Metrics

PittsburghPanthers

Season
Current

ACC

ACC, 2014

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2014Pittsburgh670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#43 (of 128 teams · 435.4 yds/g · 5,660 yards)#46 (of 128 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 414 points)#34 (of 128 teams · 359.2 yds/g allowed · 4,670 yards)#59 (of 128 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 342 points)#51 (of 128 teams · +5.5 /g · +72 on the season)#98 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 14 taken, 19 given · -0.38 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:44 /g · 7h 18m on the season)#115 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#24 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving production returning)#17 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 128 teams · 0.213 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 128 teams · 0.256 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 52% of plays successful)#87 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#123 (of 128 teams · 1.060 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 128 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 ACC teams in 20140 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#61 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #20–#128. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#54 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #12–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #1–#121. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #3–#119. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#55 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #12–#112. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#58 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #13–#104. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #4–#127. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#100 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #1–#118. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#60 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #10–#119. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#74 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #8–#120. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#57 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #4–#128. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #2–#116. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#47 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #1–#128. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #1–#123. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#88 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #11–#124. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#60 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range #4–#122. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2014Boston College760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 USC)#83 (of 128 teams · 383.7 yds/g · 4,988 yards)#86 (of 128 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 341 points)#11 (of 128 teams · 323.6 yds/g allowed · 4,207 yards)#21 (of 128 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#55 (of 128 teams · +4.9 /g · +64 on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.08 /g)#11 (of 128 teams · 33:02 /g · 7h 09m on the season)#118 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#112 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 128 teams · 19% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 128 teams · 0.184 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 128 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#71 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#36 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 128 teams · 1.261 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 128 teams · 1.199 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Clemson1031 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Louisville)#61 (of 128 teams · 408.3 yds/g · 5,308 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 401 points)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 260.8 yds/g allowed · 3,390 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 16.7 pts/g allowed · 217 points)#12 (of 128 teams · +14.2 /g · +184 on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · +6 on the season · 24 taken, 18 given · +0.46 /g)#15 (of 128 teams · 32:49 /g · 7h 07m on the season)#96 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#96 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning)#110 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 128 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#75 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 128 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 128 teams · 1.252 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Duke940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Georgia Tech)#69 (of 128 teams · 398.3 yds/g · 5,178 yards)#43 (of 128 teams · 32.4 pts/g · 421 points)#69 (of 128 teams · 399.7 yds/g allowed · 5,196 yards)#24 (of 128 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#23 (of 128 teams · +10.6 /g · +138 on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.46 /g)#97 (of 128 teams · 28:59 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's passing production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's receiving production returning)#54 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 (of 128 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 128 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#90 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 (of 128 teams · 1.066 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.993 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Florida State1313 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Georgia Tech, #17 Clemson, #21 Louisville)#38 (of 128 teams · 441.4 yds/g · 6,179 yards)#35 (of 128 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 472 points)#63 (of 128 teams · 396.9 yds/g allowed · 5,557 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#37 (of 128 teams · +8.1 /g · +114 on the season)#104 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 26 taken, 32 given · -0.43 /g)#58 (of 128 teams · 30:16 /g · 7h 04m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#119 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's receiving production returning)#93 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 128 teams · 0.240 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 128 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#83 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 128 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 128 teams · 1.154 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Georgia Tech1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #7 Mississippi State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #13 Georgia, #17 Clemson · postseason: #7 Mississippi State)#20 (of 128 teams · 476.5 yds/g · 6,671 yards)#12 (of 128 teams · 37.9 pts/g · 530 points)#81 (of 128 teams · 411.3 yds/g allowed · 5,758 yards)#53 (of 128 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#19 (of 128 teams · +12.1 /g · +170 on the season)#13 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 29 taken, 18 given · +0.79 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:58 /g · 7h 55m on the season)#100 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing production returning)#46 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#99 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.340 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#93 (of 128 teams · 0.176 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 54% of plays successful)#122 (of 128 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 128 teams · 1.140 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 128 teams · 1.151 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Louisville940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#72 (of 128 teams · 394.7 yds/g · 5,131 yards)#53 (of 128 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 405 points)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 308.5 yds/g allowed · 4,011 yards)#24 (of 128 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#28 (of 128 teams · +9.4 /g · +122 on the season)#44 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 30 taken, 26 given · +0.31 /g)#16 (of 128 teams · 32:49 /g · 7h 07m on the season)#116 