THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

San Diego StateAztecs

Season
‹
›Current

Mountain West

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2019, released in week 16.

CFP Top 25, 2019

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019San Diego State10–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#110 (of 130 teams · 343.1 yds/g · 4,461 yards)#112 (of 130 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 276 points)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 287.6 yds/g allowed · 3,739 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 12.7 pts/g allowed · 165 points)#31 (of 130 teams · +8.5 /g · +111 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +19 on the season · 27 taken, 8 given · +1.46 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:55 /g · 7h 21m on the season)#69 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's passing production returning)#79 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's rushing production returning)#77 (of 130 teams · 504.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 130 teams · 0.060 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.030 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#95 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#15 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#128 (of 130 teams · 1.047 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 130 teams · 1.099 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#42 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#99. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#21 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#88. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#22 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#82. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#19 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#78. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#15 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#54. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#31 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #3–#120. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#47 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#108. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#52 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#125. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#44 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#118. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#65 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#130. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#119. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#21 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#83. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#21 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#90. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#26 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#27 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#114. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#49 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #5–#123. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range #1–#128. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)
2019LSU15–04 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #13 Alabama · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 568.4 yds/g · 8,526 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 48.4 pts/g · 726 points)#31 (of 130 teams · 343.5 yds/g allowed · 5,153 yards)#32 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 328 points)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +26.5 /g · +398 on the season)#15 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 22 taken, 12 given · +0.67 /g)#60 (of 130 teams · 30:13 /g · 7h 33m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#28 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#87 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 906.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.413 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 130 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 56% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 130 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 130 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Ohio State13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Penn State)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Penn State, #14 Michigan, #21 Cincinnati)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 529.9 yds/g · 7,419 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 46.9 pts/g · 656 points)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 259.7 yds/g allowed · 3,636 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 13.7 pts/g allowed · 192 points)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +33.1 /g · +464 on the season)#17 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 25 taken, 16 given · +0.64 /g)#25 (of 130 teams · 31:58 /g · 7h 28m on the season)#124 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#80 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#93 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 973.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.368 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 51% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 130 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 130 teams · 1.221 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Clemson14–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #24 Virginia · postseason: #2 Ohio State)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 528.7 yds/g · 7,931 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 43.9 pts/g · 659 points)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 288.3 yds/g allowed · 4,325 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 203 points)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +30.4 /g · +456 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +15 on the season · 30 taken, 15 given · +1.00 /g)#58 (of 130 teams · 30:16 /g · 7h 34m on the season)#50 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's passing production returning)#23 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#65 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 863.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.365 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 51% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 130 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 130 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Oklahoma12–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Baylor, #7 Baylor)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Baylor, #7 Baylor, #25 Oklahoma State)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 537.5 yds/g · 7,525 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 42.1 pts/g · 590 points)#38 (of 130 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 4,990 yards)#64 (of 130 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#15 (of 130 teams · +14.9 /g · +208 on the season)#109 (of 130 teams · -8 on the season · 11 taken, 19 given · -0.57 /g)#37 (of 130 teams · 30:57 /g · 7h 13m on the season)#120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#72 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving production returning)#62 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 869.