THIRD AND DATA

Pittsburgh game log

2016: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 3vs Villanova28–7 W672613.934–8619–33–175176–150–013–4029:4340%29%
Sep 10vs #7 Penn State42–39 W714326.156–34111–15–91194–120–0210–7935:2948%42%
Sep 17at #11 Oklahoma State38–45 L845276.354–29014–30–237214–182–218–7337:5036%37%
Sep 24at North Carolina36–37 L734215.855–28114–18–1402110–171–114–4041:0952%45%
Oct 1vs Marshall43–27 W655328.241–25217–24–280287–121–303–3432:5452%44%
Oct 8vs Georgia Tech37–34 W624076.642–21514–20–192226–111–112–1530:2148%44%
Oct 15at Virginia45–31 W703464.949–20911–21–137198–171–108–6936:1441%35%
Oct 27vs #16 Virginia Tech36–39 L554588.332–18014–23–278173–100–029–6326:4347%41%
Nov 5at #20 Miami28–51 L704176.034–13017–36–287226–140–225–2526:5340%46%
Nov 12at #1 Clemson43–42 W714646.533–15622–38–308233–121–113–4025:5845%53%
Nov 19vs Duke56–14 W584617.940–22411–18–237189–130–017–5529:2348%28%
Nov 26vs Syracuse76–61 W5964410.940–3939–19–251207–110–027–6424:1851%48%
Dec 28vs Northwestern24–31 L614387.232–16916–29–269186–130–245–5024:3830%41%
Season13 games8–58665,8086.7542–2926189–324–2,88226579–1757–131874–6476:41:3344%42%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Pittsburgh on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Pittsburgh's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Pittsburgh offense 44% (384 of 865)Opponent offense / Pittsburgh defense 42% (409 of 983)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Villanova: opponent offense 29% of 65Villanova: Pittsburgh offense 40% of 67#7 Penn State: opponent offense 42% of 66#7 Penn State: Pittsburgh offense 48% of 71#11 Oklahoma State: opponent offense 37% of 78#11 Oklahoma State: Pittsburgh offense 36% of 84North Carolina: opponent offense 45% of 67North Carolina: Pittsburgh offense 52% of 73Marshall: opponent offense 44% of 62Marshall: Pittsburgh offense 52% of 65Georgia Tech: opponent offense 44% of 55Georgia Tech: Pittsburgh offense 48% of 62Virginia: opponent offense 35% of 71Virginia: Pittsburgh offense 41% of 70#16 Virginia Tech: opponent offense 41% of 82#16 Virginia Tech: Pittsburgh offense 47% of 55#20 Miami: opponent offense 46% of 83#20 Miami: Pittsburgh offense 40% of 70#1 Clemson: opponent offense 53% of 95#1 Clemson: Pittsburgh offense 45% of 71Duke: opponent offense 28% of 68Duke: Pittsburgh offense 48% of 58Syracuse: opponent offense 48% of 106Syracuse: Pittsburgh offense 51% of 59Northwestern: opponent offense 41% of 85Northwestern: Pittsburgh offense 30% of 60
Villanova#7 Penn State@ #11 Oklahoma State@ North CarolinaMarshallGeorgia Tech@ Virginia#16 Virginia Tech@ #20 Miami@ #1 ClemsonDukeSyracuseNorthwestern *
Pittsburgh offenseOpponent offense (Pittsburgh defense)
Successful snaps by player
PlayerSuccessful · rate of snaps

vs Villanova

28–7 W · 67 plays to 65
Pittsburgh offense 40% (27/67)Villanova offense 29% (19/65)

vs #7 Penn State

42–39 W · 71 plays to 66
Pittsburgh offense 48% (34/71)Penn State offense 42% (28/66)

at #11 Oklahoma State

38–45 L · 84 plays to 78
Pittsburgh offense 36% (30/84)Oklahoma State offense 37% (29/78)

at North Carolina

36–37 L · 73 plays to 67
Pittsburgh offense 52% (38/73)North Carolina offense 45% (30/67)

vs Marshall

43–27 W · 65 plays to 62
Pittsburgh offense 52% (34/65)Marshall offense 44% (27/62)

vs Georgia Tech

37–34 W · 62 plays to 55
Pittsburgh offense 48% (30/62)Georgia Tech offense 44% (24/55)

at Virginia

45–31 W · 70 plays to 71
Pittsburgh offense 41% (29/70)Virginia offense 35% (25/71)

vs #16 Virginia Tech

36–39 L · 55 plays to 82
Pittsburgh offense 47% (26/55)Virginia Tech offense 41% (34/82)

at #20 Miami

28–51 L · 70 plays to 83
Pittsburgh offense 40% (28/70)Miami offense 46% (38/83)

at #1 Clemson

43–42 W · 71 plays to 95
Pittsburgh offense 45% (32/71)Clemson offense 53% (50/95)

vs Duke

56–14 W · 58 plays to 68
Pittsburgh offense 48% (28/58)Duke offense 28% (19/68)

vs Syracuse

76–61 W · 59 plays to 106
Pittsburgh offense 51% (30/59)Syracuse offense 48% (51/106)

vs Northwestern

24–31 L · 60 plays to 85
Pittsburgh offense 30% (18/60)Northwestern offense 41% (35/85)