Metrics

San Diego StateAztecs

Season
Current

Mountain West

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season AP poll of 2006, released in week 14.

AP Top 25, 2006

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2006San Diego State390 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#106 (of 119 teams · 269.5 yds/g · 3,234 yards)#113 (of 119 teams · 14.2 pts/g · 170 points)#77 (of 119 teams · 351.8 yds/g allowed · 4,221 yards)#94 (of 119 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#109 (of 119 teams · -12.9 /g · -155 on the season)#93 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 19 taken, 25 given · -0.50 /g)#60 (of 119 teams · 18:08 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 119 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#63 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#83 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 119 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.855 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#24 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#96. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#19 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#78. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #2–#95. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#69. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#15 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#42. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #2–#79. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#35 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #2–#119. 5 of 25 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#25 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#96. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#116. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#97. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#23 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #1–#113. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#65 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #10–#106. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#71 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range #25–#118. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)
2006Ohio State1210 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 119 teams · 384.5 yds/g · 4,999 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 450 points)#15 (of 119 teams · 280.5 yds/g allowed · 3,646 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 166 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +21.9 /g · +284 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 27 taken, 20 given · +0.54 /g)#35 (of 119 teams · 18:45 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 119 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#30 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.977 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 119 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006USC1122 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 119 teams · 391.9 yds/g · 5,094 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 396 points)#24 (of 119 teams · 295.9 yds/g allowed · 3,846 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 15.2 pts/g allowed · 197 points)#14 (of 119 teams · +15.3 /g · +199 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.38 /g)#75 (of 119 teams · 17:54 /g · 3h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#23 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 119 teams · 1.007 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 119 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Michigan1122 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#36 (of 119 teams · 370.8 yds/g · 4,820 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 380 points)#11 (of 119 teams · 268.3 yds/g allowed · 3,488 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 207 points)#17 (of 119 teams · +13.3 /g · +173 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17 on the season · 30 taken, 13 given · +1.31 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:23 /g · 4h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 119 teams · -0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#29 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 119 teams · 0.863 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 119 teams · 1.052 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Florida1311 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#31 (of 119 teams · 373.3 yds/g · 5,226 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 416 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 240.1 yds/g allowed · 3,361 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 189 points)#12 (of 119 teams · +16.2 /g · +227 on the season)#41 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 30 taken, 25 given · +0.36 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:00 /g · 4h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 119 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 119 teams · -0.046 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#12 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.963 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 119 teams · 1.005 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006LSU1121 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 119 teams · 393.5 yds/g · 5,116 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 438 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 228.8 yds/g allowed · 2,974 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +21.1 /g · +274 on the season)#53 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 24 taken, 22 given · +0.15 /g)#11 (of 119 teams · 19:33 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.952 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Louisville1210 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 475.3 yds/g · 6,179 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 491 points)#46 (of 119 teams · 320.5 yds/g allowed · 4,166 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 16.3 pts/g allowed · 212 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +21.5 /g · +279 on the season)#47 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 27 taken, 24 given · +0.23 /g)#25 (of 119 teams · 19:00 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.183 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 119 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 49% of plays successful)#22 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 119 teams · 0.942 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 119 teams · 1.025 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Wisconsin1210 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 119 teams · 373.1 yds/g · 4,851 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 380 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 253.1 yds/g allowed · 3,290 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.1 pts/g allowed · 157 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.1 /g · +223 on the season)#74 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 26 taken, 29 given · -0.23 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:13 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 119 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 119 teams · 0.886 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 119 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Arkansas1040 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 119 teams · 347.4 yds/g · 4,864 yards)#31 (of 119 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 404 points)#17 (of 119 teams · 281.0 yds/g allowed · 3,934 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#22 (of 119 teams · +10.6 /g · +148 on the season)#73 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 22 taken, 25 given · -0.21 /g)#58 (of 119 teams · 18:10 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.941 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 119 teams · 1.021 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Oklahoma1132 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 119 teams · 368.7 yds/g · 5,162 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 424 points)#20 (of 119 teams · 287.1 yds/g allowed · 4,020 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#18 (of 119 teams · +13.0 /g · +182 on the season)#79 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 32 taken, 36 given · -0.29 /g)#17 (of 119 teams · 19:14 /g · 4h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 119 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#14 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.890 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 119 teams · 0.997 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Boise State1300 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 420.6 yds/g · 5,468 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 39.7 pts/g · 516 points)#18 (of 119 teams · 284.0 yds/g allowed · 3,692 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 229 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.1 /g · +287 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 34 taken, 21 given · +1.00 /g)#43 (of 119 teams · 18:34 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 119 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#39 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.899 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Auburn1120 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 119 teams · 306.9 yds/g · 3,990 yards)#56 (of 119 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 322 points)#12 (of 119 teams · 268.5 yds/g allowed · 3,490 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 13.9 pts/g allowed · 181 points)#21 (of 119 teams · +10.8 /g · +141 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +11 on the season · 31 taken, 20 given · +0.85 /g)#14 (of 119 teams · 19:24 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#49 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.890 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Notre Dame1030 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 119 