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.401 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 130 teams · 0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 54% of plays successful)#49 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 130 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 130 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Georgia12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida · postseason: #7 Baylor)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #15 Notre Dame · postseason: #7 Baylor)#61 (of 130 teams · 408.1 yds/g · 5,713 yards)#50 (of 130 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 431 points)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 275.8 yds/g allowed · 3,861 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 176 points)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.2 /g · +255 on the season)#49 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.21 /g)#18 (of 130 teams · 32:16 /g · 7h 32m on the season)#57 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#118 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's receiving production returning)#73 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 960.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 130 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#13 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 130 teams · 1.105 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 130 teams · 1.096 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Oregon12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Wisconsin)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 Utah, #22 USC · postseason: #8 Wisconsin)#39 (of 130 teams · 433.1 yds/g · 6,063 yards)#16 (of 130 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 495 points)#22 (of 130 teams · 329.1 yds/g allowed · 4,607 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 231 points)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.9 /g · +264 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +16 on the season · 27 taken, 11 given · +1.14 /g)#104 (of 130 teams · 28:14 /g · 6h 35m on the season)#35 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#57 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's rushing production returning)#17 (of 130 teams · 817.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 130 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#24 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 130 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.066 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Baylor11–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Oklahoma State)#52 (of 130 teams · 421.4 yds/g · 5,900 yards)#27 (of 130 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 471 points)#39 (of 130 teams · 358.9 yds/g allowed · 5,024 yards)#19 (of 130 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#19 (of 130 teams · +13.9 /g · +194 on the season)#13 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 29 taken, 19 given · +0.71 /g)#103 (of 130 teams · 28:15 /g · 6h 36m on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's passing production returning)#22 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#30 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing production returning)#35 (of 130 teams · 668.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 130 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#53 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 130 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Wisconsin10–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Michigan, #16 Iowa, #18 Minnesota)#38 (of 130 teams · 433.1 yds/g · 6,064 yards)#23 (of 130 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 477 points)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 287.1 yds/g allowed · 4,020 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 237 points)#14 (of 130 teams · +17.1 /g · +240 on the season)#63 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 35:40 /g · 8h 19m on the season)#91 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's passing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's receiving production returning)#47 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning)#33 (of 130 teams · 675.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 130 teams · 0.260 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 130 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays)#123 (of 130 teams · 1.337 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Florida11–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #12 Auburn · postseason: #24 Virginia)#44 (of 130 teams · 430.5 yds/g · 5,597 yards)#28 (of 130 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 304.9 yds/g allowed · 3,963 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 201 points)#12 (of 130 teams · +17.8 /g · +231 on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 23 taken, 18 given · +0.38 /g)#62 (of 130 teams · 30:10 /g · 6h 32m on the season)#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#52 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning)#15 (of 130 teams · 835.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 130 teams · 0.256 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 130 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#22 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 130 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 130 teams · 1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Penn State11–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan, #16 Iowa · postseason: #17 Memphis)#56 (of 130 teams · 412.0 yds/g · 5,356 yards)#15 (of 130 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 465 points)#33 (of 130 teams · 346.5 yds/g allowed · 4,504 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.0 pts/g allowed · 208 points)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +19.8 /g · +257 on the season)#19 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.62 /g)#108 (of 130 teams · 27:54 /g · 6h 03m on the season)#113 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#83 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#130 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's rushing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 857.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 130 teams · 0.237 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 130 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 130 teams · 1.269 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 130 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Utah11–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 130 teams · 429.0 yds/g · 6,006 yards)#38 (of 130 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 452 points)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 269.2 yds/g allowed · 3,769 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 15.0 pts/g allowed · 210 points)#13 (of 130 teams · +17.3 /g · +242 on the season)#17 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 22 taken, 13 given · +0.64 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:19 /g · 8h 00m on the season)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)#47 (of 130 teams · 620.