Metrics

RutgersScarlet Knights

Season
Current

American Athletic

American Athletic, 2013

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013Rutgers670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#96 (of 125 teams · 365.1 yds/g · 4,747 yards)#77 (of 125 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 345 points)#74 (of 125 teams · 412.8 yds/g allowed · 5,366 yards)#81 (of 125 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 387 points)#83 (of 125 teams · -3.2 /g · -42 on the season)#121 (of 125 teams · -12 on the season · 18 taken, 30 given · -0.92 /g)#90 (of 125 teams · 29:05 /g · 6h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 125 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 125 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#50 (of 125 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 125 teams · 0.995 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 125 teams · 1.035 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 American Athletic teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#55 (Total offense: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #23–#123. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#76 (Scoring offense: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #25–#122. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#39 (Total defense: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #1–#110. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#44 (Scoring defense: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #2–#100. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#83 (Point margin: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #5–#110. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#81 (Turnover margin: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #1–#121. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#57 (Possession: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #6–#121. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#46 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #3–#113. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #10–#109. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#56 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #4–#124. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#50 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #8–#112. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #7–#109. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#66 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #2–#123. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)
2013Cincinnati940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 125 teams · 472.1 yds/g · 6,137 yards)#47 (of 125 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 315.6 yds/g allowed · 4,103 yards)#14 (of 125 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 273 points)#32 (of 125 teams · +11.1 /g · +144 on the season)#103 (of 125 teams · -7 on the season · 21 taken, 28 given · -0.54 /g)#28 (of 125 teams · 32:00 /g · 6h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 125 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 125 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 125 teams · 47% of plays successful)#37 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 125 teams · 0.948 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 125 teams · 0.928 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Houston850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#55 (of 125 teams · 419.5 yds/g · 5,454 yards)#38 (of 125 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 431 points)#80 (of 125 teams · 415.8 yds/g allowed · 5,405 yards)#20 (of 125 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#31 (of 125 teams · +11.4 /g · +148 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +25 on the season · 43 taken, 18 given · +1.92 /g)#121 (of 125 teams · 26:21 /g · 5h 43m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 125 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 125 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#87 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#87 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 125 teams · 0.984 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.811 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Louisville1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#28 (of 125 teams · 460.9 yds/g · 5,991 yards)#25 (of 125 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 457 points)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 251.5 yds/g allowed · 3,269 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 12.2 pts/g allowed · 158 points)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +23.0 /g · +299 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +17 on the season · 27 taken, 10 given · +1.31 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 33:43 /g · 7h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.214 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 50% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 125 teams · 0.964 average PPA on successful plays)#121 (of 125 teams · 1.103 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Memphis390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#117 (of 125 teams · 311.5 yds/g · 3,738 yards)#111 (of 125 teams · 19.5 pts/g · 234 points)#39 (of 125 teams · 370.7 yds/g allowed · 4,448 yards)#44 (of 125 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#86 (of 125 teams · -5.1 /g · -61 on the season)#111 (of 125 teams · -8 on the season · 18 taken, 26 given · -0.67 /g)#68 (of 125 teams · 29:55 /g · 5h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 125 teams · 0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 125 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#51 (of 125 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 125 teams · 0.934 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 125 teams · 0.954 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013SMU570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 125 teams · 435.2 yds/g · 5,222 yards)#76 (of 125 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 321 points)#73 (of 125 teams · 412.6 yds/g allowed · 4,951 yards)#100 (of 125 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 400 points)#93 (of 125 teams · -6.6 /g · -79 on the season)#106 (of 125 teams · -7 on the season · 17 taken, 24 given · -0.58 /g)#94 (of 125 teams · 28:51 /g · 5h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 125 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 125 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#112 (of 125 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 125 teams · 0.950 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 125 teams · 0.862 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013South Florida2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#123 (of 125 teams · 255.5 yds/g · 3,066 yards)#122 (of 125 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 165 points)#21 (of 125 teams · 350.8 yds/g allowed · 4,209 yards)#74 (of 125 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#110 (of 125 teams · -14.8 /g · -178 on the season)#81 (of 125 teams · -3 on the season · 25 taken, 28 given · -0.25 /g)#105 (of 125 teams · 28:30 /g · 5h 42m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 125 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 125 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#124 (of 125 teams · 32% of plays successful)#74 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 1.048 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 125 teams · 0.881 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Temple2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 125 teams · 399.0 yds/g · 4,788 yards)#89 (of 125 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 299 points)#110 (of 125 teams · 473.6 yds/g allowed · 5,683 yards)#83 (of 125 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#85 (of 125 teams · -4.9 /g · -59 on the