THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Oregon StateBeavers

Season
‹
›Current

Pac-12

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Pac-12, 2013

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013Oregon State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 125 teams · 467.0 yds/g · 6,071 yds)#29 (of 125 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 452 points)#101 (of 125 teams · 436.6 yds/g allowed · 5,676 yds)#91 (of 125 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 408 points)#61 (of 125 teams · +3.4 /g · +44 on the season)#42 (of 125 teams · +3 on the season · 29 taken, 26 given · +0.23 /g)#25 (of 125 teams · 32:09 /g · 6h 58m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 125 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 125 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#23 (of 125 teams · 46% of plays successful)#90 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 125 teams · 0.993 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 125 teams · 0.945 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#34 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #2–#88. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #4–#97. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #13–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #10–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #3–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #7–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #2–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#54 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #4–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #11–#102. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #6–#103. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #13–#93. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#27 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #5–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range #9–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2013Oregon11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 565.0 yds/g · 7,345 yds)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 45.5 pts/g · 591 points)#37 (of 125 teams · 370.1 yds/g allowed · 4,811 yds)#13 (of 125 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 266 points)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +25.0 /g · +325 on the season)#14 (of 125 teams · +11 on the season · 29 taken, 18 given · +0.85 /g)#122 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 26:02 /g · 5h 38m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.208 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 125 teams · 0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 50% of plays successful)#31 (of 125 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#19 (of 125 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.850 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Arizona State10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#32 (of 125 teams · 457.3 yds/g · 6,402 yds)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 39.7 pts/g · 556 points)#42 (of 125 teams · 372.4 yds/g allowed · 5,213 yds)#64 (of 125 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 373 points)#27 (of 125 teams · +13.1 /g · +183 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +15 on the season · 33 taken, 18 given · +1.07 /g)#56 (of 125 teams · 30:17 /g · 7h 04m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 125 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 125 teams · 0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#38 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#23 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 125 teams · 0.906 average PPA on successful plays)#119 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 1.075 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Stanford11–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 125 teams · 405.4 yds/g · 5,675 yds)#45 (of 125 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 452 points)#16 (of 125 teams · 343.1 yds/g allowed · 4,804 yds)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 19.0 pts/g allowed · 266 points)#25 (of 125 teams · +13.3 /g · +186 on the season)#61 (of 125 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#37 (of 125 teams · 31:35 /g · 7h 22m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 125 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 125 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#58 (of 125 teams · 43% of plays successful)#38 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 125 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 125 teams · 1.004 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013USC10–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#73 (of 125 teams · 399.9 yds/g · 5,599 yds)#60 (of 125 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 416 points)#13 (of 125 teams · 335.2 yds/g allowed · 4,693 yds)#16 (of 125 teams · 21.2 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#37 (of 125 teams · +8.5 /g · +119 on the season)#36 (of 125 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.36 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34:18 /g · 8h 00m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 125 teams · 0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 125 teams · -0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#78 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#13 (of 125 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 125 teams · 0.995 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 125 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Washington9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 125 teams · 499.3 yds/g · 6,491 yds)#18 (of 125 teams · 37.9 pts/g · 493 points)#56 (of 125 teams · 388.5 yds/g allowed · 5,051 yds)#29 (of 125 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#15 (of 125 teams · +15.1 /g · +196 on the season)#24 (of 125 teams · +7 on the season · 23 taken, 16 given · +0.54 /g)#83 (of 125 teams · 29:14 /g · 6h 20m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 125 teams · 0.165 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 125 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#41 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#41 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 1.058 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 125 teams · 0.906 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013UCLA10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 125 teams · 448.5 yds/g · 5,830 yds)#20 (of 125 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 