Metrics

South CarolinaGamecocks

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015South Carolina390 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 North Carolina)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 North Carolina)#99 (of 128 teams · 362.2 yds/g · 4,346 yards)#110 (of 128 teams · 21.9 pts/g · 263 points)#95 (of 128 teams · 429.8 yds/g allowed · 5,158 yards)#71 (of 128 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 330 points)#95 (of 128 teams · -5.6 /g · -67 on the season)#32 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.42 /g)#92 (of 128 teams · 28:29 /g · 5h 42m on the season)#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#102 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#99 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning)#22 (of 128 teams · 725.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#79 (of 128 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 128 teams · 0.231 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#110 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 128 teams · 1.294 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 128 teams · 1.169 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 SEC teams in 20151 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#52 (Total offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #10–#125. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#71 (Scoring offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #8–#127. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Total defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #3–#95. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Scoring defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #3–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Point margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #3–#97. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Turnover margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #21–#109. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#76 (Possession: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #3–#124. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#79 (Returning passing: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #7–#115. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#67 (Returning receiving: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #7–#122. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#73 (Returning rushing: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #20–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#15 (Team talent: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #1–#44. 5 of 14 in the top 10.)#51 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #4–#125. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #2–#114. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#43 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #5–#127. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #2–#120. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#75 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #7–#126. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#18 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range #4–#114. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2015Alabama1415 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #19 Florida, #20 LSU, #23 Tennessee · postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)#45 (of 128 teams · 427.1 yds/g · 6,406 yards)#30 (of 128 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 526 points)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 276.3 yds/g allowed · 4,145 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 227 points)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19.9 /g · +299 on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · +10 on the season · 27 taken, 17 given · +0.67 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:33 /g · 8h 23m on the season)#97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing production returning)#121 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 981.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 128 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 128 teams · 1.147 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 128 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Arkansas850 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss, #20 LSU, #23 Tennessee)#29 (of 128 teams · 465.5 yds/g · 6,051 yards)#27 (of 128 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 467 points)#58 (of 128 teams · 391.6 yds/g allowed · 5,091 yards)#68 (of 128 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 356 points)#39 (of 128 teams · +8.5 /g · +111 on the season)#28 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 18 taken, 11 given · +0.54 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 34:23 /g · 7h 27m on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving production returning)#20 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning)#25 (of 128 teams · 695.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.332 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 128 teams · 0.240 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#120 (of 128 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#39 (of 128 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 128 teams · 1.150 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Auburn764 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#94 (of 128 teams · 370.0 yds/g · 4,810 yards)#75 (of 128 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 357 points)#71 (of 128 teams · 405.1 yds/g allowed · 5,267 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 338 points)#69 (of 128 teams · +1.5 /g · +19 on the season)#51 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.15 /g)#95 (of 128 teams · 28:22 /g · 6h 09m on the season)#101 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#117 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#127 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's rushing production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 865.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 128 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 128 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#105 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#126 (of 128 teams · 1.054 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.058 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Florida1044 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss, #23 Tennessee)#112 (of 128 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 4,676 yards)#100 (of 128 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 325 points)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 310.2 yds/g allowed · 4,343 yards)#11 (of 128 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#53 (of 128 teams · +4.9 /g · +69 on the season)#27 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 25 taken, 17 given · +0.57 /g)#45 (of 128 teams · 30:58 /g · 7h 14m on the season)#82 (of 128 teams · 35% of last season's passing production returning)#82 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#103 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#15 (of 128 teams · 789.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 128 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 128 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#14 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 128 teams · 1.230 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 128 teams · 1.097 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Georgia1033 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#82 (of 128 teams · 377.2 yds/g · 4,904 yards)#85 (of 128 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 342 points)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 305.9 yds/g allowed · 3,977 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 220 points)#35 (of 128 teams · +9.4 /g · +122 on the season)#39 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.31 /g)#79 (of 128 teams · 29:09 /g · 6h 19m on the season)#96 (of 128 teams · 14% of last season's passing production returning)#78 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#24 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 877.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 128 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 128 teams · 1.114 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 128 teams · 1.209 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Kentucky570 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#89 (of 128 teams · 372.0 yds/g · 4,464 yards)#95 (of 128 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 296 points)#59 (of 128 teams · 394.2 yds/g allowed · 4,730 yards)#69 (of 128 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 329 points)#88 (of 128 teams · -2.8 /g · -33 on the season)#85 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 20 taken, 22 given · -0.17 /g)#76 (of 128 teams · 29:17 /g · 5h 51m on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#67 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#43 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning)#38 (of 128 teams · 634.