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 130 teams · 0.284 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 130 teams · 49% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 130 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 130 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Auburn9–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon, #13 Alabama)#64 (of 130 teams · 405.8 yds/g · 5,275 yards)#28 (of 130 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#28 (of 130 teams · 337.0 yds/g allowed · 4,381 yards)#17 (of 130 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 254 points)#21 (of 130 teams · +13.7 /g · +178 on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#87 (of 130 teams · 29:05 /g · 6h 18m on the season)#122 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#96 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#33 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning)#13 (of 130 teams · 843.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 130 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 130 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#14 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 130 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 130 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Alabama11–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Michigan)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 510.8 yds/g · 6,640 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 47.2 pts/g · 614 points)#21 (of 130 teams · 324.4 yds/g allowed · 4,217 yards)#13 (of 130 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +28.6 /g · +372 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18 on the season · 28 taken, 10 given · +1.38 /g)#67 (of 130 teams · 29:59 /g · 6h 30m on the season)#59 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#102 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 985.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.400 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 53% of plays successful)#33 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.335 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 130 teams · 1.109 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Notre Dame, #16 Iowa)#68 (of 130 teams · 401.5 yds/g · 5,220 yards)#44 (of 130 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 412 points)#11 (of 130 teams · 307.3 yds/g allowed · 3,995 yards)#25 (of 130 teams · 20.7 pts/g allowed · 269 points)#26 (of 130 teams · +11.0 /g · +143 on the season)#63 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 20 taken, 20 given · +0.00 /g)#76 (of 130 teams · 29:32 /g · 6h 24m on the season)#30 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#67 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#11 (of 130 teams · 853.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 130 teams · 0.182 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 130 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#19 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 130 teams · 1.181 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 130 teams · 1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Notre Dame11–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 USC, #23 Navy, #24 Virginia)#46 (of 130 teams · 429.9 yds/g · 5,589 yards)#13 (of 130 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points)#18 (of 130 teams · 320.2 yds/g allowed · 4,163 yards)#12 (of 130 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 233 points)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.9 /g · +245 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +17 on the season · 28 taken, 11 given · +1.31 /g)#99 (of 130 teams · 28:29 /g · 6h 10m on the season)#68 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing production returning)#75 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)#14 (of 130 teams · 843.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 130 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 130 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#28 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 130 teams · 1.274 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Iowa10–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #18 Minnesota · postseason: #22 USC)#99 (of 130 teams · 366.5 yds/g · 4,765 yards)#88 (of 130 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 335 points)#12 (of 130 teams · 308.1 yds/g allowed · 4,006 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 14.0 pts/g allowed · 182 points)#24 (of 130 teams · +11.8 /g · +153 on the season)#19 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.62 /g)#22 (of 130 teams · 32:02 /g · 6h 56m on the season)#29 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#103 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's rushing production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 637.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 130 teams · 0.140 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 130 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#37 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#123 (of 130 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.009 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Memphis12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Cincinnati, #21 Cincinnati, #23 Navy)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 485.1 yds/g · 6,791 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 40.4 pts/g · 566 points)#61 (of 130 teams · 383.5 yds/g allowed · 5,369 yards)#58 (of 130 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 370 points)#18 (of 130 teams · +14.0 /g · +196 on the season)#68 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.07 /g)#47 (of 130 teams · 30:37 /g · 7h 09m on the season)#37 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#44 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#95 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's rushing production returning)#71 (of 130 teams · 552.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.306 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 130 teams · 0.140 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#35 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.373 average PPA on successful plays)#74 (of 130 teams · 1.228 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Minnesota11–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Penn State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #10 Penn State · postseason: #12 Auburn)#42 (of 130 teams · 432.0 yds/g · 5,616 yards)#21 (of 130 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 443 points)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 306.5 yds/g allowed · 3,985 yards)#37 (of 130 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 293 points)#25 (of 130 teams · +11.5 /g · +150 on the season)#40 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.31 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:08 /g · 7h 24m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#46 (of 130 teams · 621.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 130 teams · 0.287 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 130 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#44 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 130 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 130 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Boise State12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 130 teams · 426.6 yds/g · 5,973 yards)#19 (of 130 teams · 34.7 pts/g · 486 points)#34 (of 130 teams · 346.5 yds/g allowed · 4,851 yards)#31 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 306 points)#22 (of 130 teams · +12.9 /g · +180 on the season)#68 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.07 /g)#38 (of 130 teams · 30:56 /g · 7h 13m on the season)#117 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#102 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#125 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's rushing production returning)#67 (of 130 teams · 561.