Metrics

San Diego StateAztecs

Season
Current

Mountain West

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season AP poll of 2009, released in week 15.

AP Top 25, 2009

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2009San Diego State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 120 teams · 341.9 yds/g · 4,103 yards)#85 (of 120 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 280 points)#74 (of 120 teams · 382.0 yds/g allowed · 4,584 yards)#98 (of 120 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#99 (of 120 teams · -7.2 /g · -86 on the season)#111 (of 120 teams · -10 on the season · 15 taken, 25 given · -0.83 /g)#110 (of 120 teams · 16:58 /g · 3h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#47 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.052 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 120 teams · 1.056 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #6–#112. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#24 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#86. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#23 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#90. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#19 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#69. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#54. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #3–#71. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#37 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#118. 6 of 25 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#33 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #3–#105. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#30 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#109. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#28 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #3–#101. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#18 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #1–#105. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#73 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #14–#119. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)#67 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range #2–#119. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)
2009Alabama1401 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#42 (of 120 teams · 403.0 yds/g · 5,642 yards)#22 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 244.4 yds/g allowed · 3,421 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 11.7 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +20.4 /g · +285 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19 on the season · 31 taken, 12 given · +1.36 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:22 /g · 4h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.807 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.941 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Texas1314 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 120 teams · 421.2 yds/g · 5,897 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 39.3 pts/g · 550 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 251.9 yds/g allowed · 3,527 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 16.7 pts/g allowed · 234 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22.6 /g · +316 on the season)#13 (of 120 teams · +10 on the season · 37 taken, 27 given · +0.71 /g)#18 (of 120 teams · 19:34 /g · 4h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.875 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.815 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009TCU1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 456.7 yds/g · 5,937 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 38.3 pts/g · 498 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 239.7 yds/g allowed · 3,116 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 166 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.5 /g · +332 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.15 /g)#38 (of 120 teams · 19:13 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 120 teams · 0.766 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 120 teams · 1.018 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Cincinnati1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 120 teams · 447.5 yds/g · 5,817 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 38.6 pts/g · 502 points)#68 (of 120 teams · 374.6 yds/g allowed · 4,870 yards)#44 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +15.5 /g · +202 on the season)#14 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 19 taken, 10 given · +0.69 /g)#118 (of 120 teams · 16:08 /g · 3h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#76 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.919 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Florida1314 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 457.9 yds/g · 6,410 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 502 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 252.6 yds/g allowed · 3,536 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.4 pts/g allowed · 174 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +23.4 /g · +328 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 23 taken, 16 given · +0.50 /g)#60 (of 120 teams · 18:37 /g · 4h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#17 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.862 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Boise State1400 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 450.2 yds/g · 6,303 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 42.2 pts/g · 591 points)#14 (of 120 teams · 300.2 yds/g allowed · 4,203 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 240 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.1 /g · +351 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21 on the season · 35 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#47 (of 120 teams · 18:53 /g · 4h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.866 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.898 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Oregon1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 120 teams · 412.0 yds/g · 5,356 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 36.1 pts/g · 469 points)#35 (of 120 teams · 336.3 yds/g allowed · 4,372 yards)#51 (of 120 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +12.3 /g · +160 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.15 /g)#103 (of 120 teams · 17:25 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#18 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.991 average PPA on successful plays)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Ohio State1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 120 teams · 369.0 yds/g · 4,797 yards)#49 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 377 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 262.3 yds/g allowed · 3,410 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.5 pts/g allowed · 163 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +16.5 /g · +214 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +17 on the season · 35 taken, 18 given · +1.31 /g)#30 (of 120 teams · 19:21 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#11 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.916 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.777 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Georgia Tech1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 120 teams · 422.1 yds/g · 5,910 yards)#15 (of 120 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 473 points)#54 (of 120 teams · 360.3 yds/g allowed · 5,044 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#26 (of 120 teams · +9.0 /g · +126 on the season)#21 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 26 taken, 18 given · +0.57 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:29 /g · 4h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#63 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.937 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.963 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Iowa1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#89 (of 120 teams · 336.3 yds/g · 4,372 yards)#86 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 301 points)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 276.5 yds/g allowed · 3,595 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 200 points)#32 (of 120 teams · +7.8 /g · +101 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 30 taken, 28 given · +0.15 /g)#23 (of 120 teams · 19:29 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 120 teams · -0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.030 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#96 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#15 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.856 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Penn State1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 120 teams · 406.9 yds/g · 5,290 yards)#52 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 375 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 274.5 yds/g allowed · 3,568 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.2 pts/g allowed · 159 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +16.6 /g · +216 on the season)#26 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 23 taken, 17 given · +0.46 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 