Metrics

OregonDucks

Season
Current

Big Ten

Big Ten, 2025

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Oregon1323 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #4 Texas Tech)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 USC, #23 Iowa · postseason: #4 Texas Tech, #24 James Madison)#17 (of 136 teams · 452.2 yds/g · 6,783 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 554 points)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 274.8 yds/g allowed · 4,122 yards)#12 (of 136 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 268 points)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +19.1 /g · +286 on the season)#34 (of 136 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.40 /g)#41 (of 136 teams · 30:49 /g · 7h 42m on the season)#110 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving production returning)#71 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 941.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 136 teams · 0.303 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 136 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 136 teams · 47% of plays successful)#15 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 136 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 136 teams · 1.226 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 18 Big Ten teams in 20250 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#81 (Total offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #8–#135. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#59 (Scoring offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #3–#135. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#30 (Total defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#127. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#39 (Scoring defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#127. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#54 (Point margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#130. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#59 (Turnover margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #2–#129. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#48 (Possession: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #5–#129. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#71 (Returning passing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#127. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning receiving: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #9–#114. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#63 (Returning rushing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #5–#120. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#37 (Team talent: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #3–#72. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#47 (Offensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #4–#130. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#65 (Defensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #5–#134. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#26 (Offensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#122. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#89 (Defensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #6–#135. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#101 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #20–#134. 0 of 18 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#119. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)
2025Illinois940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 USC)#80 (of 136 teams · 373.9 yds/g · 4,861 yards)#53 (of 136 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 382 points)#46 (of 136 teams · 345.3 yds/g allowed · 4,489 yards)#57 (of 136 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 307 points)#54 (of 136 teams · +5.8 /g · +75 on the season)#35 (of 136 teams · +5 on the season · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.38 /g)#39 (of 136 teams · 30:55 /g · 6h 42m on the season)#18 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#48 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#20 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's rushing production returning)#64 (of 136 teams · 662.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 136 teams · 0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 136 teams · 0.192 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 136 teams · 48% of plays successful)#122 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 136 teams · 1.162 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 136 teams · 1.180 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Indiana1600 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon, #23 Iowa · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)#13 (of 136 teams · 456.3 yds/g · 7,301 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 41.6 pts/g · 666 points)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 266.0 yds/g allowed · 4,256 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 11.7 pts/g allowed · 187 points)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +29.9 /g · +479 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +22 on the season · 30 taken, 8 given · +1.38 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:29 /g · 8h 56m on the season)#117 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#63 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#72 (of 136 teams · 645.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.342 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 51% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 136 teams · 1.223 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 136 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Iowa940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Vanderbilt)#119 (of 136 teams · 320.1 yds/g · 4,161 yards)#54 (of 136 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 381 points)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 284.1 yds/g allowed · 3,694 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 209 points)#17 (of 136 teams · +13.2 /g · +172 on the season)#66 (of 136 teams · +1 on the season · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.08 /g)#31 (of 136 teams · 31:28 /g · 6h 49m on the season)#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving production returning)#69 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#42 (of 136 teams · 710.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 136 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 136 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 136 teams · 44% of plays successful)#35 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#134 (of 136 teams · 1.099 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.076 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Maryland480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#87 (of 136 teams · 361.2 yds/g · 4,334 yards)#95 (of 136 teams · 23.5 pts/g · 282 points)#97 (of 136 teams · 402.4 yds/g allowed · 4,829 yards)#76 (of 136 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#93 (of 136 teams · -3.0 /g · -36 on the season)#19 (of 136 teams · +7 on the season · 21 taken, 14 given · +0.58 /g)#129 (of 136 teams · 26:59 /g · 5h 24m on the season)#120 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#109 (of 136 teams · 19% of last season's receiving production returning)#93 (of 136 teams · 23% of last season's rushing production returning)#52 (of 136 teams · 699.