THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

San José StateSpartans

Season
‹
›Current

Mountain West

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2025, released in week 16.

CFP Top 25, 2025

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025San José State3–90 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 136 teams · 403.3 yds/g · 4,839 yards)#113 (of 136 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 257 points)#102 (of 136 teams · 404.1 yds/g allowed · 4,849 yards)#121 (of 136 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 390 points)#121 (of 136 teams · -11.1 /g · -133 on the season)#133 (of 136 teams · -13 on the season · 14 taken, 27 given · -1.08 /g)#124 (of 136 teams · 27:48 /g · 5h 34m on the season)#54 (of 136 teams · 60% of last season's passing production returning)#93 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's receiving production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning)#109 (of 136 teams · 522.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 136 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 136 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 136 teams · 43% of plays successful)#83 (of 136 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 136 teams · 1.246 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 136 teams · 1.278 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#26 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#119. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#27 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#79. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#94. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#76. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#120. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#38 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #2–#114. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #9–#118. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#51 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #4–#130. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#58 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#122. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#127. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#101. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#26 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #2–#99. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#27 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#97. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#117. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#134. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range #1–#135. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)
2025Indiana16–00 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon, #23 Iowa · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)#13 (of 136 teams · 456.3 yds/g · 7,301 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 41.6 pts/g · 666 points)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 266.0 yds/g allowed · 4,256 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 11.7 pts/g allowed · 187 points)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +29.9 /g · +479 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +22 on the season · 30 taken, 8 given · +1.38 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:29 /g · 8h 56m on the season)#117 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#63 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#72 (of 136 teams · 645.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.342 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 51% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 136 teams · 1.223 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 136 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas, #18 Michigan)#26 (of 136 teams · 423.0 yds/g · 5,922 yards)#21 (of 136 teams · 33.4 pts/g · 468 points)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 219.1 yds/g allowed · 3,067 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 9.3 pts/g allowed · 130 points)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +24.1 /g · +338 on the season)#53 (of 136 teams · +3 on the season · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.21 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:01 /g · 7h 42m on the season)#104 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#115 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.327 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · -0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 53% of plays successful)#12 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 (of 136 teams · 1.145 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.043 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Georgia12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ole Miss, #9 Alabama, #13 Texas, #22 Georgia Tech)#52 (of 136 teams · 402.6 yds/g · 5,636 yards)#28 (of 136 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points)#14 (of 136 teams · 298.1 yds/g allowed · 4,173 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 246 points)#15 (of 136 teams · +14.5 /g · +203 on the season)#72 (of 136 teams · +0 on the season · 13 taken, 13 given · +0.00 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:41 /g · 7h 51m on the season)#83 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's receiving production returning)#41 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's rushing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1003.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 136 teams · 0.245 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 136 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 136 teams · 47% of plays successful)#37 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#123 (of 136 teams · 1.147 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 136 teams · 1.150 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Texas Tech12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 BYU, #12 BYU, #15 Utah, #21 Houston)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 461.6 yds/g · 6,463 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 39.4 pts/g · 552 points)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 258.0 yds/g allowed · 3,612 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 11.8 pts/g allowed · 165 points)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +27.6 /g · +387 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +14 on the season · 32 taken, 18 given · +1.00 /g)#60 (of 136 teams · 30:10 /g · 7h 02m on the season)#21 (of 136 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#33 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#82 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's rushing production returning)#29 (of 136 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 136 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · -0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#50 (of 136 teams · 44% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 136 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 136 teams · 1.167 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Oregon13–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #4 Texas Tech)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 USC, #23 Iowa · postseason: #4 Texas Tech, #24 James Madison)#17 (of 136 teams · 452.2 yds/g · 6,783 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 554 points)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 274.8 yds/g allowed · 4,122 yards)#12 (of 136 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 268 points)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +19.1 /g · +286 on the season)#34 (of 136 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.40 /g)#41 (of 136 teams · 30:49 /g · 7h 42m on the season)#110 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving production returning)#71 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 941.