21:05 /g · 4h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 120 teams · -0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#14 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.856 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.919 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Virginia Tech1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 120 teams · 392.1 yds/g · 5,097 yards)#24 (of 120 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 414 points)#12 (of 120 teams · 295.5 yds/g allowed · 3,841 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 15.6 pts/g allowed · 203 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +16.2 /g · +211 on the season)#14 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 24 taken, 15 given · +0.69 /g)#69 (of 120 teams · 18:21 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 120 teams · 1.000 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 120 teams · 1.045 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009LSU943 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 120 teams · 304.5 yds/g · 3,959 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 323 points)#26 (of 120 teams · 327.6 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#28 (of 120 teams · +8.6 /g · +112 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.31 /g)#106 (of 120 teams · 17:17 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 120 teams · -0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#29 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.879 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.901 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Miami943 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 120 teams · 399.9 yds/g · 5,199 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 394 points)#29 (of 120 teams · 329.6 yds/g allowed · 4,285 yards)#37 (of 120 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#31 (of 120 teams · +8.2 /g · +106 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 21 taken, 21 given · +0.00 /g)#71 (of 120 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#28 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.985 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.954 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009BYU1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 120 teams · 427.1 yds/g · 5,553 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 461 points)#28 (of 120 teams · 329.1 yds/g allowed · 4,278 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 21.5 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#15 (of 120 teams · +13.9 /g · +181 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 24 taken, 24 given · +0.00 /g)#59 (of 120 teams · 18:39 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#35 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.881 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.882 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Oregon State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 120 teams · 410.6 yds/g · 5,338 yards)#26 (of 120 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points)#46 (of 120 teams · 349.5 yds/g allowed · 4,543 yards)#57 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#42 (of 120 teams · +6.5 /g · +84 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.38 /g)#31 (of 120 teams · 19:20 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#75 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.972 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.974 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Pittsburgh1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#52 (of 120 teams · 391.6 yds/g · 5,091 yards)#21 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#23 (of 120 teams · 319.3 yds/g allowed · 4,151 yards)#19 (of 120 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#16 (of 120 teams · +12.3 /g · +160 on the season)#11 (of 120 teams · +10 on the season · 24 taken, 14 given · +0.77 /g)#56 (of 120 teams · 18:42 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#41 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.919 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009West Virginia940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#61 (of 120 teams · 376.4 yds/g · 4,893 yards)#67 (of 120 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 340 points)#36 (of 120 teams · 336.5 yds/g allowed · 4,374 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#47 (of 120 teams · +4.5 /g · +58 on the season)#71 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.15 /g)#36 (of 120 teams · 19:17 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#26 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.995 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Stanford850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 120 teams · 427.6 yds/g · 5,559 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 461 points)#90 (of 120 teams · 402.7 yds/g allowed · 5,235 yards)#69 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#27 (of 120 teams · +8.9 /g · +116 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:08 /g · 4h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#105 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.974 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.955 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Nebraska1041 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 120 teams · 323.0 yds/g · 4,522 yards)#75 (of 120 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 352 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 272.0 yds/g allowed · 3,808 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 10.4 pts/g allowed · 146 points)#12 (of 120 teams · +14.7 /g · +206 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 28 taken, 23 given · +0.36 /g)#37 (of 120 teams · 19:14 /g · 4h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#101 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.904 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Oklahoma State940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 120 teams · 367.2 yds/g · 4,774 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 369 points)#31 (of 120 teams · 332.5 yds/g allowed · 4,323 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#38 (of 120 teams · +6.7 /g · +87 on the season)#60 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 30 taken, 30 given · +0.00 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:21 /g · 4h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#52 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.866 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Arizona850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 120 teams · 384.5 yds/g · 4,999 yards)#61 (of 120 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 356 points)#25 (of 120 teams · 322.2 yds/g allowed · 4,189 yards)#53 (of 120 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#54 (of 120 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season)#68 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g)#45 (of 120 teams · 19:01 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#33 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.861 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.900 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Utah1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 120 teams · 389.5 yds/g · 5,064 yards)#34 (of 120 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#19 (of 120 teams · 313.9 yds/g allowed · 4,080 yards)#23 (of 120 teams · 20.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points)#25 (of 120 teams · +9.6 /g · +125 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 25 taken, 20 given · +0.38 /g)#35 (of 120 teams · 19:18 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#16 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 120 teams · 0.800 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.933 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Wisconsin1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 120 teams · 416.9 yds/g · 5,420 yards)#25 (of 120 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 413 points)#17 (of 120 teams · 305.7 yds/g allowed · 3,974 yards)#33 (of 120 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#23 (of 120 teams · +10.0 /g · +130 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 27 taken, 24 given · +0.23 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:39 /g · 4h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#12 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.877 average PPA on successful plays)#119 (of 120 teams · 1.096 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Central Michigan1220 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2009's final AP poll. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 120 teams · 423.1 yds/g · 5,924 yards)#13 (of 120 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 475 points)#43 (of 120 teams · 344.2 yds/g allowed · 4,819 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 18.9 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#11 (of 120 teams · +15.0 /g · +210 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.36 /g)#73 (of 120 teams · 18:17 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#64 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.869 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.894 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