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 136 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 136 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 136 teams · 39% of plays successful)#93 (of 136 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 136 teams · 1.294 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 136 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Michigan942 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 136 teams · 397.9 yds/g · 5,173 yards)#69 (of 136 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 358 points)#24 (of 136 teams · 323.6 yds/g allowed · 4,207 yards)#29 (of 136 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#40 (of 136 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#59 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.15 /g)#74 (of 136 teams · 29:47 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#48 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing production returning)#47 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing production returning)#11 (of 136 teams · 907.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 136 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 136 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#70 (of 136 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#129 (of 136 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.130 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Michigan State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#99 (of 136 teams · 345.3 yds/g · 4,144 yards)#89 (of 136 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 295 points)#74 (of 136 teams · 379.9 yds/g allowed · 4,559 yards)#104 (of 136 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points)#104 (of 136 teams · -5.3 /g · -64 on the season)#91 (of 136 teams · -3 on the season · 9 taken, 12 given · -0.25 /g)#58 (of 136 teams · 30:12 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#31 (of 136 teams · 90% of last season's passing production returning)#30 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#63 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's rushing production returning)#38 (of 136 teams · 717.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 136 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 136 teams · 0.198 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#72 (of 136 teams · 42% of plays successful)#111 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 136 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 136 teams · 1.182 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Minnesota850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#129 (of 136 teams · 293.4 yds/g · 3,814 yards)#101 (of 136 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 299 points)#34 (of 136 teams · 332.2 yds/g allowed · 4,319 yards)#50 (of 136 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#80 (of 136 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#22 (of 136 teams · +7 on the season · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.54 /g)#86 (of 136 teams · 29:23 /g · 6h 22m on the season)#113 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#52 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#35 (of 136 teams · 56% of last season's rushing production returning)#41 (of 136 teams · 711.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 136 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 136 teams · 0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 136 teams · 40% of plays successful)#85 (of 136 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#125 (of 136 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 136 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Nebraska760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#81 (of 136 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,842 yards)#59 (of 136 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 373 points)#32 (of 136 teams · 331.0 yds/g allowed · 4,303 yards)#67 (of 136 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 320 points)#60 (of 136 teams · +4.1 /g · +53 on the season)#59 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 13 taken, 11 given · +0.15 /g)#48 (of 136 teams · 30:35 /g · 6h 38m on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#45 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's receiving production returning)#52 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's rushing production returning)#20 (of 136 teams · 821.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 136 teams · 0.182 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 136 teams · 0.190 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 136 teams · 47% of plays successful)#89 (of 136 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#132 (of 136 teams · 1.108 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 136 teams · 1.270 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Northwestern760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#98 (of 136 teams · 346.9 yds/g · 4,509 yards)#98 (of 136 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 304 points)#30 (of 136 teams · 329.9 yds/g allowed · 4,288 yards)#23 (of 136 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 258 points)#62 (of 136 teams · +3.5 /g · +46 on the season)#77 (of 136 teams · -1 on the season · 20 taken, 21 given · -0.08 /g)#18 (of 136 teams · 32:19 /g · 7h 00m on the season)#102 (of 136 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#91 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's receiving production returning)#19 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's rushing production returning)#57 (of 136 teams · 678.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 136 teams · 0.146 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 136 teams · 0.171 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#60 (of 136 teams · 43% of plays successful)#123 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 136 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 136 teams · 1.159 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Ohio State1225 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas, #18 Michigan)#26 (of 136 teams · 423.0 yds/g · 5,922 yards)#21 (of 136 teams · 33.4 pts/g · 468 points)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 219.1 yds/g allowed · 3,067 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 9.3 pts/g allowed · 130 points)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +24.1 /g · +338 on the season)#53 (of 136 teams · +3 on the season · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.21 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:01 /g · 7h 42m on the season)#104 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#115 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.327 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · -0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 53% of plays successful)#12 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 (of 136 teams · 1.145 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.043 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Penn State761 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#86 (of 136 teams · 362.0 yds/g · 4,706 yards)#34 (of 136 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#25 (of 136 teams · 327.6 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yards)#31 (of 136 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 267 points)#30 (of 136 teams · +10.5 /g · +136 on the season)#48 (of 136 teams · +3 on the season · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.23 /g)#84 (of 136 teams · 29:30 /g · 6h 23m on the season)#30 (of 136 teams · 90% of last season's passing production returning)#62 (of 136 teams · 36% of last season's receiving production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 89% of last season's rushing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 910.