Metrics

San José StateSpartans

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2009

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2009San José State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#115 (of 120 teams · 284.0 yds/g · 3,408 yards)#118 (of 120 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 165 points)#109 (of 120 teams · 442.9 yds/g allowed · 5,315 yards)#109 (of 120 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 414 points)#117 (of 120 teams · -20.8 /g · -249 on the season)#83 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 21 taken, 25 given · -0.33 /g)#80 (of 120 teams · 17:58 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 120 teams · -0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 120 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#115 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.043 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.973 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20090 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#14 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #2–#120. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#46 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #1–#120. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#98 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #14–#113. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#90 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #14–#114. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#85 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #2–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#83 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #3–#113. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#63 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #15–#85. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#27 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #1–#118. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#102 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #6–#119. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #2–#119. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#78 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #9–#116. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #1–#98. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#96 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range #16–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)
2009Boise State1400 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 450.2 yds/g · 6,303 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 42.2 pts/g · 591 points)#14 (of 120 teams · 300.2 yds/g allowed · 4,203 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 240 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.1 /g · +351 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21 on the season · 35 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#47 (of 120 teams · 18:53 /g · 4h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.866 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.898 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Fresno State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 120 teams · 430.5 yds/g · 5,597 yards)#14 (of 120 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 440 points)#98 (of 120 teams · 413.7 yds/g allowed · 5,378 yards)#84 (of 120 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#44 (of 120 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season)#106 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 16 taken, 24 given · -0.62 /g)#22 (of 120 teams · 19:31 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.058 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#31 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.976 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 120 teams · 1.065 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Hawai'i670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 120 teams · 437.5 yds/g · 5,687 yards)#89 (of 120 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 296 points)#93 (of 120 teams · 404.5 yds/g allowed · 5,259 yards)#90 (of 120 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 383 points)#95 (of 120 teams · -6.7 /g · -87 on the season)#113 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 22 taken, 33 given · -0.85 /g)#15 (of 120 teams · 19:53 /g · 4h 19m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 120 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#116 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.051 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.881 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Idaho850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 451.1 yds/g · 5,864 yards)#20 (of 120 teams · 32.7 pts/g · 425 points)#107 (of 120 teams · 433.2 yds/g allowed · 5,632 yards)#114 (of 120 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 468 points)#85 (of 120 teams · -3.3 /g · -43 on the season)#107 (of 120 teams · -9 on the season · 14 taken, 23 given · -0.69 /g)#63 (of 120 teams · 18:33 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.151 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 120 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#112 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.971 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Louisiana Tech480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 (of 120 teams · 372.3 yds/g · 4,467 yards)#46 (of 120 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 350 points)#60 (of 120 teams · 368.1 yds/g allowed · 4,417 yards)#61 (of 120 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#55 (of 120 teams · +3.4 /g · +41 on the season)#18 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 20 taken, 13 given · +0.58 /g)#79 (of 120 teams · 17:58 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#85 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#89 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.934 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.842 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Nevada850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 505.6 yds/g · 6,573 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 38.2 pts/g · 497 points)#96 (of 120 teams · 409.3 yds/g allowed · 5,321 yards)#86 (of 120 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 371 points)#24 (of 120 teams · +9.7 /g · +126 on the season)#80 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.31 /g)#27 (of 120 teams · 19:23 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#38 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 120 teams · 1.048 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009New Mexico State3100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#120 (of 120 teams · 229.3 yds/g · 2,981 yards)#120 (of 120 teams · 11.5 pts/g · 149 points)#103 (of 120 teams · 423.6 yds/g allowed · 5,507 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 31.6 pts/g allowed · 411 points)#115 (of 120 teams · -20.1 /g · -262 on the season)#110 (of 120 teams · -10 on the season · 18 taken, 28 given · -0.77 /g)#76 (of 120 teams · 18:12 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 120 teams · -0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#119 (of 120 teams · 33% of plays successful)#66 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.910 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 120 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Utah State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#12 (of 120 teams · 439.3 yds/g · 5,272 yards)#47 (of 120 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 349 points)#113 (of 120 teams · 455.1 yds/g allowed · 5,461 yards)#107 (of 120 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 408 points)#88 (of 120 teams · -4.9 /g · -59 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.50 /g)#85 (of 120 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#78 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.125 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 120 teams · 1.019 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20092009 San José StateWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #14
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Nevada #2 of 120; 2009 Idaho #9 of 120; 2009 Boise State #10 of 120; 2009 Utah State #12 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #14 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #17 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #64 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #120 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 115 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 14.
Scoring offensemedian #46
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #1 of 120; 2009 Nevada #6 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #14 of 120; 2009 Idaho #20 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #46 of 120; 2009 Utah State #47 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #89 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #120 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 118 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 46.
Total defensemedian #98
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #60 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #93 of 120; 2009 Nevada #96 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #98 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #103 of 120; 2009 Idaho #107 of 120; 2009 Utah State #113 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 109 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 98.
Scoring defensemedian #90
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #61 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #84 of 120; 2009 Nevada #86 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #90 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #101 of 120; 2009 Utah State #107 of 120; 2009 Idaho #114 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 109 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 90.
Point marginmedian #85
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #2 of 120; 2009 Nevada #24 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #44 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #55 of 120; 2009 Idaho #85 of 120; 2009 Utah State #88 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #95 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #115 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 117 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 85.
Turnover marginmedian #83
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #3 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #18 of 120; 2009 Utah State #24 of 120; 2009 Nevada #80 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #106 of 120; 2009 Idaho #107 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #110 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #113 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 83 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 83.
Possessionmedian #63
Possession. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Hawai'i #15 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #22 of 120; 2009 Nevada #27 of 120; 2009 Boise State #47 of 120; 2009 Idaho #63 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #76 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #79 of 120; 2009 Utah State #85 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 80 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 63.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #27
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Nevada #1 of 120; 2009 Idaho #5 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #17 of 120; 2009 Boise State #22 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #27 of 120; 2009 Utah State #46 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #51 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #118 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 103 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 27.
Defensive EPAmedian #102
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #6 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #64 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #74 of 120; 2009 Nevada #75 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #102 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #112 of 120; 2009 Idaho #113 of 120; 2009 Utah State #114 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 119 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 102.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Nevada #2 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #13 of 120; 2009 Boise State #14 of 120; 2009 Idaho #17 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #44 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #85 of 120; 2009 Utah State #94 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #119 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 116 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #78
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Boise State #9 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #31 of 120; 2009 Nevada #38 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #66 of 120; 2009 Utah State #78 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #89 of 120; 2009 Idaho #112 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #116 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 115 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 78.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #29
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Utah State #1 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #4 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #25 of 120; 2009 Idaho #29 of 120; 2009 Louisiana Tech #51 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #67 of 120; 2009 Nevada #71 of 120; 2009 Boise State #98 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 6 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 29.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #96
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Louisiana Tech #16 of 120; 2009 Hawai'i #29 of 120; 2009 Boise State #41 of 120; 2009 Idaho #89 of 120; 2009 Utah State #109 of 120; 2009 Nevada #114 of 120; 2009 Fresno State #117 of 120; 2009 New Mexico State #118 of 120. Marked: 2009 San José State, ranked 96 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 96.