AP Top 25, 20092009 San Diego StateAP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #6 of 120; 2009 TCU #7 of 120; 2009 Boise State #10 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #11 of 120; 2009 Stanford #19 of 120; 2009 BYU #21 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #24 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #26 of 120; 2009 Texas #29 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #30 of 120; 2009 Oregon #33 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #34 of 120; 2009 Penn State #37 of 120; 2009 Alabama #42 of 120; 2009 Miami #45 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #50 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #52 of 120; 2009 Utah #54 of 120; 2009 Arizona #58 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #61 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #68 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #70 of 120; 2009 Iowa #89 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #99 of 120; 2009 LSU #112 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 86 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #24
Scoring offense. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #1 of 120; 2009 Texas #3 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #4 of 120; 2009 TCU #5 of 120; 2009 Oregon #8 of 120; 2009 Florida #10 of 120; 2009 BYU #11 of 120; 2009 Stanford #11 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #13 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #15 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #21 of 120; 2009 Alabama #22 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #24 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #25 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #26 of 120; 2009 Miami #31 of 120; 2009 Utah #34 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #49 of 120; 2009 Penn State #52 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #56 of 120; 2009 Arizona #61 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #67 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #75 of 120; 2009 LSU #76 of 120; 2009 Iowa #86 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 85 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 24.
Total defensemedian #23
Total defense. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #1 of 120; 2009 Alabama #2 of 120; 2009 Texas #3 of 120; 2009 Florida #4 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #5 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #7 of 120; 2009 Penn State #9 of 120; 2009 Iowa #10 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #12 of 120; 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #17 of 120; 2009 Utah #19 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #23 of 120; 2009 Arizona #25 of 120; 2009 LSU #26 of 120; 2009 BYU #28 of 120; 2009 Miami #29 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #31 of 120; 2009 Oregon #35 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #36 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #43 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #46 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #54 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #68 of 120; 2009 Stanford #90 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 74 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Scoring defensemedian #19
Scoring defense. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Nebraska #1 of 120; 2009 Alabama #2 of 120; 2009 Penn State #3 of 120; 2009 Florida #4 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #5 of 120; 2009 TCU #6 of 120; 2009 Iowa #8 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #9 of 120; 2009 LSU #11 of 120; 2009 Texas #12 of 120; 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #17 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #19 of 120; 2009 Utah #23 of 120; 2009 BYU #29 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #31 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #31 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #33 of 120; 2009 Miami #37 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #44 of 120; 2009 Oregon #51 of 120; 2009 Arizona #53 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #56 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #57 of 120; 2009 Stanford #69 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 98 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 19.
Point marginmedian #16
Point margin. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #1 of 120; 2009 Boise State #2 of 120; 2009 Florida #3 of 120; 2009 Texas #4 of 120; 2009 Alabama #5 of 120; 2009 Penn State #6 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #8 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #9 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #10 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #11 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #12 of 120; 2009 BYU #15 of 120; 2009 Oregon #16 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #16 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #23 of 120; 2009 Utah #25 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #26 of 120; 2009 Stanford #27 of 120; 2009 LSU #28 of 120; 2009 Miami #31 of 120; 2009 Iowa #32 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #38 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #42 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #47 of 120; 2009 Arizona #54 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 99 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 16.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #3 of 120; 2009 Alabama #4 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #5 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #11 of 120; 2009 Texas #13 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #14 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #14 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #21 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 Penn State #26 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #32 of 120; 2009 Utah #32 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #34 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #34 of 120; 2009 LSU #37 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #45 of 120; 2009 TCU #52 of 120; 2009 Oregon #52 of 120; 2009 Iowa #52 of 120; 2009 Miami #60 of 120; 2009 BYU #60 of 120; 2009 Stanford #60 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #60 of 120; 2009 Arizona #68 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #71 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 111 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #37
