THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Oregon StateBeavers

Season
‹
›Current

Pac-12

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Pac-12, 2011

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2011Oregon State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 120 teams · 373.7 yds/g · 4,484 yds)#100 (of 120 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 262 points)#85 (of 120 teams · 411.3 yds/g allowed · 4,935 yds)#89 (of 120 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 370 points)#99 (of 120 teams · -9.0 /g · -108 on the season)#111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 21 taken, 32 given · -0.92 /g)#71 (of 120 teams · 18:03 /g · 3h 37m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.104 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#53 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#100 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.901 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#32 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #4–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #3–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #27–#111. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #19–#109. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #7–#114. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #5–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #10–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#44 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #2–#109. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#95 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #21–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #2–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #16–#103. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#15 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #2–#103. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #40–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2011Stanford11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 489.3 yds/g · 6,361 yds)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 43.1 pts/g · 561 points)#28 (of 120 teams · 337.6 yds/g allowed · 4,389 yds)#30 (of 120 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21.2 /g · +276 on the season)#28 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:29 /g · 4h 26m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.187 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#22 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.861 average PPA on successful plays)#115 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Oregon12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 522.8 yds/g · 7,319 yds)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 46.1 pts/g · 645 points)#69 (of 120 teams · 390.1 yds/g allowed · 5,461 yds)#52 (of 120 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21.4 /g · +300 on the season)#19 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 29 taken, 20 given · +0.64 /g)#118 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 15:21 /g · 3h 35m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#23 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#34 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.975 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Utah8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#109 (of 120 teams · 310.9 yds/g · 4,041 yds)#74 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 325 points)#38 (of 120 teams · 350.9 yds/g allowed · 4,562 yds)#19 (of 120 teams · 20.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points)#49 (of 120 teams · +4.8 /g · +62 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +12 on the season · 35 taken, 23 given · +0.92 /g)#62 (of 120 teams · 18:16 /g · 3h 57m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 120 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#100 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#43 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 120 teams · 0.860 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.952 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Arizona4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 120 teams · 465.3 yds/g · 5,583 yds)#38 (of 120 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 369 points)#111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 460.5 yds/g allowed · 5,526 yds)#107 (of 120 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 425 points)#85 (of 120 teams · -4.7 /g · -56 on the season)#89 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.42 /g)#87 (of 120 teams · 17:41 /g · 3h 32m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#19 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#89 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.995 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Arizona State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 120 teams · 445.8 yds/g · 5,795 yds)#28 (of 120 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 431 points)#93 (of 120 teams · 422.1 yds/g allowed · 5,487 yds)#74 (of 120 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 372 points)#51 (of 120 teams · +4.5 /g · +59 on the season)#21 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 31 taken, 23 given · +0.62 /g)#102 (of 120 teams · 17:15 /g · 3h 44m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#38 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#86 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.963 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011California7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 120 teams · 401.5 yds/g · 5,219 yds)#53 (of 120 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 368 points)#27 (of 120 teams · 332.9 yds/g allowed · 4,328 yds)#48 (of 120 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#53 (of 120 teams · +4.2 /g · +54 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 24 taken, 25 given · -0.08 /g)#26 (of 120 teams · 19:21 /g · 4h 12m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 120 teams · -0.008 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#56 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#16 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 120 teams · 0.968 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.976 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011UCLA6–81 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 (of 120 teams · 376.6 yds/g · 5,273 yds)#88 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 323 points)#91 (of 120 teams · 417.1 yds/g allowed · 5,840 yds)#92 (of 120 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 439 points)#96 (of 120 teams · -8.3 /g · -116 on the season)#86 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.36 /g)#63 (of 120 teams · 18:16 /g · 4h 16m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#66 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#96 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 120 teams · 1.001 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011USC10–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 120 teams · 456.8 yds/g · 5,481 yds)#16 (of 120 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 429 points)#56 (of 120 teams · 374.8 yds/g allowed · 4,497 yds)#45 (of 120 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#18 (of 120 teams · +12.2 /g · +146 on the season)#69 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.08 /g)#22 (of 120 teams · 19:40 /g · 3h 56m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#13 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#83 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.945 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Washington7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 120 teams · 409.9 yds/g · 5,328 yds)#25 (of 120 teams · 33.4 pts/g · 434 points)#107 (of 120 teams · 453.3 yds/g allowed · 5,893 yds)#108 (of 120 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 467 points)#79 (of 120 teams · -2.5 /g · -33 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.08 /g)#82 (of 120 teams · 17:51 /g · 3h 52m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#49 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#103 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.014 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 120 teams · 1.009 