480 points)#54 (of 125 teams · 385.9 yds/g allowed · 5,017 yds)#35 (of 125 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points)#21 (of 125 teams · +13.8 /g · +179 on the season)#19 (of 125 teams · +10 on the season · 26 taken, 16 given · +0.77 /g)#76 (of 125 teams · 29:35 /g · 6h 25m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 125 teams · 0.156 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#91 (of 125 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#37 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#93 (of 125 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 125 teams · 0.959 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 125 teams · 0.876 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Washington State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 125 teams · 421.4 yds/g · 5,478 yds)#52 (of 125 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#103 (of 125 teams · 458.0 yds/g allowed · 5,954 yds)#97 (of 125 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 423 points)#76 (of 125 teams · -1.5 /g · -20 on the season)#93 (of 125 teams · -5 on the season · 30 taken, 35 given · -0.38 /g)#84 (of 125 teams · 29:13 /g · 6h 20m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 125 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 125 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#67 (of 125 teams · 43% of plays successful)#89 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 125 teams · 1.000 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 125 teams · 0.860 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Arizona8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#31 (of 125 teams · 458.5 yds/g · 5,960 yds)#36 (of 125 teams · 33.5 pts/g · 435 points)#63 (of 125 teams · 401.1 yds/g allowed · 5,214 yds)#39 (of 125 teams · 24.2 pts/g allowed · 315 points)#35 (of 125 teams · +9.2 /g · +120 on the season)#39 (of 125 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.31 /g)#104 (of 125 teams · 28:35 /g · 6h 12m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 125 teams · 0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 125 teams · 0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#33 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#39 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.849 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 125 teams · 0.930 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Utah5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 125 teams · 396.6 yds/g · 4,759 yds)#66 (of 125 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 350 points)#61 (of 125 teams · 397.7 yds/g allowed · 4,772 yds)#73 (of 125 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#67 (of 125 teams · +1.2 /g · +14 on the season)#113 (of 125 teams · -9 on the season · 16 taken, 25 given · -0.75 /g)#64 (of 125 teams · 30:02 /g · 6h 00m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 125 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 125 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#103 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful)#25 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 125 teams · 0.993 average PPA on successful plays)#117 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 1.069 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Colorado4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#88 (of 125 teams · 369.9 yds/g · 4,439 yds)#87 (of 125 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 305 points)#108 (of 125 teams · 468.0 yds/g allowed · 5,616 yds)#114 (of 125 teams · 38.3 pts/g allowed · 459 points)#107 (of 125 teams · -12.8 /g · -154 on the season)#81 (of 125 teams · -3 on the season · 21 taken, 24 given · -0.25 /g)#98 (of 125 teams · 28:40 /g · 5h 44m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 125 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#86 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#79 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.814 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 125 teams · 0.975 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013California1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 125 teams · 453.6 yds/g · 5,443 yds)#97 (of 125 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 276 points)#124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 529.6 yds/g allowed · 6,355 yds)#124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 45.9 pts/g allowed · 551 points)#118 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -22.9 /g · -275 on the season)#124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -15 on the season · 13 taken, 28 given · -1.25 /g)#93 (of 125 teams · 28:55 /g · 5h 47m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 125 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 125 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#84 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#68 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 125 teams · 1.018 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 125 teams · 1.033 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20132013 Oregon StatePac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #34
Total offense. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #2 of 125; 2013 Washington #13 of 125; 2013 Arizona #31 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #32 of 125; 2013 California #34 of 125; 2013 UCLA #38 of 125; 2013 Washington State #54 of 125; 2013 Stanford #70 of 125; 2013 USC #73 of 125; 2013 Utah #77 of 125; 2013 Colorado #88 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 26 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 34.
Scoring offensemedian #36
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #4 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #10 of 125; 2013 Washington #18 of 125; 2013 UCLA #20 of 125; 2013 Arizona #36 of 125; 2013 Stanford #45 of 125; 2013 Washington State #52 of 125; 2013 USC #60 of 125; 2013 Utah #66 of 125; 2013 Colorado #87 of 125; 2013 California #97 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 29 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 36.
Total defensemedian #56
Total defense. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 USC #13 of 125; 2013 Stanford #16 of 125; 2013 Oregon #37 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #42 of 125; 2013 UCLA #54 of 125; 2013 Washington #56 of 125; 2013 Utah #61 of 125; 2013 Arizona #63 of 125; 2013 Washington State #103 of 125; 2013 Colorado #108 of 125; 2013 California #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 101 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 56.