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#66 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#74 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 128 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 128 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays)#60 (of 128 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Miami671 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#47 (of 128 teams · 430.3 yds/g · 5,594 yards)#62 (of 128 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 380 points)#13 (of 128 teams · 328.9 yds/g allowed · 4,275 yards)#37 (of 128 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#55 (of 128 teams · +4.9 /g · +64 on the season)#67 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 23 taken, 24 given · -0.08 /g)#89 (of 128 teams · 29:20 /g · 6h 21m on the season)#101 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's passing production returning)#60 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 128 teams · 0.230 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 128 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#50 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 128 teams · 1.299 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 128 teams · 1.093 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014NC State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#60 (of 128 teams · 408.5 yds/g · 5,311 yards)#58 (of 128 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 392 points)#47 (of 128 teams · 373.1 yds/g allowed · 4,850 yards)#66 (of 128 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 351 points)#65 (of 128 teams · +3.1 /g · +41 on the season)#38 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.38 /g)#70 (of 128 teams · 29:56 /g · 6h 29m on the season)#110 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#93 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#77 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 128 teams · 0.220 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 128 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#70 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 128 teams · 1.076 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 128 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014North Carolina670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Georgia Tech)#48 (of 128 teams · 429.8 yds/g · 5,587 yards)#38 (of 128 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#121 (of 128 teams · 497.9 yds/g allowed · 6,472 yards)#119 (of 128 teams · 39.0 pts/g allowed · 507 points)#93 (of 128 teams · -5.8 /g · -75 on the season)#60 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 23 taken, 23 given · +0.00 /g)#127 (of 128 teams · 26:08 /g · 5h 40m on the season)#73 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's passing production returning)#69 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#43 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 128 teams · 0.171 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 128 teams · 0.265 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#123 (of 128 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 128 teams · 1.163 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 128 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Syracuse390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#116 (of 128 teams · 329.3 yds/g · 3,951 yards)#121 (of 128 teams · 17.1 pts/g · 205 points)#27 (of 128 teams · 349.2 yds/g allowed · 4,190 yards)#38 (of 128 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#99 (of 128 teams · -7.3 /g · -87 on the season)#70 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 20 taken, 21 given · -0.08 /g)#122 (of 128 teams · 26:40 /g · 5h 20m on the season)#60 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's passing production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#98 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#116 (of 128 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 128 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#63 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 128 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.042 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Virginia570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Louisville)#90 (of 128 teams · 374.2 yds/g · 4,490 yards)#88 (of 128 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 310 points)#29 (of 128 teams · 353.2 yds/g allowed · 4,238 yards)#33 (of 128 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 289 points)#71 (of 128 teams · +1.8 /g · +21 on the season)#37 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 29 taken, 24 given · +0.42 /g)#27 (of 128 teams · 32:06 /g · 6h 25m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#42 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 128 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 128 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#96 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#30 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 128 teams · 1.112 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 128 teams · 1.169 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Virginia Tech760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Ohio State)#99 (of 128 teams · 365.3 yds/g · 4,749 yards)#96 (of 128 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 313 points)#21 (of 128 teams · 343.8 yds/g allowed · 4,469 yards)#14 (of 128 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 262 points)#61 (of 128 teams · +3.9 /g · +51 on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 22 taken, 26 given · -0.31 /g)#40 (of 128 teams · 31:20 /g · 6h 47m on the season)#105 (of 128 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving production returning)#63 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 128 teams · 0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 (of 128 teams · 1.057 average PPA on successful plays)#122 (of 128 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Wake Forest390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2014. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#128 (of 128 teams · 216.3 yds/g · 2,595 yards)#127 (of 128 teams · 14.8 pts/g · 178 points)#41 (of 128 teams · 369.3 yds/g allowed · 4,431 yards)#62 (of 128 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#112 (of 128 teams · -11.6 /g · -139 on the season)#78 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.17 /g)#79 (of 128 teams · 29:44 /g · 5h 57m on the season)#106 (of 128 teams · 6% of last season's passing production returning)#100 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#101 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#128 (of 128 teams · -0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#128 (of 128 teams · 32% of plays successful)#26 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 128 teams · 1.072 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 128 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20142014 PittsburghACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #61
Total offense. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #20 of 128; 2014 Florida State #38 of 128; 2014 Miami #47 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #48 of 128; 2014 NC State #60 of 128; 2014 Clemson #61 of 128; 2014 Duke #69 of 128; 2014 Louisville #72 of 128; 2014 Boston College #83 of 128; 2014 Virginia #90 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #99 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #116 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 43 of 128. ACC median rank 61.
Scoring offensemedian #54
Scoring offense. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #12 of 128; 2014 Florida State #35 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #38 of 128; 2014 Duke #43 of 128; 2014 Louisville #53 of 128; 2014 Clemson #54 of 128; 2014 NC State #58 of 128; 2014 Miami #62 of 128; 2014 Boston College #86 of 128; 2014 Virginia #88 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #96 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #121 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #127 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 46 of 128. ACC median rank 54.
Total defensemedian #29