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 136 teams · 0.303 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 136 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 136 teams · 47% of plays successful)#15 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 136 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 136 teams · 1.226 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Ole Miss13–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma · postseason: #3 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Oklahoma, #20 Tulane · postseason: #3 Georgia, #20 Tulane)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 490.1 yds/g · 7,351 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 554 points)#48 (of 136 teams · 348.1 yds/g allowed · 5,222 yards)#37 (of 136 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#12 (of 136 teams · +15.9 /g · +238 on the season)#71 (of 136 teams · +1 on the season · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.07 /g)#104 (of 136 teams · 28:46 /g · 7h 11m on the season)#96 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning)#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's receiving production returning)#122 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing production returning)#21 (of 136 teams · 813.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 136 teams · 0.307 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 136 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 136 teams · 48% of plays successful)#39 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 136 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 136 teams · 1.290 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Texas A&M11–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Notre Dame)#23 (of 136 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 5,783 yards)#19 (of 136 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 439 points)#18 (of 136 teams · 307.4 yds/g allowed · 3,996 yards)#36 (of 136 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 273 points)#18 (of 136 teams · +12.8 /g · +166 on the season)#120 (of 136 teams · -9 on the season · 10 taken, 19 given · -0.69 /g)#14 (of 136 teams · 32:30 /g · 7h 03m on the season)#49 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing production returning)#86 (of 136 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 917.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 136 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 136 teams · 0.118 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 136 teams · 1.230 average PPA on successful plays)#135 (of 136 teams · 1.440 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Oklahoma10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama, #18 Michigan)#93 (of 136 teams · 354.5 yds/g · 4,609 yards)#79 (of 136 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 341 points)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 272.8 yds/g allowed · 3,546 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 201 points)#29 (of 136 teams · +10.8 /g · +140 on the season)#87 (of 136 teams · -3 on the season · 13 taken, 16 given · -0.23 /g)#76 (of 136 teams · 29:44 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#63 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's passing production returning)#27 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#30 (of 136 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning)#14 (of 136 teams · 882.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 136 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · -0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 136 teams · 40% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 136 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 136 teams · 1.335 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Alabama11–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #3 Georgia, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #8 Oklahoma)#84 (of 136 teams · 367.7 yds/g · 5,516 yards)#50 (of 136 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 443 points)#13 (of 136 teams · 297.2 yds/g allowed · 4,458 yards)#20 (of 136 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#31 (of 136 teams · +10.3 /g · +155 on the season)#27 (of 136 teams · +7 on the season · 20 taken, 13 given · +0.47 /g)#28 (of 136 teams · 31:35 /g · 7h 54m on the season)#88 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's passing production returning)#12 (of 136 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 993.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 136 teams · 0.208 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 136 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 136 teams · 43% of plays successful)#22 (of 136 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 136 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 136 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Miami13–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #11 Notre Dame · postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)#48 (of 136 teams · 404.9 yds/g · 6,479 yards)#35 (of 136 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 495 points)#11 (of 136 teams · 294.2 yds/g allowed · 4,707 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 14.8 pts/g allowed · 237 points)#11 (of 136 teams · +16.1 /g · +258 on the season)#17 (of 136 teams · +10 on the season · 25 taken, 15 given · +0.63 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33:04 /g · 8h 49m on the season)#98 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#124 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#15 (of 136 teams · 874.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 136 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 136 teams · 0.034 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 136 teams · 47% of plays successful)#13 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 (of 136 teams · 1.156 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 136 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Notre Dame10–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 USC)#12 (of 136 teams · 459.5 yds/g · 5,514 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 42.0 pts/g · 504 points)#22 (of 136 teams · 313.1 yds/g allowed · 3,757 yards)#11 (of 136 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +24.4 /g · +293 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +13 on the season · 23 taken, 10 given · +1.08 /g)#87 (of 136 teams · 29:18 /g · 5h 52m on the season)#116 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#24 (of 136 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 912.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.333 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#14 (of 136 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.497 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 136 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025BYU12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #15 Utah, #17 Arizona · postseason: #22 Georgia Tech)#55 (of 136 teams · 400.3 yds/g · 5,604 yards)#32 (of 136 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 440 points)#35 (of 136 teams · 332.6 yds/g allowed · 4,657 yards)#19 (of 136 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 268 points)#21 (of 136 teams · +12.3 /g · +172 on the season)#20 (of 136 teams · +8 on the season · 24 taken, 16 given · +0.57 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 32:43 /g · 7h 38m on the season)#112 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#56 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#53 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's rushing production returning)#70 (of 136 teams · 649.