Scoring defensemedian #39
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Stanford #10 of 125; 2013 Oregon #13 of 125; 2013 USC #16 of 125; 2013 Washington #29 of 125; 2013 UCLA #35 of 125; 2013 Arizona #39 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #64 of 125; 2013 Utah #73 of 125; 2013 Washington State #97 of 125; 2013 Colorado #114 of 125; 2013 California #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 91 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 39.
Point marginmedian #35
Point margin. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #3 of 125; 2013 Washington #15 of 125; 2013 UCLA #21 of 125; 2013 Stanford #25 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #27 of 125; 2013 Arizona #35 of 125; 2013 USC #37 of 125; 2013 Utah #67 of 125; 2013 Washington State #76 of 125; 2013 Colorado #107 of 125; 2013 California #118 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 61 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 35.
Turnover marginmedian #39
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Arizona State #7 of 125; 2013 Oregon #14 of 125; 2013 UCLA #19 of 125; 2013 Washington #24 of 125; 2013 USC #36 of 125; 2013 Arizona #39 of 125; 2013 Stanford #61 of 125; 2013 Colorado #81 of 125; 2013 Washington State #93 of 125; 2013 Utah #113 of 125; 2013 California #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 42 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 39.
Possessionmedian #76
Possession. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 USC #2 of 125; 2013 Stanford #37 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #56 of 125; 2013 Utah #64 of 125; 2013 UCLA #76 of 125; 2013 Washington #83 of 125; 2013 Washington State #84 of 125; 2013 California #93 of 125; 2013 Colorado #98 of 125; 2013 Arizona #104 of 125; 2013 Oregon #122 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 25 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 76.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Oregon State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Oregon State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Oregon State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Oregon State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #54
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #4 of 125; 2013 Washington #13 of 125; 2013 UCLA #16 of 125; 2013 USC #53 of 125; 2013 Arizona #54 of 125; 2013 Stanford #59 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #64 of 125; 2013 Utah #74 of 125; 2013 Washington State #83 of 125; 2013 California #88 of 125; 2013 Colorado #118 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 39 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 54.
Defensive EPAmedian #49
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 USC #11 of 125; 2013 Oregon #14 of 125; 2013 Arizona #26 of 125; 2013 Washington #27 of 125; 2013 Stanford #40 of 125; 2013 Washington State #49 of 125; 2013 Utah #69 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #77 of 125; 2013 Colorado #82 of 125; 2013 UCLA #91 of 125; 2013 California #94 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 102 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 49.
Offensive success ratemedian #41
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #6 of 125; 2013 Arizona #33 of 125; 2013 UCLA #37 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #38 of 125; 2013 Washington #41 of 125; 2013 Stanford #58 of 125; 2013 Washington State #67 of 125; 2013 USC #78 of 125; 2013 California #84 of 125; 2013 Colorado #86 of 125; 2013 Utah #103 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 23 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 41.
Defensive success ratemedian #39
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 USC #13 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #23 of 125; 2013 Utah #25 of 125; 2013 Oregon #31 of 125; 2013 Stanford #38 of 125; 2013 Arizona #39 of 125; 2013 Washington #41 of 125; 2013 California #68 of 125; 2013 Colorado #79 of 125; 2013 Washington State #89 of 125; 2013 UCLA #93 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 90 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 39.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #27
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Washington #5 of 125; 2013 California #12 of 125; 2013 Oregon #19 of 125; 2013 Washington State #21 of 125; 2013 USC #24 of 125; 2013 Utah #29 of 125; 2013 UCLA #57 of 125; 2013 Stanford #88 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #89 of 125; 2013 Arizona #116 of 125; 2013 Colorado #120 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 27 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 27.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #63
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oregon #9 of 125; 2013 Washington State #12 of 125; 2013 UCLA #21 of 125; 2013 Washington #35 of 125; 2013 Arizona #56 of 125; 2013 USC #65 of 125; 2013 Colorado #81 of 125; 2013 Stanford #97 of 125; 2013 California #106 of 125; 2013 Utah #117 of 125; 2013 Arizona State #119 of 125. Marked: 2013 Oregon State, ranked 63 of 125. Pac-12 median rank 63.