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 128 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 128 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#99 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#78 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.315 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 128 teams · 1.095 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015LSU934 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#39 (of 128 teams · 437.3 yds/g · 5,247 yards)#44 (of 128 teams · 32.8 pts/g · 394 points)#25 (of 128 teams · 347.2 yds/g allowed · 4,166 yards)#41 (of 128 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 291 points)#38 (of 128 teams · +8.6 /g · +103 on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 17 taken, 10 given · +0.58 /g)#36 (of 128 teams · 31:20 /g · 6h 16m on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#22 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's receiving production returning)#71 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 128 teams · 0.281 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 128 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#55 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 128 teams · 1.294 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 128 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Mississippi State940 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#31 (of 128 teams · 460.5 yds/g · 5,986 yards)#33 (of 128 teams · 34.4 pts/g · 447 points)#56 (of 128 teams · 391.1 yds/g allowed · 5,085 yards)#36 (of 128 teams · 23.2 pts/g allowed · 302 points)#27 (of 128 teams · +11.2 /g · +145 on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 14 taken, 18 given · -0.31 /g)#124 (of 128 teams · 26:17 /g · 5h 42m on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#75 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#83 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)#28 (of 128 teams · 680.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 128 teams · 0.243 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 128 teams · 0.114 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#83 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 128 teams · 1.184 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 128 teams · 1.089 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Missouri570 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#125 (of 128 teams · 280.1 yds/g · 3,361 yards)#127 (of 128 teams · 13.6 pts/g · 163 points)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 301.2 yds/g allowed · 3,614 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 194 points)#85 (of 128 teams · -2.6 /g · -31 on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.08 /g)#117 (of 128 teams · 27:02 /g · 5h 24m on the season)#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#122 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#73 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#34 (of 128 teams · 642.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#125 (of 128 teams · -0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#127 (of 128 teams · 33% of plays successful)#25 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 128 teams · 1.103 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 128 teams · 1.070 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Ole Miss1031 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #2 Alabama, #20 LSU · postseason: #16 Oklahoma State)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 517.8 yds/g · 6,731 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.9 pts/g · 531 points)#54 (of 128 teams · 385.9 yds/g allowed · 5,016 yards)#33 (of 128 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +18.2 /g · +237 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 23 taken, 23 given · +0.00 /g)#120 (of 128 teams · 26:32 /g · 5h 45m on the season)#109 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing production returning)#27 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#19 (of 128 teams · 764.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.299 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 128 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#31 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 128 teams · 1.225 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 128 teams · 1.138 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Tennessee942 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #13 Northwestern)#52 (of 128 teams · 422.3 yds/g · 5,490 yards)#29 (of 128 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 457 points)#36 (of 128 teams · 362.0 yds/g allowed · 4,706 yards)#16 (of 128 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 260 points)#14 (of 128 teams · +15.2 /g · +197 on the season)#28 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 19 taken, 12 given · +0.54 /g)#50 (of 128 teams · 30:32 /g · 6h 37m on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's passing production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#76 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#12 (of 128 teams · 810.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 128 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 128 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#16 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 128 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 128 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Texas A&M852 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 128 teams · 424.7 yds/g · 5,521 yards)#71 (of 128 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 361 points)#51 (of 128 teams · 380.0 yds/g allowed · 4,940 yards)#28 (of 128 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#50 (of 128 teams · +5.8 /g · +75 on the season)#102 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 18 taken, 24 given · -0.46 /g)#99 (of 128 teams · 28:13 /g · 6h 07m on the season)#80 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's passing production returning)#33 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning)#63 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's rushing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 830.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 128 teams · 0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 128 teams · 0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#50 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#52 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 128 teams · 1.156 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 128 teams · 1.079 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Vanderbilt480 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#117 (of 128 teams · 326.5 yds/g · 3,918 yards)#124 (of 128 teams · 15.2 pts/g · 182 points)#28 (of 128 teams · 350.5 yds/g allowed · 4,206 yards)#22 (of 128 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 252 points)#97 (of 128 teams · -5.8 /g · -70 on the season)#109 (of 128 teams · -8 on the season · 17 taken, 25 given · -0.67 /g)#25 (of 128 teams · 32:07 /g · 6h 25m on the season)#72 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's passing production returning)#16 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning)#33 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's rushing production returning)#44 (of 128 teams · 609.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#122 (of 128 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 128 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 128 teams · 37% of plays successful)#21 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 128 teams · 1.104 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.048 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20152015 South CarolinaSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #52
Total offense. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ole Miss #10 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #29 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #31 of 128; 2015 LSU #39 of 128; 2015 Alabama #45 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #50 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #52 of 128; 2015 Georgia #82 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #89 of 128; 2015 Auburn #94 of 128; 2015 Florida #112 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #117 of 128; 2015 Missouri #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 99 of 128. SEC median rank 52.
Scoring offensemedian #71
Scoring offense. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ole Miss #8 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #27 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #29 of 128; 2015 Alabama #30 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #33 of 128; 2015 LSU #44 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #71 of 128; 2015 Auburn #75 of 128; 2015 Georgia #85 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #95 of 128; 2015 Florida #100 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #124 of 128; 2015 Missouri #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 110 of 128. SEC median rank 71.
Total defensemedian #36
Total defense. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #3 of 128; 2015 Missouri #6 of 128; 2015 Georgia #7 of 128; 2015 Florida #8 of 128; 2015 LSU #25 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #28 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #36 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #51 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #54 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #56 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #58 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #59 of 128; 2015 Auburn #71 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 95 of 128. SEC median rank 36.