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 136 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 136 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#59 (of 136 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 136 teams · 1.198 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 136 teams · 1.185 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Purdue2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#102 (of 136 teams · 343.6 yds/g · 4,123 yards)#123 (of 136 teams · 18.8 pts/g · 225 points)#120 (of 136 teams · 423.9 yds/g allowed · 5,087 yards)#117 (of 136 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#126 (of 136 teams · -13.1 /g · -157 on the season)#129 (of 136 teams · -12 on the season · 9 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g)#122 (of 136 teams · 28:02 /g · 5h 36m on the season)#71 (of 136 teams · 25% of last season's passing production returning)#114 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's receiving production returning)#28 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's rushing production returning)#54 (of 136 teams · 687.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 136 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#132 (of 136 teams · 0.270 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 136 teams · 42% of plays successful)#129 (of 136 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 136 teams · 1.221 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 136 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Rutgers570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 136 teams · 407.6 yds/g · 4,891 yards)#60 (of 136 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points)#127 (of 136 teams · 434.0 yds/g allowed · 5,208 yards)#117 (of 136 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#95 (of 136 teams · -3.2 /g · -38 on the season)#72 (of 136 teams · +0 on the season · 11 taken, 11 given · +0.00 /g)#13 (of 136 teams · 32:32 /g · 6h 30m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#24 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#53 (of 136 teams · 689.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 136 teams · 0.210 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#134 (of 136 teams · 0.309 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#128 (of 136 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 136 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#119 (of 136 teams · 1.345 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025UCLA390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#120 (of 136 teams · 319.8 yds/g · 3,838 yards)#125 (of 136 teams · 18.2 pts/g · 218 points)#85 (of 136 teams · 387.3 yds/g allowed · 4,647 yards)#127 (of 136 teams · 33.4 pts/g allowed · 401 points)#130 (of 136 teams · -15.3 /g · -183 on the season)#91 (of 136 teams · -3 on the season · 10 taken, 13 given · -0.25 /g)#92 (of 136 teams · 29:11 /g · 5h 50m on the season)#127 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#36 (of 136 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning)#64 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's rushing production returning)#26 (of 136 teams · 766.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 136 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#126 (of 136 teams · 0.261 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#81 (of 136 teams · 41% of plays successful)#135 (of 136 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 136 teams · 1.168 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 136 teams · 1.149 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025USC942 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Michigan, #23 Iowa)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 465.1 yds/g · 6,047 yards)#13 (of 136 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 465 points)#49 (of 136 teams · 350.5 yds/g allowed · 4,557 yards)#51 (of 136 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 299 points)#18 (of 136 teams · +12.8 /g · +166 on the season)#59 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.15 /g)#71 (of 136 teams · 29:50 /g · 6h 28m on the season)#66 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's passing production returning)#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#110 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#17 (of 136 teams · 847.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.344 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 136 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 49% of plays successful)#117 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 136 teams · 1.342 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 136 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Washington940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#38 (of 136 teams · 411.2 yds/g · 5,346 yards)#17 (of 136 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 443 points)#21 (of 136 teams · 311.4 yds/g allowed · 4,048 yards)#15 (of 136 teams · 18.7 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#14 (of 136 teams · +15.4 /g · +200 on the season)#35 (of 136 teams · +5 on the season · 19 taken, 14 given · +0.38 /g)#81 (of 136 teams · 29:35 /g · 6h 24m on the season)#69 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's passing production returning)#53 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning)#37 (of 136 teams · 720.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 136 teams · 0.290 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 136 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 49% of plays successful)#29 (of 136 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 136 teams · 1.257 average PPA on successful plays)#48 (of 136 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Wisconsin480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#135 (of 136 teams · 254.8 yds/g · 3,057 yards)#135 (of 136 teams · 12.8 pts/g · 154 points)#23 (of 136 teams · 323.6 yds/g allowed · 3,883 yards)#39 (of 136 teams · 21.6 pts/g allowed · 259 points)#114 (of 136 teams · -8.8 /g · -105 on the season)#124 (of 136 teams · -10 on the season · 6 taken, 16 given · -0.83 /g)#47 (of 136 teams · 30:38 /g · 6h 08m on the season)#122 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#26 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#77 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's rushing production returning)#28 (of 136 teams · 763.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#130 (of 136 teams · 0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 136 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#122 (of 136 teams · 37% of plays successful)#115 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 136 teams · 1.197 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.133 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20252025 OregonBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #81
Total offense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 USC #8 of 136; 2025 Indiana #13 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #26 of 136; 2025 Washington #38 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #44 of 136; 2025 Michigan #58 of 136; 2025 Illinois #80 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #81 of 136; 2025 Penn State #86 of 136; 2025 Maryland #87 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #98 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #99 of 136; 2025 Purdue #102 of 136; 2025 Iowa #119 of 136; 2025 UCLA #120 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #129 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #135 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 17 of 136. Big Ten median rank 81.