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 130 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 130 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#50 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#41 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 130 teams · 1.247 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 130 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019App State13–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#41 (of 130 teams · 432.5 yds/g · 6,055 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 38.8 pts/g · 543 points)#26 (of 130 teams · 336.1 yds/g allowed · 4,705 yards)#21 (of 130 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.8 /g · +263 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +15 on the season · 24 taken, 9 given · +1.07 /g)#46 (of 130 teams · 30:38 /g · 7h 09m on the season)#43 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning)#14 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing production returning)#101 (of 130 teams · 412.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 130 teams · 0.269 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 130 teams · 0.073 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#12 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.347 average PPA on successful plays)#128 (of 130 teams · 1.356 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Cincinnati11–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#77 (of 130 teams · 392.1 yds/g · 5,489 yards)#60 (of 130 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 415 points)#40 (of 130 teams · 361.4 yds/g allowed · 5,060 yards)#24 (of 130 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#30 (of 130 teams · +9.1 /g · +127 on the season)#29 (of 130 teams · +6 on the season · 26 taken, 20 given · +0.43 /g)#27 (of 130 teams · 31:45 /g · 7h 25m on the season)#52 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's passing production returning)#29 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning)#61 (of 130 teams · 576.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 130 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 130 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#32 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 130 teams · 1.142 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 130 teams · 1.168 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019USC8–55 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Utah)#21 (of 130 teams · 454.2 yds/g · 5,905 yards)#35 (of 130 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 422 points)#77 (of 130 teams · 408.5 yds/g allowed · 5,310 yards)#78 (of 130 teams · 29.4 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#54 (of 130 teams · +3.1 /g · +40 on the season)#120 (of 130 teams · -10 on the season · 16 taken, 26 given · -0.77 /g)#94 (of 130 teams · 28:48 /g · 6h 14m on the season)#41 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#60 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 915.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 130 teams · 0.251 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 130 teams · 0.195 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful)#114 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 130 teams · 1.162 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 130 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Navy11–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#20 (of 130 teams · 455.8 yds/g · 5,925 yards)#12 (of 130 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 483 points)#16 (of 130 teams · 313.5 yds/g allowed · 4,076 yards)#34 (of 130 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#16 (of 130 teams · +14.8 /g · +193 on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 21 taken, 16 given · +0.38 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:28 /g · 7h 15m on the season)#93 (of 130 teams · 21% of last season's passing production returning)#46 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#96 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing production returning)#119 (of 130 teams · 335.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.349 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 130 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#27 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.353 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 130 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Virginia9–50 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#81 (of 130 teams · 388.9 yds/g · 5,445 yards)#40 (of 130 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points)#47 (of 130 teams · 371.9 yds/g allowed · 5,206 yards)#62 (of 130 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#50 (of 130 teams · +4.9 /g · +69 on the season)#85 (of 130 teams · -3 on the season · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.21 /g)#12 (of 130 teams · 33:03 /g · 7h 43m on the season)#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#91 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning)#59 (of 130 teams · 580.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 130 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 130 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#40 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 130 teams · 1.126 average PPA on successful plays)#125 (of 130 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Oklahoma State8–50 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2019's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#18 (of 130 teams · 456.5 yds/g · 5,935 yards)#35 (of 130 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 422 points)#82 (of 130 teams · 412.3 yds/g allowed · 5,360 yards)#61 (of 130 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 348 points)#46 (of 130 teams · +5.7 /g · +74 on the season)#70 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g)#93 (of 130 teams · 28:51 /g · 6h 15m on the season)#125 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#119 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing production returning)#39 (of 130 teams · 644.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 130 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#62 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 130 teams · 1.228 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 130 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20192019 San Diego StateCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #42
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #3 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #4 of 130; 2019 Clemson #5 of 130; 2019 Alabama #6 of 130; 2019 Memphis #10 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #18 of 130; 2019 Navy #20 of 130; 2019 USC #21 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #38 of 130; 2019 Oregon #39 of 130; 2019 App State #41 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #42 of 130; 2019 Florida #44 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #46 of 130; 2019 Utah #48 of 130; 2019 Boise State #50 of 130; 2019 Baylor #52 of 130; 2019 Penn State #56 of 130; 2019 Georgia #61 of 130; 2019 Auburn #64 of 130; 2019 Michigan #68 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #77 of 130; 2019 Virginia #81 of 130; 2019 Iowa #99 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 110 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 42.