Possession. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Penn State #1 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #4 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #6 of 120; 2009 Alabama #7 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #8 of 120; 2009 Stanford #10 of 120; 2009 Texas #18 of 120; 2009 Iowa #23 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #30 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #31 of 120; 2009 Utah #35 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #36 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #37 of 120; 2009 TCU #38 of 120; 2009 Arizona #45 of 120; 2009 Boise State #47 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #56 of 120; 2009 BYU #59 of 120; 2009 Florida #60 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #69 of 120; 2009 Miami #71 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #73 of 120; 2009 Oregon #103 of 120; 2009 LSU #106 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #118 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 110 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 37.
Returning passing
Returning passing. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #33
Offensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #3 of 120; 2009 BYU #4 of 120; 2009 Stanford #6 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #7 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #10 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #12 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #14 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #15 of 120; 2009 Boise State #22 of 120; 2009 Miami #26 of 120; 2009 Oregon #29 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #30 of 120; 2009 TCU #33 of 120; 2009 Penn State #36 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #41 of 120; 2009 Alabama #42 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #49 of 120; 2009 Texas #58 of 120; 2009 LSU #60 of 120; 2009 Arizona #62 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #71 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #83 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #85 of 120; 2009 Utah #87 of 120; 2009 Iowa #105 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 48 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 33.
Defensive EPAmedian #30
Defensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Texas #1 of 120; 2009 TCU #2 of 120; 2009 Alabama #3 of 120; 2009 Boise State #6 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #7 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #8 of 120; 2009 Utah #9 of 120; 2009 Iowa #10 of 120; 2009 Penn State #16 of 120; 2009 LSU #18 of 120; 2009 Oregon #23 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #30 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #31 of 120; 2009 Arizona #35 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #39 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #41 of 120; 2009 Miami #42 of 120; 2009 BYU #43 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #49 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #50 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #87 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #90 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #94 of 120; 2009 Stanford #109 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 79 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 30.
Offensive success ratemedian #28
Offensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 BYU #3 of 120; 2009 Florida #6 of 120; 2009 TCU #7 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #8 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #9 of 120; 2009 Penn State #10 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #11 of 120; 2009 Stanford #12 of 120; 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Alabama #20 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #21 of 120; 2009 Texas #25 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #28 of 120; 2009 Miami #30 of 120; 2009 Utah #34 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #37 of 120; 2009 Oregon #41 of 120; 2009 Arizona #43 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #61 of 120; 2009 LSU #65 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #66 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #73 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #76 of 120; 2009 Iowa #96 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #101 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 92 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 28.
Defensive success ratemedian #18
Defensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 TCU #1 of 120; 2009 Alabama #3 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #4 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #5 of 120; 2009 Texas #6 of 120; 2009 Boise State #9 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #11 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #12 of 120; 2009 Penn State #14 of 120; 2009 Iowa #15 of 120; 2009 Utah #16 of 120; 2009 Florida #17 of 120; 2009 Oregon #18 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #26 of 120; 2009 Miami #28 of 120; 2009 LSU #29 of 120; 2009 Arizona #33 of 120; 2009 BYU #35 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #41 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #52 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #63 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #64 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #75 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #76 of 120; 2009 Stanford #105 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 47 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 18.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #73
Offensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Virginia Tech #14 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #16 of 120; 2009 Oregon #17 of 120; 2009 Miami #20 of 120; 2009 Stanford #27 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #28 of 120; 2009 Florida #46 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #49 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #61 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #62 of 120; 2009 Ohio State #64 of 120; 2009 Iowa #72 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #73 of 120; 2009 BYU #86 of 120; 2009 LSU #87 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #89 of 120; 2009 Texas #92 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #94 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #97 of 120; 2009 Boise State #98 of 120; 2009 Arizona #101 of 120; 2009 Penn State #104 of 120; 2009 Alabama #114 of 120; 2009 Utah #117 of 120; 2009 TCU #119 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 3 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 73.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #67
Defensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Ohio State #2 of 120; 2009 Texas #10 of 120; 2009 Iowa #21 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 BYU #30 of 120; 2009 Central Michigan #39 of 120; 2009 Boise State #41 of 120; 2009 Arizona #43 of 120; 2009 LSU #45 of 120; 2009 West Virginia #46 of 120; 2009 Oklahoma State #49 of 120; 2009 Penn State #61 of 120; 2009 Utah #67 of 120; 2009 Alabama #75 of 120; 2009 Pittsburgh #76 of 120; 2009 Oregon #78 of 120; 2009 Cincinnati #80 of 120; 2009 Miami #84 of 120; 2009 Stanford #86 of 120; 2009 Nebraska #90 of 120; 2009 Georgia Tech #92 of 120; 2009 Oregon State #98 of 120; 2009 TCU #108 of 120; 2009 Virginia Tech #112 of 120; 2009 Wisconsin #119 of 120. Marked: 2009 San Diego State, ranked 115 of 120. AP Top 25 median rank 67.