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 5,067 yards)#16 (of 119 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points)#69 (of 119 teams · 340.2 yds/g allowed · 4,423 yards)#67 (of 119 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 310 points)#38 (of 119 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#30 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.46 /g)#39 (of 119 teams · 18:42 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#79 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.930 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 119 teams · 0.863 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Rutgers1120 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 119 teams · 345.1 yds/g · 4,486 yards)#22 (of 119 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 387 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 252.2 yds/g allowed · 3,279 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.3 pts/g allowed · 186 points)#13 (of 119 teams · +15.5 /g · +201 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 34 taken, 19 given · +1.15 /g)#19 (of 119 teams · 19:08 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.031 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 119 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 119 teams · 0.844 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.986 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Virginia Tech1030 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#96 (of 119 teams · 295.1 yds/g · 3,837 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 25.9 pts/g · 336 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 219.5 yds/g allowed · 2,853 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 11.0 pts/g allowed · 143 points)#15 (of 119 teams · +14.8 /g · +193 on the season)#44 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 31 taken, 27 given · +0.31 /g)#78 (of 119 teams · 17:50 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 119 teams · -0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.860 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006West Virginia1120 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 461.4 yds/g · 5,998 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 38.9 pts/g · 505 points)#65 (of 119 teams · 336.6 yds/g allowed · 4,376 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.1 /g · +223 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 25 taken, 18 given · +0.54 /g)#56 (of 119 teams · 18:11 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#43 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.961 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.990 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Wake Forest1130 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#91 (of 119 teams · 307.0 yds/g · 4,298 yards)#78 (of 119 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 302 points)#50 (of 119 teams · 322.5 yds/g allowed · 4,515 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 215 points)#42 (of 119 teams · +6.2 /g · +87 on the season)#12 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 31 taken, 19 given · +0.86 /g)#51 (of 119 teams · 18:17 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 119 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#67 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.957 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 119 teams · 0.917 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Tennessee941 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 119 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,842 yards)#34 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 362 points)#55 (of 119 teams · 327.5 yds/g allowed · 4,258 yards)#33 (of 119 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 254 points)#28 (of 119 teams · +8.3 /g · +108 on the season)#59 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#95 (of 119 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 119 teams · 0.058 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#74 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.873 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Texas1031 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 119 teams · 391.5 yds/g · 5,089 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 467 points)#26 (of 119 teams · 297.4 yds/g allowed · 3,866 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 238 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.6 /g · +229 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +14 on the season · 38 taken, 24 given · +1.08 /g)#26 (of 119 teams · 18:59 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 119 teams · 0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 119 teams · 0.030 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#24 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 119 teams · 0.858 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.985 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Nebraska951 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 119 teams · 414.6 yds/g · 5,804 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 428 points)#60 (of 119 teams · 331.9 yds/g allowed · 4,646 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#19 (of 119 teams · +12.3 /g · +172 on the season)#63 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 27 taken, 28 given · -0.07 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:56 /g · 4h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#18 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.072 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 119 teams · 1.141 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006BYU1120 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 465.5 yds/g · 6,051 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points)#44 (of 119 teams · 319.1 yds/g allowed · 4,149 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.7 pts/g allowed · 191 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.1 /g · +287 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +14 on the season · 28 taken, 14 given · +1.08 /g)#31 (of 119 teams · 18:53 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.163 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.021 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 50% of plays successful)#63 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.907 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006California1031 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 416.0 yds/g · 5,408 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points)#95 (of 119 teams · 366.2 yds/g allowed · 4,761 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 251 points)#16 (of 119 teams · +13.5 /g · +176 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 29 taken, 24 given · +0.38 /g)#87 (of 119 teams · 17:44 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 119 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#53 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 119 teams · 1.057 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Texas A&M941 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 119 teams · 397.4 yds/g · 5,166 yards)#34 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 362 points)#51 (of 119 teams · 322.6 yds/g allowed · 4,194 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 267 points)#37 (of 119 teams · +7.3 /g · +95 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 23 taken, 13 given · +0.77 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:27 /g · 4h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 119 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#61 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.928 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 119 teams · 0.927 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Georgia Tech950 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 (of 119 teams · 332.1 yds/g · 4,649 yards)#54 (of 119 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 349 points)#30 (of 119 teams · 300.6 yds/g allowed · 4,208 yards)#27 (of 119 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#41 (of 119 teams · +6.6 /g · +92 on the season)#34 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 29 taken, 23 given · +0.43 /g)#57 (of 119 teams · 18:11 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 119 teams · -0.005 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 119 teams · 0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#15 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 119 teams · 0.886 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 119 teams · 1.057 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Hawai'i1130 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 119 teams · 394.4 yds/g · 5,521 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 46.9 pts/g · 656 points)#14 (of 119 teams · 280.1 yds/g allowed · 3,921 yards)#69 (of 119 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +22.8 /g · +319 on the season)#48 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.21 /g)#119 (of 119 teams · 10:51 /g · 2h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 55% of plays successful)#113 (of 119 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.950 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.960 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Boston College1030 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2006's final AP poll. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#47 (of 119 teams · 353.0 yds/g · 4,589 yards)#46 (of 119 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 338 points)#38 (of 119 teams · 311.5 yds/g allowed · 4,049 yards)#14 (of 119 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points)#24 (of 119 teams · +10.3 /g · +134 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17 on the season · 39 taken, 22 given · +1.31 /g)#37 (of 119 teams · 18:44 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 119 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#19 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.904 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 119 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