Scoring offensemedian #21
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #2 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #3 of 130; 2019 Clemson #4 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #6 of 130; 2019 Memphis #8 of 130; 2019 App State #9 of 130; 2019 Navy #12 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #13 of 130; 2019 Penn State #15 of 130; 2019 Oregon #16 of 130; 2019 Boise State #19 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #21 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #23 of 130; 2019 Baylor #27 of 130; 2019 Florida #28 of 130; 2019 Auburn #28 of 130; 2019 USC #35 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #35 of 130; 2019 Utah #38 of 130; 2019 Virginia #40 of 130; 2019 Michigan #44 of 130; 2019 Georgia #50 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #60 of 130; 2019 Iowa #88 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 112 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 21.
Total defensemedian #22
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2019 Utah #2 of 130; 2019 Georgia #3 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #4 of 130; 2019 Clemson #6 of 130; 2019 Florida #9 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #10 of 130; 2019 Michigan #11 of 130; 2019 Iowa #12 of 130; 2019 Navy #16 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #18 of 130; 2019 Alabama #21 of 130; 2019 Oregon #22 of 130; 2019 App State #26 of 130; 2019 Auburn #28 of 130; 2019 LSU #31 of 130; 2019 Penn State #33 of 130; 2019 Boise State #34 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #38 of 130; 2019 Baylor #39 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #40 of 130; 2019 Virginia #47 of 130; 2019 Memphis #61 of 130; 2019 USC #77 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #82 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 5 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 22.
Scoring defensemedian #19
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Georgia #1 of 130; 2019 Clemson #3 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #4 of 130; 2019 Iowa #5 of 130; 2019 Utah #6 of 130; 2019 Florida #7 of 130; 2019 Penn State #8 of 130; 2019 Oregon #9 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #10 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #12 of 130; 2019 Alabama #13 of 130; 2019 Auburn #17 of 130; 2019 Baylor #19 of 130; 2019 App State #21 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #24 of 130; 2019 Michigan #25 of 130; 2019 Boise State #31 of 130; 2019 LSU #32 of 130; 2019 Navy #34 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #37 of 130; 2019 Memphis #58 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #61 of 130; 2019 Virginia #62 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #64 of 130; 2019 USC #78 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 2 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 19.
Point marginmedian #15
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2019 Clemson #2 of 130; 2019 Alabama #3 of 130; 2019 LSU #4 of 130; 2019 Penn State #6 of 130; 2019 Oregon #7 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #8 of 130; 2019 App State #9 of 130; 2019 Georgia #10 of 130; 2019 Florida #12 of 130; 2019 Utah #13 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #14 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #15 of 130; 2019 Navy #16 of 130; 2019 Memphis #18 of 130; 2019 Baylor #19 of 130; 2019 Auburn #21 of 130; 2019 Boise State #22 of 130; 2019 Iowa #24 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #25 of 130; 2019 Michigan #26 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #30 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #46 of 130; 2019 Virginia #50 of 130; 2019 USC #54 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 31 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 15.
Turnover marginmedian #31
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #3 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #4 of 130; 2019 Oregon #5 of 130; 2019 App State #7 of 130; 2019 Clemson #8 of 130; 2019 Baylor #13 of 130; 2019 LSU #15 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #17 of 130; 2019 Utah #17 of 130; 2019 Penn State #19 of 130; 2019 Iowa #19 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #29 of 130; 2019 Florida #31 of 130; 2019 Auburn #31 of 130; 2019 Navy #31 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #40 of 130; 2019 Georgia #49 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #63 of 130; 2019 Michigan #63 of 130; 2019 Memphis #68 of 130; 2019 Boise State #68 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #70 of 130; 2019 Virginia #85 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #109 of 130; 2019 USC #120 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 2 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 31.