Scoring defensemedian #28
Scoring defense. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #3 of 128; 2015 Missouri #5 of 128; 2015 Georgia #8 of 128; 2015 Florida #11 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #22 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #28 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #33 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #36 of 128; 2015 LSU #41 of 128; 2015 Auburn #54 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #68 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #69 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 71 of 128. SEC median rank 28.
Point marginmedian #39
Point margin. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #3 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #8 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #14 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #27 of 128; 2015 Georgia #35 of 128; 2015 LSU #38 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #39 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #50 of 128; 2015 Florida #53 of 128; 2015 Auburn #69 of 128; 2015 Missouri #85 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #88 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #97 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 95 of 128. SEC median rank 39.
Turnover marginmedian #39
Turnover margin. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #21 of 128; 2015 LSU #26 of 128; 2015 Florida #27 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #28 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #28 of 128; 2015 Georgia #39 of 128; 2015 Auburn #51 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #66 of 128; 2015 Missouri #79 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #85 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #92 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #102 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #109 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 32 of 128. SEC median rank 39.
Possessionmedian #76
Possession. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas #3 of 128; 2015 Alabama #7 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #25 of 128; 2015 LSU #36 of 128; 2015 Florida #45 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #50 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #76 of 128; 2015 Georgia #79 of 128; 2015 Auburn #95 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #99 of 128; 2015 Missouri #117 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #120 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 92 of 128. SEC median rank 76.
Returning passingmedian #79
Returning passing. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Kentucky #7 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #7 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #15 of 128; 2015 LSU #26 of 128; 2015 Missouri #30 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #72 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #79 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #80 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Georgia #96 of 128; 2015 Alabama #97 of 128; 2015 Auburn #101 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #109 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 115 of 128. SEC median rank 79.
Returning receivingmedian #67
Returning receiving. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Tennessee #7 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #10 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #16 of 128; 2015 LSU #22 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #27 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #33 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #67 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #75 of 128; 2015 Georgia #78 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Auburn #117 of 128; 2015 Alabama #121 of 128; 2015 Missouri #122 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 102 of 128. SEC median rank 67.
Returning rushingmedian #73
Returning rushing. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas #20 of 128; 2015 Georgia #24 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #33 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #43 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #63 of 128; 2015 LSU #71 of 128; 2015 Missouri #73 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #76 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #83 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #86 of 128; 2015 Florida #103 of 128; 2015 Alabama #111 of 128; 2015 Auburn #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 99 of 128. SEC median rank 73.
Team talentmedian #15
Team talent. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #1 of 128; 2015 LSU #5 of 128; 2015 Georgia #6 of 128; 2015 Auburn #7 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #10 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #12 of 128; 2015 Florida #15 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #19 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #25 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #28 of 128; 2015 Missouri #34 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #38 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #44 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 22 of 128. SEC median rank 15.
Offensive EPAmedian #51
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas #4 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #9 of 128; 2015 LSU #12 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #23 of 128; 2015 Alabama #46 of 128; 2015 Auburn #50 of 128; 2015 Georgia #51 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #52 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #69 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #84 of 128; 2015 Florida #91 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #122 of 128; 2015 Missouri #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 79 of 128. SEC median rank 51.
Defensive EPAmedian #36
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #2 of 128; 2015 Georgia #7 of 128; 2015 Missouri #10 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #11 of 128; 2015 Florida #13 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #18 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #36 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #43 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #48 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #50 of 128; 2015 LSU #52 of 128; 2015 Auburn #63 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #114 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 111 of 128. SEC median rank 36.
Offensive success ratemedian #43
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arkansas #5 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #6 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #20 of 128; 2015 LSU #32 of 128; 2015 Auburn #34 of 128; 2015 Alabama #42 of 128; 2015 Georgia #43 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #47 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #50 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #99 of 128; 2015 Florida #100 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #113 of 128; 2015 Missouri #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 97 of 128. SEC median rank 43.
Defensive success ratemedian #31
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Alabama #2 of 128; 2015 Georgia #7 of 128; 2015 Florida #14 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #21 of 128; 2015 Missouri #25 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #31 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #52 of 128; 2015 LSU #55 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #78 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #83 of 128; 2015 Auburn #105 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 110 of 128. SEC median rank 31.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #75
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Kentucky #7 of 128; 2015 LSU #15 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #39 of 128; 2015 Florida #48 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #51 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #75 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #81 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #86 of 128; 2015 Alabama #91 of 128; 2015 Georgia #110 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #113 of 128; 2015 Missouri #114 of 128; 2015 Auburn #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 16 of 128. SEC median rank 75.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #18
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Vanderbilt #4 of 128; 2015 Auburn #6 of 128; 2015 Missouri #11 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #14 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #15 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #16 of 128; 2015 Florida #18 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #34 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #41 of 128; 2015 Georgia #71 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #73 of 128; 2015 LSU #88 of 128; 2015 Alabama #114 of 128. Marked: 2015 South Carolina, ranked 51 of 128. SEC median rank 18.