AP Top 25, 20062006 San Diego StateAP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #24
Total offense. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Louisville #1 of 119; 2006 BYU #3 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #4 of 119; 2006 Boise State #8 of 119; 2006 California #9 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #11 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #15 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #17 of 119; 2006 LSU #18 of 119; 2006 USC #19 of 119; 2006 Texas #20 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #21 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #24 of 119; 2006 Florida #31 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #33 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #34 of 119; 2006 Michigan #36 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #38 of 119; 2006 Boston College #47 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #51 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #54 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #64 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #91 of 119; 2006 Auburn #92 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #96 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 106 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 24.
Scoring offensemedian #19
Scoring offense. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Boise State #2 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #3 of 119; 2006 Louisville #4 of 119; 2006 BYU #5 of 119; 2006 Texas #6 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #8 of 119; 2006 LSU #9 of 119; 2006 California #11 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #16 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #17 of 119; 2006 USC #18 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #19 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #22 of 119; 2006 Florida #23 of 119; 2006 Michigan #26 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #26 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #31 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #34 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #34 of 119; 2006 Boston College #46 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #49 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #54 of 119; 2006 Auburn #56 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #78 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 113 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 19.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2006 LSU #3 of 119; 2006 Florida #5 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #6 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #7 of 119; 2006 Michigan #11 of 119; 2006 Auburn #12 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #14 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #15 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #17 of 119; 2006 Boise State #18 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #20 of 119; 2006 USC #24 of 119; 2006 Texas #26 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #30 of 119; 2006 Boston College #38 of 119; 2006 BYU #44 of 119; 2006 Louisville #46 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #50 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #51 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #55 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #60 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #65 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #69 of 119; 2006 California #95 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 77 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #17
Scoring defense. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Virginia Tech #1 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #2 of 119; 2006 LSU #4 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #5 of 119; 2006 Florida #6 of 119; 2006 Auburn #7 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #8 of 119; 2006 BYU #10 of 119; 2006 USC #11 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #12 of 119; 2006 Boston College #14 of 119; 2006 Michigan #15 of 119; 2006 Louisville #17 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #19 of 119; 2006 Boise State #20 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #24 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #24 of 119; 2006 Texas #26 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #27 of 119; 2006 California #32 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #33 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #44 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #49 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #67 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #69 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 94 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 17.
Point marginmedian #15
Point margin. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Boise State #2 of 119; 2006 BYU #2 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #4 of 119; 2006 Louisville #5 of 119; 2006 LSU #6 of 119; 2006 Texas #7 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #8 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #8 of 119; 2006 Florida #12 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #13 of 119; 2006 USC #14 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #15 of 119; 2006 California #16 of 119; 2006 Michigan #17 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #18 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #19 of 119; 2006 Auburn #21 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #22 of 119; 2006 Boston College #24 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #28 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #37 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #38 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #41 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #42 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 109 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 15.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Michigan #2 of 119; 2006 Boston College #2 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #5 of 119; 2006 Texas #6 of 119; 2006 BYU #6 of 119; 2006 Boise State #8 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #12 of 119; 2006 Auburn #13 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #17 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #24 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #24 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #30 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #34 of 119; 2006 USC #36 of 119; 2006 California #36 of 119; 2006 Florida #41 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #44 of 119; 2006 Louisville #47 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #48 of 119; 2006 LSU #53 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #59 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #63 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #73 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #74 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #79 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 93 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #35
