Metrics

PurdueBoilermakers

Season
Current

Big Ten

Big Ten, 2007

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2007Purdue850 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 119 teams · 435.9 yds/g · 5,667 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 446 points)#70 (of 119 teams · 389.1 yds/g allowed · 5,059 yards)#54 (of 119 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#30 (of 119 teams · +7.8 /g · +101 on the season)#45 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 28 taken, 26 given · +0.15 /g)#65 (of 119 teams · 18:17 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 119 teams · 0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#36 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#84 (of 119 teams · 0.884 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 119 teams · 0.976 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 11 Big Ten teams in 20070 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#48 (Total offense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #21–#107. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#49 (Scoring offense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #24–#110. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#42 (Total defense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #1–#119. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring defense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #1–#109. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#37 (Point margin: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #6–#102. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#61 (Turnover margin: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #23–#115. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#53 (Possession: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #1–#118. 2 of 11 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#40 (Offensive EPA: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #21–#86. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive EPA: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #6–#117. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#49 (Offensive success rate: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #10–#96. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive success rate: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #1–#101. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#64 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #5–#105. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#78 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range #18–#115. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)
2007Illinois940 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 119 teams · 425.0 yds/g · 5,525 yards)#58 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 362 points)#59 (of 119 teams · 376.8 yds/g allowed · 4,898 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#37 (of 119 teams · +6.1 /g · +79 on the season)#61 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 26 taken, 27 given · -0.08 /g)#53 (of 119 teams · 18:31 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 119 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 119 teams · 46% of plays successful)#48 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 119 teams · 1.032 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Indiana760 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#80 (of 119 teams · 354.1 yds/g · 4,603 yards)#38 (of 119 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 412 points)#72 (of 119 teams · 389.9 yds/g allowed · 5,068 yards)#69 (of 119 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 370 points)#52 (of 119 teams · +3.2 /g · +42 on the season)#61 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 30 taken, 31 given · -0.08 /g)#118 (of 119 teams · 15:48 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 119 teams · 0.055 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#89 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 119 teams · 1.016 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.881 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Iowa661 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#107 (of 119 teams · 316.3 yds/g · 3,796 yards)#110 (of 119 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 222 points)#39 (of 119 teams · 351.2 yds/g allowed · 4,214 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 225 points)#65 (of 119 teams · -0.3 /g · -3 on the season)#23 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.67 /g)#98 (of 119 teams · 17:21 /g · 3h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 119 teams · -0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#96 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#26 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.854 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Michigan943 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 119 teams · 385.1 yds/g · 5,006 yards)#63 (of 119 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 354 points)#30 (of 119 teams · 335.7 yds/g allowed · 4,364 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 278 points)#38 (of 119 teams · +5.8 /g · +76 on the season)#33 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 33 taken, 28 given · +0.38 /g)#70 (of 119 teams · 18:12 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 119 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#87 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#47 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.942 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 119 teams · 0.836 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Michigan State760 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 119 teams · 416.8 yds/g · 5,418 yards)#29 (of 119 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 430 points)#36 (of 119 teams · 345.5 yds/g allowed · 4,492 yards)#57 (of 119 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 346 points)#35 (of 119 teams · +6.5 /g · +84 on the season)#27 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 25 taken, 19 given · +0.46 /g)#47 (of 119 teams · 18:39 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.008 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#33 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 119 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Minnesota1110 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 119 teams · 407.5 yds/g · 4,890 yards)#67 (of 119 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 315 points)#119 (of 119 teams · 518.7 yds/g allowed · 6,224 yards)#109 (of 119 teams · 36.7 pts/g allowed · 440 points)#102 (of 119 teams · -10.4 /g · -125 on the season)#115 (of 119 teams · -15 on the season · 14 taken, 29 given · -1.25 /g)#91 (of 119 teams · 17:30 /g · 3h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 (of 119 teams · 0.025 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 119 teams · 0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#69 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#101 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.044 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 119 teams · 0.995 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Northwestern660 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 (of 119 teams · 384.7 yds/g · 4,616 yards)#72 (of 119 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 310 points)#62 (of 119 teams · 378.7 yds/g allowed · 4,544 yards)#88 (of 119 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 372 points)#83 (of 119 teams · -5.2 /g · -62 on the season)#104 (of 119 teams · -10 on the season · 18 taken, 28 given · -0.83 /g)#11 (of 119 teams · 19:43 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 119 teams · 0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 119 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#54 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.960 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.999 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Ohio State1120 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 119 teams · 393.6 yds/g · 5,117 yards)#41 (of 119 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 408 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 233.0 yds/g allowed · 3,029 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 166 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +18.6 /g · +242 on the season)#83 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 21 taken, 25 given · -0.31 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:59 /g · 4h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.912 average PPA on successful plays)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.958 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Penn State941 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#48 (of 119 teams · 400.1 yds/g · 5,201 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 394 points)#13 (of 119 teams · 308.2 yds/g allowed · 4,007 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 17.5 pts/g allowed · 228 points)#15 (of 119 teams · +12.8 /g · +166 on the season)#40 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 30 taken, 27 given · +0.23 /g)#44 (of 119 teams · 18:42 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 119 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 46% of plays successful)#24 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 119 teams · 0.846 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Wisconsin940 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#39 (of 119 teams · 408.8 yds/g · 5,314 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 383 points)#42 (of 119 teams · 356.6 yds/g allowed · 4,636 yards)#35 (of 119 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points)#36 (of 119 teams · +6.3 /g · +82 on the season)#76 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.23 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 21:06 /g · 4h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 119 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#34 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 119 teams · 0.898 average PPA on successful plays)#107 (of 119 teams · 1.011 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20072007 PurdueBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #48
Total offense. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Illinois #27 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #34 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #39 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #41 of 119; 2007 Penn State #48 of 119; 2007 Ohio State #53 of 119; 2007 Michigan #62 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #64 of 119; 2007 Indiana #80 of 119; 2007 Iowa #107 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 21 of 119. Big Ten median rank 48.
Scoring offensemedian #49
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Michigan State #29 of 119; 2007 Indiana #38 of 119; 2007 Ohio State #41 of 119; 2007 Penn State #45 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #49 of 119; 2007 Illinois #58 of 119; 2007 Michigan #63 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #67 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #72 of 119; 2007 Iowa #110 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 24 of 119. Big Ten median rank 49.
Total defensemedian #42
Total defense. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Ohio State #1 of 119; 2007 Penn State #13 of 119; 2007 Michigan #30 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #36 of 119; 2007 Iowa #39 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #42 of 119; 2007 Illinois #59 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #62 of 119; 2007 Indiana #72 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #119 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 70 of 119. Big Ten median rank 42.
Scoring defensemedian #35
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Ohio State #1 of 119; 2007 Penn State #7 of 119; 2007 Iowa #12 of 119; 2007 Michigan #23 of 119; 2007 Illinois #26 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #35 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #57 of 119; 2007 Indiana #69 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #88 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #109 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 54 of 119. Big Ten median rank 35.
Point marginmedian #37
Point margin. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Ohio State #6 of 119; 2007 Penn State #15 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #35 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #36 of 119; 2007 Illinois #37 of 119; 2007 Michigan #38 of 119; 2007 Indiana #52 of 119; 2007 Iowa #65 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #83 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #102 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 30 of 119. Big Ten median rank 37.
Turnover marginmedian #61
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Iowa #23 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #27 of 119; 2007 Michigan #33 of 119; 2007 Penn State #40 of 119; 2007 Illinois #61 of 119; 2007 Indiana #61 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #76 of 119; 2007 Ohio State #83 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #104 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #115 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 45 of 119. Big Ten median rank 61.
Possessionmedian #53
Possession. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Wisconsin #1 of 119; 2007 Ohio State #6 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #11 of 119; 2007 Penn State #44 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #47 of 119; 2007 Illinois #53 of 119; 2007 Michigan #70 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #91 of 119; 2007 Iowa #98 of 119; 2007 Indiana #118 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 65 of 119. Big Ten median rank 53.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #40
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Wisconsin #21 of 119; 2007 Penn State #26 of 119; 2007 Illinois #27 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #33 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #40 of 119; 2007 Indiana #42 of 119; 2007 Ohio State #50 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #67 of 119; 2007 Michigan #77 of 119; 2007 Iowa #86 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 31 of 119. Big Ten median rank 40.
Defensive EPAmedian #47
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Ohio State #6 of 119; 2007 Michigan #28 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #35 of 119; 2007 Iowa #45 of 119; 2007 Penn State #47 of 119; 2007 Illinois #57 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #74 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #78 of 119; 2007 Indiana #83 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #117 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 37 of 119. Big Ten median rank 47.
Offensive success ratemedian #49
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Penn State #10 of 119; 2007 Illinois #12 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #19 of 119; 2007 Ohio State #42 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #49 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #54 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #69 of 119; 2007 Indiana #70 of 119; 2007 Michigan #87 of 119; 2007 Iowa #96 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 35 of 119. Big Ten median rank 49.
Defensive success ratemedian #36
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Ohio State #1 of 119; 2007 Penn State #24 of 119; 2007 Iowa #26 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #33 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #34 of 119; 2007 Michigan #47 of 119; 2007 Illinois #48 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #54 of 119; 2007 Indiana #89 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #101 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 36 of 119. Big Ten median rank 36.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #64
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Minnesota #5 of 119; 2007 Indiana #11 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #28 of 119; 2007 Michigan #39 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #43 of 119; 2007 Ohio State #64 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #75 of 119; 2007 Illinois #80 of 119; 2007 Iowa #99 of 119; 2007 Penn State #105 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 84 of 119. Big Ten median rank 64.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #78
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Michigan #18 of 119; 2007 Indiana #36 of 119; 2007 Iowa #45 of 119; 2007 Michigan State #50 of 119; 2007 Penn State #66 of 119; 2007 Ohio State #78 of 119; 2007 Minnesota #101 of 119; 2007 Northwestern #104 of 119; 2007 Wisconsin #107 of 119; 2007 Illinois #115 of 119. Marked: 2007 Purdue, ranked 95 of 119. Big Ten median rank 78.