Metrics

South CarolinaGamecocks

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2005

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2005South Carolina750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#101 (of 119 teams · 315.9 yds/g · 3,791 yards)#75 (of 119 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 284 points)#56 (of 119 teams · 360.8 yds/g allowed · 4,329 yards)#40 (of 119 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 279 points)#61 (of 119 teams · +0.4 /g · +5 on the season)#56 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 25 taken, 24 given · +0.08 /g)#79 (of 119 teams · 17:07 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 119 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 119 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#83 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 119 teams · 1.025 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 119 teams · 1.034 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 SEC teams in 20050 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#61 (Total offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #40–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Scoring offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #30–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#23 (Total defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #3–#108. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#18 (Scoring defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #1–#109. 4 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Point margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #8–#103. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Turnover margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #3–#107. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#66 (Possession: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #1–#92. 2 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#52 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #24–#102. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #7–#105. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #23–#108. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #4–#102. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #3–#98. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#72 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range #40–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2005Alabama1020 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 119 teams · 358.9 yds/g · 4,307 yards)#86 (of 119 teams · 21.9 pts/g · 263 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 255.1 yds/g allowed · 3,061 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 10.7 pts/g allowed · 128 points)#20 (of 119 teams · +11.3 /g · +135 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.67 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:06 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 119 teams · 0.984 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 119 teams · 1.131 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Arkansas470 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#61 (of 119 teams · 360.6 yds/g · 3,967 yards)#65 (of 119 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 283 points)#43 (of 119 teams · 341.9 yds/g allowed · 3,761 yards)#54 (of 119 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 271 points)#57 (of 119 teams · +1.1 /g · +12 on the season)#50 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.09 /g)#60 (of 119 teams · 17:53 /g · 3h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.016 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 119 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#62 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#66 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 119 teams · 0.947 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.999 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Auburn930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 119 teams · 362.2 yds/g · 4,346 yards)#30 (of 119 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 386 points)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 296.9 yds/g allowed · 3,563 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 186 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +16.7 /g · +200 on the season)#78 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.33 /g)#72 (of 119 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#41 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 119 teams · 1.020 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 119 teams · 1.076 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Florida931 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 119 teams · 373.4 yds/g · 4,481 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 28.6 pts/g · 343 points)#14 (of 119 teams · 299.8 yds/g allowed · 3,598 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#25 (of 119 teams · +9.8 /g · +117 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +18 on the season · 32 taken, 14 given · +1.50 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:58 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#32 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 119 teams · 1.044 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 119 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Georgia1031 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 119 teams · 391.1 yds/g · 5,085 yards)#42 (of 119 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#23 (of 119 teams · 313.5 yds/g allowed · 4,075 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 213 points)#14 (of 119 teams · +13.2 /g · +171 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 31 taken, 18 given · +1.00 /g)#75 (of 119 teams · 17:20 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 119 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 119 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#56 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 119 teams · 1.018 average PPA on successful plays)#60 (of 119 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Kentucky380 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#105 (of 119 teams · 297.4 yds/g · 3,272 yards)#89 (of 119 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 239 points)#108 (of 119 teams · 439.6 yds/g allowed · 4,835 yards)#109 (of 119 teams · 34.1 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#103 (of 119 teams · -12.4 /g · -136 on the season)#107 (of 119 teams · -11 on the season · 17 taken, 28 given · -1.00 /g)#92 (of 119 teams · 16:48 /g · 3h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#81 (of 119 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 119 teams · 0.136 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#87 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#102 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.984 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.978 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005LSU1121 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 119 teams · 374.1 yds/g · 4,863 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 383 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 266.9 yds/g allowed · 3,469 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.2 pts/g allowed · 185 points)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15.2 /g · +198 on the season)#100 (of 119 teams · -10 on the season · 16 taken, 26 given · -0.77 /g)#12 (of 119 teams · 19:27 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 119 teams · 1.005 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Mississippi State380 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#115 (of 119 teams · 276.2 yds/g · 3,038 yards)#114 (of 119 teams · 13.9 pts/g · 153 points)#37 (of 119 teams · 335.4 yds/g allowed · 3,690 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 259 points)#98 (of 119 teams · -9.6 /g · -106 on the season)#50 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 23 taken, 22 given · +0.09 /g)#78 (of 119 teams · 17:10 /g · 3h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 119 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 119 teams · 0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#107 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#57 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 119 teams · 1.076 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 119 teams · 1.046 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Ole Miss380 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 119 teams · 281.7 yds/g · 3,099 yards)#116 (of 119 teams · 13.4 pts/g · 148 points)#33 (of 119 teams · 332.6 yds/g allowed · 3,659 yards)#31 (of 119 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 245 points)#95 (of 119 teams · -8.8 /g · -97 on the season)#92 (of 119 teams · -7 on the season · 19 taken, 26 given · -0.64 /g)#77 (of 119 teams · 17:17 /g · 3h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 119 teams · -0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#63 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.195 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 119 teams · 0.991 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Tennessee560 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#89 (of 119 teams · 326.3 yds/g · 3,589 yards)#102 (of 119 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 205 points)#12 (of 119 teams · 298.2 yds/g allowed · 3,280 yards)#16 (of 119 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 205 points)#64 (of 119 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 on the season)#101 (of 119 teams · -9 on the season · 20 taken, 29 given · -0.82 /g)#66 (of 119 teams · 17:44 /g · 3h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 119 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#30 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 119 teams · 0.955 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 119 teams · 1.015 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Vanderbilt560 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2005. Range 0–1.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 119 teams · 395.6 yds/g · 4,352 yards)#53 (of 119 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 299 points)#77 (of 119 teams · 393.7 yds/g allowed · 4,331 yards)#82 (of 119 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 321 points)#78 (of 119 teams · -2.0 /g · -22 on the season)#64 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.09 /g)#17 (of 119 teams · 19:12 /g · 3h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#98 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#28 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.205 average PPA on successful plays)#74 (of 119 teams · 1.018 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20052005 South CarolinaSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #61