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 136 teams · 0.220 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 136 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#33 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 136 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 136 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Texas10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma, #14 Vanderbilt · postseason: #18 Michigan)#69 (of 136 teams · 388.7 yds/g · 5,053 yards)#41 (of 136 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 396 points)#40 (of 136 teams · 338.9 yds/g allowed · 4,405 yards)#28 (of 136 teams · 20.3 pts/g allowed · 264 points)#32 (of 136 teams · +10.2 /g · +132 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +14 on the season · 23 taken, 9 given · +1.08 /g)#111 (of 136 teams · 28:30 /g · 6h 10m on the season)#76 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's passing production returning)#65 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving production returning)#21 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's rushing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 136 teams · 0.179 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 136 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 136 teams · 40% of plays successful)#43 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 136 teams · 1.366 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 136 teams · 1.178 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Vanderbilt10–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 463.2 yds/g · 6,022 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 38.5 pts/g · 500 points)#56 (of 136 teams · 357.5 yds/g allowed · 4,648 yards)#47 (of 136 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#13 (of 136 teams · +15.6 /g · +203 on the season)#48 (of 136 teams · +3 on the season · 15 taken, 12 given · +0.23 /g)#35 (of 136 teams · 31:18 /g · 6h 47m on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 75% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#55 (of 136 teams · 685.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.413 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 136 teams · 0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 50% of plays successful)#73 (of 136 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.415 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 136 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Utah11–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 483.1 yds/g · 6,281 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 41.3 pts/g · 537 points)#59 (of 136 teams · 357.9 yds/g allowed · 4,653 yards)#17 (of 136 teams · 18.9 pts/g allowed · 246 points)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +22.4 /g · +291 on the season)#28 (of 136 teams · +6 on the season · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.46 /g)#42 (of 136 teams · 30:48 /g · 6h 40m on the season)#53 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's passing production returning)#130 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's receiving production returning)#119 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing production returning)#44 (of 136 teams · 707.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.347 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 136 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 50% of plays successful)#32 (of 136 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 136 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 136 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025USC9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Michigan, #23 Iowa)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 465.1 yds/g · 6,047 yards)#13 (of 136 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 465 points)#49 (of 136 teams · 350.5 yds/g allowed · 4,557 yards)#51 (of 136 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 299 points)#18 (of 136 teams · +12.8 /g · +166 on the season)#59 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.15 /g)#71 (of 136 teams · 29:50 /g · 6h 28m on the season)#66 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's passing production returning)#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#110 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#17 (of 136 teams · 847.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.344 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 136 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 49% of plays successful)#117 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 136 teams · 1.342 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 136 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Arizona9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 136 teams · 407.9 yds/g · 5,303 yards)#30 (of 136 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 410 points)#19 (of 136 teams · 308.9 yds/g allowed · 4,015 yards)#21 (of 136 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 251 points)#22 (of 136 teams · +12.2 /g · +159 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +18 on the season · 31 taken, 13 given · +1.38 /g)#38 (of 136 teams · 30:57 /g · 6h 42m on the season)#13 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#44 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's receiving production returning)#58 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's rushing production returning)#67 (of 136 teams · 651.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 136 teams · 0.167 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 136 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 136 teams · 43% of plays successful)#27 (of 136 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 136 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 136 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 136 teams · 397.9 yds/g · 5,173 yards)#69 (of 136 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 358 points)#24 (of 136 teams · 323.6 yds/g allowed · 4,207 yards)#29 (of 136 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#40 (of 136 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#59 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.15 /g)#74 (of 136 teams · 29:47 /g · 6h 27m on the season)#48 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing production returning)#47 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing production returning)#11 (of 136 teams · 907.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 136 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 136 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 136 teams · 46% of plays successful)#70 (of 136 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#129 (of 136 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.130 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Virginia11–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 136 teams · 419.1 yds/g · 5,867 yards)#38 (of 136 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 431 points)#20 (of 136 teams · 311.1 yds/g allowed · 4,356 yards)#22 (of 136 teams · 19.6 pts/g allowed · 274 points)#25 (of 136 teams · +11.2 /g · +157 on the season)#33 (of 136 teams · +6 on the season · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.43 /g)#19 (of 136 teams · 32:16 /g · 7h 32m on the season)#118 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#71 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving production returning)#76 (of 136 teams · 34% of last season's rushing production returning)#62 (of 136 teams · 666.