season)#97 (of 125 teams · -6 on the season · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.50 /g)#57 (of 125 teams · 30:15 /g · 6h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 125 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 125 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#55 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#100 (of 125 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 125 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 125 teams · 0.949 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013UCF1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 125 teams · 441.5 yds/g · 5,740 yards)#30 (of 125 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 450 points)#29 (of 125 teams · 362.0 yds/g allowed · 4,706 yards)#17 (of 125 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#24 (of 125 teams · +13.3 /g · +173 on the season)#32 (of 125 teams · +5 on the season · 26 taken, 21 given · +0.38 /g)#26 (of 125 teams · 32:09 /g · 6h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 125 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 125 teams · 0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 125 teams · 48% of plays successful)#29 (of 125 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 125 teams · 0.871 average PPA on successful plays)#123 (of 125 teams · 1.130 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013UConn390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#114 (of 125 teams · 318.6 yds/g · 3,823 yards)#107 (of 125 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 247 points)#52 (of 125 teams · 384.6 yds/g allowed · 4,615 yards)#86 (of 125 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 363 points)#101 (of 125 teams · -9.7 /g · -116 on the season)#71 (of 125 teams · -1 on the season · 24 taken, 25 given · -0.08 /g)#44 (of 125 teams · 31:02 /g · 6h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 125 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 125 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 125 teams · 38% of plays successful)#27 (of 125 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 125 teams · 0.976 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 125 teams · 1.053 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20132013 RutgersAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #55
Total offense. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Cincinnati #23 of 125; 2013 Louisville #28 of 125; 2013 UCF #40 of 125; 2013 SMU #41 of 125; 2013 Houston #55 of 125; 2013 Temple #75 of 125; 2013 UConn #114 of 125; 2013 Memphis #117 of 125; 2013 South Florida #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 96 of 125. American Athletic median rank 55.
Scoring offensemedian #76
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #25 of 125; 2013 UCF #30 of 125; 2013 Houston #38 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #47 of 125; 2013 SMU #76 of 125; 2013 Temple #89 of 125; 2013 UConn #107 of 125; 2013 Memphis #111 of 125; 2013 South Florida #122 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 77 of 125. American Athletic median rank 76.
Total defensemedian #39
Total defense. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #1 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #9 of 125; 2013 South Florida #21 of 125; 2013 UCF #29 of 125; 2013 Memphis #39 of 125; 2013 UConn #52 of 125; 2013 SMU #73 of 125; 2013 Houston #80 of 125; 2013 Temple #110 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 74 of 125. American Athletic median rank 39.
Scoring defensemedian #44
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #2 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #14 of 125; 2013 UCF #17 of 125; 2013 Houston #20 of 125; 2013 Memphis #44 of 125; 2013 South Florida #74 of 125; 2013 Temple #83 of 125; 2013 UConn #86 of 125; 2013 SMU #100 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 81 of 125. American Athletic median rank 44.
Point marginmedian #83
Point margin. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #5 of 125; 2013 UCF #24 of 125; 2013 Houston #31 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #32 of 125; 2013 Temple #85 of 125; 2013 Memphis #86 of 125; 2013 SMU #93 of 125; 2013 UConn #101 of 125; 2013 South Florida #110 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 83 of 125. American Athletic median rank 83.
Turnover marginmedian #81
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Houston #1 of 125; 2013 Louisville #2 of 125; 2013 UCF #32 of 125; 2013 UConn #71 of 125; 2013 South Florida #81 of 125; 2013 Temple #97 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #103 of 125; 2013 SMU #106 of 125; 2013 Memphis #111 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 121 of 125. American Athletic median rank 81.
Possessionmedian #57
Possession. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #6 of 125; 2013 UCF #26 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #28 of 125; 2013 UConn #44 of 125; 2013 Temple #57 of 125; 2013 Memphis #68 of 125; 2013 SMU #94 of 125; 2013 South Florida #105 of 125; 2013 Houston #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 90 of 125. American Athletic median rank 57.
Returning passing
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Rutgers, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Rutgers, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Rutgers, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Rutgers, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #46
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #3 of 125; 2013 Temple #30 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #40 of 125; 2013 UCF #41 of 125; 2013 SMU #46 of 125; 2013 Houston #86 of 125; 2013 Memphis #96 of 125; 2013 UConn #110 of 125; 2013 South Florida #113 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 94 of 125. American Athletic median rank 46.
Defensive EPAmedian #47
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #10 of 125; 2013 UConn #25 of 125; 2013 South Florida #33 of 125; 2013 Memphis #39 of 125; 2013 Houston #47 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #63 of 125; 2013 UCF #74 of 125; 2013 SMU #83 of 125; 2013 Temple #109 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 105 of 125. American Athletic median rank 47.
Offensive success ratemedian #56
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #4 of 125; 2013 UCF #13 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #19 of 125; 2013 Temple #55 of 125; 2013 SMU #56 of 125; 2013 Houston #87 of 125; 2013 Memphis #89 of 125; 2013 UConn #109 of 125; 2013 South Florida #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 82 of 125. American Athletic median rank 56.
Defensive success ratemedian #50
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #8 of 125; 2013 UConn #27 of 125; 2013 UCF #29 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #37 of 125; 2013 Memphis #51 of 125; 2013 South Florida #74 of 125; 2013 Houston #87 of 125; 2013 Temple #100 of 125; 2013 SMU #112 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 50 of 125. American Athletic median rank 50.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #41
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 South Florida #7 of 125; 2013 Temple #18 of 125; 2013 Houston #38 of 125; 2013 UConn #41 of 125; 2013 Louisville #51 of 125; 2013 SMU #61 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #63 of 125; 2013 Memphis #73 of 125; 2013 UCF #109 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 25 of 125. American Athletic median rank 41.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #66
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Houston #2 of 125; 2013 SMU #14 of 125; 2013 South Florida #24 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #53 of 125; 2013 Temple #66 of 125; 2013 Memphis #70 of 125; 2013 UConn #114 of 125; 2013 Louisville #121 of 125; 2013 UCF #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Rutgers, ranked 108 of 125. American Athletic median rank 66.