Possessionmedian #47
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Wisconsin #1 of 130; 2019 Utah #3 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #4 of 130; 2019 Navy #8 of 130; 2019 Virginia #12 of 130; 2019 Georgia #18 of 130; 2019 Iowa #22 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #25 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #27 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #37 of 130; 2019 Boise State #38 of 130; 2019 App State #46 of 130; 2019 Memphis #47 of 130; 2019 Clemson #58 of 130; 2019 LSU #60 of 130; 2019 Florida #62 of 130; 2019 Alabama #67 of 130; 2019 Michigan #76 of 130; 2019 Auburn #87 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #93 of 130; 2019 USC #94 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #99 of 130; 2019 Baylor #103 of 130; 2019 Oregon #104 of 130; 2019 Penn State #108 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 6 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 47.
Returning passingmedian #52
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #1 of 130; 2019 Utah #12 of 130; 2019 Florida #16 of 130; 2019 Virginia #16 of 130; 2019 Iowa #29 of 130; 2019 Michigan #30 of 130; 2019 Oregon #35 of 130; 2019 Memphis #37 of 130; 2019 USC #41 of 130; 2019 App State #43 of 130; 2019 Clemson #50 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #52 of 130; 2019 Georgia #57 of 130; 2019 Alabama #59 of 130; 2019 Baylor #62 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #68 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #91 of 130; 2019 Navy #93 of 130; 2019 Penn State #113 of 130; 2019 Boise State #117 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #120 of 130; 2019 Auburn #122 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #124 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #125 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 69 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 52.
Returning receivingmedian #44
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Minnesota #1 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #2 of 130; 2019 USC #4 of 130; 2019 Utah #6 of 130; 2019 Florida #7 of 130; 2019 App State #14 of 130; 2019 Baylor #22 of 130; 2019 Clemson #23 of 130; 2019 LSU #28 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #29 of 130; 2019 Alabama #34 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #43 of 130; 2019 Memphis #44 of 130; 2019 Navy #46 of 130; 2019 Oregon #57 of 130; 2019 Michigan #67 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #72 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #75 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #80 of 130; 2019 Penn State #83 of 130; 2019 Virginia #84 of 130; 2019 Auburn #96 of 130; 2019 Boise State #102 of 130; 2019 Iowa #103 of 130; 2019 Georgia #118 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 79 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 44.
Returning rushingmedian #65
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Minnesota #1 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #6 of 130; 2019 Iowa #8 of 130; 2019 Oregon #25 of 130; 2019 Baylor #30 of 130; 2019 Auburn #33 of 130; 2019 App State #34 of 130; 2019 Utah #43 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #47 of 130; 2019 Florida #52 of 130; 2019 USC #60 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #62 of 130; 2019 Clemson #65 of 130; 2019 Georgia #73 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #82 of 130; 2019 LSU #87 of 130; 2019 Virginia #91 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #93 of 130; 2019 Memphis #95 of 130; 2019 Navy #96 of 130; 2019 Alabama #102 of 130; 2019 Michigan #112 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #119 of 130; 2019 Boise State #125 of 130; 2019 Penn State #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 2 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 65.
Team talentmedian #17
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #1 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #2 of 130; 2019 Georgia #3 of 130; 2019 USC #4 of 130; 2019 LSU #5 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #8 of 130; 2019 Clemson #9 of 130; 2019 Penn State #10 of 130; 2019 Michigan #11 of 130; 2019 Auburn #13 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #14 of 130; 2019 Florida #15 of 130; 2019 Oregon #17 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #33 of 130; 2019 Baylor #35 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #39 of 130; 2019 Iowa #43 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #46 of 130; 2019 Utah #47 of 130; 2019 Virginia #59 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #61 of 130; 2019 Boise State #67 of 130; 2019 Memphis #71 of 130; 2019 App State #101 of 130; 2019 Navy #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 77 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Offensive EPAmedian #21
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #2 of 130; 2019 Alabama #3 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #4 of 130; 2019 Clemson #5 of 130; 2019 Navy #6 of 130; 2019 Memphis #8 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #11 of 130; 2019 Utah #12 of 130; 2019 App State #16 of 130; 2019 Oregon #18 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #19 of 130; 2019 Florida #21 of 130; 2019 USC #22 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #28 of 130; 2019 Penn State #30 of 130; 2019 Boise State #35 of 130; 2019 Baylor #39 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #43 of 130; 2019 Auburn #58 of 130; 2019 Georgia #59 of 130; 2019 Michigan #63 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #69 of 130; 2019 Virginia #73 of 130; 2019 Iowa #83 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 115 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 21.