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 136 teams · 0.173 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 136 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 136 teams · 41% of plays successful)#18 (of 136 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 136 teams · 1.277 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 136 teams · 1.202 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Tulane11–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 North Texas)#37 (of 136 teams · 411.5 yds/g · 5,761 yards)#68 (of 136 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 388 points)#79 (of 136 teams · 384.3 yds/g allowed · 5,380 yards)#58 (of 136 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 335 points)#61 (of 136 teams · +3.8 /g · +53 on the season)#20 (of 136 teams · +8 on the season · 25 taken, 17 given · +0.57 /g)#40 (of 136 teams · 30:52 /g · 7h 12m on the season)#85 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#122 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's receiving production returning)#83 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's rushing production returning)#68 (of 136 teams · 650.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 136 teams · 0.205 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 136 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 136 teams · 45% of plays successful)#110 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 136 teams · 1.205 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 136 teams · 1.183 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Houston10–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Arizona)#62 (of 136 teams · 395.0 yds/g · 5,135 yards)#55 (of 136 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 378 points)#47 (of 136 teams · 347.9 yds/g allowed · 4,522 yards)#47 (of 136 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#48 (of 136 teams · +6.2 /g · +81 on the season)#45 (of 136 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.31 /g)#17 (of 136 teams · 32:19 /g · 7h 00m on the season)#59 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's passing production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning)#66 (of 136 teams · 656.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#101 (of 136 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 136 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 136 teams · 41% of plays successful)#63 (of 136 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 136 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.119 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Georgia Tech9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 136 teams · 460.1 yds/g · 5,982 yards)#27 (of 136 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 418 points)#94 (of 136 teams · 399.5 yds/g allowed · 5,193 yards)#69 (of 136 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#40 (of 136 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#108 (of 136 teams · -6 on the season · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.46 /g)#95 (of 136 teams · 29:03 /g · 6h 18m on the season)#37 (of 136 teams · 84% of last season's passing production returning)#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning)#39 (of 136 teams · 715.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 136 teams · 0.272 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 136 teams · 0.194 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 49% of plays successful)#102 (of 136 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 136 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 136 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Iowa9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Vanderbilt)#119 (of 136 teams · 320.1 yds/g · 4,161 yards)#54 (of 136 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 381 points)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 284.1 yds/g allowed · 3,694 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 209 points)#17 (of 136 teams · +13.2 /g · +172 on the season)#66 (of 136 teams · +1 on the season · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.08 /g)#31 (of 136 teams · 31:28 /g · 6h 49m on the season)#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving production returning)#69 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#42 (of 136 teams · 710.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 136 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 136 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 136 teams · 44% of plays successful)#35 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#134 (of 136 teams · 1.099 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 1.076 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025James Madison12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 136 teams · 454.9 yds/g · 6,368 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 519 points)#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 267.0 yds/g allowed · 3,738 yards)#13 (of 136 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +18.7 /g · +262 on the season)#70 (of 136 teams · +1 on the season · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.07 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 34:13 /g · 7h 59m on the season)#25 (of 136 teams · 93% of last season's passing production returning)#92 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's receiving production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 89% of last season's rushing production returning)#127 (of 136 teams · 459.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 136 teams · 0.225 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 136 teams · 45% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 136 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays)#132 (of 136 teams · 1.418 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025North Texas12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2025's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 511.4 yds/g · 7,160 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 45.1 pts/g · 631 points)#77 (of 136 teams · 382.1 yds/g allowed · 5,349 yards)#76 (of 136 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 371 points)#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +18.6 /g · +260 on the season)#15 (of 136 teams · +9 on the season · 28 taken, 19 given · +0.64 /g)#114 (of 136 teams · 28:23 /g · 6h 37m on the season)#89 (of 136 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#51 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning)#72 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#96 (of 136 teams · 569.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 0.351 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 136 teams · 0.162 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 52% of plays successful)#77 (of 136 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 136 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 136 teams · 1.221 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20252025 San José StateCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #26
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 North Texas #1 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #2 of 136; 2025 Utah #4 of 136; 2025 USC #8 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #10 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #11 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #12 of 136; 2025 Indiana #13 of 136; 2025 James Madison #16 of 136; 2025 Oregon #17 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #23 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #26 of 136; 2025 Virginia #29 of 136; 2025 Tulane #37 of 136; 2025 Arizona #42 of 136; 2025 Miami #48 of 136; 2025 Georgia #52 of 136; 2025 BYU #55 of 136; 2025 Michigan #58 of 136; 2025 Houston #62 of 136; 2025 Texas #69 of 136; 2025 Alabama #84 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #93 of 136; 2025 Iowa #119 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 50 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 26.
