THIRD AND DATA

SE Louisiana game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 27vs Houston Christian28–34 L783985.151–24817–27–150237–164–534–3435:3241%36%
Sep 5at South Alabama14–39 L372316.217–4512–20–186110–70–128–7219:5141%42%
Sep 12vs North Alabama30–25 W623766.136–13814–26–238175–110–015–6626:4441%57%
Sep 19at UL Monroe38–35 W552795.130–12418–25–155156–140–014–2726:3145%52%
Sep 26at Northwestern State52–21 W684767.038–30018–30–176215–133–504–4631:5647%44%
Oct 10at UT Rio Grande Valley3–13 L683254.833–12726–35–198197–140–233–3134:2449%38%
Oct 17vs Lamar34–31 W523055.939–2248–13–81164–111–213–4026:0638%44%
Oct 24at Stephen F. Austin24–45 L653225.034–11917–31–203144–151–326–6930:3526%50%
Oct 31at East Texas A&M7–10 L622994.827–11121–35–188122–142–349–7529:0531%31%
Season9 games4–55473,0115.5305–1436151–242–1,57514840–11511–211746–4604:20:4440%44%

Success rate

SE Louisiana on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game39.8% · 44.0%
41
36
41
42
41
57
45
52
47
44
49
38
38
44
26
50
31
31
Houston Christian
@ South Alabama
North Alabama
@ UL Monroe
@ Northwestern State
@ UT Rio Grande Valley
Lamar
@ Stephen F. Austin
@ East Texas A&M
Incarnate Word
McNeese
@ Nicholls

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: SE Louisiana on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is SE Louisiana's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:SE Louisiana offense 40% (212 of 533)Opponent offense / SE Louisiana defense 44% (267 of 607)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Houston Christian: opponent offense 36% of 59Houston Christian: SE Louisiana offense 41% of 76South Alabama: opponent offense 42% of 85South Alabama: SE Louisiana offense 41% of 37North Alabama: opponent offense 57% of 69North Alabama: SE Louisiana offense 41% of 59UL Monroe: opponent offense 52% of 79UL Monroe: SE Louisiana offense 45% of 53Northwestern State: opponent offense 44% of 59Northwestern State: SE Louisiana offense 47% of 66UT Rio Grande Valley: opponent offense 38% of 56UT Rio Grande Valley: SE Louisiana offense 49% of 68Lamar: opponent offense 44% of 75Lamar: SE Louisiana offense 38% of 50Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 50% of 60Stephen F. Austin: SE Louisiana offense 26% of 65East Texas A&M: opponent offense 31% of 65East Texas A&M: SE Louisiana offense 31% of 59
SE Louisiana offenseOpponent offense (SE Louisiana defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Houston Christian

28–34 L · 76 plays to 59
SE Louisiana offense 41% (31/76)HCU offense 36% (21/59)

at South Alabama

14–39 L · 37 plays to 85
SE Louisiana offense 41% (15/37)South Alabama offense 42% (36/85)

vs North Alabama

30–25 W · 59 plays to 69
SE Louisiana offense 41% (24/59)North Alabama offense 57% (39/69)

at UL Monroe

38–35 W · 53 plays to 79
SE Louisiana offense 45% (24/53)UL Monroe offense 52% (41/79)

at Northwestern State

52–21 W · 66 plays to 59
SE Louisiana offense 47% (31/66)Northwestern St. offense 44% (26/59)

at UT Rio Grande Valley

3–13 L · 68 plays to 56
SE Louisiana offense 49% (33/68)UT Rio Grande offense 38% (21/56)

vs Lamar

34–31 W · 50 plays to 75
SE Louisiana offense 38% (19/50)Lamar offense 44% (33/75)

at Stephen F. Austin

24–45 L · 65 plays to 60
SE Louisiana offense 26% (17/65)SFA offense 50% (30/60)

at East Texas A&M

7–10 L · 59 plays to 65
SE Louisiana offense 31% (18/59)East Texas A&M offense 31% (20/65)