Defensive EPAmedian #21
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2019 Alabama #2 of 130; 2019 Clemson #3 of 130; 2019 Utah #4 of 130; 2019 Georgia #6 of 130; 2019 Oregon #9 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #10 of 130; 2019 Auburn #12 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #17 of 130; 2019 Iowa #18 of 130; 2019 Florida #19 of 130; 2019 Penn State #20 of 130; 2019 Michigan #21 of 130; 2019 App State #23 of 130; 2019 Baylor #25 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #27 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #30 of 130; 2019 LSU #31 of 130; 2019 Navy #32 of 130; 2019 Boise State #45 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #52 of 130; 2019 Memphis #57 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #64 of 130; 2019 Virginia #78 of 130; 2019 USC #90 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 8 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 21.
Offensive success ratemedian #26
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #2 of 130; 2019 Alabama #4 of 130; 2019 Clemson #7 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #8 of 130; 2019 USC #10 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #11 of 130; 2019 Utah #14 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #15 of 130; 2019 Navy #17 of 130; 2019 Memphis #19 of 130; 2019 Georgia #22 of 130; 2019 Oregon #26 of 130; 2019 Virginia #32 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #37 of 130; 2019 Auburn #40 of 130; 2019 Florida #41 of 130; 2019 Iowa #45 of 130; 2019 Penn State #46 of 130; 2019 Baylor #48 of 130; 2019 Boise State #50 of 130; 2019 Michigan #51 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #52 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #59 of 130; 2019 App State #61 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 95 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 26.
Defensive success ratemedian #27
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2019 Clemson #4 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #6 of 130; 2019 Utah #7 of 130; 2019 Penn State #8 of 130; 2019 LSU #10 of 130; 2019 App State #12 of 130; 2019 Georgia #13 of 130; 2019 Auburn #14 of 130; 2019 Michigan #19 of 130; 2019 Florida #22 of 130; 2019 Oregon #24 of 130; 2019 Navy #27 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #28 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #32 of 130; 2019 Alabama #33 of 130; 2019 Memphis #35 of 130; 2019 Iowa #37 of 130; 2019 Virginia #40 of 130; 2019 Boise State #41 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #44 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #49 of 130; 2019 Baylor #53 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #62 of 130; 2019 USC #114 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 15 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 27.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #49
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Memphis #5 of 130; 2019 Navy #7 of 130; 2019 App State #8 of 130; 2019 Alabama #10 of 130; 2019 Florida #16 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #17 of 130; 2019 Clemson #22 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #31 of 130; 2019 Penn State #34 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #36 of 130; 2019 Boise State #43 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #47 of 130; 2019 LSU #49 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #55 of 130; 2019 Oregon #57 of 130; 2019 Baylor #60 of 130; 2019 Utah #68 of 130; 2019 Michigan #80 of 130; 2019 USC #90 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #104 of 130; 2019 Auburn #110 of 130; 2019 Virginia #112 of 130; 2019 Georgia #116 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #119 of 130; 2019 Iowa #123 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 128 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 49.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #55
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Iowa #1 of 130; 2019 Oregon #5 of 130; 2019 Baylor #7 of 130; 2019 Notre Dame #9 of 130; 2019 Georgia #13 of 130; 2019 Alabama #19 of 130; 2019 Clemson #29 of 130; 2019 USC #30 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #34 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #38 of 130; 2019 Florida #51 of 130; 2019 Michigan #53 of 130; 2019 Auburn #55 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #61 of 130; 2019 Navy #62 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #70 of 130; 2019 Memphis #74 of 130; 2019 Utah #85 of 130; 2019 Boise State #86 of 130; 2019 Penn State #91 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #97 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #123 of 130; 2019 LSU #124 of 130; 2019 Virginia #125 of 130; 2019 App State #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 San Diego State, ranked 15 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 55.