Scoring offensemedian #27
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 North Texas #1 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #2 of 136; 2025 Indiana #3 of 136; 2025 Utah #4 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #7 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #8 of 136; 2025 James Madison #9 of 136; 2025 Oregon #10 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #10 of 136; 2025 USC #13 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #19 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #21 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #27 of 136; 2025 Georgia #28 of 136; 2025 Arizona #30 of 136; 2025 BYU #32 of 136; 2025 Miami #35 of 136; 2025 Virginia #38 of 136; 2025 Texas #41 of 136; 2025 Alabama #50 of 136; 2025 Iowa #54 of 136; 2025 Houston #55 of 136; 2025 Tulane #68 of 136; 2025 Michigan #69 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #79 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 113 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 27.
Total defensemedian #20
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #3 of 136; 2025 Indiana #4 of 136; 2025 James Madison #5 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #6 of 136; 2025 Oregon #7 of 136; 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Miami #11 of 136; 2025 Alabama #13 of 136; 2025 Georgia #14 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #18 of 136; 2025 Arizona #19 of 136; 2025 Virginia #20 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #22 of 136; 2025 Michigan #24 of 136; 2025 BYU #35 of 136; 2025 Texas #40 of 136; 2025 Houston #47 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #48 of 136; 2025 USC #49 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #56 of 136; 2025 Utah #59 of 136; 2025 North Texas #77 of 136; 2025 Tulane #79 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #94 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 102 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Scoring defensemedian #20
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Indiana #2 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #3 of 136; 2025 Miami #5 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #7 of 136; 2025 Iowa #8 of 136; 2025 Georgia #10 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #11 of 136; 2025 Oregon #12 of 136; 2025 James Madison #13 of 136; 2025 Utah #17 of 136; 2025 BYU #19 of 136; 2025 Alabama #20 of 136; 2025 Arizona #21 of 136; 2025 Virginia #22 of 136; 2025 Texas #28 of 136; 2025 Michigan #29 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #36 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #37 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #47 of 136; 2025 Houston #47 of 136; 2025 USC #51 of 136; 2025 Tulane #58 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #69 of 136; 2025 North Texas #76 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 121 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Point marginmedian #17
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #3 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #4 of 136; 2025 Utah #5 of 136; 2025 Oregon #6 of 136; 2025 James Madison #7 of 136; 2025 North Texas #8 of 136; 2025 Miami #11 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #12 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #13 of 136; 2025 Georgia #15 of 136; 2025 Iowa #17 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #18 of 136; 2025 USC #18 of 136; 2025 BYU #21 of 136; 2025 Arizona #22 of 136; 2025 Virginia #25 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #29 of 136; 2025 Alabama #31 of 136; 2025 Texas #32 of 136; 2025 Michigan #40 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #40 of 136; 2025 Houston #48 of 136; 2025 Tulane #61 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 121 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Arizona #1 of 136; 2025 Indiana #2 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #4 of 136; 2025 Texas #5 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #7 of 136; 2025 North Texas #15 of 136; 2025 Miami #17 of 136; 2025 BYU #20 of 136; 2025 Tulane #20 of 136; 2025 Alabama #27 of 136; 2025 Utah #28 of 136; 2025 Virginia #33 of 136; 2025 Oregon #34 of 136; 2025 Houston #45 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #48 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #53 of 136; 2025 USC #59 of 136; 2025 Michigan #59 of 136; 2025 Iowa #66 of 136; 2025 James Madison #70 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #71 of 136; 2025 Georgia #72 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #87 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #108 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #120 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 133 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #38
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 James Madison #2 of 136; 2025 Georgia #4 of 136; 2025 Indiana #5 of 136; 2025 Miami #6 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 136; 2025 BYU #10 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #14 of 136; 2025 Houston #17 of 136; 2025 Virginia #19 of 136; 2025 Alabama #28 of 136; 2025 Iowa #31 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #35 of 136; 2025 Arizona #38 of 136; 2025 Tulane #40 of 136; 2025 Oregon #41 of 136; 2025 Utah #42 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #60 of 136; 2025 USC #71 of 136; 2025 Michigan #74 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #76 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #87 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #95 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #104 of 136; 2025 Texas #111 of 136; 2025 North Texas #114 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 124 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 38.