Scoring offensemedian #59
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #3 of 136; 2025 USC #13 of 136; 2025 Washington #17 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #21 of 136; 2025 Penn State #34 of 136; 2025 Illinois #53 of 136; 2025 Iowa #54 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #59 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #60 of 136; 2025 Michigan #69 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #89 of 136; 2025 Maryland #95 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #98 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #101 of 136; 2025 Purdue #123 of 136; 2025 UCLA #125 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #135 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 10 of 136. Big Ten median rank 59.
Total defensemedian #30
Total defense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Indiana #4 of 136; 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Washington #21 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #23 of 136; 2025 Michigan #24 of 136; 2025 Penn State #25 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #30 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #32 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #34 of 136; 2025 Illinois #46 of 136; 2025 USC #49 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #74 of 136; 2025 UCLA #85 of 136; 2025 Maryland #97 of 136; 2025 Purdue #120 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 7 of 136. Big Ten median rank 30.
Scoring defensemedian #39
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Indiana #2 of 136; 2025 Iowa #8 of 136; 2025 Washington #15 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #23 of 136; 2025 Michigan #29 of 136; 2025 Penn State #31 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #39 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #50 of 136; 2025 USC #51 of 136; 2025 Illinois #57 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #67 of 136; 2025 Maryland #76 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #104 of 136; 2025 Purdue #117 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #117 of 136; 2025 UCLA #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 12 of 136. Big Ten median rank 39.
Point marginmedian #54
Point margin. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #4 of 136; 2025 Washington #14 of 136; 2025 Iowa #17 of 136; 2025 USC #18 of 136; 2025 Penn State #30 of 136; 2025 Michigan #40 of 136; 2025 Illinois #54 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #60 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #62 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #80 of 136; 2025 Maryland #93 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #95 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #104 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #114 of 136; 2025 Purdue #126 of 136; 2025 UCLA #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 6 of 136. Big Ten median rank 54.
Turnover marginmedian #59
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #2 of 136; 2025 Maryland #19 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #22 of 136; 2025 Illinois #35 of 136; 2025 Washington #35 of 136; 2025 Penn State #48 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #53 of 136; 2025 Michigan #59 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #59 of 136; 2025 USC #59 of 136; 2025 Iowa #66 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #72 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #77 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #91 of 136; 2025 UCLA #91 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #124 of 136; 2025 Purdue #129 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 34 of 136. Big Ten median rank 59.
Possessionmedian #48
Possession. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #5 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #13 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #18 of 136; 2025 Iowa #31 of 136; 2025 Illinois #39 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #47 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #48 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #58 of 136; 2025 USC #71 of 136; 2025 Michigan #74 of 136; 2025 Washington #81 of 136; 2025 Penn State #84 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #86 of 136; 2025 UCLA #92 of 136; 2025 Purdue #122 of 136; 2025 Maryland #129 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 41 of 136. Big Ten median rank 48.
Returning passingmedian #71
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Rutgers #1 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #9 of 136; 2025 Illinois #18 of 136; 2025 Penn State #30 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #31 of 136; 2025 Michigan #48 of 136; 2025 USC #66 of 136; 2025 Washington #69 of 136; 2025 Purdue #71 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #102 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #104 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #113 of 136; 2025 Indiana #117 of 136; 2025 Maryland #120 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #122 of 136; 2025 UCLA #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 110 of 136. Big Ten median rank 71.