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Washington State4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#32 (of 120 teams · 422.4 yds/g · 5,069 yds)#45 (of 120 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 358 points)#83 (of 120 teams · 409.6 yds/g allowed · 4,915 yds)#95 (of 120 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 381 points)#75 (of 120 teams · -1.9 /g · -23 on the season)#89 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.42 /g)#64 (of 120 teams · 18:15 /g · 3h 39m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#87 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#79 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 120 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.971 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Colorado3–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#91 (of 120 teams · 346.3 yds/g · 4,502 yds)#109 (of 120 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 257 points)#104 (of 120 teams · 439.3 yds/g allowed · 5,711 yds)#109 (of 120 teams · 36.5 pts/g allowed · 475 points)#114 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -16.8 /g · -218 on the season)#91 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 15 taken, 21 given · -0.46 /g)#17 (of 120 teams · 19:53 /g · 4h 18m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#93 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.071 average PPA on successful plays)#112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 1.063 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20112011 Oregon StatePac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #32
Total offense. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Oregon #4 of 120; 2011 Stanford #8 of 120; 2011 Arizona #14 of 120; 2011 USC #18 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #21 of 120; 2011 Washington State #32 of 120; 2011 Washington #38 of 120; 2011 California #43 of 120; 2011 UCLA #67 of 120; 2011 Colorado #91 of 120; 2011 Utah #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 68 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 32.
Scoring offensemedian #38
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Oregon #3 of 120; 2011 Stanford #7 of 120; 2011 USC #16 of 120; 2011 Washington #25 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #28 of 120; 2011 Arizona #38 of 120; 2011 Washington State #45 of 120; 2011 California #53 of 120; 2011 Utah #74 of 120; 2011 UCLA #88 of 120; 2011 Colorado #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 100 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 38.
Total defensemedian #83
Total defense. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 California #27 of 120; 2011 Stanford #28 of 120; 2011 Utah #38 of 120; 2011 USC #56 of 120; 2011 Oregon #69 of 120; 2011 Washington State #83 of 120; 2011 UCLA #91 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #93 of 120; 2011 Colorado #104 of 120; 2011 Washington #107 of 120; 2011 Arizona #111 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 85 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 83.
Scoring defensemedian #74
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Utah #19 of 120; 2011 Stanford #30 of 120; 2011 USC #45 of 120; 2011 California #48 of 120; 2011 Oregon #52 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #74 of 120; 2011 UCLA #92 of 120; 2011 Washington State #95 of 120; 2011 Arizona #107 of 120; 2011 Washington #108 of 120; 2011 Colorado #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 89 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 74.
Point marginmedian #53
Point margin. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Oregon #7 of 120; 2011 Stanford #8 of 120; 2011 USC #18 of 120; 2011 Utah #49 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #51 of 120; 2011 California #53 of 120; 2011 Washington State #75 of 120; 2011 Washington #79 of 120; 2011 Arizona #85 of 120; 2011 UCLA #96 of 120; 2011 Colorado #114 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 99 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 53.
Turnover marginmedian #61
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Utah #5 of 120; 2011 Oregon #19 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #21 of 120; 2011 Stanford #28 of 120; 2011 California #61 of 120; 2011 Washington #61 of 120; 2011 USC #69 of 120; 2011 UCLA #86 of 120; 2011 Arizona #89 of 120; 2011 Washington State #89 of 120; 2011 Colorado #91 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 111 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 61.
Possessionmedian #63
Possession. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Stanford #10 of 120; 2011 Colorado #17 of 120; 2011 USC #22 of 120; 2011 California #26 of 120; 2011 Utah #62 of 120; 2011 UCLA #63 of 120; 2011 Washington State #64 of 120; 2011 Washington #82 of 120; 2011 Arizona #87 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #102 of 120; 2011 Oregon #118 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 71 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 63.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Oregon State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Oregon State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Oregon State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Oregon State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #44
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Stanford #2 of 120; 2011 Oregon #7 of 120; 2011 Arizona #10 of 120; 2011 USC #19 of 120; 2011 Washington #25 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #44 of 120; 2011 UCLA #46 of 120; 2011 Colorado #54 of 120; 2011 California #56 of 120; 2011 Washington State #58 of 120; 2011 Utah #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 48 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 44.
Defensive EPAmedian #95
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 California #21 of 120; 2011 Oregon #27 of 120; 2011 Utah #42 of 120; 2011 Stanford #43 of 120; 2011 Washington State #87 of 120; 2011 UCLA #95 of 120; 2011 USC #97 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #99 of 120; 2011 Washington #111 of 120; 2011 Arizona #113 of 120; 2011 Colorado #116 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 100 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 95.
Offensive success ratemedian #49
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Stanford #2 of 120; 2011 USC #13 of 120; 2011 Arizona #19 of 120; 2011 Oregon #23 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #38 of 120; 2011 Washington #49 of 120; 2011 California #56 of 120; 2011 UCLA #66 of 120; 2011 Washington State #87 of 120; 2011 Utah #100 of 120; 2011 Colorado #111 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 53 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 49.
Defensive success ratemedian #83
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 California #16 of 120; 2011 Stanford #22 of 120; 2011 Oregon #34 of 120; 2011 Utah #43 of 120; 2011 Washington State #79 of 120; 2011 USC #83 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #86 of 120; 2011 Arizona #89 of 120; 2011 Colorado #93 of 120; 2011 UCLA #96 of 120; 2011 Washington #103 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 100 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 83.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #15
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Colorado #2 of 120; 2011 Washington #8 of 120; 2011 Arizona #10 of 120; 2011 Washington State #11 of 120; 2011 UCLA #13 of 120; 2011 Oregon #29 of 120; 2011 California #34 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #37 of 120; 2011 USC #71 of 120; 2011 Stanford #102 of 120; 2011 Utah #103 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 15 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 15.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #79
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Oregon #40 of 120; 2011 UCLA #41 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #57 of 120; 2011 USC #73 of 120; 2011 Utah #79 of 120; 2011 Washington State #91 of 120; 2011 California #95 of 120; 2011 Arizona #101 of 120; 2011 Washington #103 of 120; 2011 Colorado #112 of 120; 2011 Stanford #115 of 120. Marked: 2011 Oregon State, ranked 43 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 79.