THIRD AND DATA

Pittsburgh game log

2003: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 6vs Kent State43–3 W———————————43%23%
Sep 13vs Ball State42–21 W———————————51%47%
Sep 20at Toledo31–35 L———————————47%51%
Sep 27at Texas A&M37–26 W———————————49%39%
Oct 11vs Notre Dame14–20 L———————————22%29%
Oct 18at Rutgers42–32 W———————————38%45%
Oct 25vs Syracuse34–14 W———————————35%37%
Nov 1at Boston College24–13 W———————————45%40%
Nov 8vs Virginia Tech31–28 W———————————47%52%
Nov 15at West Virginia31–52 L———————————32%49%
Nov 22at Temple30–16 W—————————————
Nov 29vs #5 Miami14–28 L—————————————
Dec 27vs Virginia16–23 L———————————54%49%
Season13 games8–5—————–—–———————42%42%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Pittsburgh on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Pittsburgh's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Pittsburgh offense 42% (329 of 777)Opponent offense / Pittsburgh defense 42% (321 of 758)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Kent State: opponent offense 23% of 62Kent State: Pittsburgh offense 43% of 81Ball State: opponent offense 47% of 64Ball State: Pittsburgh offense 51% of 69Toledo: opponent offense 51% of 91Toledo: Pittsburgh offense 47% of 62Texas A&M: opponent offense 39% of 69Texas A&M: Pittsburgh offense 49% of 71Notre Dame: opponent offense 29% of 65Notre Dame: Pittsburgh offense 22% of 58Rutgers: opponent offense 45% of 89Rutgers: Pittsburgh offense 38% of 72Syracuse: opponent offense 37% of 52Syracuse: Pittsburgh offense 35% of 71Boston College: opponent offense 40% of 65Boston College: Pittsburgh offense 45% of 83Virginia Tech: opponent offense 52% of 58Virginia Tech: Pittsburgh offense 47% of 70West Virginia: opponent offense 49% of 80West Virginia: Pittsburgh offense 32% of 69Virginia: opponent offense 49% of 63Virginia: Pittsburgh offense 54% of 71
Kent StateBall State@ Toledo@ Texas A&MNotre Dame@ RutgersSyracuse@ Boston CollegeVirginia Tech@ West Virginia@ Temple#5 MiamiVirginia *
Pittsburgh offenseOpponent offense (Pittsburgh defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Kent State

43–3 W · 81 plays to 62
Pittsburgh offense 43% (35/81)Kent State offense 23% (14/62)

vs Ball State

42–21 W · 69 plays to 64
Pittsburgh offense 51% (35/69)Ball State offense 47% (30/64)

at Toledo

31–35 L · 62 plays to 91
Pittsburgh offense 47% (29/62)Toledo offense 51% (46/91)

at Texas A&M

37–26 W · 71 plays to 69
Pittsburgh offense 49% (35/71)Texas A&M offense 39% (27/69)

vs Notre Dame

14–20 L · 58 plays to 65
Pittsburgh offense 22% (13/58)Notre Dame offense 29% (19/65)

at Rutgers

42–32 W · 72 plays to 89
Pittsburgh offense 38% (27/72)Rutgers offense 45% (40/89)

vs Syracuse

34–14 W · 71 plays to 52
Pittsburgh offense 35% (25/71)Syracuse offense 37% (19/52)

at Boston College

24–13 W · 83 plays to 65
Pittsburgh offense 45% (37/83)Boston College offense 40% (26/65)

vs Virginia Tech

31–28 W · 70 plays to 58
Pittsburgh offense 47% (33/70)Virginia Tech offense 52% (30/58)

at West Virginia

31–52 L · 69 plays to 80
Pittsburgh offense 32% (22/69)West Virginia offense 49% (39/80)

vs Virginia

16–23 L · 71 plays to 63
Pittsburgh offense 54% (38/71)Virginia offense 49% (31/63)