Returning receivingmedian #48
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #24 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #26 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #30 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #32 of 136; 2025 UCLA #36 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #45 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 Illinois #48 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #52 of 136; 2025 Washington #53 of 136; 2025 USC #54 of 136; 2025 Penn State #62 of 136; 2025 Indiana #63 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #91 of 136; 2025 Maryland #109 of 136; 2025 Purdue #114 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 61 of 136. Big Ten median rank 48.
Returning rushingmedian #63
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Penn State #5 of 136; 2025 Washington #10 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #19 of 136; 2025 Illinois #20 of 136; 2025 Purdue #28 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #35 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #52 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #55 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #63 of 136; 2025 UCLA #64 of 136; 2025 Iowa #69 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #77 of 136; 2025 Maryland #93 of 136; 2025 USC #110 of 136; 2025 Indiana #111 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #115 of 136; 2025 Michigan #120 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 71 of 136. Big Ten median rank 63.
Team talentmedian #37
Team talent. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #3 of 136; 2025 Penn State #10 of 136; 2025 Michigan #11 of 136; 2025 USC #17 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #20 of 136; 2025 UCLA #26 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #28 of 136; 2025 Washington #37 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #38 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #41 of 136; 2025 Iowa #42 of 136; 2025 Maryland #52 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #53 of 136; 2025 Purdue #54 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #57 of 136; 2025 Illinois #64 of 136; 2025 Indiana #72 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 5 of 136. Big Ten median rank 37.
Offensive EPAmedian #47
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 USC #4 of 136; 2025 Indiana #5 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 136; 2025 Washington #19 of 136; 2025 Penn State #30 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #36 of 136; 2025 Illinois #39 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #55 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #84 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #90 of 136; 2025 UCLA #96 of 136; 2025 Maryland #97 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #105 of 136; 2025 Purdue #107 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 12 of 136. Big Ten median rank 47.
Defensive EPAmedian #65
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #5 of 136; 2025 Indiana #7 of 136; 2025 Iowa #18 of 136; 2025 Washington #19 of 136; 2025 Penn State #46 of 136; 2025 Maryland #50 of 136; 2025 Michigan #52 of 136; 2025 USC #65 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #69 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #80 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #82 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #95 of 136; 2025 Illinois #98 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #102 of 136; 2025 UCLA #126 of 136; 2025 Purdue #132 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #134 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 13 of 136. Big Ten median rank 65.
Offensive success ratemedian #26
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Indiana #3 of 136; 2025 USC #8 of 136; 2025 Washington #10 of 136; 2025 Illinois #15 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #19 of 136; 2025 Penn State #25 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #26 of 136; 2025 Michigan #33 of 136; 2025 Iowa #46 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #60 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #72 of 136; 2025 Purdue #73 of 136; 2025 UCLA #81 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #102 of 136; 2025 Maryland #113 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #122 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 16 of 136. Big Ten median rank 26.
Defensive success ratemedian #89
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #6 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #12 of 136; 2025 Washington #29 of 136; 2025 Iowa #35 of 136; 2025 Penn State #59 of 136; 2025 Michigan #70 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #85 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #89 of 136; 2025 Maryland #93 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #111 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #115 of 136; 2025 USC #117 of 136; 2025 Illinois #122 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #123 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #128 of 136; 2025 Purdue #129 of 136; 2025 UCLA #135 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 15 of 136. Big Ten median rank 89.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #101
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 USC #21 of 136; 2025 Maryland #41 of 136; 2025 Washington #53 of 136; 2025 Indiana #74 of 136; 2025 Purdue #77 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #81 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #99 of 136; 2025 Penn State #101 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #103 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #110 of 136; 2025 UCLA #113 of 136; 2025 Illinois #117 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #124 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #125 of 136; 2025 Michigan #129 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #132 of 136; 2025 Iowa #134 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 20 of 136. Big Ten median rank 101.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #28
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Iowa #3 of 136; 2025 Michigan #8 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #10 of 136; 2025 UCLA #14 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #18 of 136; 2025 USC #20 of 136; 2025 Illinois #27 of 136; 2025 Michigan State #28 of 136; 2025 Penn State #32 of 136; 2025 Washington #48 of 136; 2025 Maryland #50 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #61 of 136; 2025 Purdue #63 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #82 of 136; 2025 Indiana #116 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #119 of 136. Marked: 2025 Oregon, ranked 57 of 136. Big Ten median rank 28.