Possession. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Texas A&M #2 of 119; 2006 Michigan #4 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #5 of 119; 2006 Florida #6 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #7 of 119; 2006 LSU #11 of 119; 2006 Auburn #14 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #17 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #19 of 119; 2006 Louisville #25 of 119; 2006 Texas #26 of 119; 2006 BYU #31 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #35 of 119; 2006 Boston College #37 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #39 of 119; 2006 Boise State #43 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #51 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #56 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #57 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #58 of 119; 2006 USC #75 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #78 of 119; 2006 California #87 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #95 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #119 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 60 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 35.
Returning passing
Returning passing. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #25
Offensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 Louisville #2 of 119; 2006 BYU #4 of 119; 2006 LSU #5 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #8 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #10 of 119; 2006 Boise State #11 of 119; 2006 California #15 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #16 of 119; 2006 Florida #18 of 119; 2006 USC #19 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #23 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #25 of 119; 2006 Texas #32 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #36 of 119; 2006 Auburn #40 of 119; 2006 Michigan #41 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #44 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #50 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #54 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #60 of 119; 2006 Boston College #61 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #86 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #93 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #96 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 65 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 25.
Defensive EPAmedian #37
Defensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Wisconsin #1 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2006 LSU #5 of 119; 2006 Boston College #8 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #9 of 119; 2006 Florida #11 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #13 of 119; 2006 Michigan #14 of 119; 2006 Louisville #22 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #24 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #25 of 119; 2006 Boise State #35 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #37 of 119; 2006 BYU #40 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #43 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #45 of 119; 2006 California #47 of 119; 2006 USC #48 of 119; 2006 Texas #51 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #53 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #59 of 119; 2006 Auburn #60 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #62 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #75 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #116 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 61 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 37.
Offensive success ratemedian #29
Offensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Hawai'i #1 of 119; 2006 BYU #2 of 119; 2006 Louisville #3 of 119; 2006 LSU #7 of 119; 2006 Boise State #9 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #12 of 119; 2006 Texas #18 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #19 of 119; 2006 California #20 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #21 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #23 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #28 of 119; 2006 Michigan #29 of 119; 2006 USC #30 of 119; 2006 Florida #31 of 119; 2006 Boston College #32 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #41 of 119; 2006 Auburn #42 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #46 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #48 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #52 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #54 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #68 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #76 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #97 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 63 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 29.
Defensive success ratemedian #23
Defensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Virginia Tech #1 of 119; 2006 LSU #2 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #4 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #5 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #8 of 119; 2006 Michigan #9 of 119; 2006 Florida #12 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #14 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #15 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #18 of 119; 2006 Boston College #19 of 119; 2006 Louisville #22 of 119; 2006 USC #23 of 119; 2006 Texas #24 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #30 of 119; 2006 Boise State #39 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #43 of 119; 2006 Auburn #49 of 119; 2006 California #53 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #61 of 119; 2006 BYU #63 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #67 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #74 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #79 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #113 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 83 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #65
Offensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Nebraska #10 of 119; 2006 California #12 of 119; 2006 USC #25 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #35 of 119; 2006 LSU #40 of 119; 2006 Florida #45 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #47 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #48 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #50 of 119; 2006 Louisville #55 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #57 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #64 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #65 of 119; 2006 Virginia Tech #66 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #73 of 119; 2006 BYU #80 of 119; 2006 Boston College #83 of 119; 2006 Boise State #87 of 119; 2006 Auburn #90 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #91 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #93 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #94 of 119; 2006 Michigan #100 of 119; 2006 Texas #102 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #106 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 81 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 65.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #71
Defensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Virginia Tech #25 of 119; 2006 Notre Dame #26 of 119; 2006 Tennessee #29 of 119; 2006 Ohio State #31 of 119; 2006 Boise State #40 of 119; 2006 BYU #47 of 119; 2006 Wake Forest #49 of 119; 2006 Texas A&M #53 of 119; 2006 Boston College #55 of 119; 2006 California #57 of 119; 2006 LSU #66 of 119; 2006 Auburn #70 of 119; 2006 Wisconsin #71 of 119; 2006 Hawai'i #73 of 119; 2006 Texas #87 of 119; 2006 Rutgers #89 of 119; 2006 West Virginia #90 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #92 of 119; 2006 Florida #97 of 119; 2006 Arkansas #101 of 119; 2006 Louisville #103 of 119; 2006 Michigan #109 of 119; 2006 Georgia Tech #112 of 119; 2006 USC #113 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #118 of 119. Marked: 2006 San Diego State, ranked 23 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 71.