkansas #44 of 136; 2025 Alabama #46 of 136; 2025 Kentucky #84 of 136; 2025 Tennessee #87 of 136; 2025 Auburn #92 of 136; 2025 Missouri #114 of 136. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 122 of 136. SEC median rank 38.
Team talentmedian #14
Team talent. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia #1 of 136; 2025 Alabama #2 of 136; 2025 Texas #4 of 136; 2025 LSU #6 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 136; 2025 Florida #12 of 136; 2025 Auburn #13 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #14 of 136; 2025 Tennessee #16 of 136; 2025 South Carolina #18 of 136; 2025 Missouri #22 of 136; 2025 Arkansas #23 of 136; 2025 Mississippi State #24 of 136; 2025 Kentucky #27 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #55 of 136. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 21 of 136. SEC median rank 14.
Offensive EPAmedian #34
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #7 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #10 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #11 of 74; 2025 Georgia #22 of 74; 2025 Alabama #28 of 74; 2025 Missouri #34 of 74; 2025 Texas #43 of 74; 2025 Florida #47 of 74; 2025 Auburn #56 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #57 of 74; 2025 LSU #59 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #64 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #66 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #67 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 13 of 74. SEC median rank 34.
Defensive EPAmedian #32
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Oklahoma #5 of 74; 2025 Missouri #9 of 74; 2025 Auburn #16 of 74; 2025 Alabama #18 of 74; 2025 LSU #24 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #25 of 74; 2025 Georgia #29 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #32 of 74; 2025 Texas #35 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #42 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #44 of 74; 2025 Florida #47 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #52 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #58 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 39 of 74. SEC median rank 32.
Offensive success ratemedian #40
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Tennessee #4 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #13 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #14 of 74; 2025 Georgia #18 of 74; 2025 Alabama #33 of 74; 2025 Missouri #40 of 74; 2025 Florida #43 of 74; 2025 Auburn #45 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #49 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #55 of 74; 2025 Texas #58 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #61 of 74; 2025 LSU #63 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #65 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 29 of 74. SEC median rank 40.
Defensive success ratemedian #29
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Oklahoma #2 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #5 of 74; 2025 Missouri #9 of 74; 2025 Alabama #19 of 74; 2025 Auburn #21 of 74; 2025 Georgia #25 of 74; 2025 LSU #26 of 74; 2025 Texas #29 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #37 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #43 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #51 of 74; 2025 Florida #55 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #58 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #66 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #71 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 30 of 74. SEC median rank 29.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #25
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #6 of 74; 2025 Texas #9 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #19 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #21 of 74; 2025 Missouri #24 of 74; 2025 Alabama #25 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #28 of 74; 2025 LSU #31 of 74; 2025 Tennessee #32 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #33 of 74; 2025 Georgia #55 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #58 of 74; 2025 Florida #71 of 74; 2025 Auburn #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 7 of 74. SEC median rank 25.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #41
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Tennessee #17 of 74; 2025 Georgia #20 of 74; 2025 South Carolina #26 of 74; 2025 Florida #33 of 74; 2025 Kentucky #34 of 74; 2025 Texas #36 of 74; 2025 Vanderbilt #37 of 74; 2025 Mississippi State #41 of 74; 2025 Alabama #45 of 74; 2025 Missouri #54 of 74; 2025 Arkansas #55 of 74; 2025 Auburn #58 of 74; 2025 LSU #59 of 74; 2025 Oklahoma #60 of 74; 2025 Texas A&M #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Ole Miss, ranked 56 of 74. SEC median rank 41.