THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

South AlabamaJaguars

Season
›Current

Sun Belt

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Sun Belt, 2012

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012South Alabama2–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#106 (of 124 teams · 333.4 yds/g · 4,334 yds)#117 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 240 points)#52 (of 124 teams · 382.9 yds/g allowed · 4,978 yds)#75 (of 124 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 383 points)#109 (of 124 teams · -11.0 /g · -143 on the season)#109 (of 124 teams · -12 on the season · 21 taken, 33 given · -0.92 /g)#59 (of 124 teams · 30:37 /g · 6h 38m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · -0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 124 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#115 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 37% of plays successful)#19 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 124 teams · 0.880 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 124 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Sun Belt teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#66 (Total offense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #11–#106. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#70 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #24–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#71 (Total defense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #27–#98. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#63 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #43–#91. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#71 (Point margin: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #30–#109. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#65 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #19–#109. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #17–#94. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#44 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #10–#117. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#75 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #18–#122. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #7–#115. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#65 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #19–#120. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#31 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #5–#121. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#67 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range #39–#118. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2012Arkansas State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 124 teams · 466.7 yds/g · 6,067 yds)#26 (of 124 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 454 points)#50 (of 124 teams · 380.3 yds/g allowed · 4,944 yds)#43 (of 124 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#30 (of 124 teams · +10.5 /g · +136 on the season)#24 (of 124 teams · +9 on the season · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.69 /g)#40 (of 124 teams · 31:32 /g · 6h 50m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 124 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 48% of plays successful)#65 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#121 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 0.832 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 124 teams · 0.969 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012UL Monroe8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#42 (of 124 teams · 432.8 yds/g · 5,626 yds)#32 (of 124 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 440 points)#80 (of 124 teams · 418.8 yds/g allowed · 5,444 yds)#73 (of 124 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 379 points)#54 (of 124 teams · +4.7 /g · +61 on the season)#34 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.54 /g)#66 (of 124 teams · 30:28 /g · 6h 36m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 124 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 124 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#73 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#100 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.007 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 124 teams · 0.942 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Florida Atlantic3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#100 (of 124 teams · 349.8 yds/g · 4,198 yds)#107 (of 124 teams · 20.5 pts/g · 246 points)#71 (of 124 teams · 405.3 yds/g allowed · 4,863 yds)#86 (of 124 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 370 points)#107 (of 124 teams · -10.3 /g · -124 on the season)#75 (of 124 teams · -2 on the season · 17 taken, 19 given · -0.17 /g)#22 (of 124 teams · 32:36 /g · 6h 31m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 124 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 124 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#96 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#92 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 124 teams · 0.998 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 124 teams · 0.911 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Florida International3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#76 (of 124 teams · 384.0 yds/g · 4,608 yds)#84 (of 124 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 300 points)#68 (of 124 teams · 402.9 yds/g allowed · 4,835 yds)#91 (of 124 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#94 (of 124 teams · -6.7 /g · -80 on the season)#85 (of 124 teams · -4 on the season · 18 taken, 22 given · -0.33 /g)#38 (of 124 teams · 31:35 /g · 6h 19m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 124 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 124 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#86 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#24 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.031 average PPA on successful plays)#118 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 1.038 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Louisiana9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 124 teams · 454.9 yds/g · 5,914 yds)#24 (of 124 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 461 points)#87 (of 124 teams · 427.3 yds/g allowed · 5,555 yds)#63 (of 124 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#38 (of 124 teams · +7.4 /g · +96 on the season)#65 (of 124 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.08 /g)#87 (of 124 teams · 29:26 /g · 6h 23m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 124 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 124 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#44 (of 124 teams · 43% of plays successful)#88 (of 124 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 124 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 124 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012North Texas4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 (of 124 teams · 392.2 yds/g · 4,706 yds)#105 (of 124 teams · 20.9 pts/g · 251 points)#77 (of 124 teams · 414.8 yds/g allowed · 4,977 yds)#61 (of 124 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 334 points)#96 (of 124 teams · -6.9 /g · -83 on the season)#56 (of 124 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g)#17 (of 124 teams · 32:53 /g · 6h 35m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 124 teams · -0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 124 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#93 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#81 (of 124 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 124 teams · 0.926 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 124 teams · 0.906 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Troy5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 124 teams · 498.8 yds/g · 5,985 yds)#53 (of 124 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 367 points)#98 (of 124 teams · 442.9 yds/g allowed · 5,315 yds)#84 (of 124 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#71 (of 124 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#97 (of 124 teams · -7 on the season · 20 taken, 27 given · -0.58 /g)#63 (of 124 teams · 30:32 /g · 6h 06m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 124 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 124 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#23 (of 124 teams · 45% of plays successful)#44 (of 124 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 124 teams · 0.951 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 124 teams · 1.007 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Western Kentucky7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 124 teams · 383.5 yds/g · 4,985 yds)#70 (of 124 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 366 points)#27 (of 124 teams · 348.4 yds/g allowed · 4,529 yds)#50 (of 124 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 331 points)#60 (of 124 teams · +2.7 /g · +35 on the season)#65 (of 124 teams · -1 on the season · 23 taken, 24 given · -0.08 /g)#24 (of 124 teams · 32:21 /g · 7h 01m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 124 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 124 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#54 (of 124 teams · 42% of plays successful)#40 (of 124 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 124 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 124 teams · 0.938 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Middle Tennessee8–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Sun Belt teams in 2012. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 (of 124 teams · 392.8 yds/g · 4,713 yds)#77 (of 124 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 319 points)#94 (of 124 teams · 440.8 yds/g allowed · 5,290 yds)#62 (of 124 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#76 (of 124 teams · -1.4 /g · -17 on the season)#19 (of 124 teams · +10 on the season · 28 taken, 18 given · +0.83 /g)#94 (of 124 teams · 29:12 /g · 5h 50m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 (of 124 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#122 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#47 (of 124 teams · 43% of plays successful)#120 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 124 teams · 0.869 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 124 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20122012 South AlabamaSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #66
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Troy #11 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #23 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #29 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #42 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #66 of 124; 2012 North Texas #67 of 124; 2012 Florida International #76 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #77 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #100 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 106 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 66.
Scoring offensemedian #70
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Louisiana #24 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #26 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #32 of 124; 2012 Troy #53 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #70 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #77 of 124; 2012 Florida International #84 of 124; 2012 North Texas #105 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #107 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 117 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 70.
Total defensemedian #71
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Western Kentucky #27 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #50 of 124; 2012 Florida International #68 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #71 of 124; 2012 North Texas #77 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #80 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #87 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #94 of 124; 2012 Troy #98 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 52 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 71.
Scoring defensemedian #63
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arkansas State #43 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #50 of 124; 2012 North Texas #61 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #62 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #63 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #73 of 124; 2012 Troy #84 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #86 of 124; 2012 Florida International #91 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 75 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 63.
Point marginmedian #71
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arkansas State #30 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #38 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #54 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #60 of 124; 2012 Troy #71 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #76 of 124; 2012 Florida International #94 of 124; 2012 North Texas #96 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #107 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 109 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 71.
Turnover marginmedian #65
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Middle Tennessee #19 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #24 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #34 of 124; 2012 North Texas #56 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #65 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #65 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #75 of 124; 2012 Florida International #85 of 124; 2012 Troy #97 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 109 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 65.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 North Texas #17 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #22 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #24 of 124; 2012 Florida International #38 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #40 of 124; 2012 Troy #63 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #66 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #87 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #94 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 59 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 40.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 South Alabama, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 South Alabama, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 South Alabama, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 South Alabama, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #44
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arkansas State #10 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #17 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #26 of 124; 2012 Troy #29 of 124; 2012 Florida International #44 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #67 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #69 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #88 of 124; 2012 North Texas #113 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 117 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 44.
Defensive EPAmedian #75
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Western Kentucky #40 of 124; 2012 Florida International #51 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #67 of 124; 2012 North Texas #75 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #85 of 124; 2012 Troy #88 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #89 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #96 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 18 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 75.
Offensive success ratemedian #54
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arkansas State #7 of 124; 2012 Troy #23 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #44 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #47 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #54 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #73 of 124; 2012 Florida International #86 of 124; 2012 North Texas #93 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #96 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 115 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 54.
Defensive success ratemedian #65
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida International #24 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #40 of 124; 2012 Troy #44 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #65 of 124; 2012 North Texas #81 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #88 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #92 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #100 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #120 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 19 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 65.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #31
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida International #5 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #9 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #11 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #13 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #31 of 124; 2012 Troy #44 of 124; 2012 North Texas #64 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #113 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 103 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 31.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #67
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2012, best rank first: 2012 North Texas #39 of 124; 2012 Florida Atlantic #43 of 124; 2012 Middle Tennessee #65 of 124; 2012 Western Kentucky #67 of 124; 2012 UL Monroe #70 of 124; 2012 Louisiana #84 of 124; 2012 Arkansas State #91 of 124; 2012 Troy #114 of 124; 2012 Florida International #118 of 124. Marked: 2012 South Alabama, ranked 53 of 124. Sun Belt median rank 67.