Total offense. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Vanderbilt #40 of 119; 2005 Georgia #43 of 119; 2005 LSU #53 of 119; 2005 Florida #54 of 119; 2005 Auburn #59 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #61 of 119; 2005 Alabama #62 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #89 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #105 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #112 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 101 of 119. SEC median rank 61.
Scoring offensemedian #65
Scoring offense. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Auburn #30 of 119; 2005 Georgia #42 of 119; 2005 LSU #43 of 119; 2005 Florida #49 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #53 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #65 of 119; 2005 Alabama #86 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #89 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #102 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #114 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 75 of 119. SEC median rank 65.
Total defensemedian #23
Total defense. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Alabama #3 of 119; 2005 LSU #5 of 119; 2005 Auburn #10 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #12 of 119; 2005 Florida #14 of 119; 2005 Georgia #23 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #33 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #37 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #43 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #77 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #108 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 56 of 119. SEC median rank 23.
Scoring defensemedian #18
Scoring defense. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Alabama #1 of 119; 2005 LSU #3 of 119; 2005 Auburn #6 of 119; 2005 Georgia #8 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #16 of 119; 2005 Florida #18 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #31 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #44 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #54 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #82 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #109 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 40 of 119. SEC median rank 18.
Point marginmedian #57
Point margin. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Auburn #8 of 119; 2005 LSU #10 of 119; 2005 Georgia #14 of 119; 2005 Alabama #20 of 119; 2005 Florida #25 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #57 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #64 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #78 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #95 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #98 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #103 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 61 of 119. SEC median rank 57.
Turnover marginmedian #56
Turnover margin. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Florida #3 of 119; 2005 Georgia #13 of 119; 2005 Alabama #24 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #50 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #50 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #64 of 119; 2005 Auburn #78 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #92 of 119; 2005 LSU #100 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #101 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #107 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 56 of 119. SEC median rank 56.
Possessionmedian #66
Possession. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Alabama #1 of 119; 2005 Florida #4 of 119; 2005 LSU #12 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #17 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #60 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #66 of 119; 2005 Auburn #72 of 119; 2005 Georgia #75 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #77 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #78 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #92 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 79 of 119. SEC median rank 66.
Returning passing
Returning passing. SEC, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 South Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. SEC, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 South Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. SEC, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 South Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. SEC, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 South Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #52
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 LSU #24 of 119; 2005 Auburn #29 of 119; 2005 Georgia #30 of 119; 2005 Florida #39 of 119; 2005 Alabama #52 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #62 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #81 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #83 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #90 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #96 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #102 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 43 of 119. SEC median rank 52.
Defensive EPAmedian #47
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Alabama #7 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #8 of 119; 2005 LSU #9 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #27 of 119; 2005 Florida #33 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #47 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #69 of 119; 2005 Auburn #70 of 119; 2005 Georgia #76 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #79 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #105 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 88 of 119. SEC median rank 47.
Offensive success ratemedian #53
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Georgia #23 of 119; 2005 LSU #30 of 119; 2005 Auburn #35 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #46 of 119; 2005 Alabama #51 of 119; 2005 Florida #53 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #62 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #87 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #98 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #107 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #108 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 57 of 119. SEC median rank 53.
Defensive success ratemedian #41
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Alabama #4 of 119; 2005 LSU #9 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #28 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #30 of 119; 2005 Florida #32 of 119; 2005 Auburn #41 of 119; 2005 Georgia #56 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #57 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #63 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #66 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #102 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 83 of 119. SEC median rank 41.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #47
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Vanderbilt #3 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #5 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #22 of 119; 2005 Florida #34 of 119; 2005 Auburn #47 of 119; 2005 Georgia #48 of 119; 2005 LSU #63 of 119; 2005 Kentucky #70 of 119; 2005 Alabama #72 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #93 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #98 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 44 of 119. SEC median rank 47.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #72
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Kentucky #40 of 119; 2005 Ole Miss #51 of 119; 2005 Arkansas #58 of 119; 2005 Georgia #60 of 119; 2005 LSU #63 of 119; 2005 Tennessee #72 of 119; 2005 Vanderbilt #74 of 119; 2005 Mississippi State #88 of 119; 2005 Auburn #98 of 119; 2005 Florida #100 of 119; 2005 Alabama #112 of 119. Marked: 2005 South Carolina, ranked 80 of 119. SEC median rank 72.