Total defense. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Clemson #1 of 128; 2014 Louisville #6 of 128; 2014 Boston College #11 of 128; 2014 Miami #13 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #21 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #27 of 128; 2014 Virginia #29 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #41 of 128; 2014 NC State #47 of 128; 2014 Florida State #63 of 128; 2014 Duke #69 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #81 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #121 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 34 of 128. ACC median rank 29.
Scoring defensemedian #37
Scoring defense. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Clemson #3 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #14 of 128; 2014 Boston College #21 of 128; 2014 Duke #24 of 128; 2014 Louisville #24 of 128; 2014 Virginia #33 of 128; 2014 Miami #37 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #38 of 128; 2014 Florida State #50 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #53 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #62 of 128; 2014 NC State #66 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #119 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 59 of 128. ACC median rank 37.
Point marginmedian #55
Point margin. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Clemson #12 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #19 of 128; 2014 Duke #23 of 128; 2014 Louisville #28 of 128; 2014 Florida State #37 of 128; 2014 Boston College #55 of 128; 2014 Miami #55 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #61 of 128; 2014 NC State #65 of 128; 2014 Virginia #71 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #93 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #99 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #112 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 51 of 128. ACC median rank 55.
Turnover marginmedian #58
Turnover margin. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #13 of 128; 2014 Clemson #34 of 128; 2014 Duke #34 of 128; 2014 Virginia #37 of 128; 2014 NC State #38 of 128; 2014 Louisville #44 of 128; 2014 Boston College #58 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #60 of 128; 2014 Miami #67 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #70 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #78 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #92 of 128; 2014 Florida State #104 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 98 of 128. ACC median rank 58.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #4 of 128; 2014 Boston College #11 of 128; 2014 Clemson #15 of 128; 2014 Louisville #16 of 128; 2014 Virginia #27 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #40 of 128; 2014 Florida State #58 of 128; 2014 NC State #70 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #79 of 128; 2014 Miami #89 of 128; 2014 Duke #97 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #122 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #127 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 5 of 128. ACC median rank 40.
Returning passingmedian #100
Returning passing. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Florida State #1 of 128; 2014 Virginia #1 of 128; 2014 Duke #58 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #60 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #73 of 128; 2014 Clemson #96 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #100 of 128; 2014 Miami #101 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #105 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #106 of 128; 2014 NC State #110 of 128; 2014 Louisville #116 of 128; 2014 Boston College #118 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 115 of 128. ACC median rank 100.
Returning receivingmedian #60
Returning receiving. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Virginia Tech #10 of 128; 2014 Duke #13 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #36 of 128; 2014 Virginia #42 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #46 of 128; 2014 Miami #60 of 128; 2014 Louisville #66 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #69 of 128; 2014 NC State #93 of 128; 2014 Clemson #96 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #100 of 128; 2014 Boston College #112 of 128; 2014 Florida State #119 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 24 of 128. ACC median rank 60.
Returning rushingmedian #74
Returning rushing. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Virginia #8 of 128; 2014 Miami #36 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #43 of 128; 2014 Duke #54 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #63 of 128; 2014 Louisville #74 of 128; 2014 NC State #77 of 128; 2014 Florida State #93 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #98 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #99 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #101 of 128; 2014 Clemson #110 of 128; 2014 Boston College #120 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 17 of 128. ACC median rank 74.
Team talent
Team talent. ACC, 2014, best rank first: . Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #57
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #4 of 128; 2014 Florida State #25 of 128; 2014 Miami #28 of 128; 2014 NC State #30 of 128; 2014 Boston College #44 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #57 of 128; 2014 Louisville #64 of 128; 2014 Duke #75 of 128; 2014 Clemson #87 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #108 of 128; 2014 Virginia #110 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #116 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 35 of 128. ACC median rank 57.
Defensive EPAmedian #36
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Clemson #2 of 128; 2014 Louisville #4 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #10 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #22 of 128; 2014 Virginia #26 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #31 of 128; 2014 Duke #36 of 128; 2014 Miami #37 of 128; 2014 Boston College #53 of 128; 2014 Florida State #56 of 128; 2014 NC State #75 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #93 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #116 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 114 of 128. ACC median rank 36.
Offensive success ratemedian #47
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #1 of 128; 2014 Florida State #13 of 128; 2014 NC State #14 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #39 of 128; 2014 Miami #43 of 128; 2014 Duke #47 of 128; 2014 Boston College #71 of 128; 2014 Clemson #75 of 128; 2014 Louisville #92 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #94 of 128; 2014 Virginia #96 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #117 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 3 of 128. ACC median rank 47.
Defensive success ratemedian #50
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Clemson #1 of 128; 2014 Louisville #3 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #4 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #26 of 128; 2014 Virginia #30 of 128; 2014 Boston College #36 of 128; 2014 Miami #50 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #63 of 128; 2014 NC State #70 of 128; 2014 Florida State #83 of 128; 2014 Duke #90 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #122 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 87 of 128. ACC median rank 50.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #88
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Louisville #11 of 128; 2014 Miami #13 of 128; 2014 Boston College #28 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #72 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #86 of 128; 2014 Florida State #87 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #88 of 128; 2014 Virginia #99 of 128; 2014 Clemson #106 of 128; 2014 NC State #114 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #116 of 128; 2014 Duke #120 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 123 of 128. ACC median rank 88.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #60
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Duke #4 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #9 of 128; 2014 Miami #21 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #40 of 128; 2014 Florida State #41 of 128; 2014 Virginia #50 of 128; 2014 Louisville #60 of 128; 2014 NC State #67 of 128; 2014 Boston College #70 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #80 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #88 of 128; 2014 Clemson #97 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #122 of 128. Marked: 2014 Pittsburgh, ranked 103 of 128. ACC median rank 60.