Returning passingmedian #80
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #9 of 136; 2025 Arizona #13 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #21 of 136; 2025 James Madison #25 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #37 of 136; 2025 Michigan #48 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #49 of 136; 2025 Utah #53 of 136; 2025 Houston #59 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #63 of 136; 2025 USC #66 of 136; 2025 Texas #76 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Georgia #83 of 136; 2025 Tulane #85 of 136; 2025 Alabama #88 of 136; 2025 North Texas #89 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #96 of 136; 2025 Miami #98 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #104 of 136; 2025 Oregon #110 of 136; 2025 BYU #112 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #116 of 136; 2025 Indiana #117 of 136; 2025 Virginia #118 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 54 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 80.
Returning receivingmedian #51
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #4 of 136; 2025 Houston #6 of 136; 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Alabama #12 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #27 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #32 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #33 of 136; 2025 Georgia #34 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #37 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Arizona #44 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 North Texas #51 of 136; 2025 USC #54 of 136; 2025 BYU #56 of 136; 2025 Oregon #61 of 136; 2025 Indiana #63 of 136; 2025 Texas #65 of 136; 2025 Virginia #71 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #83 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #86 of 136; 2025 James Madison #92 of 136; 2025 Tulane #122 of 136; 2025 Miami #124 of 136; 2025 Utah #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 93 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 51.
Returning rushingmedian #58
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #2 of 136; 2025 James Madison #4 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #8 of 136; 2025 Houston #9 of 136; 2025 Texas #21 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #24 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #30 of 136; 2025 Georgia #41 of 136; 2025 Alabama #46 of 136; 2025 BYU #53 of 136; 2025 Miami #55 of 136; 2025 Arizona #58 of 136; 2025 Iowa #69 of 136; 2025 Oregon #71 of 136; 2025 North Texas #72 of 136; 2025 Virginia #76 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #82 of 136; 2025 Tulane #83 of 136; 2025 USC #110 of 136; 2025 Indiana #111 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #115 of 136; 2025 Utah #119 of 136; 2025 Michigan #120 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #122 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 3 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 58.
Team talentmedian #29
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia #1 of 136; 2025 Alabama #2 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 136; 2025 Texas #4 of 136; 2025 Oregon #5 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #8 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #9 of 136; 2025 Michigan #11 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #14 of 136; 2025 Miami #15 of 136; 2025 USC #17 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #21 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #29 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Iowa #42 of 136; 2025 Utah #44 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #55 of 136; 2025 Virginia #62 of 136; 2025 Houston #66 of 136; 2025 Arizona #67 of 136; 2025 Tulane #68 of 136; 2025 BYU #70 of 136; 2025 Indiana #72 of 136; 2025 North Texas #96 of 136; 2025 James Madison #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 109 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 29.
Offensive EPAmedian #29
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Vanderbilt #1 of 136; 2025 North Texas #2 of 136; 2025 Utah #3 of 136; 2025 USC #4 of 136; 2025 Indiana #5 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #6 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #11 of 136; 2025 Oregon #12 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #21 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #23 of 136; 2025 Georgia #26 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #29 of 136; 2025 James Madison #31 of 136; 2025 Miami #32 of 136; 2025 BYU #33 of 136; 2025 Alabama #38 of 136; 2025 Tulane #41 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 Texas #57 of 136; 2025 Virginia #61 of 136; 2025 Arizona #69 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #100 of 136; 2025 Houston #101 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 65 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 29.
Defensive EPAmedian #26
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Texas Tech #2 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #4 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #5 of 136; 2025 James Madison #6 of 136; 2025 Indiana #7 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #9 of 136; 2025 Miami #12 of 136; 2025 Oregon #13 of 136; 2025 Iowa #18 of 136; 2025 BYU #22 of 136; 2025 Virginia #23 of 136; 2025 Utah #24 of 136; 2025 Arizona #26 of 136; 2025 Alabama #28 of 136; 2025 Georgia #37 of 136; 2025 Texas #40 of 136; 2025 Houston #47 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #49 of 136; 2025 Michigan #52 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #55 of 136; 2025 USC #65 of 136; 2025 Tulane #67 of 136; 2025 North Texas #74 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #96 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #99 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 105 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 26.
Offensive success ratemedian #27
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 North Texas #2 of 136; 2025 Indiana #3 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 136; 2025 Utah #6 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #7 of 136; 2025 USC #8 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #12 of 136; 2025 Oregon #16 of 136; 2025 Georgia #18 of 136; 2025 Miami #20 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #24 of 136; 2025 BYU #27 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #32 of 136; 2025 Michigan #33 of 136; 2025 James Madison #36 of 136; 2025 Tulane #42 of 136; 2025 Iowa #46 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #50 of 136; 2025 Alabama #56 of 136; 2025 Arizona #66 of 136; 2025 Houston #79 of 136; 2025 Virginia #80 of 136; 2025 Texas #94 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #97 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 57 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 27.
Defensive success ratemedian #32
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 James Madison #1 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #2 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #3 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #5 of 136; 2025 Indiana #6 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #12 of 136; 2025 Miami #13 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #14 of 136; 2025 Oregon #15 of 136; 2025 Virginia #18 of 136; 2025 Alabama #22 of 136; 2025 Arizona #27 of 136; 2025 Utah #32 of 136; 2025 BYU #33 of 136; 2025 Iowa #35 of 136; 2025 Georgia #37 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #39 of 136; 2025 Texas #43 of 136; 2025 Houston #63 of 136; 2025 Michigan #70 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #73 of 136; 2025 North Texas #77 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #102 of 136; 2025 Tulane #110 of 136; 2025 USC #117 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 83 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 32.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #60
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Notre Dame #1 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #5 of 136; 2025 Texas #13 of 136; 2025 Oregon #20 of 136; 2025 USC #21 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #31 of 136; 2025 North Texas #34 of 136; 2025 James Madison #37 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #45 of 136; 2025 Virginia #46 of 136; 2025 Alabama #48 of 136; 2025 Arizona #51 of 136; 2025 Utah #60 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #65 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #70 of 136; 2025 Indiana #74 of 136; 2025 Houston #78 of 136; 2025 Tulane #94 of 136; 2025 BYU #106 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #115 of 136; 2025 Miami #120 of 136; 2025 Georgia #123 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #124 of 136; 2025 Michigan #129 of 136; 2025 Iowa #134 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 62 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 60.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #55
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 136; 2025 Iowa #3 of 136; 2025 Houston #7 of 136; 2025 Michigan #8 of 136; 2025 Georgia #15 of 136; 2025 USC #20 of 136; 2025 Texas Tech #21 of 136; 2025 Texas #26 of 136; 2025 Tulane #29 of 136; 2025 Arizona #40 of 136; 2025 Virginia #42 of 136; 2025 BYU #43 of 136; 2025 North Texas #55 of 136; 2025 Oregon #57 of 136; 2025 Notre Dame #64 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #65 of 136; 2025 Alabama #67 of 136; 2025 Miami #77 of 136; 2025 Ole Miss #95 of 136; 2025 Vanderbilt #105 of 136; 2025 Oklahoma #113 of 136; 2025 Indiana #116 of 136; 2025 Utah #118 of 136; 2025 James Madison #132 of 136; 2025 Texas A&M #135 of 136. Marked: 2025 San José State, ranked 87 of 136. CFP Top 25 median rank 55.